turbo vs lerna
Monorepo Management Tools
Search packages..
turbolernaSimilar Packages:
Monorepo Management Tools

Monorepo management tools are essential for managing multiple packages within a single repository. They help streamline workflows, automate tasks, and optimize the development process for projects that contain multiple interdependent packages. These tools provide features like dependency management, versioning, publishing, and task automation, making it easier for teams to collaborate and maintain consistency across packages. lerna is a popular tool for managing JavaScript projects with multiple packages, providing features like versioning, publishing, and managing dependencies. turbo is a modern build system designed for monorepos, focusing on speed and efficiency by caching tasks and optimizing build processes, making it ideal for large projects with complex workflows.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
turbo6,367,07329,12334.8 kB15510 days agoMIT
lerna1,495,40036,0488.54 MB3816 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: turbo vs lerna

Versioning and Publishing

  • turbo:

    turbo focuses more on optimizing build processes and does not provide built-in versioning or publishing features. You would need to integrate it with other tools like lerna for those functionalities.

  • lerna:

    lerna provides robust versioning and publishing capabilities, allowing you to manage version numbers across multiple packages, publish them to npm, and handle both independent and fixed versioning modes.

Build Performance

  • turbo:

    turbo is designed for high-performance builds, leveraging caching and parallel execution to significantly reduce build times. It is ideal for large projects where build performance is a critical concern.

  • lerna:

    lerna does not optimize build performance out of the box, but it can be integrated with other tools to improve build times. It is primarily focused on versioning and publishing rather than build optimization.

Task Automation

  • turbo:

    turbo offers advanced task automation capabilities, including dependency-aware task execution and built-in caching, making it more efficient for running tasks across multiple packages.

  • lerna:

    lerna allows you to run scripts across multiple packages, but it does not provide advanced task automation features. You can use it in conjunction with other task runners for more complex automation.

Caching

  • turbo:

    turbo includes intelligent caching mechanisms that store the results of tasks and reuse them in future runs, significantly speeding up build and task execution.

  • lerna:

    lerna does not provide built-in caching for tasks or builds. You would need to implement caching manually or use third-party tools to achieve this.

Integration with Other Tools

  • turbo:

    turbo is designed to work seamlessly with existing workflows and tools, including lerna, making it a great addition to projects that already use lerna for versioning and publishing.

  • lerna:

    lerna integrates well with a variety of tools and workflows, including CI/CD pipelines, npm, and yarn. It is highly customizable and can be adapted to fit different project needs.

Ease of Use: Code Examples

  • turbo:

    Task Automation with turbo

    # Install turbo
npm install --save-dev turbo

# Run tasks with turbo
npx turbo run build
  • lerna:

    Versioning and Publishing with lerna

    # Initialize a new lerna project
lerna init

# Add a package
lerna create my-package

# Versioning
lerna version

# Publish packages
lerna publish
How to Choose: turbo vs lerna
  • turbo:

    Choose turbo if you are looking for a high-performance build system that optimizes task execution and caching. It is ideal for projects where build speed and efficiency are critical, especially when working with large codebases.

  • lerna:

    Choose lerna if you need a mature and feature-rich tool for managing versioning and publishing across multiple packages. It is particularly useful for projects that require fine-grained control over versioning and dependency management.

Similar Npm Packages to turbo

turbo is a modern build system designed for JavaScript and TypeScript projects, particularly those that involve monorepos. It optimizes the development workflow by providing features such as caching, parallel execution, and incremental builds, which significantly speed up the build process. Turbo is particularly useful for large codebases where multiple packages or applications are managed within a single repository. By intelligently determining what needs to be rebuilt and leveraging caching, Turbo helps developers save time and resources, making it an excellent choice for teams looking to improve their build efficiency.

One of the primary alternatives to Turbo is lerna. Lerna is a popular tool for managing JavaScript projects with multiple packages within a single repository, also known as a monorepo. It helps with versioning, dependency management, and publishing packages, making it easier to maintain and develop large-scale applications. While Lerna focuses primarily on managing the packages and their versions, it does not provide the same level of build optimization and caching that Turbo offers. If your project requires robust package management and versioning, Lerna is a solid choice, but for enhanced build performance and efficiency, Turbo may be the better option.

To see how Turbo compares with Lerna, check out the comparison: Comparing lerna vs turbo.

Similar Npm Packages to lerna

lerna is a popular tool for managing JavaScript projects with multiple packages, commonly referred to as monorepos. It simplifies the process of versioning, publishing, and managing dependencies across various packages within a single repository. Lerna helps developers streamline their workflows by allowing them to manage multiple packages in a cohesive manner, making it easier to maintain and scale large codebases. With features like automatic versioning, dependency linking, and publishing, Lerna is a go-to solution for teams working on complex projects.

However, there are alternatives to Lerna that also cater to managing monorepos and package management. Here are a few noteworthy options:

  • pnpm is a fast and efficient package manager that uses a unique approach to dependency management. Unlike npm or yarn, pnpm stores all dependencies in a global store and creates symlinks in the project, which saves disk space and speeds up installations. It is particularly beneficial for monorepos, as it allows for better handling of shared dependencies and can significantly reduce installation times. If you're looking for a package manager that optimizes performance and storage, pnpm is an excellent choice.

  • yarn is another widely used package manager that offers features such as workspaces, which enable users to manage multiple packages within a single repository efficiently. Yarn provides a more deterministic approach to dependency resolution, ensuring that installations are consistent across different environments. It also includes features like offline caching and parallel installations, which can enhance the development experience. If you prefer a robust package manager with strong community support and an emphasis on performance, Yarn is a solid alternative.

To explore how Lerna compares with pnpm and Yarn, check out the comparison: Comparing lerna vs pnpm vs yarn.

README for turbo

Turborepo

Getting Started

Visit https://turborepo.com/docs to get started with Turborepo and read the documentation.

Community

The Turborepo community can be found on GitHub Discussions, where you can ask questions, voice ideas, and share your projects.

To chat with other community members, you can join Vercel Community's #turborepo tag

Our Code of Conduct applies to all Turborepo community channels.

Who is using Turbo?

Turbo is used by the world's leading companies. Check out the Turbo Showcase to learn more.

Updates

Follow @turborepo on X and for project updates

Author

Security

If you believe you have found a security vulnerability in Turbo, we encourage you to responsibly disclose this and not open a public issue. We will investigate all legitimate reports. Email security@vercel.com to disclose any security vulnerabilities.

https://vercel.com/security

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc, the official website for the npm registry. Note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. Please share your feedback via our GitHub repository. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.