CSS Frameworks Comparison
tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs bulma vs tachyons vs purecss vs materialize-css
1 Year
tailwindcssbootstrapbulmatachyonspurecssmaterialize-cssSimilar Packages:
What's CSS Frameworks?

CSS frameworks are pre-prepared libraries that are meant to be used as a base for starting a project. They provide a standardized way to style web applications, offering a set of CSS classes and components that help developers create responsive and visually appealing designs quickly. These frameworks often include grid systems, typography, buttons, forms, and other UI elements that can be easily integrated into web projects, allowing for a more efficient development process and consistent design across different devices and screen sizes.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
tailwindcss10,557,80083,5555.73 MB11417 days agoMIT
bootstrap4,433,212170,9859.67 MB6509 months agoMIT
bulma178,44149,4076.15 MB4774 months agoMIT
tachyons64,67511,648-895 years agoMIT
purecss30,41023,611229 kB15-BSD-3-Clause
materialize-css23,78938,869-7946 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs bulma vs tachyons vs purecss vs materialize-css

Design Philosophy

  • tailwindcss:

    Tailwind CSS is also utility-first but takes it a step further by allowing extensive customization through configuration. It encourages developers to create unique designs by composing utility classes directly in their HTML.

  • bootstrap:

    Bootstrap follows a component-based design philosophy, providing a comprehensive set of UI components that can be easily integrated into any project. Its design is aimed at creating a consistent look and feel across different devices and platforms.

  • bulma:

    Bulma is based on a modern CSS architecture that leverages Flexbox, promoting a clean and responsive design. It emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, allowing developers to create layouts without complex CSS rules.

  • tachyons:

    Tachyons adopts a utility-first approach, encouraging developers to use small, single-purpose classes to build their designs. This philosophy promotes rapid prototyping and a functional style of CSS that is easy to maintain.

  • purecss:

    PureCSS is designed to be minimal and modular, providing only the essentials needed for responsive web design. It avoids unnecessary bloat, making it suitable for projects where performance is a priority.

  • materialize-css:

    Materialize CSS is built around Google's Material Design principles, focusing on depth, shadows, and animations to create a rich user experience. It aims to provide a cohesive design language that enhances usability and aesthetics.

Customization

  • tailwindcss:

    Tailwind CSS excels in customization, allowing developers to configure nearly every aspect of the framework through a configuration file. This flexibility enables the creation of highly unique designs.

  • bootstrap:

    Bootstrap offers customization through SASS variables and a built-in theming system, allowing developers to adjust styles globally. However, it can be somewhat rigid if extensive customization is needed.

  • bulma:

    Bulma is highly customizable with simple SASS variables, enabling developers to easily tweak styles without diving deep into the framework's code.

  • tachyons:

    Tachyons promotes customization through its utility classes, allowing developers to create unique designs without writing custom CSS. However, it may require a different mindset for those used to traditional CSS frameworks.

  • purecss:

    PureCSS is minimalistic by design, which means customization is straightforward but limited to the basic components provided. It is not as flexible as other frameworks for extensive styling.

  • materialize-css:

    Materialize CSS allows for some customization through SASS, but it is more focused on adhering to Material Design guidelines, which can limit extensive alterations.

Learning Curve

  • tailwindcss:

    Tailwind CSS has a steeper learning curve initially, as it requires understanding utility classes and how to compose them effectively. However, once mastered, it allows for rapid development and design flexibility.

  • bootstrap:

    Bootstrap has a moderate learning curve, especially for beginners. Its extensive documentation and community support make it easier to get started, but mastering its components may take time.

  • bulma:

    Bulma is relatively easy to learn, especially for those familiar with CSS. Its straightforward class naming conventions and documentation facilitate a quick onboarding process.

  • tachyons:

    Tachyons has a unique learning curve as it requires a shift in thinking towards utility-first CSS. Once understood, it can significantly speed up the development process.

