@casl/ability vs @casl/react vs casbin vs accesscontrol
Authorization Libraries for JavaScript Comparison
1 Year
@casl/ability@casl/reactcasbinaccesscontrol
What's Authorization Libraries for JavaScript?

Authorization libraries are essential tools in web development that help manage user permissions and access control in applications. They provide mechanisms to define what actions users can perform based on their roles or attributes, ensuring that sensitive data and functionalities are protected. These libraries facilitate the implementation of complex authorization logic, making it easier for developers to enforce security policies and maintain a robust application architecture. By leveraging these libraries, developers can streamline the process of managing user permissions, enhancing both security and user experience.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
@casl/ability680,2546,261356 kB322 months agoMIT
@casl/react130,9066,26139.7 kB322 months agoMIT
casbin78,2852,682632 kB19a month agoApache-2.0
accesscontrol33,9382,243-467 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: @casl/ability vs @casl/react vs casbin vs accesscontrol

Authorization Model

  • @casl/ability:

    @casl/ability uses a flexible and expressive ability model that allows developers to define permissions based on user roles and attributes. It supports both role-based and attribute-based access control, making it suitable for applications with complex authorization requirements.

  • @casl/react:

    @casl/react leverages the same ability model as @casl/ability, providing a seamless integration for React applications. It allows developers to define permissions in a declarative manner, enhancing the maintainability of the codebase.

  • casbin:

    casbin supports multiple authorization models, including RBAC, ABAC, and ACL. This versatility makes it suitable for applications with varying access control requirements, allowing developers to choose the model that best fits their needs.

  • accesscontrol:

    accesscontrol implements a straightforward role-based access control (RBAC) model. It allows developers to define roles and their associated permissions clearly, making it easy to manage user access in applications with simpler authorization needs.

Integration

  • @casl/ability:

    @casl/ability can be easily integrated into any JavaScript application, providing a clear API for defining and checking permissions. It is framework-agnostic, allowing developers to use it with various front-end and back-end technologies.

  • @casl/react:

    @casl/react is specifically designed for React applications, providing hooks and components that streamline the process of checking permissions within React components. This integration enhances the user experience by conditionally rendering UI elements based on permissions.

  • casbin:

    casbin can be integrated into different programming languages and frameworks, including Node.js, Go, Java, and more. Its flexibility allows developers to implement complex authorization logic across different platforms.

  • accesscontrol:

    accesscontrol offers a simple API that can be easily integrated into Node.js applications. It is lightweight and does not impose any specific framework, making it suitable for various back-end technologies.

Flexibility

  • @casl/ability:

    @casl/ability provides a high degree of flexibility in defining permissions, allowing developers to create complex rules based on user attributes and application context. This flexibility is essential for applications with dynamic access control requirements.

  • @casl/react:

    @casl/react inherits the flexibility of @casl/ability, enabling developers to create dynamic permission checks within React components. This allows for a more responsive user interface that adapts to user roles and permissions.

  • casbin:

    casbin is highly flexible and supports various access control models, allowing developers to define complex authorization rules tailored to their application's needs. This makes it suitable for applications that require intricate access control logic.

  • accesscontrol:

    accesscontrol is designed for simplicity, which may limit its flexibility compared to other libraries. It is best suited for applications with straightforward role-based access control needs, where complex rules are not required.

Learning Curve

  • @casl/ability:

    @casl/ability has a moderate learning curve, especially for developers familiar with role-based access control concepts. Its flexibility may require some time to fully understand how to implement complex permissions effectively.

  • @casl/react:

    @casl/react is relatively easy to learn for developers already familiar with React. Its integration with React's component model simplifies the process of managing permissions within the UI.

  • casbin:

    casbin has a steeper learning curve due to its support for multiple access control models and the complexity of its configuration. Developers may need to invest time in understanding the various models and how to implement them effectively.

  • accesscontrol:

    accesscontrol is straightforward and easy to learn, making it an excellent choice for developers who need to implement basic access control quickly without a steep learning curve.

Performance

  • @casl/ability:

    @casl/ability is optimized for performance, allowing quick permission checks without significant overhead. This is crucial for applications with a large number of users and complex permissions.

  • @casl/react:

    @casl/react maintains performance by leveraging React's rendering lifecycle, ensuring that permission checks are efficient and do not lead to unnecessary re-renders in components.

  • casbin:

    casbin is designed for performance and scalability, making it suitable for applications with extensive access control requirements. Its support for various storage backends allows for efficient management of permissions.

  • accesscontrol:

    accesscontrol is lightweight and performs well for applications with basic access control needs. Its simplicity contributes to efficient permission checks without added complexity.

How to Choose: @casl/ability vs @casl/react vs casbin vs accesscontrol
  • @casl/ability:

    Choose @casl/ability if you need a flexible and powerful ability management system that allows you to define and check permissions based on user roles and attributes. It is particularly useful for applications that require fine-grained control over access to resources.

  • @casl/react:

    Select @casl/react if you are building a React application and want to integrate CASL's ability management seamlessly into your components. This package provides React hooks and components that simplify permission checks and enhance the user experience by conditionally rendering UI elements based on permissions.

