rollup vs webpack vs browserify vs parcel
JavaScript Module Bundlers Comparison
1 Year
rollupwebpackbrowserifyparcelSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Module Bundlers?

JavaScript module bundlers are tools that compile and package JavaScript files and their dependencies into a single file or a few files for deployment. They help manage the complexity of modern web applications by allowing developers to write modular code while optimizing it for performance. Each bundler has its own strengths and weaknesses, making it crucial for developers to choose the right one based on their project requirements and development workflow.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
rollup25,627,67125,5162.61 MB5865 days agoMIT
webpack25,484,88364,9525.21 MB245a month agoMIT
browserify1,388,37014,638363 kB3953 months agoMIT
parcel177,41343,58243.9 kB639a month agoMIT
Feature Comparison: rollup vs webpack vs browserify vs parcel

Bundling Approach

  • rollup:

    Rollup focuses on ES module syntax and leverages tree-shaking to eliminate unused code, resulting in smaller and more efficient bundles. It is particularly effective for libraries and applications that benefit from modular architecture.

  • webpack:

    Webpack provides a highly configurable bundling system that supports various module formats, including CommonJS, AMD, and ES modules. It allows for complex configurations to optimize the build process and manage assets like images and stylesheets.

  • browserify:

    Browserify bundles JavaScript files using the CommonJS module system, allowing you to write modular code in Node.js style. It transforms your code into a format that can run in the browser, making it easy to manage dependencies.

  • parcel:

    Parcel employs a zero-configuration approach, automatically detecting file types and dependencies. It uses a file-based system to bundle assets, which simplifies the development process and speeds up the initial setup.

Performance Optimization

  • rollup:

    Rollup excels in performance optimization through its tree-shaking feature, which eliminates dead code from the final bundle. This results in smaller file sizes and faster load times, making it ideal for performance-critical applications.

  • webpack:

    Webpack offers extensive performance optimization options, including code splitting, lazy loading, and asset management. Its plugin system allows developers to customize the build process for maximum efficiency.

  • browserify:

    Browserify can lead to larger bundle sizes due to its approach to module resolution. However, it can be optimized using techniques like code splitting and minification to improve load times.

  • parcel:

    Parcel is designed for speed, utilizing multi-core processing to optimize build times. It automatically applies performance enhancements, such as caching and parallel processing, to ensure efficient bundling.

Configuration Complexity

  • rollup:

    Rollup requires some configuration to take full advantage of its features, especially for projects that need to manage multiple entry points or output formats. However, its configuration is generally simpler compared to Webpack.

  • webpack:

    Webpack has a steep learning curve due to its extensive configuration options. While it offers powerful features, the complexity can be overwhelming for newcomers, requiring a deeper understanding of its ecosystem.

  • browserify:

    Browserify is relatively easy to set up, requiring minimal configuration. However, it may lack some advanced features found in other bundlers, which could limit its use in complex projects.

  • parcel:

    Parcel's zero-configuration setup makes it incredibly user-friendly, allowing developers to get started quickly without dealing with intricate configuration files. This is particularly beneficial for beginners or small projects.

Ecosystem and Community

  • rollup:

    Rollup has a strong community focused on library development and ES modules. Its ecosystem includes various plugins that enhance its functionality, making it a preferred choice for developers creating reusable components.

  • webpack:

    Webpack boasts one of the largest ecosystems among bundlers, with a vast array of plugins and loaders available. Its strong community support ensures that developers can find resources, tutorials, and solutions to common problems.

  • browserify:

    Browserify has a smaller ecosystem compared to other bundlers, but it integrates well with existing Node.js modules and has a dedicated community. It may not receive as many updates or new features as more popular tools.

  • parcel:

    Parcel is gaining popularity rapidly, and its community is growing. It has a decent ecosystem of plugins and integrations, making it a good choice for developers looking for modern tooling without the complexity.

Use Case Suitability

  • rollup:

    Rollup is best for library authors and projects that prioritize performance and modularity. Its ability to produce optimized bundles with tree-shaking makes it ideal for creating reusable components and libraries.

  • webpack:

    Webpack is the go-to choice for large-scale applications that require advanced features like code splitting, asset management, and a highly customizable build process. It is suitable for complex projects with multiple dependencies and assets.

  • browserify:

    Browserify is well-suited for projects that primarily use CommonJS modules and require a straightforward bundling solution. It is ideal for smaller applications or those transitioning from Node.js to the browser.

  • parcel:

    Parcel is perfect for rapid prototyping and smaller projects where ease of use and speed are priorities. Its automatic handling of file types and dependencies makes it an excellent choice for developers looking to minimize setup time.

