crypto-browserify vs crypto-js
JavaScript Cryptography Libraries Comparison
1 Year
crypto-browserifycrypto-jsSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Cryptography Libraries?

JavaScript cryptography libraries provide essential tools for implementing cryptographic algorithms and protocols in web applications. They enable developers to secure data through encryption, hashing, and other cryptographic techniques, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality. These libraries are crucial for building secure applications, especially in environments where sensitive data is handled, such as user authentication, secure communications, and data storage.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
crypto-browserify8,940,77866656 kB374 months agoMIT
crypto-js8,457,21716,016487 kB274a year agoMIT
Feature Comparison: crypto-browserify vs crypto-js

Algorithm Support

  • crypto-browserify:

    crypto-browserify supports a wide range of cryptographic algorithms, including AES, SHA-1, SHA-256, HMAC, and more. It aims to provide a consistent API that mirrors Node.js's crypto module, making it easier for developers familiar with Node.js to transition to browser-based applications.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js offers a rich set of cryptographic algorithms, including AES, DES, Triple DES, MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, and HMAC. It is designed to be straightforward and efficient, providing a simple API for developers to implement encryption and hashing in their applications.

Performance

  • crypto-browserify:

    crypto-browserify is optimized for performance in the browser, but its performance may vary depending on the specific algorithms used and the complexity of the operations. It is generally efficient for most use cases, although developers should be mindful of the performance implications of using certain algorithms in resource-constrained environments.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js is designed to be lightweight and fast, making it suitable for performance-sensitive applications. It is particularly efficient for hashing operations and symmetric encryption, allowing developers to implement cryptographic functions without significant overhead.

Ease of Use

  • crypto-browserify:

    crypto-browserify provides a familiar API for developers who have experience with Node.js, making it easier to integrate cryptographic functions into web applications. However, some users may find the need for polyfills or additional configuration when using it in certain environments.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with a straightforward API that allows developers to quickly implement cryptographic functions. Its clear documentation and examples make it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

Compatibility

  • crypto-browserify:

    crypto-browserify is designed to be compatible with existing Node.js code, allowing developers to reuse their server-side cryptographic logic in browser applications. This compatibility makes it an excellent choice for full-stack JavaScript applications that require consistent cryptographic functionality across environments.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js is a standalone library that does not rely on Node.js, making it suitable for use in any JavaScript environment, including browsers and mobile applications. Its independence from Node.js allows for greater flexibility in deployment.

Security Considerations

  • crypto-browserify:

    crypto-browserify aims to provide secure implementations of cryptographic algorithms, but developers must remain vigilant about potential vulnerabilities and ensure they are using up-to-date versions of the library. Proper implementation and understanding of cryptographic principles are essential for maintaining security.

  • crypto-js:

    crypto-js provides a range of cryptographic functions, but developers should be cautious about using outdated algorithms or weak configurations. It is important to stay informed about best practices in cryptography and to use strong keys and secure modes of operation.

How to Choose: crypto-browserify vs crypto-js
  • crypto-browserify:

    Choose crypto-browserify if you need a comprehensive solution that mimics Node.js's built-in crypto module for use in the browser. It is particularly useful for applications that require compatibility with existing Node.js code and a wide range of cryptographic functions, including hashing and HMACs.

  • crypto-js:

    Choose crypto-js if you are looking for a lightweight library focused on providing a variety of cryptographic algorithms, such as AES, SHA, and HMAC. It is ideal for projects that require simple and efficient encryption and hashing without the need for extensive Node.js compatibility.

README for crypto-browserify

crypto-browserify Version Badge

A port of node's crypto module to the browser.

github actions coverage License Downloads Sauce Test Status

npm badge

The goal of this module is to reimplement node's crypto module, in pure javascript so that it can run in the browser.

Here is the subset that is currently implemented:

  • createHash (sha1, sha224, sha256, sha384, sha512, md5, rmd160)
  • createHmac (sha1, sha224, sha256, sha384, sha512, md5, rmd160)
  • pbkdf2
  • pbkdf2Sync
  • randomBytes
  • pseudoRandomBytes
  • createCipher (aes)
  • createDecipher (aes)
  • createDiffieHellman
  • createSign (rsa, ecdsa)
  • createVerify (rsa, ecdsa)
  • createECDH (secp256k1)
  • publicEncrypt/privateDecrypt (rsa)
  • privateEncrypt/publicDecrypt (rsa)

todo

these features from node's crypto are still unimplemented.

  • createCredentials

contributions

If you are interested in writing a feature, please implement as a new module, which will be incorporated into crypto-browserify as a dependency.

All deps must be compatible with node's crypto (generate example inputs and outputs with node, and save base64 strings inside JSON, so that tests can run in the browser) see sha.js

Crypto is extra serious so please do not hesitate to review the code, and post comments if you do.

License

MIT