tailwindcss vs @unocss/core vs windicss
CSS Frameworks and Utility-First Design
Search packages..
tailwindcss@unocss/corewindicssSimilar Packages:
CSS Frameworks and Utility-First Design

CSS Frameworks and Utility-First Design are tools and methodologies in web development that promote the use of pre-defined CSS classes to style HTML elements. These frameworks, like Tailwind CSS, Windi CSS, and UnoCSS, provide a set of utility classes that can be combined directly in HTML, allowing for faster and more efficient styling without writing custom CSS. This approach encourages a more modular and reusable design, reduces the need for context-specific styles, and can lead to smaller CSS bundles when configured correctly. Utility-first frameworks prioritize flexibility and customization, enabling developers to create unique designs while maintaining a consistent and maintainable codebase.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
tailwindcss24,445,71291,856749 kB60a month agoMIT
@unocss/core412,46518,43383.7 kB1557 days agoMIT
windicss18,0456,5382.29 MB226-MIT
Feature Comparison: tailwindcss vs @unocss/core vs windicss

CSS Generation

  • tailwindcss:

    tailwindcss generates a complete set of utility classes based on your configuration file. While it can produce a large CSS file by default, tools like PurgeCSS can be integrated to remove unused styles during production builds, reducing bloat.

  • @unocss/core:

    @unocss/core generates CSS on-demand, meaning it only creates styles for the classes you use in your HTML. This approach minimizes the final CSS bundle size and eliminates unused styles, making it highly efficient for performance.

  • windicss:

    windicss also generates CSS on-demand, similar to UnoCSS. It analyzes your HTML and generates only the classes you use, resulting in smaller CSS files. Windi CSS is designed for speed and efficiency, making it one of the fastest utility-first frameworks.

Customization

  • tailwindcss:

    tailwindcss is highly customizable, allowing you to modify the default theme, add new utility classes, and configure responsive breakpoints. Its configuration file (tailwind.config.js) provides a centralized way to manage all customizations.

  • @unocss/core:

    @unocss/core offers extensive customization through its configuration API. You can define your own utility classes, themes, and design tokens, allowing for a highly tailored styling solution that fits your project's needs.

  • windicss:

    windicss provides a flexible customization system similar to Tailwind. You can easily extend the default theme, add custom utilities, and configure the framework to match your design requirements.

Performance

  • tailwindcss:

    tailwindcss can be performance-friendly if configured correctly. The key is to use PurgeCSS or similar tools to remove unused styles from the final build. This process can drastically reduce the size of the generated CSS file, making it suitable for production environments.

  • @unocss/core:

    @unocss/core is designed for performance, especially with its on-demand CSS generation. By only creating styles for the classes that are actually used, it significantly reduces the amount of CSS that needs to be loaded, leading to faster page load times.

  • windicss:

    windicss is known for its performance, particularly in how it generates CSS on-demand. It is optimized for speed and can produce smaller CSS files compared to traditional frameworks, making it a great choice for projects where performance is a priority.

Ecosystem and Community

  • tailwindcss:

    tailwindcss has a large and mature ecosystem with a vibrant community. It offers a wide range of plugins, integrations, and third-party tools that enhance its functionality. The framework is well-documented and widely adopted in the industry.

  • @unocss/core:

    @unocss/core is part of the emerging ecosystem of on-demand CSS frameworks. While it is relatively new, it is gaining traction for its innovative approach to utility-first styling and has an active community contributing to its development.

  • windicss:

    windicss is rapidly growing in popularity and has a supportive community. While it may not be as large as Tailwind's, it is known for its performance-oriented approach and has a growing number of plugins and integrations.

Ease of Use: Code Examples

  • tailwindcss:

    tailwindcss Example:

    <!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <title>Tailwind CSS Example</title>
    <link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/tailwindcss@2.2.19/dist/tailwind.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
</head>
<body>
    <div class="bg-blue-500 text-white p-4 rounded">
        Hello, Tailwind CSS!
    </div>
</body>
</html>

    This example shows how to use Tailwind CSS classes in your HTML. The styles are pre-defined in the Tailwind CSS framework.

  • @unocss/core:

    @unocss/core Example:

    <!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <title>UnoCSS Example</title>
    <script src="https://unpkg.com/@unocss/core"></script>
    <style>
        /* Styles will be generated on-demand */
    </style>
</head>
<body>
    <div class="bg-blue-500 text-white p-4 rounded">
        Hello, UnoCSS!
    </div>
</body>
</html>

    This example demonstrates how UnoCSS generates styles on-demand based on the classes used in the HTML.

  • windicss:

    windicss Example:

    <!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <title>Windi CSS Example</title>
    <link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/windicss@3.0.0/dist/windi.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
</head>
<body>
    <div class="bg-blue-500 text-white p-4 rounded">
        Hello, Windi CSS!
    </div>
</body>
</html>

    This example illustrates how Windi CSS generates styles on-demand based on the classes used in the HTML.

How to Choose: tailwindcss vs @unocss/core vs windicss
  • tailwindcss:

    Choose tailwindcss if you prefer a well-established, opinionated utility-first framework with a rich ecosystem, extensive documentation, and built-in design tokens for consistent styling across your application.

  • @unocss/core:

    Choose @unocss/core if you want a highly customizable, on-demand utility-first CSS framework that generates styles as needed, reducing bloat and allowing for fine-tuned design systems.

