chalk vs ansi-colors
Terminal String Styling
chalkansi-colorsSimilar Packages:
Terminal String Styling

ansi-colors and chalk are popular Node.js libraries used for styling terminal output with colors, backgrounds, and various text effects. They enhance the visual presentation of command-line applications, making it easier to convey information, highlight warnings, or display errors in a more engaging way. Both libraries provide simple APIs for applying styles to strings, but they differ in features, size, and design philosophy. ansi-colors is a lightweight library that focuses on providing a comprehensive set of color and style functions without any dependencies. It allows developers to easily apply ANSI styles to strings using a straightforward syntax. On the other hand, chalk is a more feature-rich library that offers a chainable API for styling text, supports nested styles, and provides a more modern and expressive way to work with colors in the terminal. While chalk is slightly larger in size, it offers additional features like color manipulation, theming, and support for true color (16 million colors), making it a popular choice for projects that require more advanced styling capabilities.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
chalk364,599,34222,83744.3 kB33 months agoMIT
ansi-colors40,098,88145126.1 kB19-MIT
Feature Comparison: chalk vs ansi-colors

Size and Performance

  • chalk:

    chalk is larger than ansi-colors, but it offers a rich set of features that justify the size. The performance impact is generally negligible for most applications, but developers should be aware that the additional features may introduce some overhead, especially in performance-critical environments.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors is a very small library (around 1KB minified) that provides a wide range of color and style functions without any dependencies. Its lightweight nature means it has minimal impact on performance, making it an excellent choice for scripts and applications where speed and efficiency are important.

API Design

  • chalk:

    chalk offers a more modern and expressive API that supports chaining and nested styles. Its design allows for more complex styling with less code, making it a favorite among developers who appreciate a more elegant and flexible approach to styling terminal output. The API is well-documented and designed for ease of use.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors provides a simple and intuitive API for applying colors and styles to strings. It uses a straightforward function-based approach, allowing developers to easily apply styles without any complex setup. The API is designed to be easy to use and understand, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

Styling Capabilities

  • chalk:

    chalk supports a wide range of styling capabilities, including true color (16 million colors), nested styles, and custom themes. It is more versatile and feature-rich compared to ansi-colors, making it suitable for applications that require more advanced styling options. chalk also allows for more creative and complex styling, which can enhance the visual appeal of terminal output.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors supports a wide range of ANSI colors, styles, and effects, including bold, italic, underline, and various foreground and background colors. It provides a comprehensive set of functions for styling text, but it does not support advanced features like true color or nested styles out of the box.

True Color Support

  • chalk:

    chalk supports true color (16 million colors) out of the box, allowing for much more precise and vibrant color styling. This feature makes chalk a better choice for applications that need high-quality color output and more detailed color customization.

  • ansi-colors:

    ansi-colors does not natively support true color, but it allows for the use of 256 colors and provides a simple way to define custom colors using ANSI escape codes. This makes it flexible, but it may require more manual work to achieve true color effects.

Example Code

  • chalk:

    Basic usage of chalk

    const chalk = require('chalk');
    
    console.log(chalk.red('This is red text')); // Red text
    console.log(chalk.bgBlue('This has a blue background')); // Blue background
    console.log(chalk.bold('This is bold text')); // Bold text
    console.log(chalk.underline('This is underlined text')); // Underlined text
    
    // Nested styles
    console.log(chalk.red('This is red') + ' and ' + chalk.blue('this is blue')); // Red and blue text
    
    // True color example
    console.log(chalk.rgb(255, 0, 0)('This is red using true color')); // True color red
    
  • ansi-colors:

    Basic usage of ansi-colors

    const colors = require('ansi-colors');
    
    console.log(colors.red('This is red text')); // Red text
    console.log(colors.bgBlue('This has a blue background')); // Blue background
    console.log(colors.bold('This is bold text')); // Bold text
    console.log(colors.underline('This is underlined text')); // Underlined text
    
How to Choose: chalk vs ansi-colors
  • chalk:

    Choose chalk if you require a more feature-rich and expressive API for styling terminal output. It is particularly useful for projects that need advanced styling capabilities, such as nested styles, color manipulation, and theming. While it has a larger footprint, the additional features may be worth it for more complex applications.

