dompurify vs sanitize-html vs xss
Web アプリケーションにおける HTML サニタイズ戦略の比較
dompurifysanitize-htmlxss類似パッケージ:

Web アプリケーションにおける HTML サニタイズ戦略の比較

dompurifysanitize-htmlxss は、すべて Web アプリケーションにおいてクロスサイトスクリプティング(XSS)攻撃を防ぐための HTML サニタイズライブラリです。ユーザーから入力された HTML を安全に処理し、許可されたタグや属性のみを残すことで、セキュリティを確保します。dompurify はブラウザの DOM API を利用して高いセキュリティを実現し、sanitize-html は Node.js 環境での文字列処理に最適化されています。xss は軽量で高速なフィルターとして、シンプルな要件に向いています。

npmのダウンロードトレンド

3 年

GitHub Starsランキング

統計詳細

パッケージ
ダウンロード数
Stars
サイズ
Issues
公開日時
ライセンス
dompurify017,046687 kB02日前(MPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0)
sanitize-html04,56169.8 kB13316日前MIT
xss05,316145 kB682年前MIT

DOMPurify vs sanitize-html vs xss:セキュリティ、環境、パフォーマンスの比較

dompurifysanitize-htmlxss は、すべて Web アプリケーションにおいて XSS 攻撃を防ぐための HTML サニタイズライブラリですが、動作する環境とセキュリティのアプローチが異なります。それぞれの特性を理解し、プロジェクトのアーキテクチャに合わせて選ぶ必要があります。

🌍 動作環境:ブラウザ vs Node.js

dompurify はブラウザの DOM API を利用して動作します。

  • ブラウザ環境ではそのまま使えます。
  • Node.js で使うには jsdom などの polyfill が必要です。
  • クライアントサイドでのレンダリングに最も適しています。
// dompurify: ブラウザ環境
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>');

// dompurify: Node.js 環境(jsdom が必要)
import { JSDOM } from 'jsdom';
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const window = new JSDOM('').window;
const purify = DOMPurify(window);
const clean = purify.sanitize('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>');

sanitize-html は Node.js 環境専用に設計されています。

  • ブラウザでは動作しません(バンドルサイズが大きくなるため)。
  • サーバーサイドでの処理に特化しています。
  • 追加の DOM 環境なしで文字列を処理します。
// sanitize-html: Node.js 環境
import sanitizeHtml from 'sanitize-html';
const clean = sanitizeHtml('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>', {
  allowedTags: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'a'],
  allowedAttributes: { a: ['href'] }
});

xss は環境を選ばず動作します。

  • ブラウザでも Node.js でも動きます。
  • 正規表現ベースで処理するため、DOM 環境は不要です。
  • 軽量なユースケースに向いています。
// xss: 環境非依存
import filterXSS from 'xss';
const clean = filterXSS('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>');

🛡️ セキュリティモデル:DOM パース vs 文字列解析

dompurify はブラウザの HTML パーサーを信頼します。

  • ブラウザがどのように HTML を解釈するかと同じ基準で処理します。
  • 複雑なネストやエッジケースにも強く、最も安全とされています。
  • 設定でホワイトリストを細かく制御可能です。
// dompurify: 高度なホワイトリスト設定
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ALLOWED_TAGS: ['a', 'b'],
  ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href', 'title'],
  ALLOWED_URI_REGEXP: /^(?:(?:(?:f|ht)tps?|mailto):|[^a-z]|[a-z+.-]+(?:[^a-z+.-:]|$))/i
});

sanitize-html は独自のパーサーを使用します。

  • 文字列を解析してタグを判定します。
  • 設定が直感的で、許可するタグや属性を明確に定義できます。
  • サーバーサイドでの一貫した動作が保証されます。
// sanitize-html: 詳細な設定
const clean = sanitizeHtml(dirty, {
  allowedTags: ['p', 'br'],
  allowedAttributes: { p: ['style'] },
  allowedStyles: { p: { color: [/^#(0x)?[0-9a-f]+$/i] } }
});

xss は正規表現でフィルタリングします。

  • 高速ですが、複雑な HTML 構造では抜けが生じる可能性があります。
  • デフォルトのホワイトリストを使用するのが一般的です。
  • カスタマイズ性は他の 2 つに比べて低めです。
// xss: カスタムフィルタの適用
const options = {
  whiteList: {
    a: ['href', 'title'],
    b: []
  },
  onTag: function(tag, html, options) {
    // タグごとの処理
  }
};
const clean = filterXSS(dirty, options);

