react-icons vs font-awesome vs bootstrap-icons vs material-icons vs feather-icons vs heroicons vs octicons
Icon Libraries for Modern Web Applications
react-iconsfont-awesomebootstrap-iconsmaterial-iconsfeather-iconsheroiconsocticonsSimilar Packages:
Icon Libraries for Modern Web Applications

bootstrap-icons, feather-icons, font-awesome, heroicons, material-icons, octicons, and react-icons are popular npm packages that provide scalable vector icons for web applications. These libraries differ in design language, delivery mechanism (icon fonts vs inline SVG), and integration patterns (especially in React). react-icons serves as a meta-package that wraps multiple icon libraries into a consistent React component API, while others like heroicons and octicons offer first-party React components. All modern implementations favor inline SVG for better performance, styling control, and accessibility compared to legacy icon font approaches.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
react-icons4,873,44512,45486.2 MB233a year agoMIT
font-awesome888,51876,229-3039 years ago(OFL-1.1 AND MIT)
bootstrap-icons499,7257,8622.99 MB4648 months agoMIT
material-icons227,3383582.23 MB13a year agoApache-2.0
feather-icons142,15425,784625 kB5062 years agoMIT
heroicons54,51823,253700 kB0a year agoMIT
octicons8,7708,638-27 years agoMIT

Icon Libraries in Modern Frontend Development: A Technical Deep Dive

When building user interfaces, icons are essential for visual communication, navigation cues, and aesthetic polish. The JavaScript ecosystem offers several popular icon libraries via npm, each with distinct philosophies, delivery mechanisms, and integration patterns. This comparison focuses on bootstrap-icons, feather-icons, font-awesome, heroicons, material-icons, octicons, and the meta-package react-icons — examining how they work under the hood, how they integrate into component-based apps, and what trade-offs they impose on your architecture.

📦 Delivery Mechanism: Fonts vs SVGs vs React Components

The fundamental architectural decision across these libraries is how icons are delivered and rendered. This choice affects bundle size, customization, accessibility, and performance.

Font-Based Icons (Legacy Approach)

font-awesome and material-icons historically shipped as icon fonts. While still supported, both now offer modern SVG alternatives.

// font-awesome (font-based - legacy)
// Requires CSS import and <i> tags
import '@fortawesome/fontawesome-free/css/all.css';

// In JSX:
<i className="fas fa-user"></i>
<!-- material-icons (font-based) -->
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/icon?family=Material+Icons" rel="stylesheet">
<span class="material-icons">account_circle</span>

Font-based icons suffer from FOIT/FOUT (flash of invisible/unstyled text), limited styling control (can’t recolor parts of an icon), and accessibility issues (screen readers may read icon names as text). Most teams should avoid this approach in new projects.

Inline SVGs (Modern Standard)

All libraries now support inline SVG, which gives full control over styling, animation, and accessibility. However, integration differs:

  • bootstrap-icons, feather-icons, heroicons, octicons provide raw SVG files or pre-built components.
  • react-icons wraps multiple libraries (including many above) as ready-to-use React components.
// bootstrap-icons (as React component via react-icons)
import { BsFillPersonFill } from 'react-icons/bs';

function App() {
  return <BsFillPersonFill color="blue" size="24px" />;
}
// feather-icons (direct SVG import)
import { User } from 'feather-icons';

// Feather returns an SVG string, not a React component
const svgString = User.toSvg({ width: 24, height: 24 });
// You'd need to dangerouslySetInnerHTML or convert to JSX
// heroicons (official React components)
import { UserIcon } from '@heroicons/react/24/solid';

function App() {
  return <UserIcon className="text-blue-500 w-6 h-6" />;
}
// octicons (official React components)
import { PersonIcon } from '@primer/octicons-react';

function App() {
  return <PersonIcon size={24} verticalAlign="middle" />;
}

⚙️ Integration Patterns: Direct Import vs Meta-Wrappers

How you consume icons has major implications for tree-shaking, bundle size, and DX.

Direct Library Usage

Libraries like heroicons, octicons, and bootstrap-icons (via its own package) offer first-party React components. This means:

  • Full TypeScript support
  • Optimized for tree-shaking (only imported icons are bundled)
  • Consistent props API
// heroicons: direct import
import { HomeIcon, UserIcon } from '@heroicons/react/24/outline';

// Only HomeIcon and UserIcon are included in bundle

Meta-Wrappers: react-icons

react-icons is not an icon set — it’s a wrapper that converts SVG paths from dozens of libraries (including fa, io, md, bs, etc.) into React components.

