chokidar vs watchpack vs sane vs gaze vs node-watch
File Watching Libraries Comparison
1 Year
chokidarwatchpacksanegazenode-watchSimilar Packages:
What's File Watching Libraries?

File watching libraries are tools used in Node.js applications to monitor file system changes. They allow developers to automatically trigger actions in response to file modifications, such as recompiling assets, reloading servers, or running tests. These libraries are essential for improving development workflows by providing real-time feedback and reducing the need for manual intervention when files change.

npm Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
chokidar67,728,38211,209149 kB242 months agoMIT
watchpack29,375,05238156.4 kB146 months agoMIT
sane5,536,618387-344 years agoMIT
gaze2,737,3731,153-697 years agoMIT
node-watch624,44934126.1 kB62 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: chokidar vs watchpack vs sane vs gaze vs node-watch

Performance

  • chokidar:

    Chokidar is optimized for performance and can watch thousands of files with minimal resource consumption. It uses native file system events when available, which makes it faster and more efficient than polling-based solutions.

  • watchpack:

    Watchpack is built for performance in complex applications, particularly in build systems. It efficiently tracks file changes and dependencies, making it suitable for large-scale projects.

  • sane:

    Sane is designed to be efficient and can handle a significant number of files without excessive resource usage. It employs a combination of polling and native events to balance performance and reliability.

  • gaze:

    Gaze is relatively performant for small to medium-sized projects. However, it may not scale as well as Chokidar when monitoring a large number of files, as it relies on polling for file changes, which can introduce latency.

  • node-watch:

    Node-watch is lightweight and performs adequately for smaller projects. Its simplicity comes at the cost of performance in larger applications, where it may struggle with high-frequency file changes.

Ease of Use

  • chokidar:

    Chokidar provides a user-friendly API that makes it easy to set up and configure file watching. Its extensive documentation and community support further enhance its usability for developers.

  • watchpack:

    Watchpack is more complex due to its advanced features, but it provides a powerful API for those who need detailed control over file watching. It may require a bit more effort to learn compared to simpler libraries.

  • sane:

    Sane features a clean and intuitive API, making it easy to implement in various projects. Its straightforward configuration helps developers quickly set up file watching without unnecessary complexity.

  • gaze:

    Gaze offers a simple API that allows developers to quickly start watching files using glob patterns. This ease of use makes it a good choice for beginners or for quick implementations.

  • node-watch:

    Node-watch is straightforward and easy to integrate into existing Node.js applications. Its minimalistic design allows developers to get started quickly without a steep learning curve.

File System Events Handling

  • chokidar:

    Chokidar excels in handling file system events, utilizing native file system notifications when available. This results in immediate responses to file changes, making it highly responsive and efficient.

  • watchpack:

    Watchpack is designed to handle complex file system events and dependencies, making it suitable for intricate build processes. It provides detailed tracking of file changes and their relationships.

  • sane:

    Sane combines polling and native file system events, offering a balanced approach to file change detection. This allows it to efficiently monitor files while minimizing latency.

  • gaze:

    Gaze primarily relies on polling for file changes, which can introduce delays in detecting modifications. While it supports file system events, its performance may not match that of Chokidar.

  • node-watch:

    Node-watch uses a polling mechanism to detect changes, which can lead to latency in response times. It is less efficient than Chokidar in environments with frequent file updates.

Use Cases

  • chokidar:

    Chokidar is ideal for production environments, build tools, and applications that require real-time file watching with high reliability. It is commonly used in development servers and asset compilation workflows.

  • watchpack:

    Watchpack is tailored for advanced build systems and applications that need detailed file change tracking. It is frequently used in conjunction with tools like Webpack to manage complex asset pipelines.

  • sane:

    Sane is well-suited for projects that require monitoring multiple directories and files efficiently. It is commonly used in development environments where performance and responsiveness are critical.

  • gaze:

    Gaze is best suited for smaller projects or scripts where simple file watching is needed without the overhead of complex configurations. It is often used in tasks like live reloading during development.

  • node-watch:

    Node-watch is a good fit for lightweight applications or simple scripts that need basic file watching capabilities. It is often used in quick prototypes or smaller Node.js applications.

Community and Support

  • chokidar:

    Chokidar has a large and active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. This makes it easier for developers to find help and resources when needed.

