jwa vs jsonwebtoken vs jose vs passport-jwt vs express-jwt
JWT Authentication Libraries Comparison
1 Year
jwajsonwebtokenjosepassport-jwtexpress-jwtSimilar Packages:
What's JWT Authentication Libraries?

These libraries are designed to facilitate the implementation of JSON Web Tokens (JWT) for authentication and authorization in web applications. They provide tools for creating, verifying, and decoding JWTs, which are commonly used to secure APIs and manage user sessions. Each library has its own strengths and weaknesses, catering to different use cases and preferences in terms of complexity, flexibility, and features.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
jwa29,609,19799-145 years agoMIT
jsonwebtoken18,737,23017,85643.5 kB171a year agoMIT
jose13,669,3306,093552 kB1a day agoMIT
passport-jwt1,360,2211,97652 kB42-MIT
express-jwt485,8954,49728.5 kB622 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: jwa vs jsonwebtoken vs jose vs passport-jwt vs express-jwt

Integration

  • jwa:

    Jwa is a low-level library that focuses on cryptographic algorithms rather than integration. It can be used alongside other libraries but requires more effort to integrate into an application as it does not provide middleware or built-in support for frameworks.

  • jsonwebtoken:

    Jsonwebtoken is a standalone library that can be used in any Node.js application. It does not depend on any specific framework, allowing for flexible integration into various projects without constraints.

  • jose:

    Jose can be used in various environments and frameworks, but it requires more setup compared to express-jwt. It is versatile and can be integrated into different architectures, but may need additional configuration for optimal use.

  • passport-jwt:

    Passport-jwt is designed to work with the Passport.js authentication middleware, making it easy to integrate JWT authentication into applications that already utilize Passport for user authentication.

  • express-jwt:

    Express-jwt is designed specifically for Express.js applications, making it easy to integrate as middleware in your route definitions. This allows for quick setup and minimal configuration to protect your API endpoints.

Complexity

  • jwa:

    Jwa has a steeper learning curve as it requires knowledge of cryptographic algorithms and their implementations. It is intended for developers who need to work directly with the JWA specifications.

  • jsonwebtoken:

    Jsonwebtoken is easy to use and has a low learning curve. It allows developers to quickly create and verify tokens without needing to understand the underlying cryptographic details.

  • jose:

    Jose is more complex due to its extensive feature set, including support for JWE and JWK. It is suited for developers who need advanced capabilities and are comfortable with cryptographic concepts.

  • passport-jwt:

    Passport-jwt has a moderate complexity level, as it requires familiarity with Passport.js. Developers must understand how to set up Passport strategies and manage user sessions effectively.

  • express-jwt:

    Express-jwt is relatively simple and straightforward, making it a good choice for developers who want to add JWT authentication without dealing with complex configurations or setups.

Features

  • jwa:

    Jwa is focused on implementing cryptographic algorithms, providing a set of tools for developers to work with JWTs at a lower level, but does not handle token creation or verification directly.

  • jsonwebtoken:

    Jsonwebtoken provides basic features for token creation and verification, but lacks advanced capabilities like encryption or support for JWE, making it suitable for standard use cases.

  • jose:

    Jose offers a comprehensive set of features, including token creation, verification, encryption, and support for multiple algorithms, making it a robust choice for complex applications.

  • passport-jwt:

    Passport-jwt provides features for JWT authentication within the Passport framework, allowing for easy integration with other authentication strategies, but does not handle token creation.

  • express-jwt:

    Express-jwt focuses on middleware functionality for token validation and does not include features for token creation or encryption, making it a specialized tool for protecting routes.

Community Support

  • jwa:

    Jwa has a smaller community and is more niche, which may result in limited resources and support. Developers may need to rely on the official documentation for guidance.

  • jsonwebtoken:

    Jsonwebtoken has a large community and extensive documentation, making it one of the most popular JWT libraries in the Node.js ecosystem. This means plenty of resources and community support are available.

  • jose:

    Jose has a growing community but is less widely adopted than some other libraries. Documentation is available, but developers may encounter fewer community resources compared to more popular options.

  • passport-jwt:

    Passport-jwt benefits from the broader Passport.js community, which is active and provides various resources for authentication strategies, making it easier to find help and examples.

  • express-jwt:

    Express-jwt has a strong community support due to its popularity in the Express ecosystem. It is well-documented and widely used, making it easy to find resources and help.

Performance

  • jwa:

    Jwa's performance depends on the specific algorithms used and their implementations. Developers should choose algorithms wisely to balance security and performance needs.

  • jsonwebtoken:

    Jsonwebtoken is known for its efficient performance in creating and verifying tokens. It is optimized for speed, making it suitable for applications that require high throughput.

  • jose:

    Jose's performance can be impacted by its comprehensive feature set, especially when using advanced cryptographic functions. It is essential to consider performance trade-offs when implementing complex features.

  • passport-jwt:

    Passport-jwt's performance is generally good, but it may be affected by the overall complexity of the Passport.js strategies being used in conjunction with it.

  • express-jwt:

    Express-jwt is lightweight and performs well in typical use cases. However, performance may vary based on how it is integrated and the complexity of the middleware stack.