// react-icons: unified syntax across libraries
import { FaUser, IoMdHome, MdAccountCircle } from 'react-icons';

// Each icon is a standalone component with `color`, `size`, `className` props

Pros:

  • One consistent API across icon sets
  • No need to learn different import patterns

Cons:

  • Slight abstraction overhead
  • May lag behind upstream library updates
  • Larger install size (bundles many icon sets, though tree-shaking still works per-icon)

🎨 Styling and Customization

How easily can you change an icon’s appearance?

CSS Classes vs Props

  • heroicons, octicons: Styled via className (tailwind-friendly) or inline styles.
  • react-icons: Uses color, size, className props.
  • feather-icons: Requires manual SVG manipulation or use of helper functions.
// heroicons: style with Tailwind classes
<UserIcon className="text-indigo-600 hover:text-indigo-800 w-5 h-5" />

// react-icons: style with props
<FaUser color="#4f46e5" size="1.25rem" />

// feather-icons: requires conversion to JSX or string injection
const userSvg = User.toString(); // raw SVG string
// Then use with dangerouslySetInnerHTML (not ideal for React)

Stroke vs Fill Semantics

  • feather-icons: Designed with stroke-based outlines. Hard to fill solid.
  • heroicons: Offers both outline (stroke) and solid (fill) variants.
  • bootstrap-icons, font-awesome: Primarily filled shapes.

This matters if your design system requires consistent visual treatment (e.g., all icons must be outline-style).

🌐 Accessibility Considerations

All modern SVG implementations support accessibility when used correctly:

// Good: include aria-hidden and title
<UserIcon aria-hidden="true" />
<span className="sr-only">User profile</span>

// Or use title prop if supported
<PersonIcon title="User profile" />

However:

  • feather-icons (as raw SVG strings) require manual aria-label addition.
  • Font-based icons often fail accessibility audits unless carefully managed.

🧩 Real-World Integration Scenarios

Scenario 1: Design System with Strict Visual Language

You’re using Tailwind CSS and need outline-style icons that match your brand.

  • Best choice: heroicons (outline variant)
  • Why? First-party React components, built by Tailwind Labs, perfect visual harmony.
import { BellIcon } from '@heroicons/react/24/outline';

function NotificationBell() {
  return <BellIcon className="w-6 h-6 text-gray-700" />;
}

Scenario 2: Multi-Team App Using Mixed Icon Sources

Your company uses Font Awesome internally but also needs GitHub-style icons.

  • Best choice: react-icons
  • Why? Unified import syntax for FaGithub, FaUser, GoRepo, etc.
import { FaUser, FaGithub, GoRepo } from 'react-icons';

// Consistent usage across teams

Scenario 3: Lightweight Admin Dashboard

You need minimal bundle impact and only 10–15 icons.

  • Best choice: Direct import from bootstrap-icons or heroicons
  • Why? No wrapper overhead; only used icons are bundled.
// Only these two icons are included
import { GearFill, Speedometer } from 'bootstrap-icons';

Scenario 4: Legacy Project Migrating from Icon Fonts

You’re upgrading a jQuery app that used Font Awesome 4.

  • Best choice: font-awesome with SVG + JS method
  • Why? Official migration path; supports same icon names.
// font-awesome modern (SVG with JS)
import { library } from '@fortawesome/fontawesome-svg-core';
import { faUser } from '@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons';
import { FontAwesomeIcon } from '@fortawesome/react-fontawesome';

library.add(faUser);

// Use as <FontAwesomeIcon icon="user" />

🚫 Deprecated or Problematic Patterns

  • Avoid font-based delivery for new projects. All libraries now support superior SVG methods.
  • Don’t use feather-icons directly in React without converting to components — the string-based API doesn’t play well with React’s declarative model. Consider react-icons/fi instead.
  • material-icons font method is discouraged; use @material-design-icons/svg or react-icons/md for inline SVG.

