dompurify vs sanitize-html vs xss
HTML Sanitization Strategies for Frontend and Node.js
dompurifysanitize-htmlxssSimilar Packages:

HTML Sanitization Strategies for Frontend and Node.js

dompurify, sanitize-html, and xss are security-focused libraries designed to prevent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks by cleaning untrusted HTML input. dompurify is the industry standard for browser-based sanitization, leveraging the browser's own DOM parser to ensure safety. sanitize-html is a robust, string-based sanitizer primarily built for Node.js server environments, offering deep configuration for complex HTML structures. xss is a lightweight, string-based alternative often used in Node.js for quick filtering, though it relies on regular expressions and custom parsing logic rather than a full DOM tree.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend

3 Years

Github Stars Ranking

Stat Detail

Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
dompurify017,010642 kB03 days ago(MPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0)
sanitize-html04,55769.8 kB1297 days agoMIT
xss05,315145 kB682 years agoMIT

DOMPurify vs sanitize-html vs xss: Security, Performance, and Architecture

When handling user-generated content, sanitizing HTML is not optional — it is a critical security requirement. dompurify, sanitize-html, and xss all aim to strip dangerous scripts and attributes, but they achieve this through fundamentally different architectures. Let's compare how they handle parsing, configuration, and environment support.

đŸ–Ĩī¸ Execution Environment: Browser vs Node.js

The environment where you run your code often dictates which library you can use. Some tools rely on browser APIs, while others are built purely for server-side JavaScript.

dompurify was built for the browser first.

  • It uses the browser's native DOM parser to clean HTML.
  • In Node.js, it requires a polyfill like jsdom to simulate the browser environment.
// dompurify: Browser usage
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirtyHtml);

// dompurify: Node.js usage (requires jsdom)
import { JSDOM } from 'jsdom';
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const window = new JSDOM('').window;
const purify = DOMPurify(window);
const clean = purify.sanitize(dirtyHtml);

sanitize-html is designed for Node.js.

  • It runs without a DOM, using string parsing instead.
  • Can be bundled for the browser, but it is heavier than necessary for client-side tasks.
// sanitize-html: Node.js usage
import sanitizeHtml from 'sanitize-html';
const clean = sanitizeHtml(dirtyHtml, {
  allowedTags: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'a']
});

xss is a lightweight Node.js module.

  • It works in the browser too, but it is mostly used on the server.
  • Does not require a DOM environment, making it easy to drop into any JavaScript runtime.
// xss: Node.js or Browser usage
import { filterXSS } from 'xss';
const clean = filterXSS(dirtyHtml);

🧠 Parsing Engine: DOM Tree vs String Manipulation

How the library reads HTML determines its security posture. A DOM-based parser understands HTML the same way the browser does, while a string parser might miss edge cases.

dompurify builds a real DOM tree.

  • It lets the browser engine handle the heavy lifting of parsing tags and attributes.
  • This prevents issues where the sanitizer and the browser disagree on what is executable code.
// dompurify: Uses internal DOM creation
// No direct API to change parser, it is built-in
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>');
// Result: <img src="x">

sanitize-html uses a string-based parser (htmlparser2).

  • It walks through the HTML text and builds a virtual representation.
  • Fast and memory efficient, but theoretically prone to parser quirks if not updated.
// sanitize-html: String parsing
const clean = sanitizeHtml('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>', {
  allowedTags: ['img'],
  allowedAttributes: { img: ['src'] }
});
// Result: <img src="x" />

xss uses regular expressions and custom parsing.

  • It scans the string for known dangerous patterns.
  • Very fast, but regex-based security can sometimes be bypassed with obscure encoding.
// xss: Regex and string parsing
const clean = filterXSS('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>');
// Result: <img src="x">

âš™ī¸ Configuration: Allowlists and Custom Rules

Security is not one-size-fits-all. You often need to allow specific tags or attributes while blocking everything else. All three libraries support allowlists, but the syntax differs.

dompurify uses a global configuration object.

