slugify vs speakingurl vs slug vs url-slug
URL Slug Generation Libraries Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
slugifyspeakingurlslugurl-slug
What's URL Slug Generation Libraries?

URL slug generation libraries are essential tools in web development that help create user-friendly, SEO-optimized URLs by transforming strings into a format suitable for web addresses. These libraries typically convert spaces and special characters into hyphens, lowercase letters, and remove unwanted characters, ensuring that the resulting slugs are both readable and compliant with web standards. By using these libraries, developers can enhance the usability and accessibility of their web applications, making it easier for users to share and navigate links.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
slugify5,634,1831,61220.9 kB422 years agoMIT
speakingurl1,318,2041,114-278 years agoBSD-3-Clause
slug275,03335734.5 kB64 months agoMIT
url-slug243,5398834 kB12 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: slugify vs speakingurl vs slug vs url-slug

Customization

  • slugify:

    'slugify' provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to define their own replacement characters and handle various edge cases, such as special characters and accents, making it versatile for different use cases.

  • speakingurl:

    'speakingurl' emphasizes human-readable slugs and allows for customization in terms of how slugs are generated, including options for preserving certain characters and formatting, which is beneficial for content-heavy sites.

  • slug:

    The 'slug' library offers minimal customization options, focusing on a straightforward approach to slug generation. It is designed to be simple and effective, making it easy to use without complex configurations.

  • url-slug:

    'url-slug' offers a range of customization features, including support for localization, enabling developers to create slugs that cater to different languages and cultural contexts.

Performance

  • slugify:

    'slugify' is designed to handle complex strings efficiently, but it may introduce slight overhead due to its additional features. It balances performance with flexibility, making it suitable for most applications.

  • speakingurl:

    'speakingurl' focuses on generating readable slugs, which may involve more processing compared to simpler libraries. However, its performance is generally acceptable for most content-driven applications.

  • slug:

    Being a lightweight library, 'slug' is optimized for performance and is suitable for applications where speed is a priority. It has minimal overhead, ensuring fast slug generation.

  • url-slug:

    'url-slug' is efficient in generating slugs but may have a performance trade-off due to its extensive options for localization and customization, making it ideal for applications that prioritize these features.

Ease of Use

  • slugify:

    'slugify' is user-friendly and provides a straightforward API, but its additional options may require a bit of learning for new users. It strikes a good balance between ease of use and functionality.

  • speakingurl:

    'speakingurl' has a slightly more complex API due to its focus on generating human-readable slugs, but it is still accessible for developers familiar with slug generation concepts.

  • slug:

    The 'slug' library is extremely easy to use, with a simple API that allows developers to generate slugs with minimal effort. This makes it ideal for beginners or projects that require quick implementation.

  • url-slug:

    'url-slug' offers a comprehensive API that may have a steeper learning curve for beginners, but it provides powerful features for those needing advanced slug generation capabilities.

Community and Support

  • slugify:

    'slugify' benefits from a larger community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find support and examples for various use cases, which is advantageous for developers.

  • speakingurl:

    'speakingurl' has a dedicated user base and offers good documentation, though it may not be as widely adopted as some other libraries. It provides enough resources for effective implementation.

  • slug:

    'slug' has a smaller community compared to other libraries, but it is well-maintained and provides sufficient documentation for basic use cases.

  • url-slug:

    'url-slug' has a growing community and offers decent documentation, but it may not have as many resources available compared to more popular slug libraries.

Localization Support

  • slugify:

    'slugify' has limited localization capabilities, primarily focusing on English and basic character replacements, which may not suffice for multilingual applications.

  • speakingurl:

    'speakingurl' excels in generating slugs that are human-readable and can be customized for different languages, making it a strong choice for content-heavy applications with diverse audiences.

  • slug:

    The 'slug' library does not offer built-in localization support, making it less suitable for applications that require slugs in multiple languages or cultural contexts.

  • url-slug:

    'url-slug' is designed with localization in mind, providing extensive options for generating slugs that cater to various languages and cultural nuances, making it ideal for global applications.

How to Choose: slugify vs speakingurl vs slug vs url-slug
  • slugify:

    Opt for 'slugify' if you require a more comprehensive slug generation with options for customization and handling various edge cases. It is suitable for applications that demand flexibility and robustness in slug creation.

