argparse vs yargs
Command-Line Argument Parsers Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
argparseyargsSimilar Packages:
What's Command-Line Argument Parsers?

Command-line argument parsers are essential tools in Node.js development that help developers handle input parameters passed to scripts via the command line. They simplify the process of parsing command-line arguments, providing a structured way to define options, flags, and commands. These libraries enhance usability by allowing developers to create intuitive command-line interfaces (CLIs) for their applications, making it easier for users to interact with scripts and tools. Both Argparse and Yargs offer unique features and design philosophies that cater to different developer needs and preferences.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
argparse119,668,281500-75 years agoPython-2.0
yargs116,904,74411,262292 kB2922 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: argparse vs yargs

Ease of Use

  • argparse:

    Argparse is designed to be simple and intuitive, making it easy for developers to define command-line arguments and options. Its API is straightforward, allowing you to quickly set up argument parsing with minimal boilerplate code.

  • yargs:

    Yargs offers a more extensive API with a focus on usability. It supports chaining methods for defining commands and options, making it easy to create complex command-line interfaces. Its built-in help and versioning features enhance user experience.

Feature Set

  • argparse:

    Argparse provides essential features for argument parsing, including positional arguments, optional flags, and type validation. However, it lacks advanced features like command handling and middleware support, making it less suitable for complex applications.

  • yargs:

    Yargs boasts a rich feature set, including support for commands, middleware, and dynamic argument parsing. It allows you to create subcommands and manage complex argument structures, making it a powerful choice for building sophisticated CLIs.

Documentation and Community Support

  • argparse:

    Argparse has decent documentation, but its community is smaller compared to Yargs. This may lead to fewer resources and examples available for troubleshooting or learning.

  • yargs:

    Yargs has extensive documentation and a larger community, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and examples. This makes it easier for developers to find help and best practices when using the library.

Performance

  • argparse:

    Argparse is lightweight and performs well for simple argument parsing tasks. Its minimalistic design means it has lower overhead, making it suitable for small scripts and utilities.

  • yargs:

    Yargs is also performant but may introduce slight overhead due to its richer feature set. However, this overhead is generally negligible for most applications, especially when the benefits of its advanced features are considered.

Customization and Extensibility

  • argparse:

    Argparse offers basic customization options for argument parsing but lacks the extensibility features found in more advanced libraries. It is suitable for straightforward use cases without the need for extensive customization.

  • yargs:

    Yargs excels in customization and extensibility, allowing developers to create custom commands, middleware, and validation logic. This flexibility makes it a better choice for applications that require tailored command-line interfaces.

How to Choose: argparse vs yargs
  • argparse:

    Choose Argparse if you need a straightforward and minimalistic approach to argument parsing, especially if you are familiar with Python's argparse library. It is suitable for simple scripts where you want to define options and arguments without additional complexity.

  • yargs:

    Choose Yargs if you require a more feature-rich solution with advanced capabilities such as command chaining, middleware support, and built-in help generation. Yargs is ideal for larger applications where a more extensive command-line interface is needed.

Similar Npm Packages to argparse

argparse is a popular library for building command-line interfaces (CLIs) in Node.js applications. It allows developers to define arguments and options for their scripts, making it easy to parse command-line inputs and handle user interactions. While argparse is a robust solution for CLI argument parsing, there are several alternatives available in the Node.js ecosystem. Here are a few noteworthy options:

  • commander is a widely used library for creating command-line applications in Node.js. It provides a simple and intuitive API for defining commands, options, and arguments. With features like automatic help generation, version management, and subcommands, commander is an excellent choice for building complex CLI applications. Its user-friendly syntax and extensive documentation make it a popular choice among developers looking to create powerful command-line tools.

  • minimist is a lightweight and straightforward library for parsing command-line arguments. Unlike some of the more feature-rich libraries, minimist focuses on simplicity and speed. It is particularly useful for small scripts or applications where you need to quickly parse options without the overhead of additional features. If your project requires basic argument parsing without the need for extensive functionality, minimist is a great option.

