husky vs lint-staged vs pre-commit
Git Hooks and Code Quality Tools Comparison
1 Year
huskylint-stagedpre-commitSimilar Packages:
What's Git Hooks and Code Quality Tools?

These packages are essential tools in modern web development that help maintain code quality and enforce best practices by automating tasks during the Git commit process. They work together to ensure that code adheres to specified standards before it is committed to the repository, thus preventing potential issues and improving collaboration among developers. Husky enables the use of Git hooks, lint-staged allows running linters on staged files only, and pre-commit is a framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks. Together, they streamline the development workflow and enhance code reliability.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
husky14,479,84733,1704.04 kB763 months agoMIT
lint-staged11,363,22413,692128 kB57a month agoMIT
pre-commit309,1501,881-788 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: husky vs lint-staged vs pre-commit

Integration with Git Hooks

  • husky:

    Husky provides a simple way to manage Git hooks by allowing you to define hooks in your package.json file. It supports various hooks like pre-commit, pre-push, and commit-msg, enabling you to automate tasks like running tests or linters before code is committed.

  • lint-staged:

    While lint-staged does not manage Git hooks itself, it works in conjunction with Husky to run linters only on staged files. This integration ensures that only the files being committed are checked, making it efficient and fast.

  • pre-commit:

    pre-commit offers a more extensive framework for managing Git hooks across multiple languages. It allows you to define hooks in a .pre-commit-config.yaml file, making it easy to maintain and configure.

Performance Optimization

  • husky:

    Husky's performance is primarily dependent on the tasks defined in the hooks. It allows for quick execution of scripts, but if the scripts are slow, it can delay the commit process. Therefore, optimizing the scripts is crucial for maintaining performance.

  • lint-staged:

    lint-staged excels in performance by only running linters on files that are staged for commit. This selective approach reduces the time spent on linting, especially in larger projects with many files, leading to faster commit times.

  • pre-commit:

    pre-commit can manage multiple hooks efficiently, but its performance also depends on the complexity of the checks defined. It can be slower if many checks are configured, so it's important to balance thoroughness with speed.

Ease of Use

  • husky:

    Husky is user-friendly and easy to set up, requiring minimal configuration. Developers can quickly add hooks to their projects without extensive knowledge of Git hooks, making it accessible for teams of all skill levels.

  • lint-staged:

    lint-staged is straightforward to use, especially when combined with Husky. It requires a simple configuration to specify which linters to run on staged files, making it easy for developers to adopt in their workflow.

  • pre-commit:

    pre-commit has a steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and multi-language support. However, once set up, it provides a powerful way to manage hooks, but may require more initial configuration compared to Husky and lint-staged.

Community and Ecosystem

  • husky:

    Husky has a large community and is widely used in the JavaScript ecosystem, which means there are plenty of resources, plugins, and examples available for developers to leverage.

  • lint-staged:

    lint-staged is also popular within the JavaScript community, and its integration with Husky has led to a robust ecosystem of tools and best practices for maintaining code quality.

  • pre-commit:

    pre-commit has a broader community that spans multiple programming languages, making it a versatile choice for polyglot projects. Its extensive documentation and examples help users navigate its features.

Customization and Extensibility

  • husky:

    Husky allows for easy customization of hooks, enabling developers to define their own scripts and commands to run before commits or pushes, enhancing its flexibility.

  • lint-staged:

    lint-staged is highly customizable, allowing developers to specify different linters and commands for various file types, making it adaptable to different project needs.

  • pre-commit:

    pre-commit offers extensive customization options, allowing users to define complex workflows and integrate various tools across different languages, making it suitable for diverse development environments.

How to Choose: husky vs lint-staged vs pre-commit
  • husky:

    Choose Husky if you want to easily manage Git hooks and automate tasks such as running tests or linters before commits. It simplifies the process of setting up hooks and integrates well with other tools.

  • lint-staged:

    Choose lint-staged if you want to optimize your linting process by only running linters on files that are staged for commit. This can significantly speed up the linting process and improve developer productivity.

  • pre-commit:

    Choose pre-commit if you need a comprehensive framework that supports multiple languages and allows for complex configurations of pre-commit hooks. It is ideal for projects that require a variety of checks before commits.

README for husky

https://typicode.github.io/husky