⚙️ 設定と拡張性

セキュリティ要件はプロジェクトによって異なります。各ライブラリがどのようにカスタマイズに対応しているか比較します。

  • dompurify はフック機能を提供し、サニタイズ前後の処理を挟めます。
  • sanitize-html はスタイル(CSS)のフィルタリングに強く、インラインスタイルの制御が可能です。
  • xss はシンプルな関数呼び出しで完結し、複雑な設定は向きません。
// dompurify: フック機能
DOMPurify.addHook('beforeSanitizeAttributes', function(node) {
  if (node.tagName === 'A') {
    node.setAttribute('target', '_blank');
  }
});

// sanitize-html: スタイル制御
const clean = sanitizeHtml(dirty, {
  allowedStyles: { '*': { color: [/^green$/] } }
});

// xss: 簡易なホワイトリスト
const clean = filterXSS(dirty, {
  whiteList: { img: ['src', 'alt'] }
});

🚀 パフォーマンスと依存関係

処理速度とプロジェクトへの影響も重要な選択基準です。

  • dompurify は DOM 操作を行うため、Node.js 環境では jsdom の分だけ重くなります。
  • sanitize-html は中程度の重さですが、サーバーでは問題にならないことが多いです。
  • xss は最も軽量で、依存関係も少ないです。
// dompurify: 依存関係
// npm install dompurify
// (Node.js の場合) npm install jsdom

// sanitize-html: 依存関係
// npm install sanitize-html

// xss: 依存関係
// npm install xss

🤝 共通点:セキュリティの基本原則

これら 3 つのライブラリは、異なるアプローチを取っていますが、共通する目的と機能を持っています。

1. 🚫 危険なタグの削除

  • すべて <script> タグや javascript: プロトコルをデフォルトでブロックします。
  • 開発者が明示的に許可しない限り、実行可能なコードは削除されます。
// すべて script タグを削除
// dompurify
DOMPurify.sanitize('<script>alert(1)</script>'); // ""

// sanitize-html
sanitizeHtml('<script>alert(1)</script>'); // ""

// xss
filterXSS('<script>alert(1)</script>'); // ""

2. ✅ ホワイトリスト方式

  • 「何を許可するか」を定義する方式を採用しています。
  • 「何を禁止するか」ではなく、安全なものだけを通すため、未知の攻撃にも強いです。
// すべて a タグと href 属性のみ許可
// dompurify
DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOWED_TAGS: ['a'], ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href'] });

// sanitize-html
sanitizeHtml(dirty, { allowedTags: ['a'], allowedAttributes: { a: ['href'] } });

// xss
filterXSS(dirty, { whiteList: { a: ['href'] } });

3. 🔗 URL の検証

  • リンク先のプロトコル(http, https, mailto など)を検証します。
  • 危険なプロトコル(javascript, data など)をブロックします。
// すべて javascript: をブロック
// dompurify
DOMPurify.sanitize('<a href="javascript:alert(1)">Link</a>'); // "<a>Link</a>"

// sanitize-html
sanitizeHtml('<a href="javascript:alert(1)">Link</a>'); // "<a>Link</a>"

// xss
filterXSS('<a href="javascript:alert(1)">Link</a>'); // "<a>Link</a>"

📊 比較サマリー

特徴dompurifysanitize-htmlxss
主な環境🌐 ブラウザ (Node も可)🖥️ Node.js🌍 両方
処理方式🌳 DOM API📝 文字列パーサー🔍 正規表現
セキュリティ🛡️ 非常に高い🛡️ 高い⚠️ 標準
設定の柔軟性🔧 高い🔧 非常に高い🔧 低い
依存関係📦 軽量 (Node は重め)📦 中程度📦 最小限
推奨用途フロントエンドバックエンド軽量フィルター