  • yargs is another powerful library for building command-line interfaces. It provides a rich set of features, including argument parsing, command handling, and help generation. yargs allows developers to create complex CLI applications with ease, supporting features like middleware, command chaining, and validation. If you need a comprehensive solution for building a sophisticated command-line tool, yargs is an excellent choice.

To see how argparse compares with commander, minimist, and yargs, check out the comparison: Comparing argparse vs commander vs minimist vs yargs.

Similar Npm Packages to yargs

yargs is a powerful and popular command-line argument parser for Node.js applications. It simplifies the process of handling command-line arguments and options, allowing developers to create user-friendly command-line interfaces (CLIs) with ease. With features like automatic help generation, command chaining, and middleware support, yargs makes it easy to build robust and intuitive CLI applications. However, there are several alternatives available that also provide command-line argument parsing capabilities. Here are a few notable ones:

  • argparse is a widely-used library for parsing command-line arguments in Node.js. It is inspired by Python's argparse module and offers a straightforward API for defining arguments, options, and subcommands. argparse is particularly useful for developers who prefer a more structured approach to argument parsing and need features like type validation and automatic help generation. If you are looking for a reliable and feature-rich library for building command-line interfaces, argparse is a solid choice.
  • commander is another popular library for building command-line interfaces in Node.js. It provides a simple and intuitive API for defining commands, options, and arguments, making it easy to create complex CLI applications. commander is known for its flexibility and ease of use, allowing developers to quickly set up command-line tools with minimal boilerplate code. If you want a library that balances simplicity and functionality, commander is an excellent option.
  • minimist is a lightweight and minimalistic library for parsing command-line arguments. It is designed for simplicity and speed, making it a great choice for small projects or scripts where you need to quickly parse a few command-line options. While minimist does not offer as many features as yargs or other alternatives, its straightforward approach can be advantageous when you need a quick and easy solution for argument parsing.

To see how yargs compares with argparse, commander, and minimist, check out the comparison: Comparing yargs vs argparse vs commander vs minimist.

README for argparse

argparse

Build Status NPM version

CLI arguments parser for node.js, with sub-commands support. Port of python's argparse (version 3.9.0).

Difference with original.

  • JS has no keyword arguments support.
    • Pass options instead: new ArgumentParser({ description: 'example', add_help: true }).
  • JS has no python's types int, float, ...
    • Use string-typed names: .add_argument('-b', { type: 'int', help: 'help' }).
  • %r format specifier uses require('util').inspect().

More details in doc.

Example

test.js file:

#!/usr/bin/env node
'use strict';

const { ArgumentParser } = require('argparse');
const { version } = require('./package.json');

const parser = new ArgumentParser({
  description: 'Argparse example'
});

parser.add_argument('-v', '--version', { action: 'version', version });
parser.add_argument('-f', '--foo', { help: 'foo bar' });
parser.add_argument('-b', '--bar', { help: 'bar foo' });
parser.add_argument('--baz', { help: 'baz bar' });

console.dir(parser.parse_args());

Display help:

$ ./test.js -h
usage: test.js [-h] [-v] [-f FOO] [-b BAR] [--baz BAZ]

Argparse example

optional arguments:
  -h, --help         show this help message and exit
  -v, --version      show program's version number and exit
  -f FOO, --foo FOO  foo bar
  -b BAR, --bar BAR  bar foo
  --baz BAZ          baz bar

Parse arguments:

$ ./test.js -f=3 --bar=4 --baz 5
{ foo: '3', bar: '4', baz: '5' }

API docs

Since this is a port with minimal divergence, there's no separate documentation. Use original one instead, with notes about difference.

  1. Original doc.
  2. Original tutorial.
  3. Difference with python.

argparse for enterprise

Available as part of the Tidelift Subscription

The maintainers of argparse and thousands of other packages are working with Tidelift to deliver commercial support and maintenance for the open source dependencies you use to build your applications. Save time, reduce risk, and improve code health, while paying the maintainers of the exact dependencies you use. Learn more.

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc or npmjs.com, the official website for the npm registry. Please note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.