graphql-tools vs graphql-compose vs type-graphql vs apollo-server vs nexus vs graphql-modules
GraphQL Server Libraries Comparison
1 Year
graphql-toolsgraphql-composetype-graphqlapollo-servernexusgraphql-modulesSimilar Packages:
What's GraphQL Server Libraries?

These libraries provide various tools and frameworks for building GraphQL servers in Node.js. They simplify the process of creating a GraphQL API by offering features like schema definition, resolvers, and middleware integration. Each library has its own strengths and use cases, catering to different developer preferences and project requirements.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
graphql-tools691,9495,3712.71 kB1638 days agoMIT
graphql-compose386,9941,213909 kB85a month agoMIT
type-graphql223,2798,056335 kB1028 months agoMIT
apollo-server186,35813,84626.6 kB94a year agoMIT
nexus125,3593,4052.17 MB256-MIT
graphql-modules25,094-201 kB-4 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: graphql-tools vs graphql-compose vs type-graphql vs apollo-server vs nexus vs graphql-modules

Schema Definition

  • graphql-tools:

    GraphQL Tools offers a schema-first approach using SDL, along with utilities for merging and extending schemas, making it easy to manage complex GraphQL APIs.

  • graphql-compose:

    GraphQL Compose enables you to build your schema programmatically with a focus on type composition, allowing for complex types and relationships to be defined in a more dynamic way.

  • type-graphql:

    TypeGraphQL uses decorators to define your schema, allowing you to create resolvers and types in a more declarative manner, which can significantly reduce boilerplate code.

  • apollo-server:

    Apollo Server allows you to define your schema using SDL or programmatically, providing flexibility in how you structure your GraphQL API. It supports both query and mutation types out of the box.

  • nexus:

    Nexus provides a code-first approach to schema definition, allowing you to define your types and fields using a fluent API, which integrates well with TypeScript for type safety.

  • graphql-modules:

    GraphQL Modules promotes a modular approach to schema definition, allowing you to encapsulate types, resolvers, and other related functionalities within individual modules, enhancing maintainability.

Type Safety

  • graphql-tools:

    GraphQL Tools does not provide type safety features by itself, but it can be used in conjunction with TypeScript to create type-safe schemas and resolvers.

  • graphql-compose:

    GraphQL Compose is flexible but does not inherently provide type safety; however, it can be used alongside TypeScript to enhance type definitions and validation.

  • type-graphql:

    TypeGraphQL fully embraces TypeScript, allowing you to define your GraphQL schema with strong type safety, ensuring that your resolvers and types are correctly typed.

  • apollo-server:

    Apollo Server does not enforce type safety out of the box, but it can be integrated with TypeScript for type definitions, providing some level of type safety when used with TypeScript.

  • nexus:

    Nexus is designed with TypeScript in mind, providing full type safety for your GraphQL schema, ensuring that your types are consistent and reducing runtime errors.

  • graphql-modules:

    GraphQL Modules does not focus on type safety directly but can be integrated with TypeScript to ensure type safety across your modular GraphQL setup.

Modularity

  • graphql-tools:

    GraphQL Tools does not provide a modular architecture by itself but can be used to stitch together multiple schemas, allowing for a modular approach to API design.

  • graphql-compose:

    GraphQL Compose allows for modular schema design by enabling the composition of types and resolvers, making it easier to manage complex schemas.

  • type-graphql:

    TypeGraphQL can be organized modularly, but it does not enforce a modular structure; however, you can create modules by grouping related resolvers and types.

  • apollo-server:

    Apollo Server is not inherently modular; it is more of a standalone server solution. However, you can structure your codebase to be modular by organizing resolvers and types separately.

  • nexus:

    Nexus supports modularity through its code-first approach, allowing you to define types and resolvers in a structured manner, promoting better organization in larger projects.

  • graphql-modules:

    GraphQL Modules is explicitly designed for modularity, allowing you to encapsulate related functionality into modules, which enhances code organization and reusability.

Ease of Use

  • graphql-tools:

    GraphQL Tools is relatively easy to use, especially for those familiar with SDL, and provides a clear way to define and manage schemas.

  • graphql-compose:

    GraphQL Compose has a steeper learning curve due to its programmatic nature, but it offers powerful features for those willing to invest time in learning its API.

  • type-graphql:

    TypeGraphQL is designed to be intuitive for TypeScript users, leveraging decorators to simplify schema definition, making it easy to use for those familiar with TypeScript.

  • apollo-server:

    Apollo Server is known for its ease of use, with a straightforward setup process and extensive documentation, making it accessible for beginners and experienced developers alike.

  • nexus:

    Nexus is user-friendly for TypeScript developers, offering a clear API that simplifies schema creation, but it may require some learning for those unfamiliar with its patterns.

  • graphql-modules:

    GraphQL Modules requires some understanding of modular architecture, which may add complexity for beginners, but it greatly benefits larger applications.

Community and Ecosystem

  • graphql-tools:

    GraphQL Tools is widely used and has a strong community, providing many resources and plugins to enhance its functionality.

  • graphql-compose:

    GraphQL Compose has a smaller community compared to Apollo, but it is well-documented and has a dedicated user base, especially among those who need advanced schema composition features.

  • type-graphql:

    TypeGraphQL has a passionate community of TypeScript developers, with a wealth of resources and examples available, making it a solid choice for TypeScript-centric projects.

  • apollo-server:

    Apollo Server has a large and active community, with extensive resources, tutorials, and integrations available, making it a popular choice for many developers.

  • nexus:

    Nexus is gaining popularity, especially among TypeScript developers, and has a growing ecosystem of plugins and tools to support its use.

  • graphql-modules:

    GraphQL Modules has a niche community focused on modular architecture, with growing resources and examples available for developers looking to adopt this approach.

How to Choose: graphql-tools vs graphql-compose vs type-graphql vs apollo-server vs nexus vs graphql-modules
  • graphql-tools:

    Use GraphQL Tools if you want to create a schema using SDL (Schema Definition Language) and need utilities for schema stitching and mocking. It is particularly useful for projects that require merging multiple schemas or creating a mock server for testing.

  • graphql-compose:

    Select GraphQL Compose if you want a powerful and flexible way to build your GraphQL schema programmatically. It allows for advanced schema composition and is great for projects that require dynamic schema generation and complex type definitions.

  • type-graphql:

    Select TypeGraphQL if you want to leverage decorators and TypeScript to define your GraphQL schema. It simplifies the process of creating resolvers and types, making it suitable for developers who enjoy using TypeScript and want to minimize boilerplate code.

  • apollo-server:

    Choose Apollo Server if you need a straightforward and robust solution for building a GraphQL server with features like built-in support for subscriptions, caching, and performance tracing. It is ideal for developers looking for an easy setup and integration with Apollo Client.

  • nexus:

    Choose Nexus if you prefer a type-safe approach to building your GraphQL schema using TypeScript. It provides a code-first approach that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript, making it ideal for developers who prioritize type safety and developer experience.

  • graphql-modules:

    Opt for GraphQL Modules if you are building a large-scale application that requires modular architecture. It helps organize your GraphQL code into modules, making it easier to manage and scale your application over time.

README for graphql-tools

ERROR: No README data found!