  • ansi-colors:

    Choose ansi-colors if you need a lightweight, dependency-free solution for adding basic to advanced ANSI colors and styles to your terminal output. It is ideal for projects where simplicity and performance are priorities, and you want to avoid adding extra weight to your application.

README for chalk



Chalk


Terminal string styling done right

Coverage Status npm dependents Downloads

Info

Highlights

Install

npm install chalk

IMPORTANT: Chalk 5 is ESM. If you want to use Chalk with TypeScript or a build tool, you will probably want to use Chalk 4 for now. Read more.

Usage

import chalk from 'chalk';

console.log(chalk.blue('Hello world!'));

Chalk comes with an easy to use composable API where you just chain and nest the styles you want.

import chalk from 'chalk';

const log = console.log;

// Combine styled and normal strings
log(chalk.blue('Hello') + ' World' + chalk.red('!'));

// Compose multiple styles using the chainable API
log(chalk.blue.bgRed.bold('Hello world!'));

// Pass in multiple arguments
log(chalk.blue('Hello', 'World!', 'Foo', 'bar', 'biz', 'baz'));

// Nest styles
log(chalk.red('Hello', chalk.underline.bgBlue('world') + '!'));

// Nest styles of the same type even (color, underline, background)
log(chalk.green(
	'I am a green line ' +
	chalk.blue.underline.bold('with a blue substring') +
	' that becomes green again!'
));

// ES2015 template literal
log(`
CPU: ${chalk.red('90%')}
RAM: ${chalk.green('40%')}
DISK: ${chalk.yellow('70%')}
`);

// Use RGB colors in terminal emulators that support it.
log(chalk.rgb(123, 45, 67).underline('Underlined reddish color'));
log(chalk.hex('#DEADED').bold('Bold gray!'));

Easily define your own themes:

import chalk from 'chalk';

const error = chalk.bold.red;
const warning = chalk.hex('#FFA500'); // Orange color

console.log(error('Error!'));
console.log(warning('Warning!'));

Take advantage of console.log string substitution:

import chalk from 'chalk';

const name = 'Sindre';
console.log(chalk.green('Hello %s'), name);
//=> 'Hello Sindre'

API

chalk.<style>[.<style>...](string, [string...])

Example: chalk.red.bold.underline('Hello', 'world');

Chain styles and call the last one as a method with a string argument. Order doesn't matter, and later styles take precedent in case of a conflict. This simply means that chalk.red.yellow.green is equivalent to chalk.green.

Multiple arguments will be separated by space.

chalk.level

Specifies the level of color support.

Color support is automatically detected, but you can override it by setting the level property. You should however only do this in your own code as it applies globally to all Chalk consumers.

If you need to change this in a reusable module, create a new instance:

import {Chalk} from 'chalk';

const customChalk = new Chalk({level: 0});
LevelDescription
0All colors disabled
1Basic color support (16 colors)
2256 color support
3Truecolor support (16 million colors)

supportsColor

Detect whether the terminal supports color. Used internally and handled for you, but exposed for convenience.

Can be overridden by the user with the flags --color and --no-color. For situations where using --color is not possible, use the environment variable FORCE_COLOR=1 (level 1), FORCE_COLOR=2 (level 2), or FORCE_COLOR=3 (level 3) to forcefully enable color, or FORCE_COLOR=0 to forcefully disable. The use of FORCE_COLOR overrides all other color support checks.

Explicit 256/Truecolor mode can be enabled using the --color=256 and --color=16m flags, respectively.

chalkStderr and supportsColorStderr

chalkStderr contains a separate instance configured with color support detected for stderr stream instead of stdout. Override rules from supportsColor apply to this too. supportsColorStderr is exposed for convenience.

modifierNames, foregroundColorNames, backgroundColorNames, and colorNames

All supported style strings are exposed as an array of strings for convenience. colorNames is the combination of foregroundColorNames and backgroundColorNames.

