pako vs compression vs lz-string vs lz4 vs lzutf8
Data Compression Libraries for Web Development Comparison
1 Year
pakocompressionlz-stringlz4lzutf8Similar Packages:
What's Data Compression Libraries for Web Development?

Data compression libraries are essential tools in web development that help reduce the size of data transmitted over the network, improving load times and overall performance. These libraries utilize various algorithms to compress data efficiently, allowing developers to optimize their applications for speed and resource usage. Each library has its unique features and use cases, catering to different needs in terms of compression speed, compression ratio, and ease of use.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
pako29,914,2135,7721.64 MB262 years ago(MIT AND Zlib)
compression21,192,4492,78627.5 kB222 months agoMIT
lz-string14,766,2014,231176 kB542 years agoMIT
lz4109,728436-414 years agoMIT
lzutf861,496326149 kB15-MIT
Feature Comparison: pako vs compression vs lz-string vs lz4 vs lzutf8

Compression Algorithm

  • pako:

    Implements the zlib compression algorithm, providing a comprehensive solution for data compression and decompression, compatible with various formats and widely used in web applications.

  • compression:

    Uses the gzip compression algorithm, which is widely supported and effective for reducing the size of HTTP responses, especially for text-based content like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

  • lz-string:

    Employs a lightweight LZ-based algorithm optimized for string data, focusing on speed and efficiency, particularly for short strings and JSON data.

  • lz4:

    Utilizes the LZ4 algorithm, known for its extremely fast compression and decompression speeds, making it suitable for high-performance applications where speed is critical.

  • lzutf8:

    Implements a specialized algorithm for compressing UTF-8 strings, ensuring that character encoding is preserved while reducing data size effectively.

Use Case Scenarios

  • pako:

    Suitable for applications that need to work with existing zlib-compressed data, such as decompressing files or network streams that use the zlib format.

  • compression:

    Best used in web applications where server-side response compression is needed to improve load times and reduce bandwidth usage, particularly for static assets and API responses.

  • lz-string:

    Ideal for client-side applications that need to compress and store data in local storage or transmit data over the network, especially when working with JSON objects.

  • lz4:

    Perfect for real-time applications, such as gaming or streaming services, where fast data processing is essential, and the overhead of compression must be minimal.

  • lzutf8:

    Recommended for applications that require efficient handling of multilingual data, ensuring that UTF-8 strings are compressed without losing any character information.

Performance

  • pako:

    Delivers solid performance for both compression and decompression, making it a reliable choice for applications that require zlib compatibility.

  • compression:

    Offers good performance for general use cases, but may not be the fastest option available. It strikes a balance between compression ratio and speed, making it suitable for most web applications.

  • lz-string:

    Provides very fast compression and decompression speeds, making it an excellent choice for scenarios where performance is critical, especially for small to medium-sized data.

  • lz4:

    Excels in speed, with decompression being particularly fast, making it one of the fastest compression libraries available, suitable for high-throughput applications.

  • lzutf8:

    Offers competitive performance for compressing UTF-8 strings, though it may not be as fast as LZ4 for general data. It is optimized for handling text data specifically.

Ease of Use

  • pako:

    Provides a familiar API for those who have used zlib before, making it easy to adopt for developers transitioning from other compression libraries.

  • compression:

    Easy to integrate into Express.js applications as middleware, requiring minimal configuration to get started with automatic response compression.

  • lz-string:

    Simple API for compressing and decompressing strings, making it user-friendly for developers who need quick and efficient string handling.

  • lz4:

    Requires a bit more setup compared to other libraries, but provides clear documentation and examples to help developers implement it effectively.

  • lzutf8:

    Straightforward to use for compressing and decompressing UTF-8 strings, with a focus on maintaining character integrity during the process.

Compatibility

  • pako:

    Fully compatible with zlib, making it an excellent choice for applications that need to work with existing zlib-compressed data or libraries.

  • compression:

    Works seamlessly with Express.js and is compatible with most web servers and clients that support gzip compression, ensuring broad usability.

  • lz-string:

    Designed for web applications, it works well with modern browsers and can be used in Node.js environments, making it versatile for both client and server-side applications.

  • lz4:

    Compatible with various programming languages and platforms, making it a good choice for projects that may require cross-language support.

  • lzutf8:

    Specifically designed for UTF-8 data, ensuring compatibility with applications that handle international characters and multi-language support.

How to Choose: pako vs compression vs lz-string vs lz4 vs lzutf8
  • pako:

    Choose 'pako' if you need a robust solution for both deflating and inflating data using the zlib format. It's ideal for applications that require compatibility with existing zlib-compressed data and offers a good balance of performance and compression ratio.

  • compression:

    Choose 'compression' if you need a middleware solution for Express.js applications that automatically compresses HTTP responses. It's easy to integrate and provides a straightforward way to enhance performance without manual intervention.

  • lz-string:

    Opt for 'lz-string' if you require a lightweight, fast compression library specifically for string data, such as JSON. It's particularly useful for client-side storage and transmission of data, making it ideal for web applications that need to minimize payload sizes.

