react-test-renderer vs enzyme vs react-testing-library
React Testing Libraries Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
react-test-rendererenzymereact-testing-librarySimilar Packages:
What's React Testing Libraries?

React testing libraries are essential tools for ensuring the reliability and functionality of React applications. They provide developers with the means to create automated tests that validate the behavior of components, ensuring that the user interface behaves as expected. Each library has its unique approach to testing, focusing on different aspects of the testing process, from shallow rendering to full DOM rendering, and user interaction simulation. By leveraging these libraries, developers can catch bugs early, improve code quality, and facilitate easier maintenance of their codebase.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
react-test-renderer4,831,817232,579862 kB9593 months agoMIT
enzyme1,640,39119,943-2815 years agoMIT
react-testing-library46,116---6 years ago-
Feature Comparison: react-test-renderer vs enzyme vs react-testing-library

Rendering Approach

  • react-test-renderer:

    React Test Renderer renders components to pure JavaScript objects, allowing you to test the output without a DOM. It is designed for snapshot testing, enabling you to capture the rendered output of a component and compare it to previous snapshots, making it easy to detect unintended changes in UI.

  • enzyme:

    Enzyme provides multiple rendering options: shallow, mount, and static rendering. Shallow rendering allows you to test a component in isolation without rendering its child components, which is useful for unit testing. Full DOM rendering (mount) enables you to test components with their children and lifecycle methods, while static rendering is useful for rendering components to static HTML.

  • react-testing-library:

    React Testing Library focuses on rendering components in a way that mimics how users interact with them. It encourages testing components in a real DOM environment, which allows for more realistic tests that cover user interactions, such as clicks and form submissions.

User Interaction Testing

  • react-test-renderer:

    React Test Renderer does not provide built-in support for simulating user interactions. It focuses more on rendering output and snapshot testing, which means you would need to use additional libraries for simulating events and testing user interactions.

  • enzyme:

    Enzyme allows for simulating events and interactions on components, such as clicks and form submissions. This makes it easy to test how components respond to user actions, and you can directly manipulate the component's state and props during tests, providing a high level of control.

  • react-testing-library:

    React Testing Library excels at testing user interactions. It provides utilities for simulating user events, such as clicks and typing, and encourages developers to test components in a way that reflects how users would interact with them, making it ideal for integration tests.

Learning Curve

  • react-test-renderer:

    React Test Renderer has a relatively low learning curve, especially for those already familiar with React. Its API is simple and focused on rendering components and creating snapshots, making it easy to get started with testing.

  • enzyme:

    Enzyme has a moderate learning curve, especially for developers who are familiar with React. Its API is straightforward, but understanding the different rendering methods and when to use them effectively can take some time. Once mastered, it offers powerful testing capabilities.

  • react-testing-library:

    React Testing Library is designed to be intuitive and encourages best practices, making it easy to learn. Its API is user-friendly, and developers can quickly grasp how to write tests that focus on user interactions and accessibility.

Community and Ecosystem

  • react-test-renderer:

    React Test Renderer is maintained by the React team and is well-integrated with React's ecosystem. It is a reliable choice for snapshot testing, and its usage aligns with React's development philosophy, ensuring compatibility with future updates.

  • enzyme:

    Enzyme has a strong community and is widely used in the React ecosystem. However, it has not been actively maintained in recent years, which may lead to compatibility issues with the latest React features. It is still a popular choice for many existing projects.

  • react-testing-library:

    React Testing Library has gained significant popularity and is actively maintained by the community. It is widely adopted in the React ecosystem, and its focus on user-centric testing aligns well with modern best practices, making it a preferred choice for many developers.

Snapshot Testing

  • react-test-renderer:

    React Test Renderer is specifically designed for snapshot testing. It allows you to create snapshots of your components' rendered output, making it easy to track changes and catch unintended modifications in the UI.

  • enzyme:

    Enzyme supports snapshot testing through integration with Jest, allowing you to capture and compare component output over time. This feature is useful for ensuring that UI changes are intentional and that components render as expected.