💡 全体像と推奨

dompurify は、フロントエンド開発における事実上の標準です 🏆。ブラウザの仕組みをそのまま利用するため、セキュリティの信頼性が最も高く、React や Vue の dangerouslySetInnerHTMLv-html と組み合わせるのに最適です。クライアントサイドで HTML を扱う場合は、迷わずこれを選ぶべきです。

sanitize-html は、バックエンド(Node.js)での処理に最適です 🖥️。API サーバーや SSR 環境で、ユーザー入力を含む HTML を保存または配信する前にクリーンアップする役割を担います。設定項目が豊富で、インラインスタイルの制御など細かい要件にも応えられます。

xss は、特定のニッチな用途に残っています 🕰️。非常に軽量で依存関係が少ないため、バンドルサイズが重要な場合や、シンプルなテキストフィルタリングで十分な場合に利用されます。ただし、セキュリティの最優先事項である場合は、より堅牢な dompurifysanitize-html の使用を強く推奨します。

最終的なアドバイス:セキュリティは妥協すべき点ではありません。フロントエンドなら dompurify、バックエンドなら sanitize-html を採用し、プロジェクトの環境に合わせて使い分けるのが最も安全で確実な選択です。

選び方: dompurify vs sanitize-html vs xss

  • dompurify:

    クライアントサイド(ブラウザ)で HTML をレンダリングする必要がある場合は dompurify を選択してください。ブラウザのネイティブな DOM パーサーを利用するため、セキュリティ上の信頼性が最も高く、React や Vue などのモダンフレームワークとの相性も抜群です。Node.js で使用する場合は追加の依存関係(jsdom など)が必要になる点に注意が必要です。

  • sanitize-html:

    サーバーサイド(Node.js)で API レスポンスやメール本文などを処理する場合は sanitize-html が最適です。DOM 環境に依存せず文字列として処理するため、サーバー環境での導入が簡単で、設定項目も豊富です。バックエンドでの信頼性の高いサニタイズが必要なプロジェクトに適しています。

  • xss:

    依存関係を最小限に抑えたい、または極めて単純なフィルター処理で十分な場合に xss を検討してください。動作が軽量で高速ですが、機能のカスタマイズ性は他の 2 つに比べて限定的です。レガシーシステムの維持や、バンドルサイズを厳しく制限する必要がある場面での利用が考えられます。

dompurify のREADME

DOMPurify

npm License Downloads dependents npm package minimized gzipped size (select exports)

Build & Test OpenSSF Best Practices OpenSSF Scorecard Socket Badge Cloudback

DOMPurify is a DOM-only, super-fast, uber-tolerant XSS sanitizer for HTML, MathML and SVG.

It's also very simple to use and get started with. DOMPurify was started in February 2014 and, meanwhile, has reached version v3.4.7.

DOMPurify runs as JavaScript and works in all modern browsers (Safari (10+), Opera (15+), Edge, Firefox and Chrome - as well as almost anything else using Blink, Gecko or WebKit). It doesn't break on MSIE or other legacy browsers. It simply does nothing.

Note that DOMPurify v2.5.9 is the latest version supporting MSIE. For important security updates compatible with MSIE, please use the 2.x branch.

Our automated tests cover 9 browser/OS combinations (Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit across Ubuntu, macOS, and Windows) on every push, plus Node.js v20, v22, v24, v25 and v26 running DOMPurify on jsdom. Older Node versions are known to work as well, but hey... no guarantees.

DOMPurify is written by security people who have vast background in web attacks and XSS. Fear not. For more details please also read about our Security Goals & Threat Model. Please, read it. Like, really.

The DOMPurify project inspired the creation of the HTML Sanitizer API, which is already shipping in many browsers.

What does it do?

