chalk vs log-symbols
Node.js Logging Utilities Comparison
1 Year
chalklog-symbolsSimilar Packages:
What's Node.js Logging Utilities?

Chalk and log-symbols are two popular npm packages used in Node.js applications to enhance console output. Chalk provides a way to style terminal strings with colors and styles, making logs more visually appealing and easier to read. Log-symbols, on the other hand, offers a simple way to display symbols (like success, error, and info) alongside log messages, improving the clarity of the output. Both packages contribute to better user experience in command-line interfaces by making logs more informative and visually distinct.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
chalk362,811,39922,51144.2 kB37 months agoMIT
log-symbols49,658,4097574.4 kB02 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: chalk vs log-symbols

Styling Capabilities

  • chalk:

    Chalk allows you to apply a wide range of styles to your console output, including colors, bold, underline, and background colors. This flexibility enables developers to create visually distinct logs that can highlight important messages or errors, making it easier for users to scan through logs quickly.

  • log-symbols:

    Log-symbols does not provide styling capabilities but focuses on using Unicode symbols to represent different log types. It includes symbols for success, error, warning, and info, which can be combined with other logging libraries to enhance clarity without additional styling.

Ease of Use

  • chalk:

    Chalk is easy to use, with a simple API that allows you to chain styles together. For example, you can easily create a styled message with just a few method calls, making it accessible even for beginners.

  • log-symbols:

    Log-symbols is also straightforward to use. You simply import the package and call the appropriate symbol method to prepend a symbol to your log message, making it quick to implement.

Customization

  • chalk:

    Chalk offers extensive customization options, allowing you to define your own styles and create reusable style functions. This is particularly useful for larger applications where consistent styling is needed across various log messages.

  • log-symbols:

    Log-symbols provides a limited set of predefined symbols and does not allow for customization of the symbols themselves. However, it can be easily combined with other libraries for more complex logging needs.

Performance

  • chalk:

    Chalk is optimized for performance and does not significantly impact the speed of your application. However, excessive use of styles can lead to longer render times in the terminal, so it's best used judiciously.

  • log-symbols:

    Log-symbols is lightweight and has minimal performance overhead, making it suitable for applications where performance is a critical concern. Its simplicity ensures that it won't slow down your logging operations.

Community and Support

  • chalk:

    Chalk has a large community and is widely used in the Node.js ecosystem, which means you can find plenty of resources, examples, and support when using it.

  • log-symbols:

    Log-symbols, while not as widely adopted as Chalk, still has a supportive community and is often used in conjunction with other logging libraries, ensuring that you can find help and examples for common use cases.

How to Choose: chalk vs log-symbols
  • chalk:

    Choose Chalk if you need to customize the appearance of your console output with colors and styles. It's ideal for creating visually engaging logs that can help differentiate between various types of messages, such as warnings, errors, and informational logs.

  • log-symbols:

    Choose log-symbols if you want a straightforward way to add recognizable symbols to your log messages without needing to style the text. It's great for quickly indicating the status of operations (success, error, info) in a clean and minimalistic way.

README for chalk



Chalk


Terminal string styling done right

Coverage Status npm dependents Downloads

Info

Highlights

Install

npm install chalk

IMPORTANT: Chalk 5 is ESM. If you want to use Chalk with TypeScript or a build tool, you will probably want to use Chalk 4 for now. Read more.

Usage

import chalk from 'chalk';

console.log(chalk.blue('Hello world!'));

Chalk comes with an easy to use composable API where you just chain and nest the styles you want.

import chalk from 'chalk';

const log = console.log;

// Combine styled and normal strings
log(chalk.blue('Hello') + ' World' + chalk.red('!'));

// Compose multiple styles using the chainable API
log(chalk.blue.bgRed.bold('Hello world!'));

// Pass in multiple arguments
log(chalk.blue('Hello', 'World!', 'Foo', 'bar', 'biz', 'baz'));

// Nest styles
log(chalk.red('Hello', chalk.underline.bgBlue('world') + '!'));

// Nest styles of the same type even (color, underline, background)
log(chalk.green(
	'I am a green line ' +
	chalk.blue.underline.bold('with a blue substring') +
	' that becomes green again!'
));

// ES2015 template literal
log(`
CPU: ${chalk.red('90%')}
RAM: ${chalk.green('40%')}
DISK: ${chalk.yellow('70%')}
`);

// Use RGB colors in terminal emulators that support it.
log(chalk.rgb(123, 45, 67).underline('Underlined reddish color'));
log(chalk.hex('#DEADED').bold('Bold gray!'));

Easily define your own themes:

import chalk from 'chalk';

const error = chalk.bold.red;
const warning = chalk.hex('#FFA500'); // Orange color

console.log(error('Error!'));
console.log(warning('Warning!'));

Take advantage of console.log string substitution:

import chalk from 'chalk';

const name = 'Sindre';
console.log(chalk.green('Hello %s'), name);
//=> 'Hello Sindre'

API

chalk.<style>[.<style>...](string, [string...])

Example: chalk.red.bold.underline('Hello', 'world');

Chain styles and call the last one as a method with a string argument. Order doesn't matter, and later styles take precedent in case of a conflict. This simply means that chalk.red.yellow.green is equivalent to chalk.green.

Multiple arguments will be separated by space.

chalk.level

Specifies the level of color support.

Color support is automatically detected, but you can override it by setting the level property. You should however only do this in your own code as it applies globally to all Chalk consumers.

