Which is Better JavaScript Testing Frameworks?
jest vs mocha vs jasmine vs ava
1 Year
jestmochajasmineavaSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Testing Frameworks?

JavaScript testing frameworks are essential tools for developers to ensure their code is functioning as intended. They provide a structured way to write and execute tests, helping to catch bugs early in the development process. These frameworks support various testing methodologies, including unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing. By using these frameworks, developers can automate the testing process, improve code quality, and facilitate continuous integration and deployment workflows.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
jest29,323,79244,2725.01 kB354a year agoMIT
mocha12,116,61422,6042.13 MB19015 days agoMIT
jasmine1,702,63538079.5 kB1a month agoMIT
ava307,89020,737282 kB6318 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: jest vs mocha vs jasmine vs ava

Test Execution

  • jest: Jest runs tests in parallel and intelligently watches for changes, executing only the tests related to modified files. This results in faster feedback and efficient test execution, especially in large codebases.
  • mocha: Mocha allows for both sequential and parallel test execution, depending on how it is configured. This flexibility enables developers to optimize test performance based on their specific needs.
  • jasmine: Jasmine executes tests sequentially, which can be beneficial for maintaining order in test execution but may lead to longer execution times for extensive test suites. It provides a clear structure for writing tests, making it easy to understand the flow of execution.
  • ava: AVA runs tests concurrently, which significantly speeds up the execution time, especially for large test suites. This feature allows developers to write tests that can be executed in parallel, leading to faster feedback loops during development.

Mocking and Spying

  • jest: Jest has a powerful built-in mocking library that allows for easy mocking of functions and modules. This feature is particularly useful for isolating components during testing and ensures that tests remain focused on specific functionality.
  • mocha: Mocha does not provide built-in mocking but allows developers to integrate any assertion library or mocking tool of their choice, such as Sinon. This flexibility enables developers to tailor their testing environment to their needs.
  • jasmine: Jasmine comes with built-in support for spies, allowing developers to easily mock functions and track their calls. This feature simplifies the process of testing interactions between components and functions.
  • ava: AVA does not include built-in mocking capabilities, encouraging developers to use external libraries for mocking. This can lead to a more modular approach but requires additional setup for complex testing scenarios.

Learning Curve

  • jest: Jest is designed to be easy to use, with a zero-config setup for most projects. Its rich documentation and community support help developers quickly learn and adopt its features.
  • mocha: Mocha's flexibility can lead to a steeper learning curve, as developers need to choose and integrate their preferred assertion library and mocking tools. However, its extensive documentation aids in overcoming this challenge.
  • jasmine: Jasmine's behavior-driven approach may require some initial learning, especially for those unfamiliar with BDD concepts. However, its clear syntax makes it accessible for new users after the initial adjustment.
  • ava: AVA has a relatively low learning curve due to its minimalistic API and straightforward syntax. Developers can quickly get started with writing tests without extensive configuration.

Community and Ecosystem

  • jest: Jest has a large and active community, particularly among React developers. Its extensive ecosystem includes numerous plugins and integrations, making it a go-to choice for many modern JavaScript applications.
  • mocha: Mocha has a well-established community and is widely used in the industry. Its flexibility allows for a variety of plugins and integrations, making it suitable for diverse testing needs.
  • jasmine: Jasmine has a long-standing presence in the JavaScript testing community, with a robust ecosystem of plugins and extensions. Its popularity ensures a wealth of resources and support for developers.
  • ava: AVA has a smaller community compared to others but is growing steadily. Its focus on simplicity and performance attracts developers looking for a lightweight solution.

Integration with CI/CD

  • jest: Jest is designed with CI/CD in mind, offering built-in support for running tests in continuous integration environments. Its fast execution and intelligent watch mode enhance the CI/CD experience.
  • mocha: Mocha is highly compatible with CI/CD tools and can be easily integrated into various workflows. Its flexibility allows developers to customize their testing approach based on their CI/CD needs.
  • jasmine: Jasmine can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, but may require additional configuration for optimal performance. Its straightforward setup allows for smooth integration with various tools.
  • ava: AVA integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, allowing for easy automation of tests. Its fast execution time makes it ideal for continuous integration workflows.
How to Choose: jest vs mocha vs jasmine vs ava
  • jest: Opt for Jest if you are looking for a robust testing framework that comes with a rich feature set, including a built-in mocking library, snapshot testing, and excellent performance. Jest is particularly well-suited for React applications and offers a zero-config setup for quick start.
  • mocha: Choose Mocha if you want a flexible testing framework that allows you to use any assertion library and mocking tool. It's ideal for projects that require a customizable testing environment and support for asynchronous testing.
  • jasmine: Select Jasmine if you need a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework that provides a rich syntax for writing tests. It's great for projects that require a comprehensive testing solution with built-in spies and mocks.
  • ava: Choose AVA if you prefer a minimalistic testing framework that runs tests concurrently, allowing for faster execution. It's particularly suited for projects that require a straightforward setup and a focus on simplicity and performance.
README for jest

Jest

🃏 Delightful JavaScript Testing

  • 👩🏻‍💻 Developer Ready: Complete and ready to set-up JavaScript testing solution. Works out of the box for any React project.

  • 🏃🏽 Instant Feedback: Failed tests run first. Fast interactive mode can switch between running all tests or only test files related to changed files.

  • 📸 Snapshot Testing: Jest can capture snapshots of React trees or other serializable values to simplify UI testing.

Read More: https://jestjs.io/