This can be useful if you wrap Chalk and need to validate input:

import {modifierNames, foregroundColorNames} from 'chalk';

console.log(modifierNames.includes('bold'));
//=> true

console.log(foregroundColorNames.includes('pink'));
//=> false

Styles

Modifiers

  • reset - Reset the current style.
  • bold - Make the text bold.
  • dim - Make the text have lower opacity.
  • italic - Make the text italic. (Not widely supported)
  • underline - Put a horizontal line below the text. (Not widely supported)
  • overline - Put a horizontal line above the text. (Not widely supported)
  • inverse- Invert background and foreground colors.
  • hidden - Print the text but make it invisible.
  • strikethrough - Puts a horizontal line through the center of the text. (Not widely supported)
  • visible- Print the text only when Chalk has a color level above zero. Can be useful for things that are purely cosmetic.

Colors

  • black
  • red
  • green
  • yellow
  • blue
  • magenta
  • cyan
  • white
  • blackBright (alias: gray, grey)
  • redBright
  • greenBright
  • yellowBright
  • blueBright
  • magentaBright
  • cyanBright
  • whiteBright

Background colors

  • bgBlack
  • bgRed
  • bgGreen
  • bgYellow
  • bgBlue
  • bgMagenta
  • bgCyan
  • bgWhite
  • bgBlackBright (alias: bgGray, bgGrey)
  • bgRedBright
  • bgGreenBright
  • bgYellowBright
  • bgBlueBright
  • bgMagentaBright
  • bgCyanBright
  • bgWhiteBright

256 and Truecolor color support

Chalk supports 256 colors and Truecolor (16 million colors) on supported terminal apps.

Colors are downsampled from 16 million RGB values to an ANSI color format that is supported by the terminal emulator (or by specifying {level: n} as a Chalk option). For example, Chalk configured to run at level 1 (basic color support) will downsample an RGB value of #FF0000 (red) to 31 (ANSI escape for red).

Examples:

  • chalk.hex('#DEADED').underline('Hello, world!')
  • chalk.rgb(15, 100, 204).inverse('Hello!')

Background versions of these models are prefixed with bg and the first level of the module capitalized (e.g. hex for foreground colors and bgHex for background colors).

  • chalk.bgHex('#DEADED').underline('Hello, world!')
  • chalk.bgRgb(15, 100, 204).inverse('Hello!')

The following color models can be used:

  • rgb - Example: chalk.rgb(255, 136, 0).bold('Orange!')
  • hex - Example: chalk.hex('#FF8800').bold('Orange!')
  • ansi256 - Example: chalk.bgAnsi256(194)('Honeydew, more or less')

Browser support

Since Chrome 69, ANSI escape codes are natively supported in the developer console.

Windows

If you're on Windows, do yourself a favor and use Windows Terminal instead of cmd.exe.

FAQ

Why not switch to a smaller coloring package?

Chalk may be larger, but there is a reason for that. It offers a more user-friendly API, well-documented types, supports millions of colors, and covers edge cases that smaller alternatives miss. Chalk is mature, reliable, and built to last.

But beyond the technical aspects, there's something more critical: trust and long-term maintenance. I have been active in open source for over a decade, and I'm committed to keeping Chalk maintained. Smaller packages might seem appealing now, but there's no guarantee they will be around for the long term, or that they won't become malicious over time.

Chalk is also likely already in your dependency tree (since 100K+ packages depend on it), so switching won’t save space—in fact, it might increase it. npm deduplicates dependencies, so multiple Chalk instances turn into one, but adding another package alongside it will increase your overall size.

If the goal is to clean up the ecosystem, switching away from Chalk won’t even make a dent. The real problem lies with packages that have very deep dependency trees (for example, those including a lot of polyfills). Chalk has no dependencies. It's better to focus on impactful changes rather than minor optimizations.

If absolute package size is important to you, I also maintain yoctocolors, one of the smallest color packages out there.

- Sindre

But the smaller coloring package has benchmarks showing it is faster

Micro-benchmarks are flawed because they measure performance in unrealistic, isolated scenarios, often giving a distorted view of real-world performance. Don't believe marketing fluff. All the coloring packages are more than fast enough.

Related

(Not accepting additional entries)

Maintainers