maska vs react-input-mask vs react-maskedinput
React Input Mask Libraries
maskareact-input-maskreact-maskedinputSimilar Packages:

React Input Mask Libraries

Input masking libraries are essential tools in web development that help format user input in real-time, ensuring that data entered into forms adheres to specific patterns. These libraries enhance user experience by guiding users on how to fill out fields correctly, thus reducing errors and improving data integrity. They are particularly useful for fields like phone numbers, dates, and credit card numbers, where a specific format is required. Each of these libraries offers unique features and capabilities, making them suitable for different use cases in React applications.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend

3 Years

Github Stars Ranking

Stat Detail

Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
maska01,99856.5 kB69 months agoMIT
react-input-mask02,290-1398 years agoMIT
react-maskedinput0729-628 years agoMIT

Feature Comparison: maska vs react-input-mask vs react-maskedinput

Dynamic Masking

  • maska:

    Maska allows for dynamic masking, meaning the mask can change based on user input. This feature is particularly useful for applications that require different formats depending on the context, such as varying phone number formats based on country codes.

  • react-input-mask:

    React Input Mask supports static masks that are predefined, which can be beneficial for standard formats but lacks the dynamic capabilities that Maska offers. It is more suited for consistent input formats across the application.

  • react-maskedinput:

    React Masked Input provides some level of dynamic masking but is primarily focused on static masks. It allows for customization but may require additional configuration to achieve dynamic behavior.

Customization

  • maska:

    Maska is highly customizable, allowing developers to define their own mask patterns and behaviors easily. This flexibility makes it suitable for applications with unique input requirements.

  • react-input-mask:

    React Input Mask offers a decent level of customization but is more opinionated in its approach. It provides predefined masks that can be modified, but may not be as flexible as Maska for unique scenarios.

  • react-maskedinput:

    React Masked Input excels in customization, allowing developers to create complex input scenarios with detailed control over how the mask behaves. This makes it a great choice for applications needing intricate input handling.

Community Support

  • maska:

    Maska has a smaller community compared to the other two libraries, which may result in less available resources and examples. However, it is straightforward enough that many developers find it easy to implement without extensive documentation.

  • react-input-mask:

    React Input Mask has a larger community and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find help and resources. This can be crucial for teams needing quick solutions and support during development.

  • react-maskedinput:

    React Masked Input has a moderate level of community support. While it may not be as extensive as React Input Mask, it still has a dedicated user base and sufficient documentation for most use cases.

Learning Curve

  • maska:

    Maska is designed to be simple and intuitive, making it easy for developers to get started quickly. Its straightforward API allows for rapid implementation without a steep learning curve.

  • react-input-mask:

    React Input Mask has a moderate learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to input masking concepts. However, its comprehensive documentation helps mitigate this issue.

  • react-maskedinput:

    React Masked Input may present a steeper learning curve due to its advanced customization options. Developers may need to invest more time to fully understand its capabilities and how to implement them effectively.

Performance

  • maska:

    Maska is lightweight and optimized for performance, making it a good choice for applications where speed is a priority. Its minimal footprint ensures that it does not significantly impact the overall performance of the application.

  • react-input-mask:

    React Input Mask is also performant but may introduce some overhead due to its more extensive feature set. It is generally efficient but could be less optimal in scenarios requiring high performance.

  • react-maskedinput:

    React Masked Input can be more resource-intensive, especially when handling complex masking scenarios. Developers should be mindful of performance implications when using this library in large applications.

How to Choose: maska vs react-input-mask vs react-maskedinput

  • maska:

    Choose Maska if you need a simple, lightweight solution that supports dynamic masks and is easy to integrate into your React application. It is particularly useful for scenarios where you want to create custom input masks on the fly based on user input.

  • react-input-mask:

    Opt for React Input Mask if you require a more robust solution with extensive documentation and community support. It is ideal for applications that need a variety of input formats and offers a straightforward API for managing input masks.

  • react-maskedinput:

    Select React Masked Input if you are looking for a library that provides a high degree of customization and flexibility. It is suitable for developers who want to create complex input scenarios and need fine-grained control over the masking behavior.

README for maska

Simple zero-dependency input mask.

Documentation & demo

Maska

Support ☕️

❤️ Please support Maska development!

Features ✨

  • No dependencies and small size: ~3 Kb gziped
  • Vanilla JS version + Vue 2/3, Alpine.js and Svelte integrations
  • Works with native and custom inputs
  • Custom tokens with modifiers, transform functions and hooks
  • Number mask mode: easy money formatting
  • Dynamic, reversed and eager masks

What’s new in v3 🎉

  • Integrations with Alpine.js and Svelte
  • Number mask mode
  • Simplified directive format
  • Other small improvements and fixes

Source of Inspiration 💡

License 📄

MIT