sass vs less vs css vs stylus
CSS Preprocessors Comparison
1 Year
sasslesscssstylusSimilar Packages:
What's CSS Preprocessors?

CSS preprocessors are scripting languages that extend the capabilities of traditional CSS, allowing developers to write more maintainable and scalable stylesheets. They introduce features such as variables, nesting, mixins, and functions, which help streamline the styling process and improve code organization. By using preprocessors, developers can create complex stylesheets more efficiently, reduce redundancy, and enhance the overall maintainability of their CSS code. Each preprocessor has its unique syntax and features, catering to different developer preferences and project requirements.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
sass17,273,3514,1025.7 MB81a month agoMIT
less7,695,79717,0502.94 MB2313 months agoApache-2.0
css6,098,2961,607-905 years agoMIT
stylus3,444,94711,236366 kB2759 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: sass vs less vs css vs stylus

Syntax Flexibility

  • sass:

    Sass introduces a more complex syntax with features like nested rules and functions, providing powerful tools for organizing styles but requiring a steeper learning curve.

  • less:

    Less offers a syntax that is similar to CSS but allows for variables and mixins, making it easier to manage styles without losing familiarity.

  • css:

    CSS has a straightforward syntax that is easy to learn but lacks advanced features for complex styling needs.

  • stylus:

    Stylus provides the most flexibility with a minimalist syntax that allows for optional semicolons and braces, enabling a highly customizable coding style.

Variables and Mixins

  • sass:

    Sass offers robust support for variables and mixins, enabling complex styling patterns and reusable code snippets.

  • less:

    Less supports variables and mixins, allowing developers to define reusable styles and reduce code duplication.

  • css:

    CSS does not support variables or mixins natively, leading to potential redundancy in styles.

  • stylus:

    Stylus also supports variables and mixins, allowing for concise and reusable styles, but with a more flexible syntax.

Nesting

  • sass:

    Sass supports nesting, making it easier to structure styles hierarchically and maintain clarity in complex stylesheets.

  • less:

    Less allows for nesting of selectors, improving readability and organization of styles.

  • css:

    CSS does not support nesting, which can lead to deeply nested selectors and less readable code.

  • stylus:

    Stylus allows for nesting with a more flexible syntax, enabling developers to write cleaner and more organized styles.

Community and Ecosystem

  • sass:

    Sass has a large and active community, with numerous resources, plugins, and frameworks built around it, making it a popular choice for many developers.

  • less:

    Less has a smaller community compared to Sass but is still widely used and supported.

  • css:

    CSS has a vast community and extensive resources, but lacks the advanced features of preprocessors.

  • stylus:

    Stylus has a smaller community and ecosystem, but it is appreciated for its flexibility and expressiveness.

Learning Curve

  • sass:

    Sass has a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and syntax, but offers significant benefits for larger projects.

  • less:

    Less has a moderate learning curve, especially for those familiar with CSS, as it builds on existing knowledge.

  • css:

    CSS has a gentle learning curve, making it accessible for beginners.

  • stylus:

    Stylus has a variable learning curve depending on the developer's familiarity with its flexible syntax, which can be both a benefit and a challenge.

How to Choose: sass vs less vs css vs stylus
  • sass:

    Select Sass for its powerful features like nested rules, mixins, and functions. It's ideal for larger projects where maintainability and scalability are priorities. Sass has a more complex syntax but offers greater flexibility and control over styles.

  • less:

    Choose Less if you prefer a syntax that is similar to CSS but want to leverage features like variables and mixins. It's particularly useful for projects that require a more structured approach to styles without a steep learning curve.

  • css:

    Use CSS for simple projects where you need straightforward styling without additional complexity. It's the standard styling language for the web and is universally supported.

  • stylus:

    Opt for Stylus if you want a highly flexible and expressive syntax. Stylus allows for significant customization in how you write your styles, making it suitable for developers who prefer a minimalist approach and want to reduce boilerplate code.