How to Choose: jwa vs jsonwebtoken vs jose vs passport-jwt vs express-jwt
  • jwa:

    Use jwa if you are looking for a library focused on the JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) specifications. It is ideal for applications that need to implement specific cryptographic algorithms for JWTs and want to maintain compliance with JWA standards.

  • jsonwebtoken:

    Opt for jsonwebtoken if you need a lightweight and widely-used library for creating and verifying JWTs. It is simple to use and has a large community, making it a great choice for most standard JWT use cases without additional complexity.

  • jose:

    Select jose if you require a comprehensive library that supports a wide range of JWT features, including JWE (JSON Web Encryption) and JWK (JSON Web Key). It is suitable for applications that need advanced cryptographic capabilities and flexibility in token handling.

  • passport-jwt:

    Choose passport-jwt if you are already using Passport.js for authentication in your application. It provides a seamless integration with Passport's strategy-based approach, making it easy to handle JWT authentication alongside other authentication methods.

  • express-jwt:

    Choose express-jwt if you are using Express.js and need a straightforward middleware solution for validating JWTs in your routes. It is easy to integrate and provides a simple way to protect your API endpoints without much configuration.

README for jwa

node-jwa Build Status

A JSON Web Algorithms implementation focusing (exclusively, at this point) on the algorithms necessary for JSON Web Signatures.

This library supports all of the required, recommended and optional cryptographic algorithms for JWS:

alg Parameter Value | Digital Signature or MAC Algorithm ----------------|---------------------------- HS256 | HMAC using SHA-256 hash algorithm HS384 | HMAC using SHA-384 hash algorithm HS512 | HMAC using SHA-512 hash algorithm RS256 | RSASSA using SHA-256 hash algorithm RS384 | RSASSA using SHA-384 hash algorithm RS512 | RSASSA using SHA-512 hash algorithm PS256 | RSASSA-PSS using SHA-256 hash algorithm PS384 | RSASSA-PSS using SHA-384 hash algorithm PS512 | RSASSA-PSS using SHA-512 hash algorithm ES256 | ECDSA using P-256 curve and SHA-256 hash algorithm ES384 | ECDSA using P-384 curve and SHA-384 hash algorithm ES512 | ECDSA using P-521 curve and SHA-512 hash algorithm none | No digital signature or MAC value included

Please note that PS* only works on Node 6.12+ (excluding 7.x).

Requirements

In order to run the tests, a recent version of OpenSSL is required. The version that comes with OS X (OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011) is not recent enough, as it does not fully support ECDSA keys. You'll need to use a version > 1.0.0; I tested with OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012.

Testing

To run the tests, do

$ npm test

This will generate a bunch of keypairs to use in testing. If you want to generate new keypairs, do make clean before running npm test again.

Methodology

I spawn openssl dgst -sign to test OpenSSL sign → JS verify and openssl dgst -verify to test JS sign → OpenSSL verify for each of the RSA and ECDSA algorithms.

Usage

jwa(algorithm)

Creates a new jwa object with sign and verify methods for the algorithm. Valid values for algorithm can be found in the table above ('HS256', 'HS384', etc) and are case-sensitive. Passing an invalid algorithm value will throw a TypeError.

jwa#sign(input, secretOrPrivateKey)

Sign some input with either a secret for HMAC algorithms, or a private key for RSA and ECDSA algorithms.

If input is not already a string or buffer, JSON.stringify will be called on it to attempt to coerce it.

For the HMAC algorithm, secretOrPrivateKey should be a string or a buffer. For ECDSA and RSA, the value should be a string representing a PEM encoded private key.

Output base64url formatted. This is for convenience as JWS expects the signature in this format. If your application needs the output in a different format, please open an issue. In the meantime, you can use brianloveswords/base64url to decode the signature.

As of nodejs v0.11.8, SPKAC support was introduce. If your nodeJs version satisfies, then you can pass an object { key: '..', passphrase: '...' }

jwa#verify(input, signature, secretOrPublicKey)

Verify a signature. Returns true or false.

signature should be a base64url encoded string.

For the HMAC algorithm, secretOrPublicKey should be a string or a buffer. For ECDSA and RSA, the value should be a string represented a PEM encoded public key.

Example

HMAC

const jwa = require('jwa');

const hmac = jwa('HS256');
const input = 'super important stuff';
const secret = 'shhhhhh';

const signature = hmac.sign(input, secret);
hmac.verify(input, signature, secret) // === true
hmac.verify(input, signature, 'trickery!') // === false

With keys

const fs = require('fs');
const jwa = require('jwa');
const privateKey = fs.readFileSync(__dirname + '/ecdsa-p521-private.pem');
const publicKey = fs.readFileSync(__dirname + '/ecdsa-p521-public.pem');

const ecdsa = jwa('ES512');
const input = 'very important stuff';

const signature = ecdsa.sign(input, privateKey);
ecdsa.verify(input, signature, publicKey) // === true

License

MIT

Copyright (c) 2013 Brian J. Brennan

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
"Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included
in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE
LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION
OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.