  • You set allowed tags and attributes before or during sanitization.
  • Supports hooks to modify nodes during the cleaning process.
// dompurify: Configuration
DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ALLOWED_TAGS: ['a', 'p'],
  ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href'],
  ADD_URI_SAFE_ATTR: ['data-id']
});

sanitize-html passes options directly to the function.

  • Very explicit about what is allowed per tag.
  • Supports transforming tags and discarding unwanted content gracefully.
// sanitize-html: Configuration
sanitizeHtml(dirty, {
  allowedTags: ['a', 'p'],
  allowedAttributes: {
    a: ['href']
  },
  allowedSchemes: ['http', 'https']
});

xss uses a whiteList object.

  • You define which tags are safe and which attributes they can have.
  • Also allows custom functions to handle specific tags.
// xss: Configuration
const options = {
  whiteList: {
    a: ['href', 'title'],
    p: []
  },
  onTag: function (tag, html, options) {
    // Custom logic per tag
  }
};
const clean = filterXSS(dirty, options);

đŸ›Ąī¸ Security Posture and Maintenance

Security libraries must be actively maintained to address new attack vectors. The community trust and update frequency matter here.

dompurify is the most widely audited.

  • It is the default choice for many large organizations and browser extensions.
  • Regularly updated to patch new XSS vectors discovered in browser engines.
// dompurify: Security focus
// Actively maintained with a strong focus on CVE response
// Example: Handling of SVG namespaces is robust
DOMPurify.sanitize('<svg onload=alert(1)>'); // Safely removed

sanitize-html is highly trusted in the Node ecosystem.

  • Maintained by ApostropheCMS, a team with a strong security focus.
  • Good track record, but string parsing requires constant vigilance against new bypasses.
// sanitize-html: Security focus
// Handles complex nested structures well
sanitizeHtml('<div><script>alert(1)</script></div>'); // Script removed

xss is older and less active.

  • It has been around for a long time but sees fewer updates than the others.
  • Suitable for low-risk scenarios, but sanitize-html is generally preferred for critical apps.
// xss: Security focus
// Basic protection, may miss obscure vectors
filterXSS('<script>alert(1)</script>'); // Script removed

🌱 Similarities: Shared Ground Between Sanitizers

While their internals differ, these libraries share the same core mission and some common features.

1. đŸšĢ Script Removal

  • All three remove <script> tags and event handlers (like onclick).
  • This is the baseline requirement for preventing XSS.
// All packages remove scripts
// dompurify
DOMPurify.sanitize('<script>alert(1)</script>'); // ""

// sanitize-html
sanitizeHtml('<script>alert(1)</script>'); // ""

// xss
filterXSS('<script>alert(1)</script>'); // ""

2. 🔗 URL Sanitization

  • All three check URLs in attributes like href and src.
  • They block dangerous protocols like javascript:.
// All packages block javascript: URLs
// dompurify
DOMPurify.sanitize('<a href="javascript:alert(1)">Link</a>'); // <a>Link</a>

// sanitize-html
sanitizeHtml('<a href="javascript:alert(1)">Link</a>'); // <a>Link</a>

// xss
filterXSS('<a href="javascript:alert(1)">Link</a>'); // <a>Link</a>

3. âš™ī¸ Custom Allowlists

  • All three let you define which tags are safe.
  • Default settings vary, but all support customization.
// All packages support custom tags
// dompurify
DOMPurify.sanitize('<custom-tag>Hi</custom-tag>', { ALLOWED_TAGS: ['custom-tag'] });

// sanitize-html
sanitizeHtml('<custom-tag>Hi</custom-tag>', { allowedTags: ['custom-tag'] });

// xss
filterXSS('<custom-tag>Hi</custom-tag>', { whiteList: { 'custom-tag': [] } });

