Sass and CSS Preprocessors Comparison
sass vs postcss-scss vs node-sass vs scss vs dart-sass
1 Year
sasspostcss-scssnode-sassscssdart-sassSimilar Packages:
What's Sass and CSS Preprocessors?

Sass (Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets) is a preprocessor scripting language that is interpreted or compiled into Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). It allows for more dynamic stylesheets with features like variables, nesting, and mixins. The packages listed provide different implementations and functionalities for using Sass in web development, each with its own strengths and use cases. Understanding the differences can help developers choose the right tool for their projects, whether they need a pure Sass implementation, a Node.js binding, or integration with PostCSS.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
sass13,550,3233,9955.66 MB7012 days agoMIT
postcss-scss3,641,61565819.4 kB2a year agoMIT
node-sass1,262,5698,5061.83 MB1872 years agoMIT
scss27,354---13 years ago-
dart-sass15,6633,995-705 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: sass vs postcss-scss vs node-sass vs scss vs dart-sass

Implementation

  • sass:

    Sass is the original syntax that introduced the Sass language. It is less commonly used now compared to SCSS but is still available for those who prefer its indentation-based syntax. It compiles to CSS and supports all Sass features, though it may not be as user-friendly for those familiar with traditional CSS.

  • postcss-scss:

    PostCSS-SCSS is a PostCSS plugin that allows you to write SCSS syntax while utilizing the PostCSS ecosystem. This means you can take advantage of PostCSS plugins for tasks like autoprefixing, minification, and linting, providing a flexible and powerful workflow for CSS processing.

  • node-sass:

    Node Sass is a library that provides binding for Node.js to LibSass, which is a C/C++ implementation of Sass. It is known for its speed due to native compilation, but it may lag behind Dart Sass in terms of feature support. It is suitable for production environments where performance is a priority.

  • scss:

    SCSS (Sassy CSS) is a syntax of Sass that is fully compatible with CSS. It allows developers to write styles in a familiar CSS-like format while still using Sass features like variables, nesting, and mixins. This makes it a popular choice for developers transitioning from CSS.

  • dart-sass:

    Dart Sass is the reference implementation of Sass, written in Dart. It is actively maintained and supports all the latest features of the Sass language. It compiles Sass to CSS using a pure Dart implementation, which is cross-platform and does not require native bindings, making it easy to install and use.

Performance

  • sass:

    Sass has a straightforward compilation process, but its performance can vary based on the complexity of the stylesheets being compiled. It is generally efficient for small to medium projects but may require optimization for larger codebases.

  • postcss-scss:

    The performance of PostCSS-SCSS depends on the PostCSS plugins used in the workflow. While it may not be as fast as Node Sass for pure Sass compilation, it offers flexibility and can be optimized with various plugins to enhance performance in different scenarios.

  • node-sass:

    Node Sass is known for its high performance due to its native bindings to LibSass. It compiles Sass to CSS quickly, making it a preferred choice for large projects where compilation speed is critical. However, it may not support the latest Sass features as quickly as Dart Sass.

  • scss:

    SCSS offers similar performance to Sass, as it compiles to CSS in a similar manner. The performance is generally good, but like Sass, it may require optimization for larger projects with complex styles.

  • dart-sass:

    Dart Sass is designed to be efficient and fast, but since it is written in Dart, it may not be as fast as native implementations like Node Sass in certain scenarios. However, it is continuously optimized and is suitable for most projects, especially with its support for the latest features.

Feature Support

  • sass:

    Sass supports all the core features of the language, but it does not receive updates as frequently as Dart Sass. It is suitable for projects that do not require the latest features but still want to use Sass capabilities.

  • postcss-scss:

    PostCSS-SCSS supports SCSS syntax but relies on the PostCSS ecosystem for additional features. It allows developers to use SCSS while benefiting from PostCSS plugins, making it a versatile choice for projects that require advanced CSS processing.

  • node-sass:

    Node Sass supports many features of Sass but may lag behind Dart Sass in adopting new features due to its reliance on LibSass. It is suitable for projects that do not require the latest Sass features but still need the core functionality.

  • scss:

    SCSS supports all the features of Sass and is fully compatible with CSS. It is ideal for developers who want to use Sass features while maintaining a familiar CSS syntax.

  • dart-sass:

    Dart Sass supports all the latest features of the Sass language, including modules, new functions, and advanced syntax. As the primary implementation, it is the first to receive updates and new features, making it the best choice for projects that require the latest capabilities.

Community and Ecosystem

  • sass:

    Sass has a long-standing community and a wealth of resources, tutorials, and documentation available. It is a well-established choice for CSS preprocessing, though it may not be as actively developed as Dart Sass.

  • postcss-scss:

    PostCSS-SCSS benefits from the extensive PostCSS ecosystem, which includes a wide range of plugins for various CSS tasks. This makes it a powerful option for developers looking to enhance their CSS workflow with additional tools and features.

  • node-sass:

    Node Sass has a large user base due to its speed and native bindings. However, it is important to note that LibSass is deprecated, which may affect its long-term viability. The community is still active, but developers are encouraged to consider Dart Sass for future projects.

  • scss:

    SCSS is widely used and has a strong community support. It is a popular choice among developers who prefer a CSS-like syntax while still leveraging Sass features, ensuring a wealth of resources and examples are available.

  • dart-sass:

    Dart Sass has a growing community and is actively maintained. It is the recommended implementation by the Sass team, which means it has strong support and a wealth of resources available for developers.

Ease of Use

  • sass:

    Sass is easy to use and requires minimal setup. It is suitable for developers who want a straightforward way to compile Sass without the complexities of Node.js or additional plugins.

  • postcss-scss:

    PostCSS-SCSS can be more complex to set up due to the need for PostCSS plugins, but it offers a flexible and powerful workflow for those familiar with PostCSS. Developers may need to invest time in configuring their build process to fully utilize its capabilities.

