socket.io-client vs sockjs-client vs mqtt vs @stomp/stompjs vs webstomp-client
WebSocket and Messaging Libraries Comparison
1 Year
socket.io-clientsockjs-clientmqtt@stomp/stompjswebstomp-clientSimilar Packages:
What's WebSocket and Messaging Libraries?

These libraries are designed to facilitate real-time communication between clients and servers in web applications. They utilize various protocols and methodologies to enable message passing, event handling, and data synchronization, making them essential for applications that require instant updates, such as chat applications, live notifications, and collaborative tools. Each library has its own strengths and use cases, catering to different requirements in terms of protocol support, ease of use, and scalability.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
socket.io-client5,223,32761,8971.41 MB1876 months agoMIT
sockjs-client2,945,2748,476700 kB30-MIT
mqtt1,219,1758,7641.83 MB41a day agoMIT
@stomp/stompjs232,657812425 kB216 days agoApache-2.0
webstomp-client18,229296-236 years agoApache-2.0
Feature Comparison: socket.io-client vs sockjs-client vs mqtt vs @stomp/stompjs vs webstomp-client

Protocol Support

  • socket.io-client:

    Uses its own protocol built on top of WebSockets, with automatic fallbacks to other transport methods like polling, ensuring reliable communication in various environments.

  • sockjs-client:

    Provides a WebSocket-like API with fallbacks to other protocols such as XHR-streaming and long polling, ensuring compatibility across different browsers and networks.

  • mqtt:

    Implements the MQTT protocol, which is a lightweight messaging protocol optimized for high-latency or unreliable networks, making it ideal for IoT devices and applications.

  • @stomp/stompjs:

    Supports the STOMP protocol, which is a simple text-based protocol for messaging. It is designed for use with message brokers and provides features like subscriptions and message acknowledgments.

  • webstomp-client:

    Works with STOMP over WebSocket, allowing for easy integration with STOMP servers and providing a straightforward API for messaging.

Ease of Use

  • socket.io-client:

    Known for its ease of use, it provides a simple interface for establishing connections and handling events, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

  • sockjs-client:

    Designed to be easy to use, it provides a familiar WebSocket-like interface, allowing developers to implement real-time features without deep knowledge of the underlying protocols.

  • mqtt:

    Features a straightforward API that allows for quick setup and usage, especially for developers working on IoT applications, with minimal configuration required.

  • @stomp/stompjs:

    Offers a clean and simple API for connecting to STOMP servers, subscribing to topics, and sending messages, making it relatively easy to implement for developers familiar with STOMP.

  • webstomp-client:

    Offers a simple API for STOMP messaging, making it easy to integrate with existing applications that require STOMP support.

Scalability

  • socket.io-client:

    Scales effectively with Socket.IO servers, allowing for horizontal scaling and handling a large number of concurrent connections with ease.

  • sockjs-client:

    Scalability depends on the underlying transport protocol used; it can handle multiple connections but may not be as efficient as pure WebSocket solutions.

  • mqtt:

    Highly scalable for IoT applications, supporting thousands of devices with minimal overhead, making it ideal for environments with many connected devices.

  • @stomp/stompjs:

    Scales well with message brokers, allowing for distributed systems and high throughput, making it suitable for large-scale applications that require reliable messaging.

  • webstomp-client:

    Scales with STOMP servers, allowing for multiple clients to connect and communicate efficiently, suitable for applications requiring message distribution.

Fallback Mechanism

  • socket.io-client:

    Includes built-in fallback mechanisms to ensure connectivity, automatically switching to other transport methods if WebSocket is not supported, enhancing reliability.

  • sockjs-client:

    Provides robust fallback options, ensuring that if WebSocket is unavailable, it will use other protocols to maintain communication, making it very reliable across different environments.

  • mqtt:

    Does not have a fallback mechanism as it is designed to work over TCP/IP; however, it is lightweight and efficient for its intended use cases.

  • @stomp/stompjs:

    Does not provide fallback mechanisms as it relies on WebSocket connections; if WebSocket is not available, it will not connect.

  • webstomp-client:

    Relies on WebSocket connections and does not provide fallback options, making it less flexible in environments where WebSocket support is limited.

Use Cases

  • socket.io-client:

    Perfect for real-time web applications, such as chat apps, live updates, and collaborative tools that require instant communication between clients and servers.

  • sockjs-client:

    Useful for applications that need to support a wide range of browsers and environments, ensuring reliable communication even when WebSocket is not available.

  • mqtt:

    Best suited for IoT applications, telemetry, and scenarios where devices need to communicate efficiently over unreliable networks.

  • @stomp/stompjs:

    Ideal for applications that require a publish-subscribe model, such as chat applications, real-time notifications, and collaborative tools that utilize message brokers.

  • webstomp-client:

    Great for applications that need to interact with STOMP servers, such as messaging systems and real-time data feeds.

How to Choose: socket.io-client vs sockjs-client vs mqtt vs @stomp/stompjs vs webstomp-client
  • socket.io-client:

    Opt for socket.io-client if you require a robust solution for real-time bi-directional communication. It provides a simple API and handles fallback options automatically, making it suitable for applications that need to support various transport protocols seamlessly.

  • sockjs-client:

    Use sockjs-client when you need a WebSocket-like API that can fall back to other protocols. It is particularly useful in environments where WebSocket support may be limited, ensuring reliable communication across different browsers and networks.

  • mqtt:

    Select mqtt if you are building IoT applications or need a lightweight messaging protocol. MQTT is designed for low-bandwidth, high-latency networks and is suitable for scenarios where devices need to communicate in real-time with minimal overhead.

  • @stomp/stompjs:

    Choose @stomp/stompjs if you need to implement the STOMP protocol over WebSocket for messaging applications. It is ideal for applications that require a publish-subscribe model and works well with message brokers like RabbitMQ or ActiveMQ.

  • webstomp-client:

    Choose webstomp-client if you want to work with STOMP over WebSocket in a more straightforward manner. It is a good choice for applications that need to interact with STOMP servers without the additional complexity of a full messaging framework.

README for socket.io-client

socket.io-client

Build Status NPM version Downloads

Sauce Test Status

Documentation

Please see the documentation here.

The source code of the website can be found here. Contributions are welcome!

Debug / logging

In order to see all the client debug output, run the following command on the browser console – including the desired scope – and reload your app page:

localStorage.debug = '*';

And then, filter by the scopes you're interested in. See also: https://socket.io/docs/v4/logging-and-debugging/

License

MIT