📊 Summary: Key Differences

Featuredompurifysanitize-htmlxss
Parser TypeđŸŒŗ DOM Tree (Browser/JSdom)📝 String (htmlparser2)📝 String (Regex/Custom)
Primary EnvđŸ–Ĩī¸ Browser (Node with jsdom)đŸ–Ĩī¸ Node.jsđŸ–Ĩī¸ Node.js / Browser
Config StyleđŸ› ī¸ Global + Per-call OptionsđŸ› ī¸ Per-call OptionsđŸ› ī¸ Options Object
Security TrustđŸ›Ąī¸ Highest (Industry Standard)đŸ›Ąī¸ High (Node Standard)đŸ›Ąī¸ Medium (Legacy/Lightweight)
DependenciesđŸ“Ļ None (Browser) / jsdom (Node)đŸ“Ļ htmlparser2, deepmergeđŸ“Ļ None (Minimal)

💡 The Big Picture

dompurify is the gold standard đŸĨ‡ for security. If you are in the browser, use it. If you are in Node.js and security is your top priority, the extra cost of jsdom is worth it to match the browser's parsing behavior.

sanitize-html is the workhorse 🐴 for Node.js servers. It balances security and performance well without requiring a full DOM implementation. It is the go-to choice for API backends processing HTML content.

xss is the lightweight tool đŸĒļ for simple tasks. It works well for quick filtering where dependencies must be kept to an absolute minimum, but for critical applications, the other two offer more robust protection.

Final Thought: All three tools prevent XSS, but they do it differently. Match the tool to your environment — browser or server — and your security requirements. When in doubt, dompurify for clients and sanitize-html for servers is the safest architectural pattern.

How to Choose: dompurify vs sanitize-html vs xss

  • dompurify:

    Choose dompurify if you are sanitizing HTML directly in the browser or need the highest level of security against DOM-based XSS. It is the best choice when you can afford the cost of a DOM parser (or jsdom in Node) because it uses the browser engine's own rules to determine what is safe, reducing the risk of parser mismatches.

  • sanitize-html:

    Choose sanitize-html if you are running sanitization on the server (Node.js) and need to process complex HTML documents with strict allowlists. It is ideal for content management systems or APIs where you want to avoid the heavy memory footprint of a full DOM implementation while maintaining strong security guarantees.

  • xss:

    Choose xss if you need a very lightweight dependency for simple HTML filtering in a Node.js environment and cannot accommodate the larger footprint of sanitize-html. It is suitable for basic use cases where performance is critical and the HTML structure is not deeply nested, but be aware it may lack some advanced configuration features of the others.

README for dompurify

DOMPurify

npm License Downloads dependents npm package minimized gzipped size (select exports)

Build & Test OpenSSF Best Practices OpenSSF Scorecard Socket Badge Cloudback

DOMPurify is a DOM-only, super-fast, uber-tolerant XSS sanitizer for HTML, MathML and SVG.

It's also very simple to use and get started with. DOMPurify was started in February 2014 and, meanwhile, has reached version v3.4.5.

DOMPurify runs as JavaScript and works in all modern browsers (Safari (10+), Opera (15+), Edge, Firefox and Chrome - as well as almost anything else using Blink, Gecko or WebKit). It doesn't break on MSIE or other legacy browsers. It simply does nothing.

Note that DOMPurify v2.5.9 is the latest version supporting MSIE. For important security updates compatible with MSIE, please use the 2.x branch.

Our automated tests cover 9 browser/OS combinations (Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit across Ubuntu, macOS, and Windows) on every push, plus Node.js v20, v22, v24, v25 and v26 running DOMPurify on jsdom. Older Node versions are known to work as well, but hey... no guarantees.

DOMPurify is written by security people who have vast background in web attacks and XSS. Fear not. For more details please also read about our Security Goals & Threat Model. Please, read it. Like, really.

The DOMPurify project inspired the creation of the HTML Sanitizer API, which is already shipping in many browsers.

What does it do?

DOMPurify sanitizes HTML and prevents XSS attacks. You can feed DOMPurify with e.g. a string full of dirty HTML and it will return a string (unless configured otherwise) with clean HTML. DOMPurify will strip out everything that contains dangerous HTML and thereby prevent XSS attacks and other nastiness. It's also damn bloody fast. We use the technologies the browser provides and turn them into an XSS filter. The faster your browser, the faster DOMPurify will be.