📊 Summary Table

PackageBest ForReact Components?Styling MethodTree-Shakable
bootstrap-iconsBootstrap-aligned projects✅ (via own pkg or react-icons)className / props
feather-iconsSimple, clean line icons❌ (raw SVG strings)Manual SVG⚠️ (with effort)
font-awesomeLegacy migration, vast icon set✅ (modern SVG)Props / CSS
heroiconsTailwind projects, design-system consistency✅ (first-party)className
material-iconsMaterial Design adherence✅ (via react-icons or official SVG)className
octiconsGitHub-like UIs, developer tools✅ (first-party)Props
react-iconsUnified API across multiple icon libraries✅ (wrapper)Props (color, size)

💡 Final Recommendation

  • For new React apps using Tailwind: Start with heroicons.
  • Need icons from multiple design systems: Use react-icons for consistency.
  • Migrating from Font Awesome: Adopt font-awesome’s SVG + React method.
  • Building a GitHub-like product: octicons is purpose-built for that aesthetic.
  • Avoid raw feather-icons in React — opt for the react-icons/fi wrapper instead.

Choose based on your design system alignment, team familiarity, and whether you value a single unified API (react-icons) versus first-party optimized components (heroicons, octicons). In 2024, inline SVG via React components is the standard — any solution not offering this should be considered legacy.

How to Choose: react-icons vs font-awesome vs bootstrap-icons vs material-icons vs feather-icons vs heroicons vs octicons
  • react-icons:

    Choose react-icons if you need to combine icons from multiple libraries (e.g., Font Awesome + Bootstrap Icons) under a single, consistent React component API. It simplifies imports and styling across icon sets but adds a thin abstraction layer. Ideal for design systems that haven't standardized on one icon family or multi-team projects with mixed icon preferences.

  • font-awesome:

    Choose font-awesome if you need the largest selection of icons (1,800+ free icons) or are migrating from a legacy implementation. Use its modern SVG + React method, not icon fonts. Suitable for content-rich applications like CMS backends or marketing sites where icon variety outweighs strict design-system consistency.

  • bootstrap-icons:

    Choose bootstrap-icons if you're already using Bootstrap or need a large, versatile icon set with filled and outlined variants. It offers first-party React components and works well with react-icons for a unified API. Ideal for enterprise dashboards or admin panels where visual consistency with Bootstrap is important.

  • material-icons:

    Choose material-icons if your application follows Google's Material Design guidelines. Prefer the inline SVG method (via @material-design-icons/svg or react-icons/md) over the legacy font approach. Best for Android-centric apps, enterprise tools with Material theming, or when compliance with Material specs is required.

  • feather-icons:

    Choose feather-icons if you prefer minimalist, stroke-based line icons with a consistent 2px stroke weight. However, avoid using it directly in React projects — instead, consume it via react-icons/fi to get proper React components. Best for clean, simple UIs where lightweight aesthetics matter more than visual variety.

  • heroicons:

    Choose heroicons if you're using Tailwind CSS or value tight integration with a modern design system. It provides both outline and solid variants as first-party React components, excellent TypeScript support, and perfect visual harmony with Tailwind-based UIs. Ideal for startups, SaaS products, and design-focused applications.

  • octicons:

    Choose octicons if you're building developer tools, GitHub integrations, or products targeting technical users. It ships with first-party React components, strong TypeScript support, and a distinctive, functional aesthetic. Perfect for code editors, CI/CD dashboards, or any GitHub-native experience.

README for react-icons
React Icons

React Icons

npm

Include popular icons in your React projects easily with react-icons, which utilizes ES6 imports that allows you to include only the icons that your project is using.

Installation (for standard modern project)

yarn add react-icons
# or
npm install react-icons --save

example usage

import { FaBeer } from "react-icons/fa";

function Question() {
  return (
    <h3>
      Lets go for a <FaBeer />?
    </h3>
  );
}

View the documentation for further usage examples and how to use icons from other packages. NOTE: each Icon package has it's own subfolder under react-icons you import from.

For example, to use an icon from Material Design, your import would be: import { ICON_NAME } from 'react-icons/md';

Installation (for meteorjs, gatsbyjs, etc)

Note This option has not had a new release for some time. More info https://github.com/react-icons/react-icons/issues/593

If your project grows in size, this option is available. This method has the trade-off that it takes a long time to install the package.

yarn add @react-icons/all-files
# or
npm install @react-icons/all-files --save

example usage

import { FaBeer } from "@react-icons/all-files/fa/FaBeer";

function Question() {
  return (
    <h3>
      Lets go for a <FaBeer />?
    </h3>
  );
}

