Which is Better CSS Frameworks?
tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs foundation-sites vs materialize-css
1 Year
tailwindcssbootstrapfoundation-sitesmaterialize-cssSimilar Packages:
What's CSS Frameworks?

CSS frameworks are pre-prepared libraries that are meant to be used as a base for starting a project. They provide a standardized way to design and develop responsive web applications, offering a collection of CSS classes and components that help streamline the development process. Each of these frameworks has its unique design philosophy, components, and utility classes that cater to different needs and preferences in web development.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
tailwindcss10,507,17783,0805.73 MB9319 hours agoMIT
bootstrap4,817,102170,8859.67 MB6409 months agoMIT
foundation-sites80,16229,66624.7 MB452 months agoMIT
materialize-css23,35738,863-7946 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs foundation-sites vs materialize-css

Design Philosophy

  • tailwindcss: Tailwind CSS adopts a utility-first approach, encouraging developers to compose their designs using utility classes. This philosophy allows for rapid prototyping and customization without the need for overriding styles.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap follows a mobile-first approach and provides a set of responsive design components that adapt to various screen sizes. It emphasizes consistency and ease of use, making it suitable for developers of all skill levels.
  • foundation-sites: Foundation promotes a more flexible design philosophy, allowing developers to customize components and styles extensively. It is built with a focus on accessibility and semantic markup, catering to experienced developers who want more control.
  • materialize-css: Materialize CSS is based on Google's Material Design guidelines, focusing on creating a clean and modern user interface. It emphasizes visual hierarchy, motion, and depth, making it ideal for applications that require a polished look.

Component Library

  • tailwindcss: Tailwind CSS does not provide pre-built components but offers utility classes that can be combined to create custom designs. This flexibility allows developers to build unique components tailored to their specific needs.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap offers a comprehensive set of pre-designed components such as modals, buttons, and navigation bars. These components are easy to implement and customize, providing a solid foundation for building responsive applications.
  • foundation-sites: Foundation provides a modular component library that allows developers to include only the components they need. This modularity helps in reducing the overall file size and improving performance.
  • materialize-css: Materialize CSS includes a variety of components that adhere to Material Design principles, such as cards, buttons, and forms. These components are designed to work seamlessly together, providing a cohesive look and feel.

Customization

  • tailwindcss: Tailwind CSS excels in customization, allowing developers to create unique designs without the constraints of predefined components. Its utility-first approach enables fine-grained control over styles, making it easy to implement custom designs.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap allows for customization through its Sass variables and mixins, enabling developers to adjust the framework's styles to fit their branding and design requirements easily.
  • foundation-sites: Foundation is highly customizable, allowing developers to modify styles, components, and layouts to create a unique user experience. Its modular nature makes it easy to include only the necessary features.
  • materialize-css: Materialize CSS offers customization options through Sass variables, but it is somewhat limited compared to other frameworks. It is best suited for projects that align closely with Material Design principles.

Learning Curve

  • tailwindcss: Tailwind CSS has a moderate learning curve, particularly for those unfamiliar with utility-first CSS. However, once understood, it can significantly speed up the development process.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap has a gentle learning curve, making it accessible for beginners. Its extensive documentation and large community support help new developers get started quickly.
  • foundation-sites: Foundation has a steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and modularity. Developers may need to invest more time to understand its structure and customization options.
  • materialize-css: Materialize CSS is relatively easy to learn, especially for those familiar with Material Design. Its straightforward components and documentation make it accessible for beginners.

Community and Support

  • tailwindcss: Tailwind CSS has rapidly gained popularity and boasts a growing community. Its documentation is comprehensive, and many resources, including plugins and UI kits, are becoming available.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap has a vast community and extensive documentation, making it easy to find resources, tutorials, and support. Its popularity ensures that many developers are familiar with it, facilitating collaboration.
  • foundation-sites: Foundation has a smaller community compared to Bootstrap, but it still offers solid documentation and support. Developers may find fewer resources and examples available online.
  • materialize-css: Materialize CSS has a moderate community presence with decent documentation. However, it may not have as many resources or third-party plugins as Bootstrap or Foundation.
How to Choose: tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs foundation-sites vs materialize-css
  • tailwindcss: Choose Tailwind CSS if you prefer a utility-first approach that allows for rapid styling without leaving your HTML. It is ideal for developers who want complete control over their design without the constraints of predefined components.
  • bootstrap: Choose Bootstrap if you need a widely adopted framework with extensive documentation and a large community. It's ideal for rapid prototyping and offers a comprehensive grid system and pre-built components.
  • foundation-sites: Choose Foundation if you require a more customizable framework that emphasizes flexibility and modularity. It is suitable for projects that need a more tailored approach to design and layout.
  • materialize-css: Choose Materialize CSS if you want to implement Material Design principles in your project. It provides a clean and modern aesthetic, making it great for applications that prioritize user experience and visual appeal.
README for tailwindcss

Tailwind CSS

A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Build Status Total Downloads Latest Release License


Documentation

For full documentation, visit tailwindcss.com.

Community

For help, discussion about best practices, or any other conversation that would benefit from being searchable:

Discuss Tailwind CSS on GitHub

For casual chit-chat with others using the framework:

Join the Tailwind CSS Discord Server

Contributing

If you're interested in contributing to Tailwind CSS, please read our contributing docs before submitting a pull request.