  • react-testing-library:

    React Testing Library does not focus on snapshot testing as its primary feature. While you can use it in conjunction with Jest for snapshot testing, its main strength lies in testing user interactions and ensuring that components behave correctly in real-world scenarios.

How to Choose: react-test-renderer vs enzyme vs react-testing-library
  • react-test-renderer:

    Choose React Test Renderer if you want to create snapshots of your components and test their rendering output without worrying about the DOM. It is particularly useful for testing the output of components in isolation, making it a great choice for developers who prioritize snapshot testing and want to ensure that UI changes are intentional.

  • enzyme:

    Choose Enzyme if you need a powerful and flexible testing utility that allows for shallow rendering, full DOM rendering, and static rendering. It is particularly useful for testing component lifecycle methods and state management, making it ideal for developers who want to have granular control over their component tests.

  • react-testing-library:

    Choose React Testing Library if you prefer a testing approach that emphasizes testing components as users would interact with them. It encourages best practices by focusing on accessibility and user experience, making it suitable for developers who value integration testing and want to ensure that their components work correctly in a real-world context.

Similar Npm Packages to react-test-renderer

react-test-renderer is a testing utility for React applications that allows developers to render React components in a test environment. It provides a way to create a virtual representation of the component tree, enabling developers to assert on the output of their components without needing to mount them in a DOM. This makes it particularly useful for unit testing React components in isolation. The library is part of the React ecosystem and is often used in conjunction with other testing frameworks like Jest.

While react-test-renderer is a powerful tool for testing React components, there are other libraries that offer different approaches to testing. Here are a couple of alternatives:

  • enzyme is a popular testing utility for React that provides a more comprehensive API for rendering components and interacting with them. It allows developers to perform shallow rendering, full DOM rendering, and static rendering of components. With its rich set of methods, enzyme enables developers to simulate events, traverse the component tree, and assert on component behavior. If you need a more extensive testing solution that allows for deeper interaction with components, enzyme is a solid choice.
  • react-testing-library is another widely used testing library that focuses on testing components in a way that resembles how users interact with them. It encourages developers to write tests that prioritize user experience by querying the DOM in a way that reflects how users would find elements. This approach leads to more reliable tests that are less coupled to the implementation details of components. If your goal is to create tests that are more aligned with user behavior and interactions, react-testing-library is an excellent option.

To see how these libraries compare, check out the comparison: Comparing enzyme vs react-test-renderer vs react-testing-library.

Similar Npm Packages to enzyme

enzyme is a popular testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse React component output. Developed by Airbnb, enzyme provides a robust API that allows developers to test React components in a variety of ways, including shallow rendering, full DOM rendering, and static rendering. This flexibility makes it a valuable tool for unit testing and integration testing in React applications. However, there are several alternatives available that also cater to testing needs in the JavaScript ecosystem. Here are a few notable alternatives:

  • chai is an assertion library for Node.js and browsers that can be paired with any testing framework. It provides a rich set of assertions for writing tests, making it easier to express expectations in a readable manner. While chai is not specifically designed for React, it can be used alongside other testing libraries like Mocha or Jest to enhance the testing experience. If you prefer a BDD-style assertion library that integrates well with various testing frameworks, chai is a solid choice.

  • jest is a widely-used testing framework developed by Facebook, particularly popular in the React community. It comes with a built-in assertion library and supports features like mocking, snapshot testing, and code coverage analysis. Jest is known for its ease of use and zero-config setup, making it an excellent choice for testing React applications. Many developers opt for Jest as their primary testing framework due to its comprehensive features and seamless integration with React.

  • mocha is a flexible testing framework for Node.js and browsers that allows developers to write tests in a variety of styles, including BDD and TDD. Mocha does not come with an assertion library by default, but it can be easily paired with libraries like chai for assertions. While it requires a bit more setup compared to Jest, Mocha's flexibility and extensive ecosystem make it a popular choice for many developers looking for a customizable testing solution.