  • watchpack:

    Watchpack is part of the Webpack ecosystem, benefiting from a strong community and extensive documentation. It is well-supported due to its integration with popular build tools.

  • sane:

    Sane has a growing community, and while it offers good documentation, it may not be as extensive as that of Chokidar. Users can find support through GitHub issues and discussions.

  • gaze:

    Gaze has a smaller community compared to Chokidar, but it still offers decent documentation and examples. It may not have as much support for complex use cases.

  • node-watch:

    Node-watch has a modest community and documentation, which may limit the availability of resources for troubleshooting or advanced usage scenarios.

How to Choose: chokidar vs watchpack vs sane vs gaze vs node-watch
  • chokidar:

    Choose Chokidar if you need a highly efficient and reliable file watcher that can handle large numbers of files with minimal overhead. It is well-suited for production environments due to its performance and robustness, particularly in scenarios where file changes are frequent.

  • watchpack:

    Use Watchpack if you are building a more complex application that requires advanced file watching capabilities, such as dependency tracking and integration with build tools. It is designed for use in larger systems like Webpack, making it a good choice for sophisticated build processes.

  • sane:

    Consider Sane if you need a file watcher that can handle a large number of files efficiently while providing a simple API. It is particularly useful for projects that require monitoring multiple directories and files without significant performance hits.

  • gaze:

    Select Gaze if you require a simple and straightforward file watching solution that supports glob patterns. It is ideal for smaller projects or when you want to quickly set up file watching without the need for advanced features or configurations.

  • node-watch:

    Opt for Node-watch if you prefer a lightweight and minimalistic approach to file watching. It is easy to use and integrates well with existing Node.js applications, making it suitable for quick setups or small-scale projects.

README for chokidar

Chokidar Weekly downloads

Minimal and efficient cross-platform file watching library

Why?

There are many reasons to prefer Chokidar to raw fs.watch / fs.watchFile in 2024:

  • Events are properly reported
    • macOS events report filenames
    • events are not reported twice
    • changes are reported as add / change / unlink instead of useless rename
  • Atomic writes are supported, using atomic option
    • Some file editors use them
  • Chunked writes are supported, using awaitWriteFinish option
    • Large files are commonly written in chunks
  • File / dir filtering is supported
  • Symbolic links are supported
  • Recursive watching is always supported, instead of partial when using raw events
    • Includes a way to limit recursion depth

Chokidar relies on the Node.js core fs module, but when using fs.watch and fs.watchFile for watching, it normalizes the events it receives, often checking for truth by getting file stats and/or dir contents. The fs.watch-based implementation is the default, which avoids polling and keeps CPU usage down. Be advised that chokidar will initiate watchers recursively for everything within scope of the paths that have been specified, so be judicious about not wasting system resources by watching much more than needed. For some cases, fs.watchFile, which utilizes polling and uses more resources, is used.

Made for Brunch in 2012, it is now used in ~30 million repositories and has proven itself in production environments.

Sep 2024 update: v4 is out! It decreases dependency count from 13 to 1, removes support for globs, adds support for ESM / Common.js modules, and bumps minimum node.js version from v8 to v14. Check out upgrading.

Getting started

Install with npm:

npm install chokidar

Use it in your code:

import chokidar from 'chokidar';

// One-liner for current directory
chokidar.watch('.').on('all', (event, path) => {
  console.log(event, path);
});


// Extended options
// ----------------

// Initialize watcher.
const watcher = chokidar.watch('file, dir, or array', {
  ignored: (path, stats) => stats?.isFile() && !path.endsWith('.js'), // only watch js files
  persistent: true
});

// Something to use when events are received.
const log = console.log.bind(console);
// Add event listeners.
watcher
  .on('add', path => log(`File ${path} has been added`))
  .on('change', path => log(`File ${path} has been changed`))
  .on('unlink', path => log(`File ${path} has been removed`));

// More possible events.
watcher
  .on('addDir', path => log(`Directory ${path} has been added`))
  .on('unlinkDir', path => log(`Directory ${path} has been removed`))
  .on('error', error => log(`Watcher error: ${error}`))
  .on('ready', () => log('Initial scan complete. Ready for changes'))
  .on('raw', (event, path, details) => { // internal
    log('Raw event info:', event, path, details);
  });

