Which is Better JavaScript Utility Libraries?
regenerator-runtime vs async vs rxjs vs core-js vs bluebird vs babel-runtime
1 Year
regenerator-runtimeasyncrxjscore-jsbluebirdbabel-runtimeSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Utility Libraries?

These npm packages serve various purposes in JavaScript development, enhancing asynchronous programming, providing polyfills, and enabling reactive programming. They are essential for managing asynchronous operations, ensuring compatibility across different environments, and facilitating the creation of reactive applications. Each library has its unique strengths and use cases, making them valuable tools for developers aiming to improve code efficiency and maintainability.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
regenerator-runtime58,694,0693,82527.9 kB8310 months agoMIT
async55,892,61328,155808 kB52 months agoMIT
rxjs42,157,18330,6974.5 MB266a year agoApache-2.0
core-js32,739,30024,4251.24 MB382 months agoMIT
bluebird26,601,54220,449-1205 years agoMIT
babel-runtime7,097,662---7 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: regenerator-runtime vs async vs rxjs vs core-js vs bluebird vs babel-runtime

Asynchronous Control Flow

  • regenerator-runtime: Regenerator Runtime is crucial for enabling async/await functionality in environments that do not support it natively, allowing developers to write cleaner asynchronous code without worrying about compatibility issues.
  • async: Async provides a simple API for handling asynchronous operations, allowing developers to execute functions in series or parallel. It simplifies the management of callbacks and helps avoid callback hell by providing utility functions like `async.series` and `async.parallel`.
  • rxjs: RxJS introduces a reactive programming model, allowing developers to work with asynchronous data streams using observables. It provides powerful operators to manage and compose asynchronous events effectively.
  • core-js: Core-js does not specifically handle asynchronous control flow but provides polyfills for Promise and other ES6+ features, ensuring that your async code runs correctly in environments that lack support.
  • bluebird: Bluebird excels in asynchronous control flow with its Promise implementation, offering advanced features like `Promise.map` for parallel execution and `Promise.each` for sequential execution, making it ideal for complex workflows.
  • babel-runtime: Babel Runtime does not directly manage asynchronous control flow but ensures that your async/await code works seamlessly in older environments by providing necessary polyfills and helpers.

Polyfills and Compatibility

  • regenerator-runtime: Regenerator Runtime provides polyfills specifically for async/await syntax, ensuring that code using these features runs correctly in environments that do not support them natively.
  • async: Async does not provide polyfills but is designed for Node.js environments where callback patterns are prevalent.
  • rxjs: RxJS does not provide polyfills but is designed for modern JavaScript environments, leveraging ES6+ features to create reactive applications.
  • core-js: Core-js is a comprehensive polyfill library that covers a wide range of modern JavaScript features, making it indispensable for projects that need to support older browsers and environments.
  • bluebird: Bluebird does not serve as a polyfill but enhances native Promises with additional functionality, making it a robust choice for Promise management.
  • babel-runtime: Babel Runtime is essential for ensuring compatibility with older JavaScript environments, providing polyfills for features that may not be available natively, thus enabling the use of modern JavaScript syntax and features.

Learning Curve

  • regenerator-runtime: Regenerator Runtime is straightforward to use, especially for those familiar with async/await syntax, but understanding its role in transpilation may take some time for beginners.
  • async: Async has a relatively low learning curve, especially for developers familiar with Node.js and callback patterns. Its straightforward API allows for quick adoption.
  • rxjs: RxJS has a steep learning curve due to its unique reactive programming paradigm. Developers may need to invest time in understanding observables and operators to leverage its full potential.
  • core-js: Core-js is simple to use as a polyfill, but understanding which features to include for specific environments may require some knowledge of JavaScript versions.
  • bluebird: Bluebird has a moderate learning curve due to its extensive feature set. Developers may need time to fully grasp its advanced capabilities beyond native Promises.
  • babel-runtime: Babel Runtime is easy to integrate if you are already using Babel, but understanding its role in polyfilling and transpiling may require some familiarity with modern JavaScript features.