DOMPurify sanitizes HTML and prevents XSS attacks. You can feed DOMPurify with e.g. a string full of dirty HTML and it will return a string (unless configured otherwise) with clean HTML. DOMPurify will strip out everything that contains dangerous HTML and thereby prevent XSS attacks and other nastiness. It's also damn bloody fast. We use the technologies the browser provides and turn them into an XSS filter. The faster your browser, the faster DOMPurify will be.

How do I use it?

It's easy. Just include DOMPurify on your website.

Using the unminified version (source-map available)

<script type="text/javascript" src="dist/purify.js"></script>

Using the minified and tested production version (source-map available)

<script type="text/javascript" src="dist/purify.min.js"></script>

Afterwards you can sanitize strings by executing the following code:

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty);

Or maybe this, if you love working with Angular or alike:

import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<b>hello there</b>');

The resulting HTML can be written into a DOM element using innerHTML or the DOM using document.write(). That is fully up to you. Note that by default, we permit HTML, SVG and MathML. If you only need HTML, which might be a very common use-case, you can easily set that up as well:

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { USE_PROFILES: { html: true } });

Is there any foot-gun potential?

Well, please note, if you first sanitize HTML and then modify it afterwards, you might easily void the effects of sanitization. If you feed the sanitized markup to another library after sanitization, please be certain that the library doesn't mess around with the HTML on its own.

Okay, makes sense, let's move on

After sanitizing your markup, you can also have a look at the property DOMPurify.removed and find out, what elements and attributes were thrown out. Please do not use this property for making any security critical decisions. This is just a little helper for curious minds.

Running DOMPurify on the server

DOMPurify technically also works server-side with Node.js. Our support strives to follow the Node.js release cycle.

Running DOMPurify on the server requires a DOM to be present, which is probably no surprise. Usually, jsdom is the tool of choice and we strongly recommend to use the latest version of jsdom.

Why? Because older versions of jsdom are known to be buggy in ways that result in XSS even if DOMPurify does everything 100% correctly. There are known attack vectors in, e.g. jsdom v19.0.0 that are fixed in jsdom v20.0.0 - and we really recommend to keep jsdom up to date because of that.

Please also be aware that tools like happy-dom exist but are not considered safe at this point. Combining DOMPurify with happy-dom is currently not recommended and will likely lead to XSS.

Other than that, you are fine to use DOMPurify on the server. Probably. This really depends on jsdom or whatever DOM you utilize server-side. If you can live with that, this is how you get it to work:

npm install dompurify
npm install jsdom

For jsdom (please use an up-to-date version), this should do the trick:

const createDOMPurify = require('dompurify');
const { JSDOM } = require('jsdom');

const window = new JSDOM('').window;
const DOMPurify = createDOMPurify(window);
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<b>hello there</b>');

Or even this, if you prefer working with imports:

import { JSDOM } from 'jsdom';
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';

const window = new JSDOM('').window;
const purify = DOMPurify(window);
const clean = purify.sanitize('<b>hello there</b>');

If you have problems making it work in your specific setup, consider looking at the amazing isomorphic-dompurify project which solves lots of problems people might run into.

npm install isomorphic-dompurify
import DOMPurify from 'isomorphic-dompurify';

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<s>hello</s>');

Is there a demo?

Of course there is a demo! Play with DOMPurify

What if I find a security bug?

First of all, please immediately contact us via email so we can work on a fix. PGP key

Also, you probably qualify for a bug bounty! The fine folks over at Fastmail use DOMPurify for their services and added our library to their bug bounty scope. So, if you find a way to bypass or weaken DOMPurify, please also have a look at their website and the bug bounty info.

Some purification samples please?

How does purified markup look like? Well, the demo shows it for a big bunch of nasty elements. But let's also show some smaller examples!

