lru-cache vs node-cache vs memory-cache vs node-persist
Node.js Caching Libraries Comparison
1 Year
lru-cachenode-cachememory-cachenode-persistSimilar Packages:
What's Node.js Caching Libraries?

Caching libraries in Node.js are essential tools for optimizing application performance by temporarily storing frequently accessed data in memory. This reduces the need for repeated database queries or expensive computations, leading to faster response times and improved user experience. Each caching library offers unique features and use cases, catering to different caching strategies, data persistence needs, and application architectures.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
lru-cache88,900,0465,408808 kB82 months agoISC
node-cache1,682,0232,290-734 years agoMIT
memory-cache417,8791,595-328 years agoBSD-2-Clause
node-persist61,50972439.1 kB185 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: lru-cache vs node-cache vs memory-cache vs node-persist

Eviction Policy

  • lru-cache:

    lru-cache implements a Least Recently Used (LRU) eviction policy, automatically removing the least recently accessed items when the cache exceeds its size limit. This ensures that the most relevant data remains in memory, optimizing performance for frequently accessed items.

  • node-cache:

    node-cache supports TTL (time-to-live) for cache entries, allowing you to specify how long an item should remain in the cache before being automatically removed. This helps manage memory usage by ensuring that stale data does not linger indefinitely.

  • memory-cache:

    memory-cache does not have an eviction policy; it simply stores key-value pairs in memory until the application terminates or the cache is manually cleared. This makes it less suitable for scenarios with limited memory, as it can lead to memory overflow if not managed carefully.

  • node-persist:

    node-persist does not implement an eviction policy as it is designed for persistent storage. Data remains in the filesystem until explicitly deleted, making it suitable for applications that require long-term data retention.

Data Persistence

  • lru-cache:

    lru-cache does not provide data persistence; all cached data is stored in memory and lost when the application restarts. It is best suited for transient data that does not need to survive application restarts.

  • node-cache:

    node-cache is also an in-memory cache and does not provide persistence. Cached data is lost upon application restart, but it allows for TTL settings to manage data freshness effectively.

  • memory-cache:

    memory-cache is purely an in-memory cache with no persistence capabilities. Data is lost when the application is stopped or crashes, making it suitable for temporary caching needs only.

  • node-persist:

    node-persist excels in data persistence, storing cached data on the filesystem. This allows data to survive application restarts, making it ideal for applications that require durable storage of cached information.

Ease of Use

  • lru-cache:

    lru-cache is straightforward to use with a simple API for setting and getting cache entries. Its focus on LRU eviction makes it easy to implement without complex configurations, making it a good choice for developers looking for efficiency without overhead.

  • node-cache:

    node-cache provides a user-friendly API with additional features like TTL and cache statistics, making it easy to manage cache entries. It strikes a balance between simplicity and functionality, suitable for various applications.

  • memory-cache:

    memory-cache offers a very simple API for storing and retrieving data, making it extremely easy to implement. It is ideal for quick caching solutions where complexity is not required.

  • node-persist:

    node-persist has a slightly more complex API due to its persistent storage capabilities, but it is still user-friendly. It requires some setup for file storage, making it a bit more involved than the others but still manageable.

Performance

  • lru-cache:

    lru-cache is optimized for performance with fast access times due to its LRU strategy, making it efficient for applications that require quick retrieval of frequently accessed data while managing memory effectively.

  • node-cache:

    node-cache offers good performance with the added benefit of TTL management, allowing for efficient memory usage by automatically removing stale entries. It is suitable for applications that require a balance of speed and data freshness.

  • memory-cache:

    memory-cache provides excellent performance for simple caching needs, as it stores data in memory without any overhead. However, it may not scale well for larger datasets due to the lack of eviction policies.

  • node-persist:

    node-persist may have slower performance compared to in-memory caches due to filesystem I/O operations, but it is ideal for applications that prioritize data durability over speed.

Use Cases

  • lru-cache:

    lru-cache is best suited for applications that require fast access to frequently used data, such as web applications with high traffic where caching responses can significantly improve load times.

  • node-cache:

    node-cache is suitable for applications that need to cache data with expiration, such as session management or caching database query results that can become stale over time.

  • memory-cache:

    memory-cache is ideal for lightweight applications or scripts where temporary data storage is needed without the need for persistence, such as caching API responses during a single request lifecycle.

  • node-persist:

    node-persist is perfect for applications that require persistent caching, such as storing user preferences, session data, or any data that needs to be retained across application restarts.

How to Choose: lru-cache vs node-cache vs memory-cache vs node-persist
  • lru-cache:

    Choose lru-cache if you need a simple and efficient Least Recently Used (LRU) cache implementation that automatically evicts the least recently accessed items when the cache reaches its limit. It is ideal for scenarios where memory usage is a concern and you want to optimize for the most frequently accessed data.