  • speakingurl:

    Select 'speakingurl' if you want to generate slugs that are not only SEO-friendly but also human-readable, making them ideal for content-heavy applications where clarity is essential. It is particularly useful for blogs and articles.

  • slug:

    Choose 'slug' if you need a straightforward and lightweight solution for generating slugs without additional dependencies. It is ideal for simple projects where performance and minimalism are priorities.

  • url-slug:

    Use 'url-slug' if you need a library that focuses on generating slugs while providing extensive options for localization and customization, making it a good choice for multilingual applications.

Similar Npm Packages to slugify

slugify is a popular npm package used to convert strings into URL-friendly slugs. This is particularly useful for generating clean, readable URLs from titles or other text inputs, making it easier for users and search engines to understand the content of a page. The slugify function typically removes special characters, replaces spaces with hyphens, and converts the text to lowercase, resulting in a string that can be safely used in URLs. While slugify is a great choice for this task, there are several alternatives worth considering:

  • slug is a simple and efficient library for creating slugs from strings. It provides a straightforward API and focuses on generating clean slugs without unnecessary complexity. If you need a lightweight solution that handles basic slug generation, slug is an excellent option. It is easy to use and integrates well with various JavaScript projects, making it a popular choice among developers looking for a no-frills slug generation tool.

  • speakingurl is another alternative that focuses on creating human-readable slugs. It offers more customization options compared to other libraries, allowing developers to define their own character replacements and transformations. This can be particularly useful if you need to generate slugs that adhere to specific formatting rules or if you want to support multiple languages. speakingurl is ideal for projects that require more control over the slug generation process.

  • url-slug is a library designed to convert strings into URL slugs while preserving the original meaning of the text. It aims to create slugs that are both user-friendly and SEO-friendly. url-slug offers various options for customization, such as specifying delimiters and handling special characters. If your project requires slugs that are optimized for search engines and user experience, url-slug is a solid choice.

To see how slugify compares with slug, speakingurl, and url-slug, check out the comparison: Comparing slug vs slugify vs speakingurl vs url-slug.

Similar Npm Packages to speakingurl

speakingurl is an npm package designed to convert strings into URL-friendly slugs. It helps developers create clean, readable, and SEO-friendly URLs by transforming text into a format that can be easily used in web addresses. This is particularly useful for blog posts, articles, and any content that requires a user-friendly URL structure. Speakingurl takes care of various edge cases, such as special characters and spaces, ensuring that the resulting slug is both safe and meaningful.

While speakingurl is a robust solution for generating slugs, there are several alternatives available in the npm ecosystem that provide similar functionality. Here are a few noteworthy options:

  • slug is a simple and straightforward library for creating slugs from strings. It focuses on transforming text into a URL-friendly format while removing special characters and spaces. Slug is lightweight and easy to use, making it a great choice for developers looking for a no-frills solution to generate slugs quickly.
  • slugify is another popular library for converting strings into slugs. It offers more customization options compared to other slug generators, allowing developers to specify custom replacements for special characters and control the output format. If you need more flexibility in how your slugs are generated, slugify is an excellent choice.
  • url-slug is a library that provides a simple way to create URL slugs from strings. It focuses on producing clean and readable slugs while offering a straightforward API. If you are looking for a lightweight solution that prioritizes simplicity and ease of use, url-slug is worth considering.

To see how speakingurl compares with slug, slugify, and url-slug, check out the comparison: Comparing slug vs slugify vs speakingurl vs url-slug.

Similar Npm Packages to slug

slug is a simple utility for generating URL-friendly slugs from strings. It is commonly used in web applications to create readable and SEO-friendly URLs by transforming titles or other text into a format suitable for use in URLs. The slug library helps ensure that the generated slugs are consistent and free of special characters, making them easier to read and share.

While slug provides a straightforward solution for generating slugs, there are alternatives available that offer similar functionality. Here are a few notable options:

  • slugify is a popular library that focuses on converting strings into URL-friendly slugs. It provides a range of options for customizing the slug generation process, including support for different replacement characters, handling of special characters, and more. slugify is a great choice if you need a more feature-rich solution that allows for greater control over the slug creation process, making it suitable for various use cases.
  • url-slug is another library designed for generating slugs from strings. It offers a simple API and focuses on transforming text into a URL-safe format. url-slug is lightweight and easy to use, making it a good option for developers looking for a straightforward solution without the need for extensive configuration. If you want a no-frills approach to slug generation, url-slug may be the right choice for your project.