DOMPurify.sanitize('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)//>'); // becomes <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cure53/DOMPurify/HEAD/x">
DOMPurify.sanitize('<svg><g/onload=alert(2)//<p>'); // becomes <svg><g></g></svg>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<p>abc<iframe//src=jAva&Tab;script:alert(3)>def</p>'); // becomes <p>abc</p>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<math><mi//xlink:href="data:x,<script>alert(4)</script>">'); // becomes <math><mi></mi></math>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<TABLE><tr><td>HELLO</tr></TABL>'); // becomes <table><tbody><tr><td>HELLO</td></tr></tbody></table>
DOMPurify.sanitize('<UL><li><A HREF=//google.com>click</UL>'); // becomes <ul><li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/blob/HEAD///google.com">click</a></li></ul>

What is supported?

DOMPurify currently supports HTML5, SVG and MathML. DOMPurify per default allows CSS, HTML custom data attributes. DOMPurify also supports the Shadow DOM - and sanitizes DOM templates recursively. DOMPurify also allows you to sanitize HTML for being used with the jQuery $() and elm.html() API without any known problems.

What about legacy browsers like Internet Explorer?

DOMPurify does nothing at all. It simply returns exactly the string that you fed it. DOMPurify exposes a property called isSupported, which tells you whether it will be able to do its job, so you can come up with your own backup plan.

What about DOMPurify and Trusted Types?

In version 1.0.9, support for Trusted Types API was added to DOMPurify. In version 2.0.0, a config flag was added to control DOMPurify's behavior regarding this.

When DOMPurify.sanitize is used in an environment where the Trusted Types API is available and RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE is set to true, it tries to return a TrustedHTML value instead of a string (the behavior for RETURN_DOM and RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT config options does not change).

Note that in order to create a policy in trustedTypes using DOMPurify, RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: false is required, as createHTML expects a normal string, not TrustedHTML. The example below shows this.

window.trustedTypes.createPolicy('default', {
  createHTML: (to_escape) =>
    DOMPurify.sanitize(to_escape, { RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: false }),
});

Can I configure DOMPurify?

Yes. The included default configuration values are pretty good already - but you can of course override them. Check out the /demos folder to see a bunch of examples on how you can customize DOMPurify.

General settings

// strip {{ ... }}, ${ ... } and <% ... %> to make output safe for template systems
// be careful please, this mode is not recommended for production usage.
// allowing template parsing in user-controlled HTML is not advised at all.
// only use this mode if there is really no alternative.
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true });

// change how e.g. comments containing risky HTML characters are treated.
// be very careful, this setting should only be set to `false` if you really only handle
// HTML and nothing else, no SVG, MathML or the like.
// Otherwise, changing from `true` to `false` will lead to XSS in this or some other way.
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SAFE_FOR_XML: false });

Control our allow-lists and block-lists

// allow only <b> elements, very strict
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b'] });

// allow only <b> and <q> with style attributes
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'q'],
  ALLOWED_ATTR: ['style'],
});

// allow all safe HTML elements but neither SVG nor MathML
// note that the USE_PROFILES setting will override the ALLOWED_TAGS setting
// so don't use them together
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { USE_PROFILES: { html: true } });

// allow all safe SVG elements and SVG Filters, no HTML or MathML
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  USE_PROFILES: { svg: true, svgFilters: true },
});

// allow all safe MathML elements and SVG, but no SVG Filters
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  USE_PROFILES: { mathMl: true, svg: true },
});

// change the default namespace from HTML to something different
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  NAMESPACE: 'http://www.w3.org/2000/svg',
});

// leave all safe HTML as it is and add <style> elements to block-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { FORBID_TAGS: ['style'] });

// leave all safe HTML as it is and add style attributes to block-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { FORBID_ATTR: ['style'] });

// extend the existing array of allowed tags and add <my-tag> to allow-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_TAGS: ['my-tag'] });

// extend the existing array of allowed attributes and add my-attr to allow-list
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_ATTR: ['my-attr'] });

// use functions to control which additional tags and attributes are allowed
const allowlist = {
  one: ['attribute-one'],
  two: ['attribute-two'],
};
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<one attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></one><two attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></two>',
  {
    ADD_TAGS: (tagName) => {
      return Object.keys(allowlist).includes(tagName);
    },
    ADD_ATTR: (attributeName, tagName) => {
      return allowlist[tagName]?.includes(attributeName) || false;
    },
  }
); // <one attribute-one="1"></one><two attribute-two="2"></two>