How to Choose: rollup vs webpack vs browserify vs parcel
  • rollup:

    Choose Rollup if you need to create libraries or applications with a focus on ES modules. Its tree-shaking capabilities allow for efficient code elimination, making it perfect for projects that prioritize performance and smaller bundle sizes.

  • webpack:

    Choose Webpack for its powerful configuration options and extensive plugin ecosystem. It is best suited for large-scale applications that require advanced features like code splitting, lazy loading, and asset management.

  • browserify:

    Choose Browserify if you are looking for a straightforward solution to bundle CommonJS modules for the browser. It is ideal for projects that heavily utilize Node.js-style module syntax and require minimal configuration.

  • parcel:

    Choose Parcel for its zero-configuration setup and fast build times. It is suitable for smaller projects or prototypes where rapid development is essential, as it automatically handles file transformations and optimizations without requiring extensive configuration.

README for rollup

npm version node compatibility install size code coverage backers sponsors license Join the chat at https://is.gd/rollup_chat

Rollup

Overview

Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the standardized ES module format for code, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD. ES modules let you freely and seamlessly combine the most useful individual functions from your favorite libraries. Rollup can optimize ES modules for faster native loading in modern browsers, or output a legacy module format allowing ES module workflows today.

Quick Start Guide

Install with npm install --global rollup. Rollup can be used either through a command line interface with an optional configuration file or else through its JavaScript API. Run rollup --help to see the available options and parameters. The starter project templates, rollup-starter-lib and rollup-starter-app, demonstrate common configuration options, and more detailed instructions are available throughout the user guide.

Commands

These commands assume the entry point to your application is named main.js, and that you'd like all imports compiled into a single file named bundle.js.

For browsers:

# compile to a <script> containing a self-executing function
rollup main.js --format iife --name "myBundle" --file bundle.js

For Node.js:

# compile to a CommonJS module
rollup main.js --format cjs --file bundle.js

For both browsers and Node.js:

# UMD format requires a bundle name
rollup main.js --format umd --name "myBundle" --file bundle.js

Why

Developing software is usually easier if you break your project into smaller separate pieces, since that often removes unexpected interactions and dramatically reduces the complexity of the problems you'll need to solve, and simply writing smaller projects in the first place isn't necessarily the answer. Unfortunately, JavaScript has not historically included this capability as a core feature in the language.

This finally changed with ES modules support in JavaScript, which provides a syntax for importing and exporting functions and data so they can be shared between separate scripts. Most browsers and Node.js support ES modules. However, Node.js releases before 12.17 support ES modules only behind the --experimental-modules flag, and older browsers like Internet Explorer do not support ES modules at all. Rollup allows you to write your code using ES modules, and run your application even in environments that do not support ES modules natively. For environments that support them, Rollup can output optimized ES modules; for environments that don't, Rollup can compile your code to other formats such as CommonJS modules, AMD modules, and IIFE-style scripts. This means that you get to write future-proof code, and you also get the tremendous benefits of...

Tree Shaking

In addition to enabling the use of ES modules, Rollup also statically analyzes and optimizes the code you are importing, and will exclude anything that isn't actually used. This allows you to build on top of existing tools and modules without adding extra dependencies or bloating the size of your project.

For example, with CommonJS, the entire tool or library must be imported.

// import the entire utils object with CommonJS
var utils = require('node:utils');
var query = 'Rollup';
// use the ajax method of the utils object
utils.ajax('https://api.example.com?search=' + query).then(handleResponse);

But with ES modules, instead of importing the whole utils object, we can just import the one ajax function we need:

// import the ajax function with an ES import statement
import { ajax } from 'node:utils';

var query = 'Rollup';
// call the ajax function
ajax('https://api.example.com?search=' + query).then(handleResponse);

Because Rollup includes the bare minimum, it results in lighter, faster, and less complicated libraries and applications. Since this approach is based on explicit import and export statements, it is vastly more effective than simply running an automated minifier to detect unused variables in the compiled output code.

Compatibility

Importing CommonJS

Rollup can import existing CommonJS modules through a plugin.

Publishing ES Modules

To make sure your ES modules are immediately usable by tools that work with CommonJS such as Node.js and webpack, you can use Rollup to compile to UMD or CommonJS format, and then point to that compiled version with the main property in your package.json file. If your package.json file also has a module field, ES-module-aware tools like Rollup and webpack will import the ES module version directly.

Contributors

This project exists thanks to all the people who contribute. [Contribute]. . If you want to contribute yourself, head over to the contribution guidelines.

Backers

Thank you to all our backers! 🙏 [Become a backer]

Sponsors

Support this project by becoming a sponsor. Your logo will show up here with a link to your website. [Become a sponsor]

Special Sponsor

TNG Logo

TNG has been supporting the work of Lukas Taegert-Atkinson on Rollup since 2017.

License

MIT