How do I use it?

It's easy. Just include DOMPurify on your website.

Using the unminified version (source-map available)

<script type="text/javascript" src="dist/purify.js"></script>

Using the minified and tested production version (source-map available)

<script type="text/javascript" src="dist/purify.min.js"></script>

Afterwards you can sanitize strings by executing the following code:

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty);

Or maybe this, if you love working with Angular or alike:

import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<b>hello there</b>');

The resulting HTML can be written into a DOM element using innerHTML or the DOM using document.write(). That is fully up to you. Note that by default, we permit HTML, SVG and MathML. If you only need HTML, which might be a very common use-case, you can easily set that up as well:

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { USE_PROFILES: { html: true } });

Is there any foot-gun potential?

Well, please note, if you first sanitize HTML and then modify it afterwards, you might easily void the effects of sanitization. If you feed the sanitized markup to another library after sanitization, please be certain that the library doesn't mess around with the HTML on its own.

Okay, makes sense, let's move on

After sanitizing your markup, you can also have a look at the property DOMPurify.removed and find out, what elements and attributes were thrown out. Please do not use this property for making any security critical decisions. This is just a little helper for curious minds.

Running DOMPurify on the server

DOMPurify technically also works server-side with Node.js. Our support strives to follow the Node.js release cycle.

Running DOMPurify on the server requires a DOM to be present, which is probably no surprise. Usually, jsdom is the tool of choice and we strongly recommend to use the latest version of jsdom.

Why? Because older versions of jsdom are known to be buggy in ways that result in XSS even if DOMPurify does everything 100% correctly. There are known attack vectors in, e.g. jsdom v19.0.0 that are fixed in jsdom v20.0.0 - and we really recommend to keep jsdom up to date because of that.

Please also be aware that tools like happy-dom exist but are not considered safe at this point. Combining DOMPurify with happy-dom is currently not recommended and will likely lead to XSS.

Other than that, you are fine to use DOMPurify on the server. Probably. This really depends on jsdom or whatever DOM you utilize server-side. If you can live with that, this is how you get it to work:

npm install dompurify
npm install jsdom

For jsdom (please use an up-to-date version), this should do the trick:

const createDOMPurify = require('dompurify');
const { JSDOM } = require('jsdom');

const window = new JSDOM('').window;
const DOMPurify = createDOMPurify(window);
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<b>hello there</b>');

Or even this, if you prefer working with imports:

import { JSDOM } from 'jsdom';
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';

const window = new JSDOM('').window;
const purify = DOMPurify(window);
const clean = purify.sanitize('<b>hello there</b>');

If you have problems making it work in your specific setup, consider looking at the amazing isomorphic-dompurify project which solves lots of problems people might run into.

npm install isomorphic-dompurify
import DOMPurify from 'isomorphic-dompurify';

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<s>hello</s>');

Is there a demo?

Of course there is a demo! Play with DOMPurify

What if I find a security bug?

First of all, please immediately contact us via email so we can work on a fix. PGP key

Also, you probably qualify for a bug bounty! The fine folks over at Fastmail use DOMPurify for their services and added our library to their bug bounty scope. So, if you find a way to bypass or weaken DOMPurify, please also have a look at their website and the bug bounty info.

Some purification samples please?

How does purified markup look like? Well, the demo shows it for a big bunch of nasty elements. But let's also show some smaller examples!

DOMPurify.sanitize('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)//>'); // becomes <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cure53/DOMPurify/HEAD/x">
DOMPurify.sanitize('<svg><g/onload=alert(2)//<p>'); // becomes <svg><g></g></svg>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<p>abc<iframe//src=jAva&Tab;script:alert(3)>def</p>'); // becomes <p>abc</p>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<math><mi//xlink:href="data:x,<script>alert(4)</script>">'); // becomes <math><mi></mi></math>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<TABLE><tr><td>HELLO</tr></TABL>'); // becomes <table><tbody><tr><td>HELLO</td></tr></tbody></table>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<UL><li><A HREF=//google.com>click</UL>'); // becomes <ul><li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/blob/HEAD///google.com">click</a></li></ul>

What is supported?