// prohibit ARIA attributes, leave other safe HTML as is (default is true)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOW_ARIA_ATTR: false });

// prohibit HTML5 data attributes, leave other safe HTML as is (default is true)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOW_DATA_ATTR: false });

Control behavior relating to Custom Elements

// DOMPurify allows to define rules for Custom Elements. When using the CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING
// literal, it is possible to define exactly what elements you wish to allow (by default, none are allowed).
//
// The same goes for their attributes. By default, the built-in or configured allow.list is used.
//
// You can use a RegExp literal to specify what is allowed or a predicate, examples for both can be seen below.
// When using a predicate function for attributeNameCheck, it can optionally receive the tagName as a second parameter
// for more granular control over which attributes are allowed for specific elements.
// The default values are very restrictive to prevent accidental XSS bypasses. Handle with great care!

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<foo-bar baz="foobar" forbidden="true"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: null, // no custom elements are allowed
      attributeNameCheck: null, // default / standard attribute allow-list is used
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: false, // no customized built-ins allowed
    },
  }
); // <div is=""></div>

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<foo-bar baz="foobar" forbidden="true"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: /^foo-/, // allow all tags starting with "foo-"
      attributeNameCheck: /baz/, // allow all attributes containing "baz"
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: true, // customized built-ins are allowed
    },
  }
); // <foo-bar baz="foobar"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<foo-bar baz="foobar" forbidden="true"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: (tagName) => tagName.match(/^foo-/), // allow all tags starting with "foo-"
      attributeNameCheck: (attr) => attr.match(/baz/), // allow all containing "baz"
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: true, // allow customized built-ins
    },
  }
); // <foo-bar baz="foobar"></foo-bar><div is="foo-baz"></div>

// Example with attributeNameCheck receiving tagName as a second parameter
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(
  '<element-one attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></element-one><element-two attribute-one="1" attribute-two="2"></element-two>',
  {
    CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
      tagNameCheck: (tagName) => tagName.match(/^element-(one|two)$/),
      attributeNameCheck: (attr, tagName) => {
        if (tagName === 'element-one') {
          return ['attribute-one'].includes(attr);
        } else if (tagName === 'element-two') {
          return ['attribute-two'].includes(attr);
        } else {
          return false;
        }
      },
      allowCustomizedBuiltInElements: false,
    },
  }
); // <element-one attribute-one="1"></element-one><element-two attribute-two="2"></element-two>

Control behavior relating to URI values

// extend the existing array of elements that can use Data URIs
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_DATA_URI_TAGS: ['a', 'area'] });

// extend the existing array of elements that are safe for URI-like values (be careful, XSS risk)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ADD_URI_SAFE_ATTR: ['my-attr'] });

Control permitted attribute values

// allow external protocol handlers in URL attributes (default is false, be careful, XSS risk)
// by default only http, https, ftp, ftps, tel, mailto, callto, sms, cid, xmpp and matrix are allowed.
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { ALLOW_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOLS: true });

// allow specific protocol handlers in URL attributes via regex (default is false, be careful, XSS risk)
// by default only (protocol-)relative URLs, http, https, ftp, ftps, tel, mailto, callto, sms, cid, xmpp and matrix are allowed.
// Default RegExp: /^(?:(?:(?:f|ht)tps?|mailto|tel|callto|sms|cid|xmpp):|[^a-z]|[a-z+.\-]+(?:[^a-z+.\-:]|$))/i;
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ALLOWED_URI_REGEXP:
    /^(?:(?:(?:f|ht)tps?|mailto|tel|callto|sms|cid|xmpp|matrix):|[^a-z]|[a-z+.\-]+(?:[^a-z+.\-:]|$))/i,
});

Influence the return-type

// return a DOM HTMLBodyElement instead of an HTML string (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { RETURN_DOM: true });

// return a DOM DocumentFragment instead of an HTML string (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT: true });