Icons

Icon LibraryLicenseVersionCount
Circum IconsMPL-2.0 license1.0.0288
Font Awesome 5CC BY 4.0 License5.15.4-3-gafecf2a1612
Font Awesome 6CC BY 4.0 License6.5.22045
Ionicons 4MIT4.6.3696
Ionicons 5MIT5.5.41332
Material Design iconsApache License Version 2.04.0.0-98-g9beae745bb4341
TypiconsCC BY-SA 3.02.1.2336
Github Octicons iconsMIT18.3.0264
FeatherMIT4.29.1287
LucideISCv5.1.0-6-g438f572e1215
Game IconsCC BY 3.012920d6565588f0512542a3cb0cdfd36a497f9104040
Weather IconsSIL OFL 1.12.0.12219
DeviconsMIT1.8.0192
Ant Design IconsMIT4.4.2831
Bootstrap IconsMIT1.11.32716
Remix IconApache License Version 2.04.2.02860
Flat Color IconsMIT1.0.2329
Grommet-IconsApache License Version 2.04.12.1635
HeroiconsMIT1.0.6460
Heroicons 2MIT2.1.3888
Simple IconsCC0 1.0 Universal12.14.03209
Simple Line IconsMIT2.5.5189
IcoMoon FreeCC BY 4.0 Licensed006795ede82361e1bac1ee76f215cf1dc51e4ca491
BoxIconsMIT2.1.41634
css.ggMIT2.1.1704
VS Code IconsCC BY 4.00.0.35461
Tabler IconsMIT3.2.05237
Themify IconsMITv0.1.2-2-g9600186352
Radix IconsMIT@radix-ui/react-icons@1.3.0-1-g94b3fcf318
Phosphor IconsMIT2.1.19072
Icons8 Line AwesomeMIT1.3.11544

You can add more icons by submitting pull requests or creating issues.

Configuration

You can configure react-icons props using React Context API.

Requires React 16.3 or higher.

import { IconContext } from "react-icons";

<IconContext.Provider value={{ color: "blue", className: "global-class-name" }}>
  <div>
    <FaFolder />
  </div>
</IconContext.Provider>;
KeyDefaultNotes
colorundefined (inherit)
size1em
classNameundefined
styleundefinedCan overwrite size and color
attrundefinedOverwritten by other attributes
titleundefinedIcon description for accessibility

Migrating from version 2 -> 3

Change import style

Import path has changed. You need to rewrite from the old style.

// OLD IMPORT STYLE
import FaBeer from "react-icons/lib/fa/beer";

function Question() {
  return (
    <h3>
      Lets go for a <FaBeer />?
    </h3>
  );
}
// NEW IMPORT STYLE
import { FaBeer } from "react-icons/fa";

function Question() {
  return (
    <h3>
      Lets go for a <FaBeer />?
    </h3>
  );
}

Ending up with a large JS bundle? Check out this issue.

Adjustment CSS

From version 3, vertical-align: middle is not automatically given. Please use IconContext to specify className or specify an inline style.

Global Inline Styling

<IconContext.Provider value={{ style: { verticalAlign: 'middle' } }}>

Global className Styling

Component

<IconContext.Provider value={{ className: 'react-icons' }}>

CSS

.react-icons {
  vertical-align: middle;
}

TypeScript native support

Dependencies on @types/react-icons can be deleted.

Yarn

yarn remove @types/react-icons

NPM

npm remove @types/react-icons

Contributing

./build-script.sh will build the whole project. See also CI scripts for more information.

Development

yarn
cd packages/react-icons
yarn fetch  # fetch icon sources
yarn build

Add/Update icon set

First, check the discussion to see if anyone would like to add an icon set.

https://github.com/react-icons/react-icons/discussions/categories/new-icon-set

The SVG files to be fetched are managed in this file. Edit this file and run yarn fetch && yarn check && yarn build.

https://github.com/react-icons/react-icons/blob/master/packages/react-icons/src/icons/index.ts

Preview

Note The project is not actively accepting PR for the preview site at this time.

The preview site is the react-icons website, built in Astro+React.

cd packages/react-icons
yarn fetch
yarn build

cd ../preview-astro
yarn start

Demo

The demo is a Create React App boilerplate with react-icons added as a dependency for easy testing.

cd packages/react-icons
yarn fetch
yarn build

cd ../demo
yarn start

Why React SVG components instead of fonts?

SVG is supported by all major browsers. With react-icons, you can serve only the needed icons instead of one big font file to the users, helping you to recognize which icons are used in your project.

Related Projects

Licence

MIT

  • Icons are taken from the other projects so please check each project licences accordingly.