  • node-sass:

    Node Sass requires Node.js and native bindings, which can complicate the setup process for some developers. However, once configured, it is easy to use and integrates well with existing Node.js projects.

  • scss:

    SCSS is designed to be user-friendly, especially for those familiar with CSS. Its syntax is similar to CSS, making it easy for developers to adopt and start using Sass features without a steep learning curve.

  • dart-sass:

    Dart Sass is user-friendly and straightforward to set up, especially for new projects. It provides a simple command-line interface and is easy to integrate into various build tools, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

How to Choose: sass vs postcss-scss vs node-sass vs scss vs dart-sass
  • sass:

    Choose Sass if you prefer a simple command-line interface for compiling Sass files without additional dependencies. It is a straightforward option for users who want to get started quickly with Sass without the complexities of Node.js or PostCSS.

  • postcss-scss:

    Choose PostCSS-SCSS if you want to integrate Sass-like syntax into a PostCSS workflow. This package allows you to use SCSS syntax while leveraging PostCSS plugins for additional processing, making it ideal for projects that require advanced CSS transformations.

  • node-sass:

    Choose Node Sass if you need a fast, native binding for Node.js that compiles Sass to CSS. It is suitable for projects where performance is critical, but be aware that it may not support the latest Sass features as quickly as Dart Sass.

  • scss:

    Choose SCSS if you are looking for a syntax that is more CSS-like and easier for developers transitioning from CSS. SCSS allows for the same features as Sass but uses a syntax that is more familiar to CSS developers.

  • dart-sass:

    Choose Dart Sass if you want the most up-to-date implementation of Sass, as it is the primary implementation and supports the latest features. It is also the only implementation that supports the full Sass specification, making it ideal for new projects.

README for sass

A pure JavaScript implementation of Sass. Sass makes CSS fun again.

Sass logo npm statistics GitHub actions build status
Appveyor build status

This package is a distribution of Dart Sass, compiled to pure JavaScript with no native code or external dependencies. It provides a command-line sass executable and a Node.js API.

Usage

You can install Sass globally using npm install -g sass which will provide access to the sass executable. You can also add it to your project using npm install --save-dev sass. This provides the executable as well as a library:

const sass = require('sass');

const result = sass.compile(scssFilename);

// OR

// Note that `compileAsync()` is substantially slower than `compile()`.
const result = await sass.compileAsync(scssFilename);

See the Sass website for full API documentation.

Legacy API

Dart Sass also supports an older JavaScript API that's fully compatible with Node Sass (with a few exceptions listed below), with support for both the render() and renderSync() functions. This API is considered deprecated and will be removed in Dart Sass 2.0.0, so it should be avoided in new projects.

Sass's support for the legacy JavaScript API has the following limitations:

  • Only the "expanded" and "compressed" values of outputStyle are supported.

  • Dart Sass doesn't support the precision option. Dart Sass defaults to a sufficiently high precision for all existing browsers, and making this customizable would make the code substantially less efficient.

  • Dart Sass doesn't support the sourceComments option. Source maps are the recommended way of locating the origin of generated selectors.

See Also

  • Dart Sass, from which this package is compiled, can be used either as a stand-alone executable or as a Dart library. Running Dart Sass on the Dart VM is substantially faster than running the pure JavaScript version, so this may be appropriate for performance-sensitive applications. The Dart API is also (currently) more user-friendly than the JavaScript API. See the Dart Sass README for details on how to use it.

  • Node Sass, which is a wrapper around LibSass, the C++ implementation of Sass. Node Sass supports the same API as this package and is also faster (although it's usually a little slower than Dart Sass). However, it requires a native library which may be difficult to install, and it's generally slower to add features and fix bugs.

Behavioral Differences from Ruby Sass

There are a few intentional behavioral differences between Dart Sass and Ruby Sass. These are generally places where Ruby Sass has an undesired behavior, and it's substantially easier to implement the correct behavior than it would be to implement compatible behavior. These should all have tracking bugs against Ruby Sass to update the reference behavior.

  1. @extend only accepts simple selectors, as does the second argument of selector-extend(). See issue 1599.

  2. Subject selectors are not supported. See issue 1126.

  3. Pseudo selector arguments are parsed as <declaration-value>s rather than having a more limited custom parsing. See issue 2120.

  4. The numeric precision is set to 10. See issue 1122.

  5. The indented syntax parser is more flexible: it doesn't require consistent indentation across the whole document. See issue 2176.

  6. Colors do not support channel-by-channel arithmetic. See issue 2144.

  7. Unitless numbers aren't == to unit numbers with the same value. In addition, map keys follow the same logic as ==-equality. See issue 1496.

  8. rgba() and hsla() alpha values with percentage units are interpreted as percentages. Other units are forbidden. See issue 1525.

  9. Too many variable arguments passed to a function is an error. See issue 1408.

  10. Allow @extend to reach outside a media query if there's an identical @extend defined outside that query. This isn't tracked explicitly, because it'll be irrelevant when issue 1050 is fixed.

  11. Some selector pseudos containing placeholder selectors will be compiled where they wouldn't be in Ruby Sass. This better matches the semantics of the selectors in question, and is more efficient. See issue 2228.

  12. The old-style :property value syntax is not supported in the indented syntax. See issue 2245.

  13. The reference combinator is not supported. See issue 303.

  14. Universal selector unification is symmetrical. See issue 2247.

  15. @extend doesn't produce an error if it matches but fails to unify. See issue 2250.

  16. Dart Sass currently only supports UTF-8 documents. We'd like to support more, but Dart currently doesn't support them. See dart-lang/sdk#11744, for example.

Disclaimer: this is not an official Google product.