  • node-cache:

    Opt for node-cache if you require a caching solution that supports time-to-live (TTL) for cache entries, allowing you to set expiration times for cached data. This is beneficial for applications where data freshness is important, and you want to automatically remove stale entries from the cache.

  • memory-cache:

    Select memory-cache for a straightforward in-memory caching solution that allows for easy key-value storage without eviction policies. It is suitable for lightweight applications or scenarios where data persistence is not critical and you need a quick and easy way to cache data temporarily.

  • node-persist:

    Choose node-persist if you need a persistent storage solution that saves data to the filesystem. This is ideal for applications that require data to survive server restarts or need to store larger datasets that exceed memory limits. It combines the benefits of caching with durability.

README for lru-cache

lru-cache

A cache object that deletes the least-recently-used items.

Specify a max number of the most recently used items that you want to keep, and this cache will keep that many of the most recently accessed items.

This is not primarily a TTL cache, and does not make strong TTL guarantees. There is no preemptive pruning of expired items by default, but you may set a TTL on the cache or on a single set. If you do so, it will treat expired items as missing, and delete them when fetched. If you are more interested in TTL caching than LRU caching, check out @isaacs/ttlcache.

As of version 7, this is one of the most performant LRU implementations available in JavaScript, and supports a wide diversity of use cases. However, note that using some of the features will necessarily impact performance, by causing the cache to have to do more work. See the "Performance" section below.

Installation

npm install lru-cache --save

Usage

// hybrid module, either works
import { LRUCache } from 'lru-cache'
// or:
const { LRUCache } = require('lru-cache')
// or in minified form for web browsers:
import { LRUCache } from 'http://unpkg.com/lru-cache@9/dist/mjs/index.min.mjs'

// At least one of 'max', 'ttl', or 'maxSize' is required, to prevent
// unsafe unbounded storage.
//
// In most cases, it's best to specify a max for performance, so all
// the required memory allocation is done up-front.
//
// All the other options are optional, see the sections below for
// documentation on what each one does.  Most of them can be
// overridden for specific items in get()/set()
const options = {
  max: 500,

  // for use with tracking overall storage size
  maxSize: 5000,
  sizeCalculation: (value, key) => {
    return 1
  },

  // for use when you need to clean up something when objects
  // are evicted from the cache
  dispose: (value, key) => {
    freeFromMemoryOrWhatever(value)
  },

  // how long to live in ms
  ttl: 1000 * 60 * 5,

  // return stale items before removing from cache?
  allowStale: false,

  updateAgeOnGet: false,
  updateAgeOnHas: false,

  // async method to use for cache.fetch(), for
  // stale-while-revalidate type of behavior
  fetchMethod: async (
    key,
    staleValue,
    { options, signal, context }
  ) => {},
}

const cache = new LRUCache(options)

cache.set('key', 'value')
cache.get('key') // "value"

// non-string keys ARE fully supported
// but note that it must be THE SAME object, not
// just a JSON-equivalent object.
var someObject = { a: 1 }
cache.set(someObject, 'a value')
// Object keys are not toString()-ed
cache.set('[object Object]', 'a different value')
assert.equal(cache.get(someObject), 'a value')
// A similar object with same keys/values won't work,
// because it's a different object identity
assert.equal(cache.get({ a: 1 }), undefined)

cache.clear() // empty the cache

If you put more stuff in the cache, then less recently used items will fall out. That's what an LRU cache is.

For full description of the API and all options, please see the LRUCache typedocs

Storage Bounds Safety

This implementation aims to be as flexible as possible, within the limits of safe memory consumption and optimal performance.

At initial object creation, storage is allocated for max items. If max is set to zero, then some performance is lost, and item count is unbounded. Either maxSize or ttl must be set if max is not specified.

If maxSize is set, then this creates a safe limit on the maximum storage consumed, but without the performance benefits of pre-allocation. When maxSize is set, every item must provide a size, either via the sizeCalculation method provided to the constructor, or via a size or sizeCalculation option provided to cache.set(). The size of every item must be a positive integer.

If neither max nor maxSize are set, then ttl tracking must be enabled. Note that, even when tracking item ttl, items are not preemptively deleted when they become stale, unless ttlAutopurge is enabled. Instead, they are only purged the next time the key is requested. Thus, if ttlAutopurge, max, and maxSize are all not set, then the cache will potentially grow unbounded.

In this case, a warning is printed to standard error. Future versions may require the use of ttlAutopurge if max and maxSize are not specified.

If you truly wish to use a cache that is bound only by TTL expiration, consider using a Map object, and calling setTimeout to delete entries when they expire. It will perform much better than an LRU cache.

