Which is Better JavaScript Transpilers and Compilers?
typescript vs esbuild vs @swc/core vs babel
1 Year
typescriptesbuild@swc/corebabelSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Transpilers and Compilers?

JavaScript transpilers and compilers are tools that convert modern JavaScript (and sometimes TypeScript) code into a version that is compatible with older environments or different platforms. They are essential in modern web development to ensure that code can run across various browsers and devices, providing features like syntax transformations, polyfills, and optimizations. Each of these packages has unique strengths, catering to different needs in the development workflow, such as speed, compatibility, and feature support.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
typescript58,386,482100,45422.4 MB5,75925 days agoApache-2.0
esbuild35,808,87637,998134 kB47712 days agoMIT
@swc/core7,621,97631,008119 kB37823 days agoApache-2.0
babel107,279----MIT
Feature Comparison: typescript vs esbuild vs @swc/core vs babel

Performance

  • typescript: TypeScript's performance is generally comparable to Babel, as it primarily focuses on type checking and transpilation. However, it may not be as fast as esbuild or @swc/core when it comes to large codebases.
  • esbuild: esbuild is renowned for its lightning-fast performance, often completing builds in milliseconds. Its architecture is designed for speed, making it the go-to choice for developers who need rapid build times without sacrificing functionality.
  • @swc/core: @swc/core is built in Rust, which allows it to achieve remarkable performance, often significantly faster than Babel. It is optimized for large projects and can handle complex transformations quickly, making it a great choice for developers who prioritize build speed.
  • babel: Babel is slower compared to @swc/core and esbuild due to its extensive plugin system and JavaScript-based architecture. While it provides powerful transformation capabilities, it may not be the best option for projects where build time is critical.

Ecosystem and Community Support

  • typescript: TypeScript has a robust ecosystem with strong community support and a wide range of libraries that provide type definitions. Its integration with popular frameworks and tools makes it a popular choice among developers.
  • esbuild: esbuild has a simpler ecosystem focused on performance and ease of use. While it may not have as many plugins as Babel, it covers most common use cases effectively, making it suitable for many modern projects without the overhead of extensive configurations.
  • @swc/core: @swc/core is relatively new compared to Babel and has a growing ecosystem. While it supports many common JavaScript features, its plugin ecosystem is not as extensive as Babel's yet, which may limit its use in some projects.
  • babel: Babel has a vast ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and presets, allowing for extensive customization and support for various JavaScript features and proposals. Its long-standing community support makes it a reliable choice for many developers.

Type Safety

  • typescript: TypeScript is designed specifically for type safety, providing static type checking at compile time. This feature helps catch errors early in the development process, making it ideal for large and complex applications.
  • esbuild: esbuild also does not provide type safety features directly. It can transpile TypeScript code but does not perform type checking. For type safety, it should be used in conjunction with TypeScript's compiler.
  • @swc/core: @swc/core does not provide type safety features itself but can be used in conjunction with TypeScript to enable type checking during the build process. It focuses on transforming JavaScript and TypeScript code efficiently.
  • babel: Babel does not offer type safety features; it is primarily a transpiler. However, it can be used alongside TypeScript to enable type checking, but it lacks built-in support for type definitions.

Configuration Complexity

  • typescript: TypeScript requires some configuration, particularly when integrating with existing JavaScript projects. However, its configuration is generally straightforward, especially for new projects where type safety is a primary concern.
  • esbuild: esbuild is designed for simplicity, often requiring minimal configuration to get started. Its straightforward API and sensible defaults make it easy to use, especially for developers looking for a quick setup.
  • @swc/core: @swc/core offers a straightforward configuration process, often requiring less setup compared to Babel. Its focus on performance means that it can be easier to integrate into existing projects without extensive configuration.
  • babel: Babel can be complex to configure due to its extensive plugin system and options. Developers may need to spend time setting up presets and plugins to achieve the desired transformations, which can be overwhelming for newcomers.

Use Cases

  • typescript: TypeScript is essential for projects that require type safety and better tooling support. It is particularly beneficial for large-scale applications where maintainability and code quality are critical.
  • esbuild: esbuild is perfect for modern web applications where speed is paramount. It excels in scenarios where rapid development cycles are necessary, such as in hot module replacement during development.
  • @swc/core: @swc/core is ideal for projects that require fast builds and are using modern JavaScript features. It is particularly suited for large codebases where build speed can significantly impact development time.
  • babel: Babel is best suited for projects that need to support a wide range of browsers and environments, especially when using experimental JavaScript features. It is the go-to choice for many front-end projects that require extensive customization.
How to Choose: typescript vs esbuild vs @swc/core vs babel
  • typescript: Choose TypeScript if you want to leverage static typing in your JavaScript code. TypeScript provides type checking at compile time, enhancing code quality and maintainability. It is ideal for large-scale applications where type safety is essential.
  • esbuild: Choose esbuild for its exceptional speed and simplicity. It is designed for modern JavaScript and TypeScript projects, offering both bundling and transpiling capabilities. If you prioritize build performance and minimal configuration, esbuild is an excellent choice.
  • @swc/core: Choose @swc/core if you need a fast, Rust-based JavaScript/TypeScript compiler that focuses on performance and is suitable for large codebases. It is particularly beneficial for projects where build speed is critical.
  • babel: Choose Babel if you require extensive plugin support and need to transform modern JavaScript syntax into a version compatible with older browsers. Babel has a vast ecosystem of plugins and presets, making it highly customizable for various use cases.
README for typescript

TypeScript

GitHub Actions CI npm version Downloads OpenSSF Scorecard

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript. TypeScript adds optional types to JavaScript that support tools for large-scale JavaScript applications for any browser, for any host, on any OS. TypeScript compiles to readable, standards-based JavaScript. Try it out at the playground, and stay up to date via our blog and Twitter account.

Find others who are using TypeScript at our community page.

Installing

For the latest stable version:

npm install -D typescript

For our nightly builds:

npm install -D typescript@next

Contribute

There are many ways to contribute to TypeScript.

This project has adopted the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct. For more information see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact opencode@microsoft.com with any additional questions or comments.

Documentation

Roadmap

For details on our planned features and future direction, please refer to our roadmap.