sharp vs knip vs image-js
Image Processing Libraries Comparison
1 Year
sharpknipimage-jsSimilar Packages:
What's Image Processing Libraries?

Image processing libraries are essential tools in web development that allow developers to manipulate and transform images programmatically. They provide functionalities such as resizing, cropping, format conversion, and applying filters, which are crucial for optimizing images for web use, enhancing user experience, and ensuring fast loading times. These libraries cater to different needs, from simple image manipulations to more complex operations, making them versatile for various applications in web development.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
sharp10,842,64130,192522 kB12010 hours agoApache-2.0
knip2,264,5077,8571.35 MB482 days agoISC
image-js23,484734802 kB1183 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: sharp vs knip vs image-js

Performance

  • sharp:

    sharp is known for its exceptional performance, especially with large images. It uses native C++ bindings, allowing it to process images quickly and with low memory overhead, making it suitable for high-demand applications.

  • knip:

    knip focuses on optimizing images for web use, providing a balance between performance and quality. It automates the optimization process, making it efficient for handling multiple images in build pipelines.

  • image-js:

    image-js is designed for ease of use and flexibility, but it may not be as fast as other libraries for large-scale image processing tasks. It operates entirely in JavaScript, which can lead to slower performance compared to native solutions.

Functionality

  • sharp:

    sharp offers extensive image processing capabilities, including resizing, cropping, rotation, and format conversion. It supports advanced features like image compositing and can handle multiple image formats, making it a robust choice for server-side image processing.

  • knip:

    knip specializes in image optimization, providing features like resizing, format conversion, and automatic compression. It is designed to streamline the image processing workflow, making it easy to integrate into build systems for web projects.

  • image-js:

    image-js provides a wide range of functionalities, including image manipulation, analysis, and basic effects. It supports various image formats and allows for pixel-level manipulation, making it versatile for custom image processing tasks.

Ease of Use

  • sharp:

    sharp, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and reliance on native bindings. However, once mastered, it offers unparalleled control and performance for image processing tasks.

  • knip:

    knip is designed with simplicity in mind, providing a clean API for image optimization tasks. It is particularly user-friendly for developers looking to automate image processing in their build pipelines without dealing with complex configurations.

  • image-js:

    image-js has a straightforward API that is easy to understand, making it accessible for developers who may not have extensive experience with image processing. Its focus on JavaScript means that it can be easily integrated into web applications without additional dependencies.

Supported Formats

  • sharp:

    sharp supports a wide range of image formats, including JPEG, PNG, WebP, TIFF, and more. This extensive support allows developers to work with various image types and convert between them seamlessly.

  • knip:

    knip supports common web formats like JPEG, PNG, and GIF, focusing on optimizing these formats for web delivery. Its primary goal is to enhance the performance of images used on websites.

  • image-js:

    image-js supports a variety of image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, and BMP. This makes it versatile for different use cases, although it may not support as many formats as some other libraries.

Use Cases

  • sharp:

    sharp is perfect for server-side applications that need to process large volumes of images quickly, such as image upload services, content management systems, or any application where performance is critical.

  • knip:

    knip is best suited for automated image processing in build systems, making it an excellent choice for web developers who need to optimize images as part of their deployment workflow.

  • image-js:

    image-js is ideal for projects that require client-side image manipulation or analysis, such as web applications that allow users to edit images directly in the browser.

How to Choose: sharp vs knip vs image-js
  • sharp:

    Choose sharp if you need a high-performance image processing library that can handle large images efficiently. It is ideal for server-side applications where speed and memory usage are critical, as it leverages native bindings to provide fast image transformations.

  • knip:

    Choose knip if you are looking for a library that specializes in image optimization and management. It is particularly useful for projects that require automated image processing workflows, as it integrates well with build tools and focuses on optimizing images for web delivery.

  • image-js:

    Choose image-js if you need a pure JavaScript solution for image manipulation that runs in the browser or Node.js. It is suitable for projects that require a lightweight library with a focus on image analysis and manipulation without external dependencies.

README for sharp

sharp

sharp logo

The typical use case for this high speed Node-API module is to convert large images in common formats to smaller, web-friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF images of varying dimensions.

It can be used with all JavaScript runtimes that provide support for Node-API v9, including Node.js (^18.17.0 or >= 20.3.0), Deno and Bun.

Resizing an image is typically 4x-5x faster than using the quickest ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick settings due to its use of libvips.

Colour spaces, embedded ICC profiles and alpha transparency channels are all handled correctly. Lanczos resampling ensures quality is not sacrificed for speed.

As well as image resizing, operations such as rotation, extraction, compositing and gamma correction are available.

Most modern macOS, Windows and Linux systems do not require any additional install or runtime dependencies.

Documentation

Visit sharp.pixelplumbing.com for complete installation instructions, API documentation, benchmark tests and changelog.

Examples

npm install sharp
const sharp = require('sharp');

Callback

sharp(inputBuffer)
  .resize(320, 240)
  .toFile('output.webp', (err, info) => { ... });

Promise

sharp('input.jpg')
  .rotate()
  .resize(200)
  .jpeg({ mozjpeg: true })
  .toBuffer()
  .then( data => { ... })
  .catch( err => { ... });

Async/await

const semiTransparentRedPng = await sharp({
  create: {
    width: 48,
    height: 48,
    channels: 4,
    background: { r: 255, g: 0, b: 0, alpha: 0.5 }
  }
})
  .png()
  .toBuffer();

Stream

const roundedCorners = Buffer.from(
  '<svg><rect x="0" y="0" width="200" height="200" rx="50" ry="50"/></svg>'
);

const roundedCornerResizer =
  sharp()
    .resize(200, 200)
    .composite([{
      input: roundedCorners,
      blend: 'dest-in'
    }])
    .png();

readableStream
  .pipe(roundedCornerResizer)
  .pipe(writableStream);

Contributing

A guide for contributors covers reporting bugs, requesting features and submitting code changes.

Licensing

Copyright 2013 Lovell Fuller and others.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.