@biomejs/biome vs dprint
JavaScript Code Formatting Tools Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
@biomejs/biomedprintSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Code Formatting Tools?

Both @biomejs/biome and dprint are tools designed to format code in JavaScript and other languages, ensuring consistent styling and adherence to coding standards. They help developers maintain clean and readable codebases, which is crucial for collaboration and long-term project maintenance. While both tools serve the same primary purpose of code formatting, they differ in their design philosophies, configuration capabilities, and performance characteristics.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
@biomejs/biome2,450,34519,708322 kB2683 days agoMIT OR Apache-2.0
dprint120,7363,4848.38 kB104a month agoMIT
Feature Comparison: @biomejs/biome vs dprint

Performance

  • @biomejs/biome:

    @biomejs/biome is built with performance in mind, but it may not be as fast as dprint in large projects due to its extensive feature set and customization options. It performs well for medium-sized codebases but can experience slower formatting times with complex configurations.

  • dprint:

    dprint is known for its exceptional speed and efficiency, making it one of the fastest code formatters available. It is optimized for large projects, allowing developers to format their code quickly without significant delays, which is particularly beneficial in continuous integration environments.

Customization

  • @biomejs/biome:

    @biomejs/biome offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to define their own formatting rules and styles. This flexibility is ideal for teams with specific coding standards or those working on diverse projects requiring tailored formatting solutions.

  • dprint:

    dprint provides a simpler configuration model, focusing on sensible defaults that can be easily adjusted. While it allows for some customization, it may not offer the same level of detail as @biomejs/biome, making it more suitable for teams looking for quick setup without extensive customization.

Language Support

  • @biomejs/biome:

    @biomejs/biome supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and more, making it a versatile choice for polyglot projects. Its ability to handle various languages in one tool is a significant advantage for developers working in diverse environments.

  • dprint:

    dprint also supports multiple languages, but its primary focus is on JavaScript and TypeScript. It is particularly optimized for these languages, which may make it a better choice for projects heavily centered around JavaScript.

Ease of Use

  • @biomejs/biome:

    @biomejs/biome has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and configuration options. New users may require some time to understand its capabilities fully and set it up according to their needs.

  • dprint:

    dprint is designed to be user-friendly with a straightforward setup process. Developers can quickly get started with minimal configuration, making it an excellent choice for those who want to implement code formatting without a steep learning curve.

Integration

  • @biomejs/biome:

    @biomejs/biome integrates well with various IDEs and editors, allowing for seamless formatting within the development environment. This integration enhances the developer experience by providing real-time feedback and formatting suggestions as code is written.

  • dprint:

    dprint also offers good integration with popular editors and can be easily incorporated into build processes. Its simplicity in setup allows for quick integration without extensive configuration, making it a convenient choice for developers.

How to Choose: @biomejs/biome vs dprint
  • @biomejs/biome:

    Choose @biomejs/biome if you are looking for a highly customizable code formatter that integrates well with various development environments and supports multiple languages. It is particularly useful for projects that require strict adherence to specific coding styles and offers advanced features like linting and type checking.

  • dprint:

    Choose dprint if you prioritize speed and performance in your code formatting process. dprint is designed to be fast and efficient, making it suitable for large codebases. It also offers a simple configuration setup and is ideal for developers who want a straightforward, no-frills approach to code formatting.

Similar Npm Packages to dprint

dprint is a code formatting tool that aims to provide a fast and customizable way to format code across various programming languages. It is designed to be extensible and can be integrated into different development environments, making it a versatile choice for developers looking to maintain consistent code style. While dprint offers a unique approach to code formatting, there are several alternatives in the ecosystem that also provide code linting and formatting capabilities. Here are a few notable alternatives:

