chalk vs ansi-colors
Node.js Console Styling Libraries Comparison
1 Year
chalkansi-colorsSimilar Packages:
What's Node.js Console Styling Libraries?

Console styling libraries are essential tools in Node.js development for enhancing the visual output of command-line applications. They allow developers to apply colors, styles, and formatting to console messages, making logs and user interactions more readable and visually appealing. These libraries are particularly useful for debugging, providing feedback, and creating user-friendly command-line interfaces. By utilizing these libraries, developers can improve the overall user experience and make their applications stand out in the terminal environment.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
chalk293,390,11522,22044.2 kB42 months agoMIT
ansi-colors31,974,89644326.1 kB15-MIT
Feature Comparison: chalk vs ansi-colors

API Simplicity

  • chalk:

    Chalk provides a more expressive API that supports chaining and nested styles, allowing for more complex styling scenarios. While it may have a slightly steeper learning curve, it offers greater flexibility for developers looking to create intricate console outputs.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors offers a minimalistic API that allows developers to easily apply colors and styles to strings with simple function calls. This simplicity makes it quick to implement and ideal for small scripts or projects where ease of use is a priority.

Performance

  • chalk:

    Chalk is also performant, but its additional features may introduce slight overhead compared to ansi-colors. However, for most applications, this difference is negligible, and the benefits of advanced styling can outweigh the performance considerations.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for applications where performance is critical. Its minimalistic approach ensures that it does not add significant overhead to the application.

Styling Capabilities

  • chalk:

    Chalk excels in styling capabilities, offering a wide range of colors, background colors, and styles. It allows for more creative and visually appealing console outputs, making it suitable for applications that require a polished user interface.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors supports basic text colors and styles, including bold and underline. It is sufficient for simple applications that require basic console formatting without the need for advanced features.

Community and Ecosystem

  • chalk:

    Chalk has a larger community and is widely adopted in the Node.js ecosystem. This means more resources, tutorials, and community support are available, making it easier for developers to find help and examples.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to chalk, which may result in fewer resources and examples available for developers. However, its simplicity can be an advantage for those who prefer a straightforward solution.

Customization

  • chalk:

    Chalk allows for more customization in terms of defining custom styles and creating reusable style functions. This flexibility is advantageous for larger projects where consistent styling is needed across different parts of the application.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors offers limited customization options, focusing on providing a straightforward way to apply colors and styles without extensive configuration. This can be beneficial for developers who prefer a quick setup.

How to Choose: chalk vs ansi-colors
  • chalk:

    Choose chalk if you need a more feature-rich library that supports advanced styling options, including nested styles and background colors. Chalk is well-suited for larger projects where you may want to create complex styled outputs, as it offers a more extensive set of features and a more expressive syntax.

  • ansi-colors:

    Choose ansi-colors if you prefer a lightweight library that provides a simple API for applying colors and styles to console output. It is straightforward and easy to use, making it ideal for quick projects or scripts where minimal overhead is desired.

README for chalk



Chalk


Terminal string styling done right

Coverage Status npm dependents Downloads

Info

Highlights

Install

npm install chalk

IMPORTANT: Chalk 5 is ESM. If you want to use Chalk with TypeScript or a build tool, you will probably want to use Chalk 4 for now. Read more.

Usage

import chalk from 'chalk';

console.log(chalk.blue('Hello world!'));

Chalk comes with an easy to use composable API where you just chain and nest the styles you want.

import chalk from 'chalk';

const log = console.log;

// Combine styled and normal strings
log(chalk.blue('Hello') + ' World' + chalk.red('!'));

// Compose multiple styles using the chainable API
log(chalk.blue.bgRed.bold('Hello world!'));

// Pass in multiple arguments
log(chalk.blue('Hello', 'World!', 'Foo', 'bar', 'biz', 'baz'));

// Nest styles
log(chalk.red('Hello', chalk.underline.bgBlue('world') + '!'));

// Nest styles of the same type even (color, underline, background)
log(chalk.green(
	'I am a green line ' +
	chalk.blue.underline.bold('with a blue substring') +
	' that becomes green again!'
));

// ES2015 template literal
log(`
CPU: ${chalk.red('90%')}
RAM: ${chalk.green('40%')}
DISK: ${chalk.yellow('70%')}
`);

// Use RGB colors in terminal emulators that support it.
log(chalk.rgb(123, 45, 67).underline('Underlined reddish color'));
log(chalk.hex('#DEADED').bold('Bold gray!'));

Easily define your own themes:

import chalk from 'chalk';

const error = chalk.bold.red;
const warning = chalk.hex('#FFA500'); // Orange color

console.log(error('Error!'));
console.log(warning('Warning!'));

Take advantage of console.log string substitution:

import chalk from 'chalk';

const name = 'Sindre';
console.log(chalk.green('Hello %s'), name);
//=> 'Hello Sindre'

API

chalk.<style>[.<style>...](string, [string...])

Example: chalk.red.bold.underline('Hello', 'world');

Chain styles and call the last one as a method with a string argument. Order doesn't matter, and later styles take precedent in case of a conflict. This simply means that chalk.red.yellow.green is equivalent to chalk.green.

Multiple arguments will be separated by space.

chalk.level

Specifies the level of color support.

Color support is automatically detected, but you can override it by setting the level property. You should however only do this in your own code as it applies globally to all Chalk consumers.