Performance

  • regenerator-runtime: Regenerator Runtime has a slight performance overhead due to the transformation of async functions, but it allows for cleaner code and better compatibility, which can enhance overall application performance.
  • async: Async is lightweight and optimized for performance in Node.js, making it suitable for handling multiple asynchronous operations efficiently without significant overhead.
  • rxjs: RxJS is designed for performance in reactive programming, but improper usage of observables can lead to memory leaks and performance issues. Proper management of subscriptions is crucial for maintaining performance.
  • core-js: Core-js may introduce some overhead due to its comprehensive polyfilling, but it ensures that your code runs consistently across different environments, which can be worth the trade-off.
  • bluebird: Bluebird is known for its high performance, often outperforming native Promises in complex scenarios due to its optimizations and advanced features.
  • babel-runtime: Babel Runtime's performance impact is minimal as it only adds necessary polyfills, ensuring that the transpiled code remains efficient and performant across environments.

Use Cases

  • regenerator-runtime: Regenerator Runtime is particularly useful in applications that utilize async/await syntax, allowing developers to write cleaner and more maintainable asynchronous code.
  • async: Async is ideal for Node.js applications that require simple control flow management for asynchronous tasks, such as file operations and API calls.
  • rxjs: RxJS is perfect for applications that require reactive programming, such as real-time data applications, event handling, and complex data flows.
  • core-js: Core-js is a go-to choice for projects that need to support a wide range of browsers and environments, ensuring that modern JavaScript features are available everywhere.
  • bluebird: Bluebird is best suited for applications that require advanced Promise handling, such as complex asynchronous workflows or when dealing with multiple asynchronous operations that need to be coordinated.
  • babel-runtime: Babel Runtime is essential for any project using Babel that needs to ensure compatibility with older environments while using modern JavaScript features.
How to Choose: regenerator-runtime vs async vs rxjs vs core-js vs bluebird vs babel-runtime
  • regenerator-runtime: Choose Regenerator Runtime if you are using async/await syntax and need to transpile your code for environments that do not support it natively. It allows you to write asynchronous code in a more synchronous style without worrying about compatibility issues.
  • async: Choose Async if you need a simple way to manage asynchronous control flow in Node.js, especially for tasks like parallel and series execution of functions. It's lightweight and straightforward for handling callbacks.
  • rxjs: Select RxJS if you are building applications that require reactive programming paradigms. It provides powerful tools for composing asynchronous and event-based programs using observable sequences, making it suitable for complex data flows.
  • core-js: Use Core-js for comprehensive polyfills of modern JavaScript features. It's essential when you need to support older browsers or environments that lack support for ES6+ features, ensuring your code runs smoothly across all platforms.
  • bluebird: Opt for Bluebird if you require a powerful Promise library with advanced features like cancellation, progress notifications, and performance optimizations. It's ideal for complex asynchronous workflows that demand more than native Promises can offer.
  • babel-runtime: Select Babel Runtime if you are using Babel to transpile your code and need to ensure compatibility with older environments. It provides the necessary polyfills and helpers for ES6+ features without polluting the global scope.
README for regenerator-runtime

regenerator-runtime

Standalone runtime for Regenerator-compiled generator and async functions.

To import the runtime as a module (recommended), either of the following import styles will work:

// CommonJS
const regeneratorRuntime = require("regenerator-runtime");

// ECMAScript 2015
import regeneratorRuntime from "regenerator-runtime";

To ensure that regeneratorRuntime is defined globally, either of the following styles will work:

// CommonJS
require("regenerator-runtime/runtime");

// ECMAScript 2015
import "regenerator-runtime/runtime.js";

To get the absolute file system path of runtime.js, evaluate the following expression:

require("regenerator-runtime/path").path