  • eslint is a widely-used linting tool for JavaScript and TypeScript. It helps developers identify and fix problems in their code by enforcing coding standards and best practices. While eslint primarily focuses on linting, it can also be configured to format code using plugins and rules. If you are looking for a comprehensive tool to improve code quality and maintainability in JavaScript projects, eslint is an excellent choice.
  • prettier is a popular code formatter that supports multiple languages and frameworks. It automatically formats code according to a set of predefined rules, ensuring a consistent style throughout the codebase. Prettier is known for its opinionated approach, which means it has a specific way of formatting code that may not be customizable to the same extent as dprint. If you want a straightforward solution for code formatting that requires minimal configuration, prettier is a great option.
  • prettier-plugin-toml is a plugin for prettier that adds support for formatting TOML files. While it is a more specialized tool compared to dprint, it is useful for developers who work with TOML configuration files and want to maintain a consistent style across their projects. If your project involves TOML files and you are already using prettier, this plugin can seamlessly integrate into your workflow.

To see how dprint compares with eslint, prettier, and prettier-plugin-toml, check out the comparison: Comparing dprint vs eslint vs prettier vs prettier-plugin-toml.

README for @biomejs/biome

Biome fournit un ensemble d’outils performants conçus pour maintenir des projets web.

Biome est un outil de formatage rapide pour JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, JSON, CSS et GraphQL qui atteint 97 % de compatibilité avec Prettier.

Biome est un outil de linting performant pour JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, CSS et GraphQL qui comprend plus de 270 règles d’ESLint, de typescript-eslint, et d’autres sources. Il fournit des diagnostics détaillés et contextualisés qui vous aident à améliorer votre code et à devenir un meilleur programmeur !

Biome est conçu dès le départ pour être utilisé dans un éditeur de manière interactive. Il peut formater et analyser du code malformé pendant que vous l’écrivez.

Installation

npm install --save-dev --save-exact @biomejs/biome

Utilisation

# formater les fichiers
npx @biomejs/biome format --write ./src

# linter les fichiers et appliquer les corrections sûres
npx @biomejs/biome lint --write ./src

# exécuter le formatage, le linting, etc. et appliquer les corrections sûres
npx @biomejs/biome check --write ./src

# vérifier tous les fichiers par rapport au formatage, au linting, etc. dans les environnements d’intégration continue
npx @biomejs/biome ci ./src

Si vous voulez essayer Biome sans l’installer, utilisez le bac à sable en ligne, compilé en WebAssembly.

Documentation

Consultez notre page d’accueil pour en savoir plus sur Biome ou allez directement sur le guide de démarrage pour commencer à utiliser Biome.

Plus sur Biome

Biome a des réglages par défaut robustes et ne demande pas de configuration.

Biome vise à prendre en charge les principaux langages du développement web moderne.

Biome ne requiert pas Node.js pour fonctionnner.

Biome a une prise en charge du LSP de premier ordre, avec un analyseur sophistiqué qui représente le code source en toute fidélité et une excellente récupération des erreurs.

Biome unifie des fonctionnalités précédemment disponibles sous forme d’outils séparés. Partir d’une base partagée nous permet de fournir une expérience cohérente pour traiter le code, afficher les erreurs, paralléliser le travail, la mise en cache et la configuration.

En savoir plus sur la philosophie de notre projet.

Biome est sous licence MIT ou licence Apache 2.0 et modéré selon les termes du Code de conduite des contributeurs.

Financement

Vous pouvez financer le projet de différentes manières.

Sponsoring et financement du projet

Vous pouvez sponsoriser ou financer le projet via Open collective ou GitHub sponsors.

Biome offre un programme de sponsoring simple qui permet aux entreprises d’obtenir de la visibilité et la reconnaissance de divers développeurs.

Financement d’un problème

Nous utilisons Polar.sh pour voter pour des fonctionnalités spécifiques que vous aimeriez voir implémentées et pour les promouvoir. Jetez un coup d'œil aux fonctionnalités demandées et aidez-nous à les financer.

Sponsors

Platinum Sponsors

Vercel

Sponsors Or

Depot

Sponsors Argent

L2BEAT logo Phoenix Labs logo Lokalise logo

Sponsors Bronze

Nanabit logo Vital logo CodeRabbit logo Forge42 logo RStudio logo Pennylane logo JetBrains logo
npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc or npmjs.com, the official website for the npm registry. Please note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.