README for sass

A pure JavaScript implementation of Sass. Sass makes CSS fun again.

Sass logo npm statistics GitHub actions build status
Appveyor build status

This package is a distribution of Dart Sass, compiled to pure JavaScript with no native code or external dependencies. It provides a command-line sass executable and a Node.js API.

Usage

You can install Sass globally using npm install -g sass which will provide access to the sass executable. You can also add it to your project using npm install --save-dev sass. This provides the executable as well as a library:

const sass = require('sass');

const result = sass.compile(scssFilename);

// OR

// Note that `compileAsync()` is substantially slower than `compile()`.
const result = await sass.compileAsync(scssFilename);

See the Sass website for full API documentation.

Legacy API

Dart Sass also supports an older JavaScript API that's fully compatible with Node Sass (with a few exceptions listed below), with support for both the render() and renderSync() functions. This API is considered deprecated and will be removed in Dart Sass 2.0.0, so it should be avoided in new projects.

Sass's support for the legacy JavaScript API has the following limitations:

  • Only the "expanded" and "compressed" values of outputStyle are supported.

  • Dart Sass doesn't support the precision option. Dart Sass defaults to a sufficiently high precision for all existing browsers, and making this customizable would make the code substantially less efficient.

  • Dart Sass doesn't support the sourceComments option. Source maps are the recommended way of locating the origin of generated selectors.

See Also

  • Dart Sass, from which this package is compiled, can be used either as a stand-alone executable or as a Dart library. Running Dart Sass on the Dart VM is substantially faster than running the pure JavaScript version, so this may be appropriate for performance-sensitive applications. The Dart API is also (currently) more user-friendly than the JavaScript API. See the Dart Sass README for details on how to use it.

  • Node Sass, which is a wrapper around LibSass, the C++ implementation of Sass. Node Sass supports the same API as this package and is also faster (although it's usually a little slower than Dart Sass). However, it requires a native library which may be difficult to install, and it's generally slower to add features and fix bugs.

Behavioral Differences from Ruby Sass

There are a few intentional behavioral differences between Dart Sass and Ruby Sass. These are generally places where Ruby Sass has an undesired behavior, and it's substantially easier to implement the correct behavior than it would be to implement compatible behavior. These should all have tracking bugs against Ruby Sass to update the reference behavior.

  1. @extend only accepts simple selectors, as does the second argument of selector-extend(). See issue 1599.

  2. Subject selectors are not supported. See issue 1126.

  3. Pseudo selector arguments are parsed as <declaration-value>s rather than having a more limited custom parsing. See issue 2120.

  4. The numeric precision is set to 10. See issue 1122.

  5. The indented syntax parser is more flexible: it doesn't require consistent indentation across the whole document. See issue 2176.

  6. Colors do not support channel-by-channel arithmetic. See issue 2144.

  7. Unitless numbers aren't == to unit numbers with the same value. In addition, map keys follow the same logic as ==-equality. See issue 1496.

  8. rgba() and hsla() alpha values with percentage units are interpreted as percentages. Other units are forbidden. See issue 1525.

  9. Too many variable arguments passed to a function is an error. See issue 1408.

  10. Allow @extend to reach outside a media query if there's an identical @extend defined outside that query. This isn't tracked explicitly, because it'll be irrelevant when issue 1050 is fixed.

  11. Some selector pseudos containing placeholder selectors will be compiled where they wouldn't be in Ruby Sass. This better matches the semantics of the selectors in question, and is more efficient. See issue 2228.

  12. The old-style :property value syntax is not supported in the indented syntax. See issue 2245.

  13. The reference combinator is not supported. See issue 303.

  14. Universal selector unification is symmetrical. See issue 2247.

  15. @extend doesn't produce an error if it matches but fails to unify. See issue 2250.

  16. Dart Sass currently only supports UTF-8 documents. We'd like to support more, but Dart currently doesn't support them. See dart-lang/sdk#11744, for example.

Disclaimer: this is not an official Google product.