eventemitter3 vs mitt vs nanoevents
Event Emitter Libraries Comparison
1 Year
eventemitter3mittnanoeventsSimilar Packages:
What's Event Emitter Libraries?

Event emitter libraries are essential tools in JavaScript for managing events and facilitating communication between different parts of an application. They provide a way to subscribe to events and respond to them, enabling a decoupled architecture where components can interact without direct references to each other. This is particularly useful in large applications where maintaining clean and manageable code is crucial. Each library offers unique features and performance characteristics, making them suitable for different use cases in event-driven programming.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
eventemitter342,093,9223,38473.4 kB172 years agoMIT
mitt9,155,13011,11426.4 kB202 years agoMIT
nanoevents152,1061,5155.43 kB05 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: eventemitter3 vs mitt vs nanoevents

Performance

  • eventemitter3:

    EventEmitter3 is optimized for performance, boasting a faster event dispatching mechanism compared to many other libraries. It minimizes overhead by using a direct approach to event handling, making it suitable for applications with high event frequencies.

  • mitt:

    Mitt is designed to be extremely lightweight and fast, with minimal overhead. Its simplicity allows for rapid event handling, making it a great choice for performance-sensitive applications that don't require complex features.

  • nanoevents:

    Nanoevents is one of the smallest event emitter libraries available, focusing on speed and efficiency. Its design allows for quick event dispatching, making it ideal for projects where performance is paramount.

API Complexity

  • eventemitter3:

    EventEmitter3 offers a rich API with methods for adding, removing, and emitting events. While this provides flexibility, it may introduce a slight learning curve for new users. However, its comprehensive documentation helps mitigate this issue.

  • mitt:

    Mitt has a very simple and intuitive API, making it easy to learn and use. It provides only the essential methods for event management, which is beneficial for developers looking for a straightforward solution without extra complexity.

  • nanoevents:

    Nanoevents features a minimalist API that is easy to grasp. It focuses on providing just enough functionality to handle events effectively without overwhelming the user with options.

Memory Usage

  • eventemitter3:

    EventEmitter3 is efficient in memory usage, but its advanced features may lead to higher memory consumption in scenarios with many listeners and events. It's important to manage listeners carefully to avoid memory leaks.

  • mitt:

    Mitt is extremely lightweight, consuming minimal memory due to its simple design. It is particularly advantageous for applications that require a low memory footprint and quick event handling.

  • nanoevents:

    Nanoevents is designed to be memory-efficient, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments. Its small size and efficient event handling contribute to lower memory usage.

Extensibility

  • eventemitter3:

    EventEmitter3 allows for extensibility through its comprehensive API, enabling developers to create custom event handling solutions tailored to specific needs. This makes it a versatile choice for complex applications.

  • mitt:

    Mitt is intentionally minimalistic, which limits extensibility. However, its simplicity can be an advantage for developers who prefer a straightforward event emitter without the need for additional features.

  • nanoevents:

    Nanoevents supports a namespace feature, allowing for a more organized event management system. This extensibility makes it easier to manage related events without cluttering the global event space.

Use Cases

  • eventemitter3:

    EventEmitter3 is well-suited for applications that require high-performance event handling, such as gaming or real-time data processing applications where events are frequent and need to be managed efficiently.

  • mitt:

    Mitt is ideal for smaller applications or scenarios where simplicity and speed are prioritized. It's great for quick prototypes or projects that require basic event handling without additional complexity.

  • nanoevents:

    Nanoevents is perfect for modern web applications that need a lightweight solution for event management. Its namespace feature allows for organized event handling, making it suitable for larger applications that still prioritize performance.

How to Choose: eventemitter3 vs mitt vs nanoevents
  • eventemitter3:

    Choose EventEmitter3 if you need a robust and highly performant event emitter with a simple API. It's ideal for applications that require high-frequency event handling and need to manage a large number of listeners efficiently.

  • mitt:

    Choose Mitt for its minimalistic design and ease of use. It's perfect for lightweight applications or when you want a straightforward event emitter without unnecessary overhead.

  • nanoevents:

    Choose Nanoevents if you are looking for a tiny, fast, and modern event emitter that supports namespaces. It's suitable for projects where size is a concern and you need a simple yet effective way to manage events.

README for eventemitter3

EventEmitter3

Version npmCICoverage Status

Sauce Test Status

EventEmitter3 is a high performance EventEmitter. It has been micro-optimized for various of code paths making this, one of, if not the fastest EventEmitter available for Node.js and browsers. The module is API compatible with the EventEmitter that ships by default with Node.js but there are some slight differences:

  • Domain support has been removed.
  • We do not throw an error when you emit an error event and nobody is listening.
  • The newListener and removeListener events have been removed as they are useful only in some uncommon use-cases.
  • The setMaxListeners, getMaxListeners, prependListener and prependOnceListener methods are not available.
  • Support for custom context for events so there is no need to use fn.bind.
  • The removeListener method removes all matching listeners, not only the first.

It's a drop in replacement for existing EventEmitters, but just faster. Free performance, who wouldn't want that? The EventEmitter is written in EcmaScript 3 so it will work in the oldest browsers and node versions that you need to support.

Installation

$ npm install --save eventemitter3

CDN

Recommended CDN:

https://unpkg.com/eventemitter3@latest/dist/eventemitter3.umd.min.js

Usage

After installation the only thing you need to do is require the module:

var EventEmitter = require('eventemitter3');

And you're ready to create your own EventEmitter instances. For the API documentation, please follow the official Node.js documentation:

http://nodejs.org/api/events.html

Contextual emits

We've upgraded the API of the EventEmitter.on, EventEmitter.once and EventEmitter.removeListener to accept an extra argument which is the context or this value that should be set for the emitted events. This means you no longer have the overhead of an event that required fn.bind in order to get a custom this value.

var EE = new EventEmitter()
  , context = { foo: 'bar' };

function emitted() {
  console.log(this === context); // true
}

EE.once('event-name', emitted, context);
EE.on('another-event', emitted, context);
EE.removeListener('another-event', emitted, context);

Tests and benchmarks

This module is well tested. You can run:

  • npm test to run the tests under Node.js.
  • npm run test-browser to run the tests in real browsers via Sauce Labs.

We also have a set of benchmarks to compare EventEmitter3 with some available alternatives. To run the benchmarks run npm run benchmark.

Tests and benchmarks are not included in the npm package. If you want to play with them you have to clone the GitHub repository. Note that you will have to run an additional npm i in the benchmarks folder before npm run benchmark.

License

MIT