rollup vs webpack
JavaScript Module Bundlers Comparison
1 Year
rollupwebpackSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Module Bundlers?

JavaScript module bundlers are tools that compile and package JavaScript files and their dependencies into a single file or a few files, optimizing them for use in web applications. They help manage the complexity of modern web development by allowing developers to write modular code while ensuring that the final output is efficient and optimized for performance. Rollup and Webpack are two popular choices, each with its own strengths and use cases, making it essential to understand their differences to select the right tool for a project.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
rollup30,205,45425,6042.69 MB5888 days agoMIT
webpack28,549,09365,0615.21 MB23412 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: rollup vs webpack

Bundling Approach

  • rollup:

    Rollup uses a simpler bundling approach focused on ES modules, allowing for efficient tree-shaking. It analyzes the module dependency graph and eliminates unused code, resulting in smaller and faster bundles. This makes Rollup particularly effective for libraries where bundle size is a priority.

  • webpack:

    Webpack employs a more complex bundling strategy that can handle various asset types, including JavaScript, CSS, images, and more. It allows for dynamic imports and code splitting, enabling developers to create optimized bundles that load only the necessary code for each page, improving performance in larger applications.

Configuration Complexity

  • rollup:

    Rollup has a more straightforward configuration process, often requiring less boilerplate code. Its configuration is generally simpler, making it easier to get started, especially for smaller projects or libraries that don't require extensive customization.

  • webpack:

    Webpack's configuration can be quite complex due to its extensive feature set and flexibility. It offers a wide range of options for loaders, plugins, and optimization strategies, which can be overwhelming for beginners but allows for deep customization for larger applications.

Ecosystem and Community

  • rollup:

    Rollup has a smaller ecosystem compared to Webpack but is growing steadily. It is particularly favored in the library development community due to its emphasis on output optimization and simplicity. The community provides a range of plugins tailored for various use cases, though not as extensive as Webpack's.

  • webpack:

    Webpack has a vast and mature ecosystem with a rich collection of plugins and loaders that extend its functionality. The community support is robust, making it easy to find solutions and resources for a wide range of use cases, from simple setups to complex applications.

Performance Optimization

  • rollup:

    Rollup's tree-shaking capabilities significantly reduce the final bundle size by removing unused exports. This optimization is particularly beneficial for libraries, where a smaller footprint is essential. Rollup also supports code splitting, but its primary strength lies in producing optimized single-file outputs.

  • webpack:

    Webpack offers various optimization techniques, including code splitting, lazy loading, and asset management. It allows developers to create multiple bundles that can be loaded on demand, improving initial load times and overall performance in larger applications. However, managing these optimizations can add complexity to the configuration.

Development Experience

  • rollup:

    Rollup provides a smooth development experience with fast builds, especially for smaller projects. Its simplicity allows developers to focus on writing code rather than managing complex configurations. However, it may lack some advanced features needed for larger applications.

  • webpack:

    Webpack offers a powerful development experience with features like hot module replacement (HMR), which allows developers to see changes in real-time without a full page reload. This can significantly speed up the development process, especially in larger applications, but requires more configuration to set up.

How to Choose: rollup vs webpack
  • rollup:

    Choose Rollup if you are focused on building libraries or applications that require optimized output with ES modules. Rollup excels in tree-shaking, which eliminates dead code and produces smaller bundles, making it ideal for library authors and projects where bundle size is critical.

  • webpack:

    Choose Webpack if you need a highly configurable bundler that supports a wide range of asset types beyond JavaScript, such as CSS, images, and fonts. Webpack is suitable for complex applications with multiple entry points and dynamic imports, providing a robust ecosystem of plugins and loaders to handle various tasks.

README for rollup

npm version node compatibility install size code coverage backers sponsors license Join the chat at https://is.gd/rollup_chat

Rollup

Overview

Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the standardized ES module format for code, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD. ES modules let you freely and seamlessly combine the most useful individual functions from your favorite libraries. Rollup can optimize ES modules for faster native loading in modern browsers, or output a legacy module format allowing ES module workflows today.

Quick Start Guide

Install with npm install --global rollup. Rollup can be used either through a command line interface with an optional configuration file or else through its JavaScript API. Run rollup --help to see the available options and parameters. The starter project templates, rollup-starter-lib and rollup-starter-app, demonstrate common configuration options, and more detailed instructions are available throughout the user guide.

Commands

These commands assume the entry point to your application is named main.js, and that you'd like all imports compiled into a single file named bundle.js.

For browsers:

# compile to a <script> containing a self-executing function
rollup main.js --format iife --name "myBundle" --file bundle.js

For Node.js:

# compile to a CommonJS module
rollup main.js --format cjs --file bundle.js

For both browsers and Node.js:

# UMD format requires a bundle name
rollup main.js --format umd --name "myBundle" --file bundle.js

Why

Developing software is usually easier if you break your project into smaller separate pieces, since that often removes unexpected interactions and dramatically reduces the complexity of the problems you'll need to solve, and simply writing smaller projects in the first place isn't necessarily the answer. Unfortunately, JavaScript has not historically included this capability as a core feature in the language.

This finally changed with ES modules support in JavaScript, which provides a syntax for importing and exporting functions and data so they can be shared between separate scripts. Most browsers and Node.js support ES modules. However, Node.js releases before 12.17 support ES modules only behind the --experimental-modules flag, and older browsers like Internet Explorer do not support ES modules at all. Rollup allows you to write your code using ES modules, and run your application even in environments that do not support ES modules natively. For environments that support them, Rollup can output optimized ES modules; for environments that don't, Rollup can compile your code to other formats such as CommonJS modules, AMD modules, and IIFE-style scripts. This means that you get to write future-proof code, and you also get the tremendous benefits of...

Tree Shaking

In addition to enabling the use of ES modules, Rollup also statically analyzes and optimizes the code you are importing, and will exclude anything that isn't actually used. This allows you to build on top of existing tools and modules without adding extra dependencies or bloating the size of your project.

For example, with CommonJS, the entire tool or library must be imported.

// import the entire utils object with CommonJS
var utils = require('node:utils');
var query = 'Rollup';
// use the ajax method of the utils object
utils.ajax('https://api.example.com?search=' + query).then(handleResponse);

But with ES modules, instead of importing the whole utils object, we can just import the one ajax function we need:

// import the ajax function with an ES import statement
import { ajax } from 'node:utils';

var query = 'Rollup';
// call the ajax function
ajax('https://api.example.com?search=' + query).then(handleResponse);

Because Rollup includes the bare minimum, it results in lighter, faster, and less complicated libraries and applications. Since this approach is based on explicit import and export statements, it is vastly more effective than simply running an automated minifier to detect unused variables in the compiled output code.

Compatibility

Importing CommonJS

Rollup can import existing CommonJS modules through a plugin.

Publishing ES Modules

To make sure your ES modules are immediately usable by tools that work with CommonJS such as Node.js and webpack, you can use Rollup to compile to UMD or CommonJS format, and then point to that compiled version with the main property in your package.json file. If your package.json file also has a module field, ES-module-aware tools like Rollup and webpack will import the ES module version directly.

Contributors

This project exists thanks to all the people who contribute. [Contribute]. . If you want to contribute yourself, head over to the contribution guidelines.

Backers

Thank you to all our backers! 🙏 [Become a backer]

Sponsors

Support this project by becoming a sponsor. Your logo will show up here with a link to your website. [Become a sponsor]

Special Sponsor

TNG Logo

TNG has been supporting the work of Lukas Taegert-Atkinson on Rollup since 2017.

License

MIT