  • windicss:

    Choose windicss if you need a fast, on-demand utility-first CSS framework that offers similar features to Tailwind but with better performance and smaller bundle sizes, especially for large projects.

Similar Npm Packages to tailwindcss

tailwindcss is a utility-first CSS framework that allows developers to create custom designs without having to leave their HTML. Unlike traditional CSS frameworks that come with predefined components, Tailwind CSS provides low-level utility classes that can be composed to build any design directly in your markup. This approach promotes a more efficient workflow and encourages the creation of unique designs tailored to specific project needs. Tailwind CSS is particularly popular among developers who appreciate flexibility and customization in their styling process.

However, there are several alternatives to Tailwind CSS that also provide robust solutions for styling web applications:

  • bootstrap is one of the most popular front-end frameworks for developing responsive and mobile-first websites. It comes with a comprehensive set of pre-designed components and utilities, making it easy to create visually appealing layouts quickly. Bootstrap is ideal for developers who prefer a more structured approach to styling and want to leverage its extensive library of components for rapid development.

  • bulma is a modern CSS framework based on Flexbox. It offers a clean and minimalistic design with a set of responsive components. Bulma is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a great choice for developers who want a straightforward framework without the overhead of JavaScript components. Its class-based structure allows for easy customization while maintaining a consistent design.

  • materialize-css is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a set of responsive components and styles that adhere to Material Design guidelines, making it suitable for developers looking to create applications with a modern and cohesive look. Materialize CSS is particularly useful for projects that aim to provide a user experience consistent with Google's design philosophy.

  • purecss is a minimalistic CSS framework that provides a set of small, responsive CSS modules. It is designed to be lightweight and easy to integrate into any project without adding unnecessary bloat. Pure CSS is ideal for developers who want a simple solution for styling without the overhead of a larger framework.

  • tachyons is another utility-first CSS framework that emphasizes speed and performance. It provides a set of small, composable classes that can be combined to create responsive layouts. Tachyons is similar to Tailwind CSS in its utility-first approach but is designed to be even more lightweight and focused on performance.

To explore how Tailwind CSS compares with these alternatives, check out the comparison: Comparing bootstrap vs bulma vs materialize-css vs purecss vs tachyons vs tailwindcss.

Similar Npm Packages to @unocss/core

@unocss/core is a utility-first CSS framework designed to provide a highly customizable and efficient way to style applications. It focuses on generating styles on-demand, which can lead to smaller bundle sizes and improved performance. With its unique approach, @unocss/core allows developers to define styles using a set of utility classes, making it easy to create responsive and maintainable designs without the overhead of traditional CSS frameworks.

While @unocss/core offers a compelling solution for styling, there are several alternatives in the CSS utility framework space that developers may consider:

  • tailwindcss is one of the most popular utility-first CSS frameworks available. It provides a comprehensive set of utility classes that enable developers to build custom designs directly in their markup. Tailwind's extensive configuration options allow for deep customization, making it suitable for a wide range of projects. With a strong community and ecosystem, Tailwind CSS has become a go-to choice for many developers looking to streamline their styling process while maintaining design consistency.
  • windicss is a utility-first CSS framework that is inspired by Tailwind CSS but focuses on performance and speed. It features on-demand utility generation, which means that only the classes used in your project are generated, resulting in smaller CSS files. Windi CSS also supports features like variants, shortcuts, and dynamic classes, making it a flexible alternative for developers who want the benefits of utility-first styling without the overhead of larger frameworks.

To see how @unocss/core compares with tailwindcss and windicss, check out the comparison: Comparing @unocss/core vs tailwindcss vs windicss.

Similar Npm Packages to windicss

windicss is a utility-first CSS framework designed for rapid UI development. It is inspired by Tailwind CSS but aims to provide a more optimized and faster approach to styling applications. Windicss generates styles on-demand, which means it only includes the CSS classes that are actually used in your project, leading to smaller bundle sizes and improved performance. This makes it an excellent choice for developers who want the benefits of utility-first styling without the overhead typically associated with larger CSS frameworks.

While Windicss has its unique advantages, there are alternatives in the utility-first CSS ecosystem that developers might consider:

  • tailwindcss is the most popular utility-first CSS framework and serves as the foundation for many modern web applications. It provides a comprehensive set of utility classes that can be composed to build custom designs without leaving your HTML. Tailwind CSS emphasizes a mobile-first approach and offers extensive customization options through its configuration file. If you're looking for a well-established framework with a large community and extensive documentation, Tailwind CSS is a solid choice.
  • twind is a smaller and more lightweight alternative to Tailwind CSS that also embraces the utility-first approach. Unlike Tailwind, Twind generates styles at runtime, which means it can be used in environments where CSS-in-JS is preferred. Twind is particularly useful for projects that require a minimal footprint and want to leverage the benefits of utility classes without the need for a build step. If you're looking for a flexible solution that can work seamlessly with various frameworks, Twind is worth considering.

To compare Windicss with Tailwind CSS and explore their differences, check out the comparison: Comparing tailwindcss vs windicss.

README for tailwindcss

Tailwind CSS

A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Build Status Total Downloads Latest Release License

Documentation

For full documentation, visit tailwindcss.com.

Community

For help, discussion about best practices, or feature ideas:

Discuss Tailwind CSS on GitHub

Contributing

If you're interested in contributing to Tailwind CSS, please read our contributing docs before submitting a pull request.

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc, the official website for the npm registry. Note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. Please share your feedback via our GitHub repository. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.