DOMPurify currently supports HTML5, SVG and MathML. DOMPurify per default allows CSS, HTML custom data attributes. DOMPurify also supports the Shadow DOM - and sanitizes DOM templates recursively. DOMPurify also allows you to sanitize HTML for being used with the jQuery $() and elm.html() API without any known problems.

What about legacy browsers like Internet Explorer?

DOMPurify does nothing at all. It simply returns exactly the string that you fed it. DOMPurify exposes a property called isSupported, which tells you whether it will be able to do its job, so you can come up with your own backup plan.

What about DOMPurify and Trusted Types?

In version 1.0.9, support for Trusted Types API was added to DOMPurify. In version 2.0.0, a config flag was added to control DOMPurify's behavior regarding this.

When DOMPurify.sanitize is used in an environment where the Trusted Types API is available and RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE is set to true, it tries to return a TrustedHTML value instead of a string (the behavior for RETURN_DOM and RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT config options does not change).

Note that in order to create a policy in trustedTypes using DOMPurify, RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: false is required, as createHTML expects a normal string, not TrustedHTML. The example below shows this.

window.trustedTypes.createPolicy('default', {
  createHTML: (to_escape) =>
    DOMPurify.sanitize(to_escape, { RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: false }),
});

Can I configure DOMPurify?

Yes. The included default configuration values are pretty good already - but you can of course override them. Check out the /demos folder to see a bunch of examples on how you can customize DOMPurify.

General settings

// strip {{ ... }}, ${ ... } and <% ... %> to make output safe for template systems
// be careful please, this mode is not recommended for production usage.
// allowing template parsing in user-controlled HTML is not advised at all.
// only use this mode if there is really no alternative.
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true });

// change how e.g. comments containing risky HTML characters are treated.
// be very careful, this setting should only be set to `false` if you really only handle
// HTML and nothing else, no SVG, MathML or the like.
// Otherwise, changing from `true` to `false` will lead to XSS in this or some other way.
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SAFE_FOR_XML: false });

Control our allow-lists and block-lists

// allow only <b> elements, very strict
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b'] });

// allow only <b> and <q> with style attributes
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'q'],
  ALLOWED_ATTR: ['style'],
});

// allow all safe HTML elements but neither SVG nor MathML
// note that the USE_PROFILES setting will override the ALLOWED_TAGS setting
// so don't use them together
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { USE_PROFILES: { html: true } });

// allow all safe SVG elements and SVG Filters, no HTML or MathML
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  USE_PROFILES: { svg: true, svgFilters: true },
});

// allow all safe MathML elements and SVG, but no SVG Filters
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  USE_PROFILES: { mathMl: true, svg: true },
});

// change the default namespace from HTML to something different
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  NAMESPACE: 'http://www.w3.org/2000/svg',
});

// leave all safe HTML as it is and add <style> elements to block-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { FORBID_TAGS: ['style'] });

// leave all safe HTML as it is and add style attributes to block-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { FORBID_ATTR: ['style'] });

// extend the existing array of allowed tags and add <my-tag> to allow-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_TAGS: ['my-tag'] });

// extend the existing array of allowed attributes and add my-attr to allow-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_ATTR: ['my-attr'] });

// use functions to control which additional tags and attributes are allowed
const allowlist = {
  one: ['attribute-one'],
  two: ['attribute-two'],
};
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<one attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></one><two attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></two>',
  {
    ADD_TAGS: (tagName) => {
      return Object.keys(allowlist).includes(tagName);
    },
    ADD_ATTR: (attributeName, tagName) => {
      return allowlist[tagName]?.includes(attributeName) || false;
    },
  }
); // <one attribute-one="1"></one><two attribute-two="2"></two>