  • react-testing-library is a library that focuses on testing React components in a way that resembles how users interact with them. It encourages better testing practices by promoting tests that are more aligned with user behavior rather than implementation details. React Testing Library is often used in conjunction with Jest, making it a powerful combination for testing React applications. If your goal is to write tests that prioritize user experience and interaction, React Testing Library is an excellent alternative to enzyme.

For a comprehensive comparison of these testing libraries, check out the following link: Comparing chai vs enzyme vs jest vs mocha vs react-testing-library.

Similar Npm Packages to react-testing-library

react-testing-library is a popular testing utility for React applications that encourages good testing practices. It provides a simple and accessible API to render components and interact with them in a way that resembles how users would interact with the application. By focusing on testing components from the user's perspective, react-testing-library helps developers create more reliable and maintainable tests. While it is a powerful tool for testing React applications, there are several alternatives worth considering:

  • cypress is an end-to-end testing framework that allows developers to test their applications in a real browser environment. Unlike react-testing-library, which focuses on unit and integration testing of React components, cypress is designed for testing the entire application flow, including user interactions, API calls, and UI behavior. It provides a rich set of features, including time travel debugging, automatic waiting, and a powerful assertion library. If you need to test the complete user experience of your application, cypress is an excellent choice.
  • enzyme is another testing utility for React that allows developers to test components in isolation. It provides a more in-depth API for rendering components, allowing for shallow rendering, full DOM rendering, and static rendering. While enzyme is powerful and flexible, it encourages a different testing philosophy compared to react-testing-library, as it often focuses on the implementation details of components rather than user interactions. If you prefer a more detailed approach to testing and need to inspect component internals, enzyme may be the right tool for you.
  • jest-dom is an extension of the Jest testing framework that provides custom matchers for asserting on DOM nodes. It enhances the testing experience by allowing developers to write more expressive and readable assertions when testing React components. While jest-dom is not a standalone testing library, it complements react-testing-library by providing additional matchers that make it easier to assert on the state of the DOM. If you're already using Jest for your testing needs, incorporating jest-dom can improve the quality of your tests.

To explore how these testing libraries compare, check out the comparison: Comparing cypress vs enzyme vs jest-dom vs react-testing-library.

README for react-test-renderer

react-test-renderer (DEPRECATED)

Deprecation notice

react-test-renderer is deprecated and no longer maintained. It will be removed in a future version. As of React 19, you will see a console warning when invoking ReactTestRenderer.create().

React Testing

This library creates a contrived environment and its APIs encourage introspection on React's internals, which may change without notice causing broken tests. It is instead recommended to use browser-based environments such as jsdom and standard DOM APIs for your assertions.

The React team recommends @testing-library/react as a modern alternative that uses standard APIs, avoids internals, and promotes best practices.

React Native Testing

The React team recommends @testing-library/react-native as a replacement for react-test-renderer for native integration tests. This React Native testing-library variant follows the same API design as described above and promotes better testing patterns.

Documentation

This package provides an experimental React renderer that can be used to render React components to pure JavaScript objects, without depending on the DOM or a native mobile environment.

Essentially, this package makes it easy to grab a snapshot of the "DOM tree" rendered by a React DOM or React Native component without using a browser or jsdom.

Documentation: https://reactjs.org/docs/test-renderer.html

Usage:

const ReactTestRenderer = require('react-test-renderer');

const renderer = ReactTestRenderer.create(
  <Link page="https://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</Link>
);

console.log(renderer.toJSON());
// { type: 'a',
//   props: { href: 'https://www.facebook.com/' },
//   children: [ 'Facebook' ] }

You can also use Jest's snapshot testing feature to automatically save a copy of the JSON tree to a file and check in your tests that it hasn't changed: https://jestjs.io/blog/2016/07/27/jest-14.html.

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc or npmjs.com, the official website for the npm registry. Please note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.