// use the RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE flag to turn on Trusted Types support if available
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: true }); // will return a TrustedHTML object instead of a string if possible

// use a provided Trusted Types policy
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  // supplied policy must define createHTML and createScriptURL
  TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: trustedTypes.createPolicy('dompurify', {
    createHTML(s) {
      return s;
    },
    createScriptURL(s) {
      return s;
    },
  }),
});

Influence how we sanitize

// return entire document including <html> tags (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { WHOLE_DOCUMENT: true });

// disable DOM Clobbering protection on output (default is true, handle with care, minor XSS risks here)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SANITIZE_DOM: false });

// enforce strict DOM Clobbering protection via namespace isolation (default is false)
// when enabled, isolates the namespace of named properties (i.e., `id` and `name` attributes)
// from JS variables by prefixing them with the string `user-content-`
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SANITIZE_NAMED_PROPS: true });

// keep an element's content when the element is removed (default is true)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { KEEP_CONTENT: false });

// glue elements like style, script or others to document.body and prevent unintuitive browser behavior in several edge-cases (default is false)
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { FORCE_BODY: true });

// remove all <a> elements under <p> elements that are removed
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  FORBID_CONTENTS: ['a'],
  FORBID_TAGS: ['p'],
});

// extend the default FORBID_CONTENTS list to also remove <a> elements under <p> elements
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  ADD_FORBID_CONTENTS: ['a'],
  FORBID_TAGS: ['p'],
});

// change the parser type so sanitized data is treated as XML and not as HTML, which is the default
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, {
  PARSER_MEDIA_TYPE: 'application/xhtml+xml',
});

Influence where we sanitize

// use the IN_PLACE mode to sanitize a node "in place", which is much faster depending on how you use DOMPurify
const dirty = document.createElement('a');
dirty.setAttribute('href', 'javascript:alert(1)');

const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { IN_PLACE: true }); // see https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/288 for more info

There is even more examples here, showing how you can run, customize and configure DOMPurify to fit your needs.

Persistent Configuration

Instead of repeatedly passing the same configuration to DOMPurify.sanitize, you can use the DOMPurify.setConfig method. Your configuration will persist until your next call to DOMPurify.setConfig, or until you invoke DOMPurify.clearConfig to reset it. Remember that there is only one active configuration, which means once it is set, all extra configuration parameters passed to DOMPurify.sanitize are ignored.

Hooks

DOMPurify allows you to augment its functionality by attaching one or more functions with the DOMPurify.addHook method to one of the following hooks:

  • beforeSanitizeElements
  • uponSanitizeElement (No 's' - called for every element)
  • afterSanitizeElements
  • beforeSanitizeAttributes
  • uponSanitizeAttribute
  • afterSanitizeAttributes
  • beforeSanitizeShadowDOM
  • uponSanitizeShadowNode
  • afterSanitizeShadowDOM

It passes the currently processed DOM node, when needed a literal with verified node and attribute data and the DOMPurify configuration to the callback. Check out the MentalJS hook demo to see how the API can be used nicely.

Example:

DOMPurify.addHook(
  'uponSanitizeAttribute',
  function (currentNode, hookEvent, config) {
    // Do something with the current node
    // You can also mutate hookEvent for current node (i.e. set hookEvent.forceKeepAttr = true)
    // For other than 'uponSanitizeAttribute' hook types hookEvent equals to null
  }
);

Removed Configuration

OptionSinceNote
SAFE_FOR_JQUERY2.1.0No replacement required.

Continuous Integration

We are currently using GitHub Actions in combination with Playwright. This gives us the possibility to confirm for each and every commit that all is going according to plan in relevant modern browsers. Check out the build logs here: https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/actions

You can further run local tests by executing npm run test.

All relevant commits will be signed with the key 0x24BB6BF4 for additional security (since 8th of April 2016).

Development and contributing

Installation (npm i)

We support npm officially. GitHub Actions workflow is configured to install dependencies using npm. When using a deprecated version of npm, we cannot fully ensure the versions of installed dependencies, which might lead to unanticipated problems.