  • casbin:

    Consider casbin if you require a powerful and extensible access control framework that supports multiple access control models, including ACL, RBAC, and ABAC. Casbin is ideal for applications that need to implement complex authorization logic and offers support for various storage backends.

  • accesscontrol:

    Opt for accesscontrol if you prefer a straightforward and easy-to-use role-based access control (RBAC) system. It is designed for simplicity and provides a clear API for defining roles and their associated permissions, making it suitable for applications with basic access control needs.

README for @casl/ability

CASL Ability @casl/ability NPM version CASL Documentation CASL Join the chat

This package is the core of CASL. It includes logic responsible for checking and defining permissions.

Installation

npm install @casl/ability
# or
pnpm install @casl/ability
# or
yarn add @casl/ability

Documentation

This README file contains only basic information about the package. If you need an in depth introduction, please visit CASL's documentation.

Getting Started

Note: the best way to get started is to read the Guide in the official documentation. In this README file, you will find just basic information.

Note: all the examples below are written in ES6 using ES modules but CASL also has a sophisticated support for TypeScript, read CASL TypeScript support for details.

1. Define Abilities

Lets define Ability for a blog website where visitors:

  • can read blog posts
  • can manage (i.e., do anything) own posts
  • cannot delete a post if it was created more than a day ago
import { AbilityBuilder, createMongoAbility } from '@casl/ability';
import { User } from '../models'; // application specific interfaces

/**
 * @param user contains details about logged in user: its id, name, email, etc
 */
function defineAbilitiesFor(user) {
  const { can, cannot, build } = new AbilityBuilder(createMongoAbility);

  // can read blog posts
  can('read', 'BlogPost');
  // can manage (i.e., do anything) own posts
  can('manage', 'BlogPost', { author: user.id });
  // cannot delete a post if it was created more than a day ago
  cannot('delete', 'BlogPost', {
    createdAt: { $lt: Date.now() - 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000 }
  });

  return build();
});

Do you see how easily business requirements were translated into CASL's rules?

And yes, Ability class allow you to use some MongoDB operators to define conditions. Don't worry if you don't know MongoDB, it's not required and explained in details in Defining Abilities

2. Check Abilities

Later on you can check abilities by using can and cannot methods of Ability instance.

import { BlogPost, ForbiddenError } from '../models';

const user = getLoggedInUser(); // app specific function
const ability = defineAbilitiesFor(user)

// true if ability allows to read at least one Post
ability.can('read', 'BlogPost');

// true if there is no ability to read this particular blog post
const post = new BlogPost({ title: 'What is CASL?' });
ability.cannot('read', post);

// you can even throw an error if there is a missed ability
ForbiddenError.from(ability).throwUnlessCan('read', post);

Of course, you are not restricted to use only class instances in order to check permissions on objects. See Introduction for the detailed explanation.

3. Database integration

CASL has a complementary package [@casl/mongoose] which provides easy integration with MongoDB and [mongoose].

import { accessibleRecordsPlugin } from '@casl/mongoose';
import mongoose from 'mongoose';

mongoose.plugin(accessibleRecordsPlugin);

const user = getUserLoggedInUser(); // app specific function

const ability = defineAbilitiesFor(user);
const BlogPost = mongoose.model('BlogPost', mongoose.Schema({
  title: String,
  author: mongoose.Types.ObjectId,
  content: String,
  createdAt: Date,
  hidden: { type: Boolean, default: false }
}))

// returns mongoose Query, so you can chain it with other conditions
const posts = await Post.accessibleBy(ability).where({ hidden: false });

// you can also call it on existing query to enforce permissions
const hiddenPosts = await Post.find({ hidden: true }).accessibleBy(ability);

// you can even pass the action as a 2nd parameter. By default action is "read"
const updatablePosts = await Post.accessibleBy(ability, 'update');

See Database integration for details.

4. Advanced usage

CASL is incrementally adoptable, that means you can start your project with simple claim (or action) based authorization and evolve it later, when your app functionality evolves.

CASL is composable, that means you can implement alternative conditions matching (e.g., based on joi, ajv or pure functions) and field matching (e.g., to support alternative syntax in fields like addresses.*.street or addresses[0].street) logic.

See Advanced usage for details.

5. Performance and computational complexity

CASL checks are quite fast, thanks to underlying rule index structure. The estimated complexity of different operations can be found below:

| Operation | Complexity | Notes | |----------------------------------|------------|---------------| | Ability creation time | O(n) | n - amount of rules | | Check by action and subject type (e.g., ability.can('read', 'Todo')) | O(1) | | | Check by action and subject object (e.g., ability.can('read', todo)) | O(m + k) + O(p) | m - amount of rules for the same pair of action and subject; k - amount of operators in conditions; O(p) - complexity of used operators (e.g., $in implementation is more complex than $lt) |

Want to help?

Want to file a bug, contribute some code, or improve documentation? Excellent! Read up on guidelines for contributing

License

MIT License