To see how slug compares with slugify and url-slug, check out the comparison: Comparing slug vs slugify vs url-slug.

Similar Npm Packages to url-slug

url-slug is a lightweight npm package designed to generate URL-friendly slugs from strings. It is particularly useful for creating clean and readable URLs for web applications, blogs, or any content management system. By converting titles or phrases into slugs, it helps improve SEO and enhances user experience. The package offers various options for customizing the slug generation process, such as specifying a custom separator or handling special characters.

While url-slug is a solid choice for slug generation, there are other libraries in the ecosystem that provide similar functionality. Here are a couple of alternatives:

  • slug is a simple and effective library for generating slugs from strings. It focuses on transforming a given string into a URL-friendly format by removing special characters, replacing spaces with hyphens, and converting the text to lowercase. The slug package is straightforward to use and can be a great option for developers looking for a no-frills solution for slug generation.
  • slugify is another popular library for creating slugs from strings. It offers more advanced features compared to some other slug generation libraries, such as support for custom replacements and the ability to handle various character encodings. slugify is particularly useful when you need more control over the slug creation process or when working with international characters.

To see how url-slug compares with slug and slugify, check out the comparison: Comparing slug vs slugify vs url-slug.

README for slugify

slugify

npm-version coveralls-status

var slugify = require('slugify')

slugify('some string') // some-string

// if you prefer something other than '-' as separator
slugify('some string', '_')  // some_string
  • Vanilla ES2015 JavaScript
    • If you need to use Slugify with older browsers, consider using version 1.4.7
  • No dependencies
  • Coerces foreign symbols to their English equivalent (check out the charMap for more details)
  • Works in the browser (window.slugify) and AMD/CommonJS-flavored module loaders

Options

slugify('some string', {
  replacement: '-',  // replace spaces with replacement character, defaults to `-`
  remove: undefined, // remove characters that match regex, defaults to `undefined`
  lower: false,      // convert to lower case, defaults to `false`
  strict: false,     // strip special characters except replacement, defaults to `false`
  locale: 'vi',      // language code of the locale to use
  trim: true         // trim leading and trailing replacement chars, defaults to `true`
})

Remove

For example, to remove *+~.()'"!:@ from the result slug, you can use slugify('..', {remove: /[*+~.()'"!:@]/g}).

  • If the value of remove is a regular expression, it should be a character class and only a character class. It should also use the global flag. (For example: /[*+~.()'"!:@]/g.) Otherwise, the remove option might not work as expected.
  • If the value of remove is a string, it should be a single character. Otherwise, the remove option might not work as expected.

Locales

The main charmap.json file contains all known characters and their transliteration. All new characters should be added there first. In case you stumble upon a character already set in charmap.json, but not transliterated correctly according to your language, then you have to add those characters in locales.json to override the already existing transliteration in charmap.json, but for your locale only.

You can get the correct language code of your language from here.

Extend

Out of the box slugify comes with support for a handful of Unicode symbols. For example the ☢ (radioactive) symbol is not defined in the charMap and therefore it will be stripped by default:

slugify('unicode ♥ is ☢') // unicode-love-is

However you can extend the supported symbols, or override the existing ones with your own:

slugify.extend({'☢': 'radioactive'})
slugify('unicode ♥ is ☢') // unicode-love-is-radioactive

Keep in mind that the extend method extends/overrides the default charMap for the entire process. In case you need a fresh instance of the slugify's charMap object you have to clean up the module cache first:

delete require.cache[require.resolve('slugify')]
var slugify = require('slugify')

Contribute

  1. Add chars to charmap.json
  2. Run tests npm test
  3. The tests will build the charmap in index.js and will sort the charmap.json
  4. Commit all modified files

Originally this was a vanilla javascript port of node-slug.
Note that the original slug module has been ported to vanilla javascript too.

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc or npmjs.com, the official website for the npm registry. Please note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.