socket.io-client vs sockjs-client vs websocket vs stompjs
WebSocket Communication Libraries Comparison
1 Year
socket.io-clientsockjs-clientwebsocketstompjsSimilar Packages:
What's WebSocket Communication Libraries?

WebSocket communication libraries facilitate real-time, bidirectional communication between clients and servers over a single, long-lived connection. These libraries abstract the complexities of WebSocket protocols, providing developers with easy-to-use APIs for implementing real-time features in web applications. They are essential for applications that require instant data updates, such as chat applications, live notifications, and collaborative tools. Each library has its unique features and use cases, making it important to choose the right one based on project requirements.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
socket.io-client5,476,69661,7051.41 MB1854 months agoMIT
sockjs-client3,058,2528,467700 kB29-MIT
websocket1,028,1383,770154 kB7010 months agoApache-2.0
stompjs46,8071,439-8811 years agoApache-2.0
Feature Comparison: socket.io-client vs sockjs-client vs websocket vs stompjs

Protocol Support

  • socket.io-client:

    Socket.IO uses a custom protocol that falls back to HTTP long-polling when WebSocket is not available, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of browsers and environments. It also supports multiplexing, allowing multiple connections over a single WebSocket connection.

  • sockjs-client:

    SockJS provides a WebSocket-like API and supports various transport protocols including WebSocket, XHR-streaming, and more. It automatically chooses the best available transport method, ensuring reliable communication even in restrictive environments.

  • websocket:

    The native WebSocket API provides a straightforward implementation of the WebSocket protocol, offering low-level access to the connection. It does not include any fallback mechanisms or additional features, focusing solely on real-time communication.

  • stompjs:

    STOMP.js is built specifically for the STOMP protocol, which is a simple text-based protocol for messaging. It allows for easy integration with message brokers like RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ, making it suitable for applications that require message-oriented middleware.

Ease of Use

  • socket.io-client:

    Socket.IO offers a high-level API that simplifies event-based communication, making it easy to implement real-time features with minimal code. Its built-in reconnection and event handling capabilities enhance developer productivity.

  • sockjs-client:

    SockJS provides a simple and familiar API similar to WebSocket, making it easy to integrate into existing applications. Its automatic transport selection abstracts the complexity of handling different environments.

  • websocket:

    The native WebSocket API is simple and minimalistic, but it requires more boilerplate code for handling connection events and message parsing, which can increase development time for complex applications.

  • stompjs:

    STOMP.js offers a straightforward API for subscribing to topics and sending messages, making it easy to work with message brokers. However, it may require additional setup for broker configurations, which can add complexity.

Performance

  • socket.io-client:

    Socket.IO is optimized for performance with features like automatic reconnection and message buffering. However, its abstraction layer may introduce some overhead compared to raw WebSocket connections.

  • sockjs-client:

    SockJS may introduce additional latency due to its fallback mechanisms and transport negotiation, but it ensures reliable communication across various environments, which can be a worthwhile trade-off.

  • websocket:

    The native WebSocket API provides the best performance for real-time applications, as it establishes a direct connection without any additional overhead. This makes it ideal for high-frequency messaging scenarios.

  • stompjs:

    STOMP.js performance is highly dependent on the underlying message broker. It can efficiently handle message delivery and subscription management, but may introduce overhead compared to direct WebSocket usage.

Community and Ecosystem

  • socket.io-client:

    Socket.IO has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and numerous resources available. It is widely used in the industry, making it a reliable choice for real-time applications.

  • sockjs-client:

    SockJS has a smaller community compared to Socket.IO but is still well-documented and supported. It is often used in conjunction with other frameworks, such as Spring, which enhances its ecosystem.

  • websocket:

    The native WebSocket API is part of the browser's standard API, ensuring broad support and community knowledge. However, it lacks the extensive ecosystem and resources that come with higher-level libraries.

  • stompjs:

    STOMP.js has a niche community focused on message-oriented middleware. Its documentation is adequate, but it may not have as many resources or examples compared to more popular libraries.

Fallback Mechanisms

  • socket.io-client:

    Socket.IO excels in fallback mechanisms, automatically switching to HTTP long-polling or other transports if WebSocket is unavailable, ensuring consistent connectivity across different environments.

  • sockjs-client:

    SockJS is specifically designed to provide fallback options, ensuring that applications can maintain functionality even in environments where WebSocket is not supported or blocked.

  • websocket:

    The native WebSocket API does not include any fallback mechanisms. If the WebSocket connection fails, the developer must implement their own reconnection logic.

  • stompjs:

    STOMP.js does not provide fallback mechanisms itself, as it relies on the underlying transport (usually WebSocket) to handle connections. If WebSocket fails, the application may need additional logic to manage reconnections.

How to Choose: socket.io-client vs sockjs-client vs websocket vs stompjs
  • socket.io-client:

    Choose Socket.IO if you need a robust solution that supports fallback options for older browsers and offers features like automatic reconnection, event-based communication, and rooms for grouping sockets. It's ideal for applications requiring real-time capabilities with a focus on reliability and ease of use.

  • sockjs-client:

    Select SockJS if you require a library that provides a WebSocket-like API while ensuring compatibility with browsers that do not support WebSockets. It offers a variety of fallback options, making it suitable for applications that need to maintain functionality across different environments.

  • websocket:

    Use the native WebSocket API if you want a lightweight solution without additional abstractions. This is ideal for projects where you have full control over the server and client and do not need the added features provided by libraries like Socket.IO or SockJS.

  • stompjs:

    Opt for STOMP.js if your application needs to communicate with message brokers using the STOMP protocol. It is particularly useful for applications that require message queuing and pub/sub patterns, such as chat applications or real-time dashboards, where message delivery guarantees are important.

README for socket.io-client

socket.io-client

Build Status NPM version Downloads

Sauce Test Status

Documentation

Please see the documentation here.

The source code of the website can be found here. Contributions are welcome!

Debug / logging

In order to see all the client debug output, run the following command on the browser console – including the desired scope – and reload your app page:

localStorage.debug = '*';

And then, filter by the scopes you're interested in. See also: https://socket.io/docs/v4/logging-and-debugging/

License

MIT