  • lz4:

    Select 'lz4' when performance is a priority and you need a high-speed compression algorithm. It's suitable for scenarios where decompression speed is critical, such as real-time data processing or streaming applications, and offers a good balance between speed and compression ratio.

  • lzutf8:

    Use 'lzutf8' if you need to handle UTF-8 encoded strings efficiently. This library is designed for compressing and decompressing UTF-8 data, making it a great choice for applications that work with internationalization or require support for multiple languages.

README for pako

pako

CI NPM version

zlib port to javascript, very fast!

Why pako is cool:

  • Results are binary equal to well known zlib (now contains ported zlib v1.2.8).
  • Almost as fast in modern JS engines as C implementation (see benchmarks).
  • Works in browsers, you can browserify any separate component.

This project was done to understand how fast JS can be and is it necessary to develop native C modules for CPU-intensive tasks. Enjoy the result!

Benchmarks:

node v12.16.3 (zlib 1.2.9), 1mb input sample:

deflate-imaya x 4.75 ops/sec ±4.93% (15 runs sampled)
deflate-pako x 10.38 ops/sec ±0.37% (29 runs sampled)
deflate-zlib x 17.74 ops/sec ±0.77% (46 runs sampled)
gzip-pako x 8.86 ops/sec ±1.41% (29 runs sampled)
inflate-imaya x 107 ops/sec ±0.69% (77 runs sampled)
inflate-pako x 131 ops/sec ±1.74% (82 runs sampled)
inflate-zlib x 258 ops/sec ±0.66% (88 runs sampled)
ungzip-pako x 115 ops/sec ±1.92% (80 runs sampled)

node v14.15.0 (google's zlib), 1mb output sample:

deflate-imaya x 4.93 ops/sec ±3.09% (16 runs sampled)
deflate-pako x 10.22 ops/sec ±0.33% (29 runs sampled)
deflate-zlib x 18.48 ops/sec ±0.24% (48 runs sampled)
gzip-pako x 10.16 ops/sec ±0.25% (28 runs sampled)
inflate-imaya x 110 ops/sec ±0.41% (77 runs sampled)
inflate-pako x 134 ops/sec ±0.66% (83 runs sampled)
inflate-zlib x 402 ops/sec ±0.74% (87 runs sampled)
ungzip-pako x 113 ops/sec ±0.62% (80 runs sampled)

zlib's test is partially affected by marshalling (that make sense for inflate only). You can change deflate level to 0 in benchmark source, to investigate details. For deflate level 6 results can be considered as correct.

Install:

npm install pako

Examples / API

Full docs - http://nodeca.github.io/pako/

const pako = require('pako');

// Deflate
//
const input = new Uint8Array();
//... fill input data here
const output = pako.deflate(input);

// Inflate (simple wrapper can throw exception on broken stream)
//
const compressed = new Uint8Array();
//... fill data to uncompress here
try {
  const result = pako.inflate(compressed);
  // ... continue processing
} catch (err) {
  console.log(err);
}

//
// Alternate interface for chunking & without exceptions
//

const deflator = new pako.Deflate();

deflator.push(chunk1, false);
deflator.push(chunk2); // second param is false by default.
...
deflator.push(chunk_last, true); // `true` says this chunk is last

if (deflator.err) {
  console.log(deflator.msg);
}

const output = deflator.result;


const inflator = new pako.Inflate();

inflator.push(chunk1);
inflator.push(chunk2);
...
inflator.push(chunk_last); // no second param because end is auto-detected

if (inflator.err) {
  console.log(inflator.msg);
}

const output = inflator.result;

Sometime you can wish to work with strings. For example, to send stringified objects to server. Pako's deflate detects input data type, and automatically recode strings to utf-8 prior to compress. Inflate has special option, to say compressed data has utf-8 encoding and should be recoded to javascript's utf-16.

const pako = require('pako');

const test = { my: 'super', puper: [456, 567], awesome: 'pako' };

const compressed = pako.deflate(JSON.stringify(test));

const restored = JSON.parse(pako.inflate(compressed, { to: 'string' }));

Notes

Pako does not contain some specific zlib functions:

  • deflate - methods deflateCopy, deflateBound, deflateParams, deflatePending, deflatePrime, deflateTune.
  • inflate - methods inflateCopy, inflateMark, inflatePrime, inflateGetDictionary, inflateSync, inflateSyncPoint, inflateUndermine.
  • High level inflate/deflate wrappers (classes) may not support some flush modes.

pako for enterprise

Available as part of the Tidelift Subscription

The maintainers of pako and thousands of other packages are working with Tidelift to deliver commercial support and maintenance for the open source dependencies you use to build your applications. Save time, reduce risk, and improve code health, while paying the maintainers of the exact dependencies you use. Learn more.

Authors

Personal thanks to:

  • Vyacheslav Egorov (@mraleph) for his awesome tutorials about optimising JS code for v8, IRHydra tool and his advices.
  • David Duponchel (@dduponchel) for help with testing.

Original implementation (in C):

  • zlib by Jean-loup Gailly and Mark Adler.

License

  • MIT - all files, except /lib/zlib folder
  • ZLIB - /lib/zlib content