// prohibit ARIA attributes, leave other safe HTML as is (default is true)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOW_ARIA_ATTR: false });

// prohibit HTML5 data attributes, leave other safe HTML as is (default is true)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOW_DATA_ATTR: false });

Control behavior relating to Custom Elements

// DOMPurify allows to define rules for Custom Elements. When using the CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING
// literal, it is possible to define exactly what elements you wish to allow (by default, none are allowed).
//
// The same goes for their attributes. By default, the built-in or configured allow.list is used.
//
// You can use a RegExp literal to specify what is allowed or a predicate, examples for both can be seen below.
// When using a predicate function for attributeNameCheck, it can optionally receive the tagName as a second parameter
// for more granular control over which attributes are allowed for specific elements.
// The default values are very restrictive to prevent accidental XSS bypasses. Handle with great care!

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<foo-bar baz="foobar" forbidden="true"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: null, // no custom elements are allowed
      attributeNameCheck: null, // default / standard attribute allow-list is used
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: false, // no customized built-ins allowed
    },
  }
); // <div is=""></div>

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<foo-bar baz="foobar" forbidden="true"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: /^foo-/, // allow all tags starting with "foo-"
      attributeNameCheck: /baz/, // allow all attributes containing "baz"
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: true, // customized built-ins are allowed
    },
  }
); // <foo-bar baz="foobar"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<foo-bar baz="foobar" forbidden="true"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: (tagName) => tagName.match(/^foo-/), // allow all tags starting with "foo-"
      attributeNameCheck: (attr) => attr.match(/baz/), // allow all containing "baz"
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: true, // allow customized built-ins
    },
  }
); // <foo-bar baz="foobar"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>

// Example with attributeNameCheck receiving tagName as a second parameter
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<element-one attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></element-one><element-two attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></element-two>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: (tagName) => tagName.match(/^element-(one|two)$/),
      attributeNameCheck: (attr, tagName) => {
        if (tagName === 'element-one') {
          return ['attribute-one'].includes(attr);
        } else if (tagName === 'element-two') {
          return ['attribute-two'].includes(attr);
        } else {
          return false;
        }
      },
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: false,
    },
  }
); // <element-one attribute-one="1"></element-one><element-two attribute-two="2"></element-two>

Control behavior relating to URI values

// extend the existing array of elements that can use Data URIs
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_DATA_URI_TAGS: ['a', 'area'] });

// extend the existing array of elements that are safe for URI-like values (be careful, XSS risk)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_URI_SAFE_ATTR: ['my-attr'] });

Control permitted attribute values

// allow external protocol handlers in URL attributes (default is false, be careful, XSS risk)
// by default only http, https, ftp, ftps, tel, mailto, callto, sms, cid, xmpp and matrix are allowed.
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOW_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOLS: true });

// allow specific protocol handlers in URL attributes via regex (default is false, be careful, XSS risk)
// by default only (protocol-)relative URLs, http, https, ftp, ftps, tel, mailto, callto, sms, cid, xmpp and matrix are allowed.
// Default RegExp: /^(?:(?:(?:f|ht)tps?|mailto|tel|callto|sms|cid|xmpp):|[^a-z]|[a-z+.\-]+(?:[^a-z+.\-:]|$))/i;
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ALLOWED_URI_REGEXP:
    /^(?:(?:(?:f|ht)tps?|mailto|tel|callto|sms|cid|xmpp|matrix):|[^a-z]|[a-z+.\-]+(?:[^a-z+.\-:]|$))/i,
});

Influence the return-type

// return a DOM HTMLBodyElement instead of an HTML string (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { RETURN_DOM: true });

// return a DOM DocumentFragment instead of an HTML string (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT: true });

// use the RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE flag to turn on Trusted Types support if available
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: true }); // will return a TrustedHTML object instead of a string if possible