If you need to change this in a reusable module, create a new instance:

import {Chalk} from 'chalk';

const customChalk = new Chalk({level: 0});

| Level | Description | | :---: | :--- | | 0 | All colors disabled | | 1 | Basic color support (16 colors) | | 2 | 256 color support | | 3 | Truecolor support (16 million colors) |

supportsColor

Detect whether the terminal supports color. Used internally and handled for you, but exposed for convenience.

Can be overridden by the user with the flags --color and --no-color. For situations where using --color is not possible, use the environment variable FORCE_COLOR=1 (level 1), FORCE_COLOR=2 (level 2), or FORCE_COLOR=3 (level 3) to forcefully enable color, or FORCE_COLOR=0 to forcefully disable. The use of FORCE_COLOR overrides all other color support checks.

Explicit 256/Truecolor mode can be enabled using the --color=256 and --color=16m flags, respectively.

chalkStderr and supportsColorStderr

chalkStderr contains a separate instance configured with color support detected for stderr stream instead of stdout. Override rules from supportsColor apply to this too. supportsColorStderr is exposed for convenience.

modifierNames, foregroundColorNames, backgroundColorNames, and colorNames

All supported style strings are exposed as an array of strings for convenience. colorNames is the combination of foregroundColorNames and backgroundColorNames.

This can be useful if you wrap Chalk and need to validate input:

import {modifierNames, foregroundColorNames} from 'chalk';

console.log(modifierNames.includes('bold'));
//=> true

console.log(foregroundColorNames.includes('pink'));
//=> false

Styles

Modifiers

  • reset - Reset the current style.
  • bold - Make the text bold.
  • dim - Make the text have lower opacity.
  • italic - Make the text italic. (Not widely supported)
  • underline - Put a horizontal line below the text. (Not widely supported)
  • overline - Put a horizontal line above the text. (Not widely supported)
  • inverse- Invert background and foreground colors.
  • hidden - Print the text but make it invisible.
  • strikethrough - Puts a horizontal line through the center of the text. (Not widely supported)
  • visible- Print the text only when Chalk has a color level above zero. Can be useful for things that are purely cosmetic.

Colors

  • black
  • red
  • green
  • yellow
  • blue
  • magenta
  • cyan
  • white
  • blackBright (alias: gray, grey)
  • redBright
  • greenBright
  • yellowBright
  • blueBright
  • magentaBright
  • cyanBright
  • whiteBright

Background colors

  • bgBlack
  • bgRed
  • bgGreen
  • bgYellow
  • bgBlue
  • bgMagenta
  • bgCyan
  • bgWhite
  • bgBlackBright (alias: bgGray, bgGrey)
  • bgRedBright
  • bgGreenBright
  • bgYellowBright
  • bgBlueBright
  • bgMagentaBright
  • bgCyanBright
  • bgWhiteBright

256 and Truecolor color support

Chalk supports 256 colors and Truecolor (16 million colors) on supported terminal apps.

Colors are downsampled from 16 million RGB values to an ANSI color format that is supported by the terminal emulator (or by specifying {level: n} as a Chalk option). For example, Chalk configured to run at level 1 (basic color support) will downsample an RGB value of #FF0000 (red) to 31 (ANSI escape for red).

Examples:

  • chalk.hex('#DEADED').underline('Hello, world!')
  • chalk.rgb(15, 100, 204).inverse('Hello!')

Background versions of these models are prefixed with bg and the first level of the module capitalized (e.g. hex for foreground colors and bgHex for background colors).

  • chalk.bgHex('#DEADED').underline('Hello, world!')
  • chalk.bgRgb(15, 100, 204).inverse('Hello!')

The following color models can be used:

  • rgb - Example: chalk.rgb(255, 136, 0).bold('Orange!')
  • hex - Example: chalk.hex('#FF8800').bold('Orange!')
  • ansi256 - Example: chalk.bgAnsi256(194)('Honeydew, more or less')

Browser support

Since Chrome 69, ANSI escape codes are natively supported in the developer console.

Windows

If you're on Windows, do yourself a favor and use Windows Terminal instead of cmd.exe.

FAQ

Why not switch to a smaller coloring package?

Chalk may be larger, but there is a reason for that. It offers a more user-friendly API, well-documented types, supports millions of colors, and covers edge cases that smaller alternatives miss. Chalk is mature, reliable, and built to last.

But beyond the technical aspects, there's something more critical: trust and long-term maintenance. I have been active in open source for over a decade, and I'm committed to keeping Chalk maintained. Smaller packages might seem appealing now, but there's no guarantee they will be around for the long term, or that they won't become malicious over time.

Chalk is also likely already in your dependency tree (since 100K+ packages depend on it), so switching won’t save space—in fact, it might increase it. npm deduplicates dependencies, so multiple Chalk instances turn into one, but adding another package alongside it will increase your overall size.

If the goal is to clean up the ecosystem, switching away from Chalk won’t even make a dent. The real problem lies with packages that have very deep dependency trees (for example, those including a lot of polyfills). Chalk has no dependencies. It's better to focus on impactful changes rather than minor optimizations.

If absolute package size is important to you, I also maintain yoctocolors, one of the smallest color packages out there.

- Sindre

But the smaller coloring package has benchmarks showing it is faster

Micro-benchmarks are flawed because they measure performance in unrealistic, isolated scenarios, often giving a distorted view of real-world performance. Don't believe marketing fluff. All the coloring packages are more than fast enough.

Related

(Not accepting additional entries)

Maintainers