// 'add', 'addDir' and 'change' events also receive stat() results as second
// argument when available: https://nodejs.org/api/fs.html#fs_class_fs_stats
watcher.on('change', (path, stats) => {
  if (stats) console.log(`File ${path} changed size to ${stats.size}`);
});

// Watch new files.
watcher.add('new-file');
watcher.add(['new-file-2', 'new-file-3']);

// Get list of actual paths being watched on the filesystem
let watchedPaths = watcher.getWatched();

// Un-watch some files.
await watcher.unwatch('new-file');

// Stop watching. The method is async!
await watcher.close().then(() => console.log('closed'));

// Full list of options. See below for descriptions.
// Do not use this example!
chokidar.watch('file', {
  persistent: true,

  // ignore .txt files
  ignored: (file) => file.endsWith('.txt'),
  // watch only .txt files
  // ignored: (file, _stats) => _stats?.isFile() && !file.endsWith('.txt'),

  awaitWriteFinish: true, // emit single event when chunked writes are completed
  atomic: true, // emit proper events when "atomic writes" (mv _tmp file) are used

  // The options also allow specifying custom intervals in ms
  // awaitWriteFinish: {
  //   stabilityThreshold: 2000,
  //   pollInterval: 100
  // },
  // atomic: 100,

  interval: 100,
  binaryInterval: 300,

  cwd: '.',
  depth: 99,

  followSymlinks: true,
  ignoreInitial: false,
  ignorePermissionErrors: false,
  usePolling: false,
  alwaysStat: false,
});

chokidar.watch(paths, [options])

  • paths (string or array of strings). Paths to files, dirs to be watched recursively.
  • options (object) Options object as defined below:

Persistence

  • persistent (default: true). Indicates whether the process should continue to run as long as files are being watched.

Path filtering

  • ignored function, regex, or path. Defines files/paths to be ignored. The whole relative or absolute path is tested, not just filename. If a function with two arguments is provided, it gets called twice per path - once with a single argument (the path), second time with two arguments (the path and the fs.Stats object of that path).
  • ignoreInitial (default: false). If set to false then add/addDir events are also emitted for matching paths while instantiating the watching as chokidar discovers these file paths (before the ready event).
  • followSymlinks (default: true). When false, only the symlinks themselves will be watched for changes instead of following the link references and bubbling events through the link's path.
  • cwd (no default). The base directory from which watch paths are to be derived. Paths emitted with events will be relative to this.

Performance

  • usePolling (default: false). Whether to use fs.watchFile (backed by polling), or fs.watch. If polling leads to high CPU utilization, consider setting this to false. It is typically necessary to set this to true to successfully watch files over a network, and it may be necessary to successfully watch files in other non-standard situations. Setting to true explicitly on MacOS overrides the useFsEvents default. You may also set the CHOKIDAR_USEPOLLING env variable to true (1) or false (0) in order to override this option.
  • Polling-specific settings (effective when usePolling: true)
    • interval (default: 100). Interval of file system polling, in milliseconds. You may also set the CHOKIDAR_INTERVAL env variable to override this option.
    • binaryInterval (default: 300). Interval of file system polling for binary files. (see list of binary extensions)
  • alwaysStat (default: false). If relying upon the fs.Stats object that may get passed with add, addDir, and change events, set this to true to ensure it is provided even in cases where it wasn't already available from the underlying watch events.
  • depth (default: undefined). If set, limits how many levels of subdirectories will be traversed.
  • awaitWriteFinish (default: false). By default, the add event will fire when a file first appears on disk, before the entire file has been written. Furthermore, in some cases some change events will be emitted while the file is being written. In some cases, especially when watching for large files there will be a need to wait for the write operation to finish before responding to a file creation or modification. Setting awaitWriteFinish to true (or a truthy value) will poll file size, holding its add and change events until the size does not change for a configurable amount of time. The appropriate duration setting is heavily dependent on the OS and hardware. For accurate detection this parameter should be relatively high, making file watching much less responsive. Use with caution.
    • options.awaitWriteFinish can be set to an object in order to adjust timing params:
    • awaitWriteFinish.stabilityThreshold (default: 2000). Amount of time in milliseconds for a file size to remain constant before emitting its event.
    • awaitWriteFinish.pollInterval (default: 100). File size polling interval, in milliseconds.