// use a provided Trusted Types policy
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  // supplied policy must define createHTML and createScriptURL
  TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: trustedTypes.createPolicy('dompurify', {
    createHTML(s) {
      return s;
    },
    createScriptURL(s) {
      return s;
    },
  }),
});

Influence how we sanitize

// return entire document including <html> tags (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { WHOLE_DOCUMENT: true });

// disable DOM Clobbering protection on output (default is true, handle with care, minor XSS risks here)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SANITIZE_DOM: false });

// enforce strict DOM Clobbering protection via namespace isolation (default is false)
// when enabled, isolates the namespace of named properties (i.e., `id` and `name` attributes)
// from JS variables by prefixing them with the string `user-content-`
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SANITIZE_NAMED_PROPS: true });

// keep an element's content when the element is removed (default is true)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { KEEP_CONTENT: false });

// glue elements like style, script or others to document.body and prevent unintuitive browser behavior in several edge-cases (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { FORCE_BODY: true });

// remove all <a> elements under <p> elements that are removed
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  FORBID_CONTENTS: ['a'],
  FORBID_TAGS: ['p'],
});

// extend the default FORBID_CONTENTS list to also remove <a> elements under <p> elements
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ADD_FORBID_CONTENTS: ['a'],
  FORBID_TAGS: ['p'],
});

// change the parser type so sanitized data is treated as XML and not as HTML, which is the default
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  PARSER_MEDIA_TYPE: 'application/xhtml+xml',
});

Influence where we sanitize

// use the IN_PLACE mode to sanitize a node "in place", which is much faster depending on how you use DOMPurify
const dirty = document.createElement('a');
dirty.setAttribute('href', 'javascript:alert(1)');

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { IN_PLACE: true }); // see https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/288 for more info

There is even more examples here, showing how you can run, customize and configure DOMPurify to fit your needs.

Persistent Configuration

Instead of repeatedly passing the same configuration to DOMPurify.sanitize, you can use the DOMPurify.setConfig method. Your configuration will persist until your next call to DOMPurify.setConfig, or until you invoke DOMPurify.clearConfig to reset it. Remember that there is only one active configuration, which means once it is set, all extra configuration parameters passed to DOMPurify.sanitize are ignored.

Hooks

DOMPurify allows you to augment its functionality by attaching one or more functions with the DOMPurify.addHook method to one of the following hooks:

  • beforeSanitizeElements
  • uponSanitizeElement (No 's' - called for every element)
  • afterSanitizeElements
  • beforeSanitizeAttributes
  • uponSanitizeAttribute
  • afterSanitizeAttributes
  • beforeSanitizeShadowDOM
  • uponSanitizeShadowNode
  • afterSanitizeShadowDOM

It passes the currently processed DOM node, when needed a literal with verified node and attribute data and the DOMPurify configuration to the callback. Check out the MentalJS hook demo to see how the API can be used nicely.

Example:

DOMPurify.addHook(
  'uponSanitizeAttribute',
  function (currentNode, hookEvent, config) {
    // Do something with the current node
    // You can also mutate hookEvent for current node (i.e. set hookEvent.forceKeepAttr = true)
    // For other than 'uponSanitizeAttribute' hook types hookEvent equals to null
  }
);

Removed Configuration

OptionSinceNote
SAFE_FOR_JQUERY2.1.0No replacement required.

Continuous Integration

We are currently using GitHub Actions in combination with Playwright. This gives us the possibility to confirm for each and every commit that all is going according to plan in relevant modern browsers. Check out the build logs here: https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/actions

You can further run local tests by executing npm run test.

All relevant commits will be signed with the key 0x24BB6BF4 for additional security (since 8th of April 2016).

Development and contributing

Installation (npm i)

We support npm officially. GitHub Actions workflow is configured to install dependencies using npm. When using a deprecated version of npm, we cannot fully ensure the versions of installed dependencies, which might lead to unanticipated problems.

Scripts

We use ESLint via xo as part of our pre-commit workflow to help ensure code consistency. In addition, we use Prettier for source and Markdown formatting, and /dist assets are built through rollup.

