firebase vs supabase vs parse-server
Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) Solutions Comparison
1 Year
firebasesupabaseparse-serverSimilar Packages:
What's Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) Solutions?

Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) solutions provide developers with a way to manage the backend of applications without the need to build and maintain server-side infrastructure. These services typically offer features such as database management, user authentication, file storage, and real-time data synchronization, allowing developers to focus on building the frontend and user experience. BaaS solutions streamline the development process, reduce time to market, and often include SDKs and APIs that make integration with mobile and web applications seamless.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
firebase2,539,1524,94025.2 MB68215 days agoApache-2.0
supabase224,3161,21412.5 kB18610 days agoMIT
parse-server23,37021,0785.34 MB46511 days agoApache-2.0
Feature Comparison: firebase vs supabase vs parse-server

Database Management

  • firebase:

    Firebase uses a NoSQL database that allows for real-time data synchronization and is optimized for mobile applications. It provides a flexible data structure that can easily adapt to changing requirements, making it suitable for applications with dynamic data needs.

  • supabase:

    Supabase utilizes PostgreSQL, a powerful relational database, which allows for complex queries and transactions. It provides a familiar SQL interface, making it easier for developers with SQL experience to manage data and perform advanced operations.

  • parse-server:

    Parse Server supports a variety of data types and allows for complex queries. It can be hosted on any infrastructure, giving developers the flexibility to manage their database as needed. It also supports file storage and user management, making it a versatile choice for many applications.

Real-time Capabilities

  • firebase:

    Firebase excels in real-time data synchronization, allowing applications to reflect changes instantly across all connected clients. This is particularly useful for chat applications, collaborative tools, and any application requiring live updates.

  • supabase:

    Supabase offers real-time capabilities through PostgreSQL's built-in features, enabling developers to listen for changes in the database and update clients accordingly. This makes it suitable for applications that require live data updates.

  • parse-server:

    Parse Server does not natively support real-time data synchronization but can be extended with additional libraries or services to achieve similar functionality. Developers may need to implement custom solutions for real-time features.

User Authentication

  • firebase:

    Firebase provides a comprehensive user authentication system that supports email/password, social logins, and anonymous authentication. It also includes built-in security features and user management tools, making it easy to implement secure authentication in applications.

  • supabase:

    Supabase offers a straightforward authentication system that supports email/password and OAuth providers. It provides a simple API for managing users and sessions, making it easy to implement secure authentication in applications.

  • parse-server:

    Parse Server includes user authentication features but requires more setup compared to Firebase. It supports various authentication methods and allows for custom user management, giving developers more control over the authentication process.

Hosting and Deployment

  • firebase:

    Firebase provides a hosting service that is fast, secure, and easy to set up. It offers features like SSL certificates, global CDN, and automatic scaling, making it ideal for hosting web applications and static sites.

  • supabase:

    Supabase offers a managed hosting solution, allowing developers to deploy their applications easily. It provides automatic scaling and backups, making it a convenient choice for developers looking for a hassle-free deployment process.

  • parse-server:

    Parse Server requires self-hosting, which gives developers full control over their deployment environment. This can be beneficial for applications with specific hosting requirements but requires more maintenance and management.

Community and Support

  • firebase:

    Firebase has a large community and extensive documentation, providing ample resources for developers to troubleshoot issues and learn best practices. Google’s backing also ensures ongoing support and updates.

  • supabase:

    Supabase is rapidly growing in popularity and has an active community. Its documentation is comprehensive, and the open-source nature allows developers to contribute and request features, fostering a collaborative environment.

  • parse-server:

    Parse Server has a dedicated community of developers who contribute to its open-source ecosystem. While it may not have as extensive documentation as Firebase, the community support can be valuable for troubleshooting and feature enhancements.

How to Choose: firebase vs supabase vs parse-server
  • firebase:

    Choose Firebase if you need a comprehensive suite of tools that includes real-time database capabilities, user authentication, and analytics, especially for mobile applications. Firebase is ideal for rapid prototyping and applications that require real-time data updates.

  • supabase:

    Choose Supabase if you want an open-source alternative to Firebase that provides a PostgreSQL database, real-time subscriptions, and an easy-to-use interface. Supabase is great for developers familiar with SQL and looking for a robust, scalable solution.

  • parse-server:

    Choose Parse Server if you prefer an open-source solution that allows for self-hosting and customization. It offers a flexible data model and supports complex queries, making it suitable for applications that require more control over the backend infrastructure.