Which is Better Image Optimization Libraries?
sharp vs imagemin vs imagemin-webp vs webp-converter
1 Year
sharpimageminimagemin-webpwebp-converterSimilar Packages:
What's Image Optimization Libraries?

Image optimization libraries are essential tools in web development that help reduce the file size of images without significantly compromising quality. This is crucial for improving website performance, reducing load times, and enhancing user experience. These libraries offer various functionalities, including format conversion, compression, and resizing, catering to different use cases and requirements for web and mobile applications.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
sharp6,147,43229,070503 kB1072 months agoApache-2.0
imagemin907,8925,5626.73 kB785 months agoMIT
imagemin-webp181,6924966.18 kB202 years agoMIT
webp-converter10,562233-324 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: sharp vs imagemin vs imagemin-webp vs webp-converter

Image Format Support

  • sharp: Sharp supports multiple image formats such as JPEG, PNG, WebP, TIFF, and AVIF. It excels in handling large images and performing complex transformations, making it a robust choice for image processing tasks.
  • imagemin: Imagemin supports a wide array of image formats including JPEG, PNG, GIF, SVG, and more. Its plugin architecture allows for additional formats to be integrated easily, making it a flexible choice for diverse projects.
  • imagemin-webp: Imagemin-WebP is specifically designed to convert images to the WebP format, leveraging Imagemin's capabilities. It is focused on providing high-quality WebP images, which are known for their superior compression rates compared to traditional formats.
  • webp-converter: WebP-Converter is dedicated to converting images to the WebP format. It is straightforward and does not support other formats, focusing solely on providing a simple conversion process.

Performance

  • sharp: Sharp is known for its exceptional performance, processing images in a non-blocking manner and utilizing fewer resources. It is optimized for speed, making it suitable for applications that require real-time image manipulation.
  • imagemin: Imagemin is efficient but can be slower than some alternatives due to its plugin-based architecture. Performance may vary based on the plugins used and the complexity of the optimization tasks.
  • imagemin-webp: Imagemin-WebP benefits from Imagemin's optimization capabilities, delivering good performance for WebP conversion. However, it may not be as fast as dedicated libraries like Sharp for large-scale image processing.
  • webp-converter: WebP-Converter offers decent performance for converting images to WebP but may not match the speed of Sharp. It is best for simpler projects where quick conversion is needed without heavy processing.

Ease of Use

  • sharp: Sharp has a user-friendly API that is easy to understand, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels. Its documentation is comprehensive, aiding in quick implementation.
  • imagemin: Imagemin has a moderate learning curve due to its plugin system, which may require some time to understand and configure effectively. However, once set up, it is straightforward to use.
  • imagemin-webp: Imagemin-WebP is easy to use for those already familiar with Imagemin. It integrates seamlessly as a plugin, making it simple to add WebP conversion to existing workflows.
  • webp-converter: WebP-Converter is designed for simplicity, offering a straightforward API that is easy to use, making it ideal for developers who want quick results without extensive configuration.

Customization and Extensibility

  • sharp: Sharp provides a set of built-in methods for various image processing tasks, but it is less extensible compared to Imagemin. It is designed for performance rather than customization.
  • imagemin: Imagemin is highly customizable due to its plugin architecture, allowing developers to tailor the optimization process to meet specific needs. This extensibility makes it suitable for a wide range of projects.
  • imagemin-webp: Imagemin-WebP inherits the extensibility of Imagemin, allowing users to combine it with other plugins for enhanced functionality. However, its focus is primarily on WebP conversion.
  • webp-converter: WebP-Converter is not designed for customization or extensibility. It focuses solely on converting images to WebP, making it less flexible for diverse image processing needs.

Use Cases

  • sharp: Sharp is perfect for applications that need fast and efficient image processing, such as image-heavy websites, real-time image manipulation, and server-side processing.
  • imagemin: Imagemin is ideal for projects that require comprehensive image optimization across multiple formats, such as web applications and content management systems where various image types are used.
  • imagemin-webp: Imagemin-WebP is best suited for projects that prioritize WebP images, such as modern web applications aiming to reduce image sizes while maintaining quality.
  • webp-converter: WebP-Converter is suitable for projects that need a quick solution for converting images to WebP format without additional processing requirements.
How to Choose: sharp vs imagemin vs imagemin-webp vs webp-converter
  • sharp: Opt for Sharp if you need a high-performance image processing library that supports a wide range of operations such as resizing, cropping, and format conversion. Sharp is particularly suited for applications requiring fast processing and handling of large images due to its efficient use of memory and CPU resources.
  • imagemin: Choose Imagemin if you need a versatile and extensible image optimization tool that supports multiple formats and plugins. It is ideal for projects where you want to integrate various optimization techniques and customize the process with different plugins.
  • imagemin-webp: Select Imagemin-WebP if your primary goal is to convert images to the WebP format while benefiting from Imagemin's plugin architecture. This package is perfect for projects that require high-quality images with reduced file sizes specifically in the WebP format.
  • webp-converter: Use WebP-Converter if you are focused solely on converting images to the WebP format with a simple and straightforward API. This package is best for projects that require quick and easy conversion without the need for extensive configuration or additional features.
README for sharp

sharp

sharp logo

The typical use case for this high speed Node-API module is to convert large images in common formats to smaller, web-friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF images of varying dimensions.

It can be used with all JavaScript runtimes that provide support for Node-API v9, including Node.js (^18.17.0 or >= 20.3.0), Deno and Bun.

Resizing an image is typically 4x-5x faster than using the quickest ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick settings due to its use of libvips.

Colour spaces, embedded ICC profiles and alpha transparency channels are all handled correctly. Lanczos resampling ensures quality is not sacrificed for speed.

As well as image resizing, operations such as rotation, extraction, compositing and gamma correction are available.

Most modern macOS, Windows and Linux systems do not require any additional install or runtime dependencies.

Documentation

Visit sharp.pixelplumbing.com for complete installation instructions, API documentation, benchmark tests and changelog.

Examples

npm install sharp
const sharp = require('sharp');

Callback

sharp(inputBuffer)
  .resize(320, 240)
  .toFile('output.webp', (err, info) => { ... });

Promise

sharp('input.jpg')
  .rotate()
  .resize(200)
  .jpeg({ mozjpeg: true })
  .toBuffer()
  .then( data => { ... })
  .catch( err => { ... });

Async/await

const semiTransparentRedPng = await sharp({
  create: {
    width: 48,
    height: 48,
    channels: 4,
    background: { r: 255, g: 0, b: 0, alpha: 0.5 }
  }
})
  .png()
  .toBuffer();

Stream

const roundedCorners = Buffer.from(
  '<svg><rect x="0" y="0" width="200" height="200" rx="50" ry="50"/></svg>'
);

const roundedCornerResizer =
  sharp()
    .resize(200, 200)
    .composite([{
      input: roundedCorners,
      blend: 'dest-in'
    }])
    .png();

readableStream
  .pipe(roundedCornerResizer)
  .pipe(writableStream);

Contributing

A guide for contributors covers reporting bugs, requesting features and submitting code changes.

Licensing

Copyright 2013 Lovell Fuller and others.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.