regenerator-runtime vs core-js
JavaScript Polyfills and Runtime Libraries Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
regenerator-runtimecore-jsSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Polyfills and Runtime Libraries?

Core-js and regenerator-runtime are essential libraries in modern JavaScript development. Core-js provides polyfills for ECMAScript features, enabling developers to use the latest JavaScript features while maintaining compatibility with older environments. Regenerator-runtime, on the other hand, is specifically designed to support the async/await syntax and generator functions, allowing developers to write asynchronous code in a more readable manner. Together, these libraries enhance the development experience by ensuring that modern JavaScript features are available across various environments, improving code maintainability and performance.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
regenerator-runtime65,748,6173,83727.9 kB81a year agoMIT
core-js35,723,37324,8661.27 MB412 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: regenerator-runtime vs core-js

Polyfill Coverage

  • regenerator-runtime:

    Regenerator-runtime does not provide polyfills for ECMAScript features but focuses on enabling generator functions and async/await syntax. It transforms these features into compatible code that can run in environments that do not natively support them, ensuring that asynchronous programming remains accessible.

  • core-js:

    Core-js offers extensive polyfill coverage for ECMAScript features, including ES6, ES7, and beyond. It allows developers to use modern JavaScript features without worrying about compatibility issues in older environments. With core-js, developers can seamlessly integrate features like promises, symbols, and typed arrays into their applications.

Usage Scenario

  • regenerator-runtime:

    Regenerator-runtime is best used in applications that utilize async/await for handling asynchronous operations. It is particularly beneficial in scenarios where developers want to write cleaner and more maintainable asynchronous code without the complexity of traditional callback patterns.

  • core-js:

    Core-js is suitable for applications that need to support a wide range of browsers, including older versions. It is particularly useful in large-scale applications where developers want to leverage the latest JavaScript features while ensuring a consistent experience across different environments.

Performance Impact

  • regenerator-runtime:

    Regenerator-runtime is lightweight and specifically optimized for handling async/await and generator functions. It has a minimal performance impact, making it a suitable choice for applications that require efficient asynchronous code execution without the bloat of unnecessary polyfills.

  • core-js:

    While core-js provides a vast array of polyfills, it may introduce some performance overhead due to the additional code that needs to be executed. However, this impact is generally minimal compared to the benefits of using modern JavaScript features. Developers should consider the trade-off between compatibility and performance based on their target environments.

Learning Curve

  • regenerator-runtime:

    Regenerator-runtime is relatively easy to integrate into projects, especially for developers already accustomed to async/await syntax. The learning curve is minimal, as it primarily focuses on enabling existing JavaScript features rather than introducing new concepts.

  • core-js:

    Core-js is straightforward to use, especially for developers familiar with modern JavaScript. However, understanding when and how to apply polyfills effectively requires some knowledge of ECMAScript standards and browser compatibility issues. Documentation and community support are available to aid in this learning process.

Community and Support

  • regenerator-runtime:

    Regenerator-runtime is also well-supported, particularly within projects that utilize Babel for transpiling JavaScript. It benefits from a strong community and is often included as a dependency in projects that require async/await functionality, ensuring that developers have access to support and resources.

  • core-js:

    Core-js has a large community and is widely used in the JavaScript ecosystem. It is actively maintained, with regular updates to ensure compatibility with the latest ECMAScript standards. Developers can find extensive documentation and community resources to assist with implementation.

How to Choose: regenerator-runtime vs core-js
  • regenerator-runtime:

    Choose regenerator-runtime if your project heavily relies on async/await or generator functions. It is specifically tailored for handling asynchronous code and is lightweight, making it a good choice for projects that need to manage async operations without the overhead of additional polyfills.

  • core-js:

    Choose core-js if you need comprehensive polyfills for a wide range of ECMAScript features, including promises, symbols, and various collection types. It is ideal for projects that require backward compatibility with older browsers or environments that do not support the latest JavaScript standards.