  • purecss:

    PureCSS is very easy to learn due to its minimalistic approach. Developers can quickly understand how to implement its components without much overhead.

  • materialize-css:

    Materialize CSS has a moderate learning curve due to its adherence to Material Design principles. Developers may need to familiarize themselves with these concepts to fully utilize the framework.

Community and Ecosystem

  • tailwindcss:

    Tailwind CSS has rapidly gained popularity and has a vibrant community. It offers a wealth of plugins, themes, and resources, making it easy for developers to find support and inspiration.

  • bootstrap:

    Bootstrap has a large and active community, providing extensive resources, plugins, and third-party themes. Its popularity ensures a wealth of tutorials and support.

  • bulma:

    Bulma has a growing community with a decent number of resources and extensions, though it is not as extensive as Bootstrap's. It is gaining traction among developers looking for modern CSS solutions.

  • tachyons:

    Tachyons has a passionate community that promotes the utility-first approach. Resources are available, but they are not as extensive as those for Bootstrap.

  • purecss:

    PureCSS has a niche community focused on minimalism and performance. While resources are limited, its simplicity makes it easy to pick up and use.

  • materialize-css:

    Materialize CSS has a smaller community compared to Bootstrap, but it still offers sufficient resources and documentation for developers interested in Material Design.

Performance

  • tailwindcss:

    Tailwind CSS can lead to larger file sizes if not purged properly, but it provides excellent performance when configured correctly. Its utility-first approach can also lead to more efficient CSS.

  • bootstrap:

    Bootstrap can lead to larger file sizes due to its comprehensive nature, but it includes optimization techniques like SASS to help reduce bloat. Performance can be managed with careful selection of components.

  • bulma:

    Bulma is lightweight and performs well, as it does not include JavaScript components. Its reliance on Flexbox allows for efficient layouts without excessive CSS.

  • tachyons:

    Tachyons is optimized for performance, focusing on small utility classes that keep the CSS file size down. This approach allows for quick loading and rendering of styles.

  • purecss:

    PureCSS is designed for performance, offering a minimal footprint and fast loading times. It is an excellent choice for projects where speed is critical.

  • materialize-css:

    Materialize CSS may have performance overhead due to its animations and components, but it provides a visually rich experience. Developers should optimize their usage to maintain performance.

How to Choose: tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs bulma vs tachyons vs purecss vs materialize-css
  • tailwindcss:

    Choose Tailwind CSS if you want a highly customizable utility-first framework that allows for extensive design flexibility. It is best for developers who enjoy composing styles directly in their markup and prefer a more hands-on approach to design.

  • bootstrap:

    Choose Bootstrap if you need a comprehensive, feature-rich framework that provides a wide array of pre-built components and responsive utilities. It is ideal for developers who want a quick start with a well-documented and widely-used framework.

  • bulma:

    Opt for Bulma if you prefer a modern, flexbox-based framework that is lightweight and easy to customize. Bulma is great for developers who want a clean design without the overhead of JavaScript components.

  • tachyons:

    Consider Tachyons if you want a utility-first CSS framework that promotes rapid prototyping and encourages a functional approach to styling. It's ideal for developers who prefer to build their designs using small, reusable classes.

  • purecss:

    Use PureCSS if you need a minimalistic framework that focuses on simplicity and performance. It is perfect for projects where you want to keep the CSS footprint small while still having a responsive layout.

  • materialize-css:

    Select Materialize CSS if you want to implement Material Design principles in your project. It is suitable for developers looking to create visually appealing applications that adhere to Google's design guidelines.

README for tailwindcss

Tailwind CSS

A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Build Status Total Downloads Latest Release License


Documentation

For full documentation, visit tailwindcss.com.

Community

For help, discussion about best practices, or any other conversation that would benefit from being searchable:

Discuss Tailwind CSS on GitHub

For casual chit-chat with others using the framework:

Join the Tailwind CSS Discord Server

Contributing

If you're interested in contributing to Tailwind CSS, please read our contributing docs before submitting a pull request.