Scripts

We use ESLint via xo as part of our pre-commit workflow to help ensure code consistency. In addition, we use Prettier for source and Markdown formatting, and /dist assets are built through rollup.

These are our npm scripts:

  • npm run dev to build the unminified UMD bundle while watching sources for changes
  • npm run test to lint the sources, run tests through jsdom, and run Karma tests in Chrome
    • npm run test:jsdom to only run tests through jsdom
    • npm run test:browser to only run tests through Playwright
    • npm run test:ci to run the CI test flow for jsdom and Karma/BrowserStack
    • npm run test:fuzz to run a small fuzzer covering sanitize() and CONFIG
  • npm run lint to lint the sources using ESLint via xo
  • npm run format to format JavaScript/TypeScript and Markdown sources with Prettier
    • npm run format:js to only format JavaScript/TypeScript sources
    • npm run format:md to only format Markdown files
  • npm run build to build type declarations and distribution bundles, then fix and clean up generated types
    • npm run build:types to only emit TypeScript declaration files
    • npm run build:rollup to build all Rollup bundles
    • npm run build:umd to only build an unminified UMD bundle
    • npm run build:umd:min to only build a minified UMD bundle
    • npm run build:es to only build the ES module bundle
    • npm run build:cjs to only build the CommonJS bundle
    • npm run build:fix-types to post-process generated type files
    • npm run build:cleanup to clean up temporary generated type output
  • npm run verify-typescript to run the TypeScript verification script
  • npm run commit-amend-build to run the maintainer helper script for amending build output

Note: all run scripts triggered via npm run <script>.

There are more npm scripts but they are mainly to integrate with CI or are meant to be "private" for instance to amend build distribution files with every commit.

Security Mailing List

We maintain a mailing list that notifies whenever a security-critical release of DOMPurify was published. This means, if someone found a bypass and we fixed it with a release (which always happens when a bypass was found) a mail will go out to that list. This usually happens within minutes or a few hours after learning about a bypass. The list can be subscribed to here:

https://lists.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/mailman/listinfo/dompurify-security

Feature releases will not be announced to this list.

Who contributed?

Many people have helped DOMPurify become what it is today, and they deserve to be acknowledged!

offset, Bankde, lukewarlow, DEMON1A, fg0x0, kodareef5, DavidOliver, 1Jesper1, bencalif, trace37labs, eddieran, christos-eth, researchatfluidattacks, frevadiscor, Rotzbua, binhpv, MariusRumpf, prasadrajandran, Cybozu 💛💸, hata6502 💸, openclaw 💸, intra-mart-dh 💸, nelstrom ❤️, hash_kitten ❤️, kevin_mizu ❤️, icesfont ❤️, reduckted ❤️, dcramer 💸, JGraph 💸, baekilda 💸, Healthchecks 💸, Sentry 💸, jarrodldavis 💸, CynegeticIO, ssi02014 ❤️, GrantGryczan, Lowdefy, granlem, oreoshake, tdeekens ❤️, peernohell ❤️, is2ei, SoheilKhodayari, franktopel, NateScarlet, neilj, fhemberger, Joris-van-der-Wel, ydaniv, terjanq, filedescriptor, ConradIrwin, gibson042, choumx, 0xSobky, styfle, koto, tlau88, strugee, oparoz, mathiasbynens, edg2s, dnkolegov, dhardtke, wirehead, thorn0, styu, mozfreddyb, mikesamuel, jorangreef, jimmyhchan, jameydeorio, jameskraus, hyderali, hansottowirtz, hackvertor, freddyb, flavorjones, djfarrelly, devd, camerondunford, buu700, buildog, alabiaga, Vector919, Robbert, GreLI, FuzzySockets, ArtemBernatskyy, @garethheyes, @shafigullin, @mmrupp, @irsdl,ShikariSenpai, ansjdnakjdnajkd, @asutherland, @mathias, @cgvwzq, @robbertatwork, @giutro, @CmdEngineer_, @avr4mit, davecardwell and especially @securitymb ❤️ & @masatokinugawa ❤️