These are our npm scripts:

  • npm run dev to build the unminified UMD bundle while watching sources for changes
  • npm run test to lint the sources, run tests through jsdom, and run Karma tests in Chrome
    • npm run test:jsdom to only run tests through jsdom
    • npm run test:browser to only run tests through Playwright
    • npm run test:ci to run the CI test flow for jsdom and Karma/BrowserStack
    • npm run test:fuzz to run a small fuzzer covering sanitize() and CONFIG
  • npm run lint to lint the sources using ESLint via xo
  • npm run format to format JavaScript/TypeScript and Markdown sources with Prettier
    • npm run format:js to only format JavaScript/TypeScript sources
    • npm run format:md to only format Markdown files
  • npm run build to build type declarations and distribution bundles, then fix and clean up generated types
    • npm run build:types to only emit TypeScript declaration files
    • npm run build:rollup to build all Rollup bundles
    • npm run build:umd to only build an unminified UMD bundle
    • npm run build:umd:min to only build a minified UMD bundle
    • npm run build:es to only build the ES module bundle
    • npm run build:cjs to only build the CommonJS bundle
    • npm run build:fix-types to post-process generated type files
    • npm run build:cleanup to clean up temporary generated type output
  • npm run verify-typescript to run the TypeScript verification script
  • npm run commit-amend-build to run the maintainer helper script for amending build output

Note: all run scripts triggered via npm run <script>.

There are more npm scripts but they are mainly to integrate with CI or are meant to be "private" for instance to amend build distribution files with every commit.

Security Mailing List

We maintain a mailing list that notifies whenever a security-critical release of DOMPurify was published. This means, if someone found a bypass and we fixed it with a release (which always happens when a bypass was found) a mail will go out to that list. This usually happens within minutes or a few hours after learning about a bypass. The list can be subscribed to here:

https://lists.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/mailman/listinfo/dompurify-security

Feature releases will not be announced to this list.

Who contributed?

Many people have helped DOMPurify become what it is today, and they deserve to be acknowledged!

lukewarlow, DEMON1A, fg0x0, kodareef5, DavidOliver, 1Jesper1, bencalif, trace37labs, eddieran, christos-eth, researchatfluidattacks, frevadiscor, Rotzbua, binhpv, MariusRumpf, prasadrajandran, Cybozu 💛💸, hata6502 💸, openclaw 💸, intra-mart-dh 💸, nelstrom â¤ī¸, hash_kitten â¤ī¸, kevin_mizu â¤ī¸, icesfont â¤ī¸, reduckted â¤ī¸, dcramer 💸, JGraph 💸, baekilda 💸, Healthchecks 💸, Sentry 💸, jarrodldavis 💸, CynegeticIO, ssi02014 â¤ī¸, GrantGryczan, Lowdefy, granlem, oreoshake, tdeekens â¤ī¸, peernohell â¤ī¸, is2ei, SoheilKhodayari, franktopel, NateScarlet, neilj, fhemberger, Joris-van-der-Wel, ydaniv, terjanq, filedescriptor, ConradIrwin, gibson042, choumx, 0xSobky, styfle, koto, tlau88, strugee, oparoz, mathiasbynens, edg2s, dnkolegov, dhardtke, wirehead, thorn0, styu, mozfreddyb, mikesamuel, jorangreef, jimmyhchan, jameydeorio, jameskraus, hyderali, hansottowirtz, hackvertor, freddyb, flavorjones, djfarrelly, devd, camerondunford, buu700, buildog, alabiaga, Vector919, Robbert, GreLI, FuzzySockets, ArtemBernatskyy, @garethheyes, @shafigullin, @mmrupp, @irsdl,ShikariSenpai, ansjdnakjdnajkd, @asutherland, @mathias, @cgvwzq, @robbertatwork, @giutro, @CmdEngineer_, @avr4mit, davecardwell and especially @securitymb â¤ī¸ & @masatokinugawa â¤ī¸