Similar Npm Packages to regenerator-runtime

regenerator-runtime is a runtime library that enables the use of generator functions and async/await syntax in JavaScript. It is particularly useful for transpiling modern JavaScript code, allowing developers to write asynchronous code in a more readable and maintainable way. While regenerator-runtime is a powerful tool for handling asynchronous programming, there are several alternatives that also provide similar functionalities. Here are a few notable alternatives:

  • async is a utility module that provides powerful functions for working with asynchronous JavaScript. It offers a variety of methods for handling asynchronous operations, such as async.waterfall, async.series, and async.parallel, making it easier to manage complex asynchronous workflows. If you are looking for a comprehensive solution to handle asynchronous control flow without using promises or async/await, async is a great choice.

  • babel-runtime is a library that provides a modular runtime for Babel, which is a popular JavaScript compiler. It includes polyfills and helper functions that allow developers to use modern JavaScript features while maintaining compatibility with older environments. If you are already using Babel for transpiling your code and want to ensure that your async/await syntax works seamlessly across different environments, babel-runtime can be a useful addition.

  • bluebird is a fully-featured promise library that focuses on performance and features. It provides a rich set of methods for working with promises, including advanced features like cancellation, progress tracking, and more. If you need a powerful promise library that goes beyond the native Promise implementation, bluebird is an excellent option.

  • core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript that includes polyfills for many modern JavaScript features, including those related to promises and async/await. It is often used in conjunction with Babel to ensure that modern JavaScript code runs smoothly in older environments. If you want a comprehensive set of polyfills for various JavaScript features, core-js is a solid choice.

  • rxjs is a library for reactive programming using Observables, which makes it easy to compose asynchronous and event-based programs. It provides a powerful set of operators for handling asynchronous data streams, making it suitable for complex applications that require reactive programming patterns. If you are building applications that heavily rely on event-driven architecture or need to manage multiple asynchronous data streams, rxjs is a great fit.

To see how regenerator-runtime compares with async, babel-runtime, bluebird, core-js, and rxjs, check out the comparison: Comparing async vs babel-runtime vs bluebird vs core-js vs regenerator-runtime vs rxjs.

Similar Npm Packages to core-js

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript that provides polyfills for ECMAScript features, including ES6, ES7, and beyond. It allows developers to use modern JavaScript features in environments that do not support them natively, ensuring compatibility across different browsers and platforms. With its modular design, developers can selectively include only the polyfills they need, making it a lightweight and efficient choice for polyfilling JavaScript features.

While core-js is a powerful solution for polyfilling, there are alternatives available that also aim to provide similar functionality. Here are a few notable options:

  • babel-polyfill is a package that includes a full set of polyfills for ECMAScript features. It is designed to work seamlessly with Babel, a popular JavaScript compiler that allows developers to use the latest JavaScript syntax and features. babel-polyfill provides a comprehensive solution for ensuring that your code runs in older environments by including all necessary polyfills. However, it is worth noting that babel-polyfill has been deprecated in favor of using core-js directly, as it is more modular and allows for better tree-shaking.
  • es6-shim is another polyfill library that aims to provide compatibility for ECMAScript 6 features in older JavaScript environments. It extends the built-in JavaScript objects and adds support for new features such as promises, symbols, and more. While es6-shim is a solid choice for adding ES6 compatibility, it is less modular than core-js, which means it may include more polyfills than necessary, potentially increasing the bundle size.

For a detailed comparison of these packages, check out the following link: Comparing babel-polyfill vs core-js vs es6-shim.

README for regenerator-runtime

regenerator-runtime

Standalone runtime for Regenerator-compiled generator and async functions.

To import the runtime as a module (recommended), either of the following import styles will work:

// CommonJS
const regeneratorRuntime = require("regenerator-runtime");

// ECMAScript 2015
import regeneratorRuntime from "regenerator-runtime";

To ensure that regeneratorRuntime is defined globally, either of the following styles will work:

// CommonJS
require("regenerator-runtime/runtime");

// ECMAScript 2015
import "regenerator-runtime/runtime.js";

To get the absolute file system path of runtime.js, evaluate the following expression:

require("regenerator-runtime/path").path
npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc or npmjs.com, the official website for the npm registry. Please note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.