sha.js vs hash.js vs crypto-js vs bcryptjs
JavaScript Hashing and Encryption Libraries Comparison
1 Year
sha.jshash.jscrypto-jsbcryptjsSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Hashing and Encryption Libraries?

These libraries provide various methods for hashing and encrypting data in JavaScript applications. They are essential for securing sensitive information, such as passwords and personal data, by ensuring that the data is not easily readable or tampered with. Each library has its own strengths, weaknesses, and use cases, making it crucial for developers to choose the right one based on their specific requirements for security, performance, and ease of use.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
sha.js13,087,819290-157 years ago(MIT AND BSD-3-Clause)
hash.js10,991,140320-146 years agoMIT
crypto-js8,371,18616,014487 kB274a year agoMIT
bcryptjs2,614,9503,606112 kB288 days agoBSD-3-Clause
Feature Comparison: sha.js vs hash.js vs crypto-js vs bcryptjs

Hashing Algorithm

  • sha.js:

    sha.js is a simple and efficient library for hashing data using SHA-1, SHA-256, and SHA-512 algorithms. It is lightweight and optimized for performance, making it a good choice for applications that require fast hashing.

  • hash.js:

    hash.js focuses on providing a fast and efficient implementation of various hashing algorithms, including SHA-256, SHA-512, and others. It is designed for performance and can be used in environments where speed is critical.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js provides a variety of cryptographic algorithms, including hashing functions like SHA-1, SHA-256, and MD5. It is versatile and can be used for both hashing and encryption, making it suitable for various cryptographic needs.

  • bcryptjs:

    bcryptjs implements the bcrypt hashing algorithm, which is specifically designed for hashing passwords. It includes a salt to protect against rainbow table attacks and allows for adjustable work factors to increase the hashing time as hardware improves.

Security Features

  • sha.js:

    sha.js provides basic hashing capabilities without additional security features like salting. It is suitable for scenarios where data integrity is more important than security.

  • hash.js:

    hash.js provides a straightforward hashing mechanism but does not include salting or other security features. It is best used for non-sensitive data where performance is prioritized over security.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js offers various encryption algorithms along with hashing, but its security depends on the implementation of the chosen algorithm. It is essential to use strong keys and initialization vectors for secure encryption.

  • bcryptjs:

    bcryptjs includes built-in salting and a configurable cost factor, which makes it resistant to brute-force attacks. This makes it a strong choice for password storage and authentication.

Performance

  • sha.js:

    sha.js is lightweight and optimized for performance, making it suitable for applications that require fast hashing capabilities without the overhead of additional features.

  • hash.js:

    hash.js is designed for speed and efficiency, making it one of the faster hashing libraries available. It is ideal for applications that require quick hashing without the need for additional security features.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js is optimized for performance and can handle a wide range of cryptographic operations efficiently. Its performance can vary depending on the algorithm used, but it generally performs well for both hashing and encryption tasks.

  • bcryptjs:

    bcryptjs is slower than other hashing libraries due to its design for security. The adjustable work factor allows developers to balance security and performance based on their application's needs.

Ease of Use

  • sha.js:

    sha.js provides a straightforward API for hashing, making it easy to implement in applications. Its simplicity is a key advantage for developers looking for quick hashing solutions.

  • hash.js:

    hash.js offers a simple and intuitive API for hashing data, making it easy to use for developers who need quick and efficient hashing without complex configurations.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js has a more complex API due to its wide range of features and algorithms. While powerful, it may require more effort to implement correctly, especially for encryption tasks.

  • bcryptjs:

    bcryptjs has a simple API for hashing and comparing passwords, making it easy to integrate into authentication systems. Its focus on password hashing means it is straightforward to use for its intended purpose.

Community and Support

  • sha.js:

    sha.js is a well-established library with a solid user base and documentation. It is commonly used in various applications, ensuring that developers can find support and examples easily.

  • hash.js:

    hash.js is less commonly used compared to other libraries, which may result in fewer resources and community support. However, its performance-focused design appeals to specific use cases.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js is a popular library with a large user base and extensive documentation. Its versatility in cryptographic functions means there are many resources available for developers.

  • bcryptjs:

    bcryptjs has a strong community and is widely used for password hashing in Node.js applications. It is well-documented, making it easy for developers to find support and resources.

How to Choose: sha.js vs hash.js vs crypto-js vs bcryptjs
  • bcryptjs:

    Choose bcryptjs if you need to securely hash passwords with a strong algorithm that includes salting and is resistant to brute-force attacks. It is specifically designed for password hashing and is widely recognized for its security features.

README for sha.js

sha.js

NPM Package Build Status Dependency status

js-standard-style

Node style SHA on pure JavaScript.

var shajs = require('sha.js')

console.log(shajs('sha256').update('42').digest('hex'))
// => 73475cb40a568e8da8a045ced110137e159f890ac4da883b6b17dc651b3a8049
console.log(new shajs.sha256().update('42').digest('hex'))
// => 73475cb40a568e8da8a045ced110137e159f890ac4da883b6b17dc651b3a8049

var sha256stream = shajs('sha256')
sha256stream.end('42')
console.log(sha256stream.read().toString('hex'))
// => 73475cb40a568e8da8a045ced110137e159f890ac4da883b6b17dc651b3a8049

supported hashes

sha.js currently implements:

  • SHA (SHA-0) -- legacy, do not use in new systems
  • SHA-1 -- legacy, do not use in new systems
  • SHA-224
  • SHA-256
  • SHA-384
  • SHA-512

Not an actual stream

Note, this doesn't actually implement a stream, but wrapping this in a stream is trivial. It does update incrementally, so you can hash things larger than RAM, as it uses a constant amount of memory (except when using base64 or utf8 encoding, see code comments).

Acknowledgements

This work is derived from Paul Johnston's A JavaScript implementation of the Secure Hash Algorithm.

LICENSE MIT