retext vs natural vs compromise
Natural Language Processing Libraries Comparison
1 Year
retextnaturalcompromiseSimilar Packages:
What's Natural Language Processing Libraries?

Natural Language Processing (NLP) libraries facilitate the interaction between computers and human language, enabling applications to understand, interpret, and generate human language in a valuable way. These libraries provide various functionalities such as text analysis, sentiment analysis, and language parsing, which are essential for developing intelligent applications that require language comprehension. Each of these libraries has unique strengths and use cases, making them suitable for different NLP tasks in web development.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
retext477,8552,37410.3 kB0a year agoMIT
natural202,87210,70113.8 MB816 months agoMIT
compromise88,95611,6072.58 MB111a month agoMIT
Feature Comparison: retext vs natural vs compromise

Core Functionality

  • retext:

    Retext focuses on processing and analyzing natural language in Markdown and HTML formats. It provides plugins for linting and transforming text, making it particularly useful for content-heavy applications where text quality and structure are paramount.

  • natural:

    Natural offers a comprehensive suite of NLP tools, including tokenization, stemming, classification, and phonetics. It supports various algorithms and provides a modular architecture, allowing developers to choose specific components for their NLP needs, making it versatile for complex applications.

  • compromise:

    Compromise excels in providing fast and efficient natural language processing for tasks like part-of-speech tagging, entity recognition, and sentence parsing. It is designed for quick text manipulation and can handle a variety of common NLP tasks without extensive configuration.

Performance

  • retext:

    Retext is designed to handle text transformations efficiently, particularly for Markdown and HTML content. Its performance is generally good, but it may depend on the number of plugins used and the complexity of the text being processed.

  • natural:

    Natural's performance can vary depending on the complexity of the NLP tasks being performed. While it provides a rich feature set, some operations may require more computational resources, especially when dealing with large datasets or complex algorithms.

  • compromise:

    Compromise is optimized for speed and efficiency, making it suitable for applications that require quick responses. Its lightweight nature allows for rapid text processing without significant resource consumption, which is beneficial for real-time applications.

Ease of Use

  • retext:

    Retext provides a clear and modular approach to text processing, but its focus on plugins may require users to familiarize themselves with the ecosystem to leverage its full potential. However, once understood, it offers great flexibility in handling text.

  • natural:

    Natural has a more extensive API and may require a deeper understanding of NLP concepts to fully utilize its capabilities. While it offers powerful tools, the learning curve can be steeper compared to Compromise, especially for beginners.

  • compromise:

    Compromise is known for its user-friendly API and straightforward syntax, making it easy for developers to get started with NLP tasks. Its simplicity allows for quick integration into projects without a steep learning curve.

Community and Support

  • retext:

    Retext benefits from a strong community, especially among those working with Markdown and content management. Its plugin architecture encourages contributions, leading to a rich ecosystem of tools and resources.

  • natural:

    Natural has a solid user base and community support, with documentation available for various features. However, it may not be as actively maintained as some other libraries, which could affect long-term support.

  • compromise:

    Compromise has a growing community and is actively maintained, providing good documentation and examples. This makes it easier for developers to find support and resources when working with the library.

Extensibility

  • retext:

    Retext's plugin system encourages extensibility, allowing developers to add custom processing rules and linting checks. This is particularly useful for applications that need to enforce specific content standards or styles.

  • natural:

    Natural's modular architecture allows for extensibility, enabling developers to integrate additional NLP algorithms or customize existing ones. This makes it suitable for projects that require tailored solutions.

  • compromise:

    Compromise is designed to be extensible, allowing developers to create custom plugins and enhance its capabilities. This flexibility is beneficial for projects with specific NLP requirements that go beyond the built-in features.

How to Choose: retext vs natural vs compromise
  • retext:

    Choose Retext if you want a powerful library focused on natural language processing with a strong emphasis on Markdown and HTML content. It is ideal for applications that require text analysis, linting, and transformations, especially in content management systems or static site generators.

  • natural:

    Choose Natural if you are looking for a comprehensive NLP toolkit that includes a wide range of functionalities such as tokenization, stemming, classification, and phonetics. It is suitable for projects that require more advanced text processing capabilities and offers a modular approach for building NLP applications.

  • compromise:

    Choose Compromise if you need a lightweight and fast library for simple NLP tasks such as part-of-speech tagging, entity recognition, and basic sentence parsing. It is particularly useful for applications that require quick text manipulation without the overhead of more complex NLP frameworks.

README for retext

retext

Build Coverage Downloads Size Sponsors Backers Chat

unified processor to add support for parsing and serializing Latin-script natural language.

Contents

What is this?

This package is a unified processor with support for parsing Latin-script natural language as input and serializing it as output by using unified with retext-latin and retext-stringify.

See the monorepo readme for info on what the retext ecosystem is.

When should I use this?

You can use this package when you want to use unified, have Latin-script as input, and as output. This package is a shortcut for unified().use(retextLatin).use(retextStringify). When the input isn’t Latin-script or is English or Dutch (meaning you don’t need retext-latin), it’s recommended to use unified directly.

Install

This package is ESM only. In Node.js (version 16+), install with npm:

npm install retext

In Deno with esm.sh:

import {retext} from 'https://esm.sh/retext@9'

In browsers with esm.sh:

<script type="module">
  import {retext} from 'https://esm.sh/retext@9?bundle'
</script>

Use

import {retext} from 'retext'
import retextEmoji from 'retext-emoji'
import retextProfanities from 'retext-profanities'
import {reporter} from 'vfile-reporter'

const file = await retext()
  .use(retextEmoji, {convert: 'encode'})
  .use(retextProfanities)
  .process('He’s set on beating your butt for sheriff! :cop:')

console.log(String(file))
console.error(reporter(file))

Yields:

He’s set on beating your butt for sheriff! 👮
1:26-1:30 warning Be careful with `butt`, it’s profane in some cases butt retext-profanities

⚠ 1 warning

API

This package exports the identifier retext. There is no default export.

retext()

Create a new unified processor that already uses retext-latin and retext-stringify.

You can add more plugins with use. See unified for more information.

Syntax tree

The syntax tree used in retext is nlcst.

Types

This package is fully typed with TypeScript. It exports no additional types.

Compatibility

Projects maintained by the unified collective are compatible with maintained versions of Node.js.

When we cut a new major release, we drop support for unmaintained versions of Node. This means we try to keep the current release line, retext@^9, compatible with Node.js 16.

Contribute

See contributing.md in retextjs/.github for ways to get started. See support.md for ways to get help.

This project has a code of conduct. By interacting with this repository, organization, or community you agree to abide by its terms.

Sponsor

Support this effort and give back by sponsoring on OpenCollective!

Vercel

Motif

HashiCorp

GitBook

Gatsby

Netlify

Coinbase

ThemeIsle

Expo

Boost Note

Markdown Space

Holloway


You?

License

MIT © Titus Wormer