base-64 vs js-base64
Base64 Encoding Libraries
base-64js-base64Similar Packages:

Base64 Encoding Libraries

Base64 encoding libraries are essential tools in web development for encoding binary data into ASCII string format, which is particularly useful for transmitting data over media that are designed to deal with textual data. These libraries provide developers with the ability to easily encode and decode data, ensuring compatibility with various data formats and protocols. The primary purpose of these libraries is to facilitate the safe transmission of data, such as images or files, in environments that may not support binary data directly. Both 'base-64' and 'js-base64' serve this purpose but come with different features and design philosophies that may influence their selection based on specific project requirements.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend

3 Years

Github Stars Ranking

Stat Detail

Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
base-640519-125 years agoMIT
js-base6404,36739 kB118 months agoBSD-3-Clause

Feature Comparison: base-64 vs js-base64

Encoding/Decoding Functions

  • base-64:

    The 'base-64' package provides basic encoding and decoding functions that are straightforward to use. It focuses on performance and simplicity, allowing developers to quickly encode and decode strings without additional overhead.

  • js-base64:

    The 'js-base64' library offers a more extensive set of encoding and decoding functions, including support for both standard Base64 and URL-safe Base64 encoding. This makes it versatile for various applications, including web APIs and data storage.

UTF-8 Support

  • base-64:

    The 'base-64' library does not natively support UTF-8 encoding and decoding, which may limit its usability in applications that require handling of multi-byte characters.

  • js-base64:

    'js-base64' includes built-in support for UTF-8 encoding and decoding, making it a better choice for applications that need to handle internationalization or special character sets.

Size and Performance

  • base-64:

    Being a minimalistic library, 'base-64' has a smaller footprint and can be faster in scenarios where only basic Base64 functionality is required. It is optimized for performance with minimal dependencies.

  • js-base64:

    While 'js-base64' is slightly larger due to its additional features, it still maintains good performance. However, if size is a critical factor, 'base-64' may be the preferred option.

Browser Compatibility

  • base-64:

    The 'base-64' library is designed to work seamlessly across all modern browsers, ensuring that developers can rely on it for consistent behavior in web applications.

  • js-base64:

    'js-base64' also supports all modern browsers and includes polyfills for older browsers, making it a robust choice for applications that need to support a wider range of environments.

Documentation and Community Support

  • base-64:

    The documentation for 'base-64' is concise and focused, making it easy for developers to get started quickly. However, it may lack extensive community support due to its simplicity.

  • js-base64:

    'js-base64' has comprehensive documentation and a larger community, providing more resources, examples, and support for developers looking to implement Base64 encoding in their applications.

How to Choose: base-64 vs js-base64

  • base-64:

    Choose 'base-64' if you need a minimalistic library focused solely on Base64 encoding and decoding without additional dependencies. It is lightweight and straightforward, making it ideal for simple use cases.

  • js-base64:

    Choose 'js-base64' if you require a more feature-rich library that includes additional utilities for encoding and decoding, such as support for UTF-8 encoding and decoding. It is better suited for applications that need more comprehensive handling of character sets.

README for base-64

base64 Build status Code coverage status

base64 is a robust base64 encoder/decoder that is fully compatible with atob() and btoa(), written in JavaScript. The base64-encoding and -decoding algorithms it uses are fully RFC 4648 compliant.

Installation

Via npm:

npm install base-64

In a browser:

<script src="base64.js"></script>

In Narwhal, Node.js, and RingoJS:

var base64 = require('base-64');

In Rhino:

load('base64.js');

Using an AMD loader like RequireJS:

require(
  {
    'paths': {
      'base64': 'path/to/base64'
    }
  },
  ['base64'],
  function(base64) {
    console.log(base64);
  }
);

API

base64.version

A string representing the semantic version number.

base64.encode(input)

This function takes a byte string (the input parameter) and encodes it according to base64. The input data must be in the form of a string containing only characters in the range from U+0000 to U+00FF, each representing a binary byte with values 0x00 to 0xFF. The base64.encode() function is designed to be fully compatible with btoa() as described in the HTML Standard.

var encodedData = base64.encode(input);

To base64-encode any Unicode string, encode it as UTF-8 first:

var base64 = require('base-64');
var utf8 = require('utf8');

var text = 'foo © bar 𝌆 baz';
var bytes = utf8.encode(text);
var encoded = base64.encode(bytes);
console.log(encoded);
// → 'Zm9vIMKpIGJhciDwnYyGIGJheg=='

base64.decode(input)

This function takes a base64-encoded string (the input parameter) and decodes it. The return value is in the form of a string containing only characters in the range from U+0000 to U+00FF, each representing a binary byte with values 0x00 to 0xFF. The base64.decode() function is designed to be fully compatible with atob() as described in the HTML Standard.

var decodedData = base64.decode(encodedData);

To base64-decode UTF-8-encoded data back into a Unicode string, UTF-8-decode it after base64-decoding it:

var encoded = 'Zm9vIMKpIGJhciDwnYyGIGJheg==';
var bytes = base64.decode(encoded);
var text = utf8.decode(bytes);
console.log(text);
// → 'foo © bar 𝌆 baz'

Support

base64 is designed to work in at least Node.js v0.10.0, Narwhal 0.3.2, RingoJS 0.8-0.9, PhantomJS 1.9.0, Rhino 1.7RC4, as well as old and modern versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera, and Internet Explorer.

Unit tests & code coverage

After cloning this repository, run npm install to install the dependencies needed for development and testing. You may want to install Istanbul globally using npm install istanbul -g.

Once that’s done, you can run the unit tests in Node using npm test or node tests/tests.js. To run the tests in Rhino, Ringo, Narwhal, and web browsers as well, use grunt test.

To generate the code coverage report, use grunt cover.

Author

twitter/mathias
Mathias Bynens

License

base64 is available under the MIT license.