Errors

  • ignorePermissionErrors (default: false). Indicates whether to watch files that don't have read permissions if possible. If watching fails due to EPERM or EACCES with this set to true, the errors will be suppressed silently.
  • atomic (default: true if useFsEvents and usePolling are false). Automatically filters out artifacts that occur when using editors that use "atomic writes" instead of writing directly to the source file. If a file is re-added within 100 ms of being deleted, Chokidar emits a change event rather than unlink then add. If the default of 100 ms does not work well for you, you can override it by setting atomic to a custom value, in milliseconds.

Methods & Events

chokidar.watch() produces an instance of FSWatcher. Methods of FSWatcher:

  • .add(path / paths): Add files, directories for tracking. Takes an array of strings or just one string.
  • .on(event, callback): Listen for an FS event. Available events: add, addDir, change, unlink, unlinkDir, ready, raw, error. Additionally all is available which gets emitted with the underlying event name and path for every event other than ready, raw, and error. raw is internal, use it carefully.
  • .unwatch(path / paths): Stop watching files or directories. Takes an array of strings or just one string.
  • .close(): async Removes all listeners from watched files. Asynchronous, returns Promise. Use with await to ensure bugs don't happen.
  • .getWatched(): Returns an object representing all the paths on the file system being watched by this FSWatcher instance. The object's keys are all the directories (using absolute paths unless the cwd option was used), and the values are arrays of the names of the items contained in each directory.

CLI

Check out third party chokidar-cli, which allows to execute a command on each change, or get a stdio stream of change events.

Troubleshooting

Sometimes, Chokidar runs out of file handles, causing EMFILE and ENOSP errors:

  • bash: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device bash: no job control in this shell
  • Error: watch /home/ ENOSPC

There are two things that can cause it.

  1. Exhausted file handles for generic fs operations
    • Can be solved by using graceful-fs, which can monkey-patch native fs module used by chokidar: let fs = require('fs'); let grfs = require('graceful-fs'); grfs.gracefulify(fs);
    • Can also be solved by tuning OS: echo fs.inotify.max_user_watches=524288 | sudo tee -a /etc/sysctl.conf && sudo sysctl -p.
  2. Exhausted file handles for fs.watch
    • Can't seem to be solved by graceful-fs or OS tuning
    • It's possible to start using usePolling: true, which will switch backend to resource-intensive fs.watchFile

All fsevents-related issues (WARN optional dep failed, fsevents is not a constructor) are solved by upgrading to v4+.

Changelog

  • v4 (Sep 2024): remove glob support and bundled fsevents. Decrease dependency count from 13 to 1. Rewrite in typescript. Bumps minimum node.js requirement to v14+
  • v3 (Apr 2019): massive CPU & RAM consumption improvements; reduces deps / package size by a factor of 17x and bumps Node.js requirement to v8.16+.
  • v2 (Dec 2017): globs are now posix-style-only. Tons of bugfixes.
  • v1 (Apr 2015): glob support, symlink support, tons of bugfixes. Node 0.8+ is supported
  • v0.1 (Apr 2012): Initial release, extracted from Brunch

Upgrading

If you've used globs before and want do replicate the functionality with v4:

// v3
chok.watch('**/*.js');
chok.watch("./directory/**/*");

// v4
chok.watch('.', {
  ignored: (path, stats) => stats?.isFile() && !path.endsWith('.js'), // only watch js files
});
chok.watch('./directory');

// other way
import { glob } from 'node:fs/promises';
const watcher = watch(await Array.fromAsync(glob('**/*.js')));

// unwatching
// v3
chok.unwatch('**/*.js');
// v4
chok.unwatch(await glob('**/*.js'));

Also

Why was chokidar named this way? What's the meaning behind it?

Chowkidar is a transliteration of a Hindi word meaning 'watchman, gatekeeper', चौकीदार. This ultimately comes from Sanskrit _ चतुष्क_ (crossway, quadrangle, consisting-of-four). This word is also used in other languages like Urdu as (چوکیدار) which is widely used in Pakistan and India.

License

MIT (c) Paul Miller (https://paulmillr.com), see LICENSE file.