If you need to change this in a reusable module, create a new instance:

import {Chalk} from 'chalk';

const customChalk = new Chalk({level: 0});

| Level | Description | | :---: | :--- | | 0 | All colors disabled | | 1 | Basic color support (16 colors) | | 2 | 256 color support | | 3 | Truecolor support (16 million colors) |

supportsColor

Detect whether the terminal supports color. Used internally and handled for you, but exposed for convenience.

Can be overridden by the user with the flags --color and --no-color. For situations where using --color is not possible, use the environment variable FORCE_COLOR=1 (level 1), FORCE_COLOR=2 (level 2), or FORCE_COLOR=3 (level 3) to forcefully enable color, or FORCE_COLOR=0 to forcefully disable. The use of FORCE_COLOR overrides all other color support checks.

Explicit 256/Truecolor mode can be enabled using the --color=256 and --color=16m flags, respectively.

chalkStderr and supportsColorStderr

chalkStderr contains a separate instance configured with color support detected for stderr stream instead of stdout. Override rules from supportsColor apply to this too. supportsColorStderr is exposed for convenience.

modifierNames, foregroundColorNames, backgroundColorNames, and colorNames

All supported style strings are exposed as an array of strings for convenience. colorNames is the combination of foregroundColorNames and backgroundColorNames.

This can be useful if you wrap Chalk and need to validate input:

import {modifierNames, foregroundColorNames} from 'chalk';

console.log(modifierNames.includes('bold'));
//=> true

console.log(foregroundColorNames.includes('pink'));
//=> false

Styles

Modifiers

  • reset - Reset the current style.
  • bold - Make the text bold.
  • dim - Make the text have lower opacity.
  • italic - Make the text italic. (Not widely supported)
  • underline - Put a horizontal line below the text. (Not widely supported)
  • overline - Put a horizontal line above the text. (Not widely supported)
  • inverse- Invert background and foreground colors.
  • hidden - Print the text but make it invisible.
  • strikethrough - Puts a horizontal line through the center of the text. (Not widely supported)
  • visible- Print the text only when Chalk has a color level above zero. Can be useful for things that are purely cosmetic.

Colors

  • black
  • red
  • green
  • yellow
  • blue
  • magenta
  • cyan
  • white
  • blackBright (alias: gray, grey)
  • redBright
  • greenBright
  • yellowBright
  • blueBright
  • magentaBright
  • cyanBright
  • whiteBright

Background colors

  • bgBlack
  • bgRed
  • bgGreen
  • bgYellow
  • bgBlue
  • bgMagenta
  • bgCyan
  • bgWhite
  • bgBlackBright (alias: bgGray, bgGrey)
  • bgRedBright
  • bgGreenBright
  • bgYellowBright
  • bgBlueBright
  • bgMagentaBright
  • bgCyanBright
  • bgWhiteBright

256 and Truecolor color support

Chalk supports 256 colors and Truecolor (16 million colors) on supported terminal apps.

Colors are downsampled from 16 million RGB values to an ANSI color format that is supported by the terminal emulator (or by specifying {level: n} as a Chalk option). For example, Chalk configured to run at level 1 (basic color support) will downsample an RGB value of #FF0000 (red) to 31 (ANSI escape for red).

Examples:

  • chalk.hex('#DEADED').underline('Hello, world!')
  • chalk.rgb(15, 100, 204).inverse('Hello!')

Background versions of these models are prefixed with bg and the first level of the module capitalized (e.g. hex for foreground colors and bgHex for background colors).

  • chalk.bgHex('#DEADED').underline('Hello, world!')
  • chalk.bgRgb(15, 100, 204).inverse('Hello!')

The following color models can be used:

  • rgb - Example: chalk.rgb(255, 136, 0).bold('Orange!')
  • hex - Example: chalk.hex('#FF8800').bold('Orange!')
  • ansi256 - Example: chalk.bgAnsi256(194)('Honeydew, more or less')

Browser support

Since Chrome 69, ANSI escape codes are natively supported in the developer console.

Windows

If you're on Windows, do yourself a favor and use Windows Terminal instead of cmd.exe.

FAQ

Why not switch to a smaller coloring package?

Chalk may be larger, but there is a reason for that. It offers a more user-friendly API, well-documented types, supports millions of colors, and covers edge cases that smaller alternatives miss. Chalk is mature, reliable, and built to last.

But beyond the technical aspects, there's something more critical: trust and long-term maintenance. I have been active in open source for over a decade, and I'm committed to keeping Chalk maintained. Smaller packages might seem appealing now, but there's no guarantee they will be around for the long term, or that they won't become malicious over time.

Chalk is also likely already in your dependency tree (since 100K+ packages depend on it), so switching won’t save space—in fact, it might increase it. npm deduplicates dependencies, so multiple Chalk instances turn into one, but adding another package alongside it will increase your overall size.

If the goal is to clean up the ecosystem, switching away from Chalk won’t even make a dent. The real problem lies with packages that have very deep dependency trees (for example, those including a lot of polyfills). Chalk has no dependencies. It's better to focus on impactful changes rather than minor optimizations.

If absolute package size is important to you, I also maintain yoctocolors, one of the smallest color packages out there.

- Sindre

But the smaller coloring package has benchmarks showing it is faster

Micro-benchmarks are flawed because they measure performance in unrealistic, isolated scenarios, often giving a distorted view of real-world performance. Don't believe marketing fluff. All the coloring packages are more than fast enough.

Related

(Not accepting additional entries)

Maintainers