Here is an implementation you may use, under the same license as this package:

// a storage-unbounded ttl cache that is not an lru-cache
const cache = {
  data: new Map(),
  timers: new Map(),
  set: (k, v, ttl) => {
    if (cache.timers.has(k)) {
      clearTimeout(cache.timers.get(k))
    }
    cache.timers.set(
      k,
      setTimeout(() => cache.delete(k), ttl)
    )
    cache.data.set(k, v)
  },
  get: k => cache.data.get(k),
  has: k => cache.data.has(k),
  delete: k => {
    if (cache.timers.has(k)) {
      clearTimeout(cache.timers.get(k))
    }
    cache.timers.delete(k)
    return cache.data.delete(k)
  },
  clear: () => {
    cache.data.clear()
    for (const v of cache.timers.values()) {
      clearTimeout(v)
    }
    cache.timers.clear()
  },
}

If that isn't to your liking, check out @isaacs/ttlcache.

Storing Undefined Values

This cache never stores undefined values, as undefined is used internally in a few places to indicate that a key is not in the cache.

You may call cache.set(key, undefined), but this is just an alias for cache.delete(key). Note that this has the effect that cache.has(key) will return false after setting it to undefined.

cache.set(myKey, undefined)
cache.has(myKey) // false!

If you need to track undefined values, and still note that the key is in the cache, an easy workaround is to use a sigil object of your own.

import { LRUCache } from 'lru-cache'
const undefinedValue = Symbol('undefined')
const cache = new LRUCache(...)
const mySet = (key, value) =>
  cache.set(key, value === undefined ? undefinedValue : value)
const myGet = (key, value) => {
  const v = cache.get(key)
  return v === undefinedValue ? undefined : v
}

Performance

As of January 2022, version 7 of this library is one of the most performant LRU cache implementations in JavaScript.

Benchmarks can be extremely difficult to get right. In particular, the performance of set/get/delete operations on objects will vary wildly depending on the type of key used. V8 is highly optimized for objects with keys that are short strings, especially integer numeric strings. Thus any benchmark which tests solely using numbers as keys will tend to find that an object-based approach performs the best.

Note that coercing anything to strings to use as object keys is unsafe, unless you can be 100% certain that no other type of value will be used. For example:

const myCache = {}
const set = (k, v) => (myCache[k] = v)
const get = k => myCache[k]

set({}, 'please hang onto this for me')
set('[object Object]', 'oopsie')

Also beware of "Just So" stories regarding performance. Garbage collection of large (especially: deep) object graphs can be incredibly costly, with several "tipping points" where it increases exponentially. As a result, putting that off until later can make it much worse, and less predictable. If a library performs well, but only in a scenario where the object graph is kept shallow, then that won't help you if you are using large objects as keys.

In general, when attempting to use a library to improve performance (such as a cache like this one), it's best to choose an option that will perform well in the sorts of scenarios where you'll actually use it.

This library is optimized for repeated gets and minimizing eviction time, since that is the expected need of a LRU. Set operations are somewhat slower on average than a few other options, in part because of that optimization. It is assumed that you'll be caching some costly operation, ideally as rarely as possible, so optimizing set over get would be unwise.

If performance matters to you:

  1. If it's at all possible to use small integer values as keys, and you can guarantee that no other types of values will be used as keys, then do that, and use a cache such as lru-fast, or mnemonist's LRUCache which uses an Object as its data store.

  2. Failing that, if at all possible, use short non-numeric strings (ie, less than 256 characters) as your keys, and use mnemonist's LRUCache.

  3. If the types of your keys will be anything else, especially long strings, strings that look like floats, objects, or some mix of types, or if you aren't sure, then this library will work well for you.

    If you do not need the features that this library provides (like asynchronous fetching, a variety of TTL staleness options, and so on), then mnemonist's LRUMap is a very good option, and just slightly faster than this module (since it does considerably less).

  4. Do not use a dispose function, size tracking, or especially ttl behavior, unless absolutely needed. These features are convenient, and necessary in some use cases, and every attempt has been made to make the performance impact minimal, but it isn't nothing.

Breaking Changes in Version 7

This library changed to a different algorithm and internal data structure in version 7, yielding significantly better performance, albeit with some subtle changes as a result.

If you were relying on the internals of LRUCache in version 6 or before, it probably will not work in version 7 and above.

Breaking Changes in Version 8

  • The fetchContext option was renamed to context, and may no longer be set on the cache instance itself.
  • Rewritten in TypeScript, so pretty much all the types moved around a lot.
  • The AbortController/AbortSignal polyfill was removed. For this reason, Node version 16.14.0 or higher is now required.
  • Internal properties were moved to actual private class properties.
  • Keys and values must not be null or undefined.
  • Minified export available at 'lru-cache/min', for both CJS and MJS builds.

Breaking Changes in Version 9

  • Named export only, no default export.
  • AbortController polyfill returned, albeit with a warning when used.

Breaking Changes in Version 10

  • cache.fetch() return type is now Promise<V | undefined> instead of Promise<V | void>. This is an irrelevant change practically speaking, but can require changes for TypeScript users.

For more info, see the change log.