Which is Better CSS Frameworks?
tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs bulma vs purecss
1 Year
tailwindcssbootstrapbulmapurecssSimilar Packages:
What's CSS Frameworks?

CSS frameworks are pre-prepared libraries that are meant to be used as a base for starting a particular type of project. They provide a standard structure and set of styles that help developers create responsive and visually appealing web applications quickly. Each framework has its own design philosophy and approach to styling, which can significantly affect the development process and final output.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
tailwindcss10,208,71582,3665.71 MB8616 days agoMIT
bootstrap4,348,283170,3949.67 MB6328 months agoMIT
bulma171,99749,2376.15 MB4722 months agoMIT
purecss29,02223,565229 kB8-BSD-3-Clause
Feature Comparison: tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs bulma vs purecss

Design Philosophy

  • tailwindcss: TailwindCSS promotes a utility-first approach, where developers compose styles directly in their markup. This allows for greater flexibility and customization, enabling the creation of unique designs without overriding existing styles.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap follows a component-based approach, providing a rich set of pre-designed UI components, making it easy to create responsive layouts quickly. It emphasizes consistency and usability across various devices and browsers.
  • bulma: Bulma adopts a modern, minimalistic design philosophy that leverages Flexbox for layout. It focuses on simplicity and elegance, allowing developers to create clean interfaces without excessive styling.
  • purecss: PureCSS is designed to be minimal and modular, providing only the essential styles needed for responsive layouts. It avoids unnecessary bloat, making it suitable for projects that prioritize performance and simplicity.

Customization

  • tailwindcss: TailwindCSS is built for customization, allowing developers to create unique designs by composing utility classes. The configuration file enables extensive customization of design tokens, such as colors, spacing, and breakpoints.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap offers customization through SASS variables and mixins, allowing developers to modify the default styles. However, extensive customization may lead to overriding many base styles, which can complicate maintenance.
  • bulma: Bulma is highly customizable with SASS variables, making it easy to adjust the design to fit specific needs. Its modular nature allows developers to include only the components they need, reducing overhead.
  • purecss: PureCSS is inherently customizable due to its minimalistic design. Developers can easily override styles or add their own without worrying about conflicting styles from a large framework.

Learning Curve

  • tailwindcss: TailwindCSS has a steeper learning curve initially due to its utility-first approach, which may feel different from traditional CSS frameworks. However, once accustomed, developers find it efficient for rapid UI development.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap has a moderate learning curve due to its extensive documentation and component library. Developers familiar with HTML and CSS can quickly grasp its usage, but mastering its customization may take time.
  • bulma: Bulma is relatively easy to learn, especially for those familiar with Flexbox. Its straightforward class naming conventions make it intuitive, allowing developers to get started quickly.
  • purecss: PureCSS has a gentle learning curve, as it focuses on providing essential styles without overwhelming developers with options. Its modularity makes it easy to integrate into existing projects.

Community and Ecosystem

  • tailwindcss: TailwindCSS has rapidly gained popularity, leading to a vibrant community and a plethora of plugins, themes, and resources. Its ecosystem is expanding quickly, making it easier to find tools that complement its utility-first approach.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap has a large community and a rich ecosystem of third-party themes and plugins. This extensive support makes it easier to find solutions and resources for common challenges.
  • bulma: Bulma has a growing community and a decent selection of extensions and themes. While not as extensive as Bootstrap, it offers enough resources for developers to enhance their projects.
  • purecss: PureCSS has a smaller community compared to others, but it is still supported by a range of resources and examples. Its simplicity means that many developers can easily adapt it to their needs without extensive community support.

Performance

  • tailwindcss: TailwindCSS can lead to larger file sizes if not purged properly, but it offers excellent performance when configured correctly. The utility-first approach can also reduce the amount of custom CSS needed, improving overall performance.
  • bootstrap: Bootstrap is relatively performant, but the inclusion of many components can lead to larger file sizes. Developers can mitigate this by customizing their builds to include only the necessary components.
  • bulma: Bulma is lightweight and performs well, as it only includes the styles needed for the components used. Its reliance on Flexbox also contributes to efficient layouts without excessive CSS.
  • purecss: PureCSS is designed for performance, with a minimal footprint. Its modular nature allows developers to include only the styles they need, resulting in faster load times.
How to Choose: tailwindcss vs bootstrap vs bulma vs purecss
  • tailwindcss: Go for TailwindCSS if you want a utility-first approach that allows for rapid UI development. It's suited for developers who prefer to build custom designs without being constrained by predefined components.
  • bootstrap: Choose Bootstrap if you need a comprehensive, feature-rich framework that includes a wide range of pre-built components and utilities. It's ideal for projects that require quick prototyping and a consistent design across different devices.
  • bulma: Select Bulma if you prefer a modern, lightweight framework that uses Flexbox for layout. It's great for developers who want a clean and minimalistic design without the need for JavaScript components.
  • purecss: Opt for PureCSS if you need a minimalistic and modular approach to styling. It's perfect for projects where you want to keep the CSS footprint small while still having a solid foundation for responsive design.
README for tailwindcss

Tailwind CSS

A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Build Status Total Downloads Latest Release License


Documentation

For full documentation, visit tailwindcss.com.

Community

For help, discussion about best practices, or any other conversation that would benefit from being searchable:

Discuss Tailwind CSS on GitHub

For casual chit-chat with others using the framework:

Join the Tailwind CSS Discord Server

Contributing

If you're interested in contributing to Tailwind CSS, please read our contributing docs before submitting a pull request.