lunr vs algoliasearch vs flexsearch vs elasticsearch vs typesense
Search Libraries Comparison
1 Year
lunralgoliasearchflexsearchelasticsearchtypesenseSimilar Packages:
What's Search Libraries?

Search libraries are tools that facilitate the implementation of search functionality within applications. They allow developers to index and query data efficiently, providing features like full-text search, filtering, and ranking of results. These libraries cater to various use cases, from simple keyword searches to complex, scalable search solutions that can handle large datasets and provide real-time results. Choosing the right search library depends on the specific needs of the application, including performance, ease of use, and the complexity of the search requirements.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
lunr2,737,1279,021-1264 years agoMIT
algoliasearch2,216,3441,3411.38 MB46a day agoMIT
flexsearch319,72212,700718 kB78a year agoApache-2.0
elasticsearch208,147563.23 MB0-Apache-2.0
typesense174,2834371.56 MB3810 months agoApache-2.0
Feature Comparison: lunr vs algoliasearch vs flexsearch vs elasticsearch vs typesense

Performance

  • lunr:

    Lunr provides good performance for small to medium-sized datasets. It is optimized for client-side searches and can quickly index and search through documents without significant delays, making it ideal for static sites.

  • algoliasearch:

    Algolia is optimized for speed, providing instant search results with low latency. Its infrastructure is designed to handle millions of queries per second, making it ideal for applications that require real-time search capabilities.

  • flexsearch:

    FlexSearch is designed for speed and efficiency in client-side searches. It uses advanced algorithms to deliver results quickly, making it suitable for applications where performance is critical and data is relatively small.

  • elasticsearch:

    Elasticsearch is built for horizontal scalability and can handle large datasets efficiently. It uses inverted indexing and distributed architecture, allowing for fast search queries even on massive data volumes.

  • typesense:

    Typesense is built for speed and relevance, providing fast search results with a focus on user experience. It is designed to handle real-time indexing and search, ensuring that users receive immediate feedback.

Ease of Use

  • lunr:

    Lunr is easy to use and integrate into projects, especially for static sites. Its API is intuitive, allowing developers to implement search functionality with minimal effort and without external dependencies.

  • algoliasearch:

    Algolia offers a user-friendly API and a comprehensive dashboard that simplifies the setup and management of search indices. Its documentation is clear and provides numerous examples, making it easy for developers to implement.

  • flexsearch:

    FlexSearch is straightforward to integrate and use, with minimal configuration required. Its API is simple, making it accessible for developers who want to add search functionality quickly without complex setups.

  • elasticsearch:

    Elasticsearch has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and capabilities. While powerful, it requires a good understanding of its architecture and query DSL to fully leverage its potential.

  • typesense:

    Typesense is designed with developer experience in mind, offering a simple API and clear documentation. It allows for quick setup and easy integration, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

Scalability

  • lunr:

    Lunr is not designed for scalability in the same way as server-based solutions. It works well for smaller datasets but may struggle with performance as the dataset grows significantly.

  • algoliasearch:

    Algolia is highly scalable, handling millions of records and queries effortlessly. Its cloud-based infrastructure allows for seamless scaling as your application grows, ensuring consistent performance under heavy loads.

  • flexsearch:

    FlexSearch is limited in scalability as it operates on the client-side. It is best suited for smaller applications where the dataset is manageable and does not require server-side processing.

  • elasticsearch:

    Elasticsearch is built for scalability, allowing you to add nodes to your cluster easily. It can handle large datasets and high query volumes, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications that require robust search capabilities.

  • typesense:

    Typesense is designed to scale easily, allowing for the addition of new indices and documents without compromising performance. It is suitable for applications that expect to grow and require efficient search capabilities.

Search Features

  • lunr:

    Lunr supports full-text search and provides features like stemming and scoring. It is suitable for applications that need basic search functionality without the complexity of a full search engine.

  • algoliasearch:

    Algolia provides advanced search features, including typo tolerance, synonyms, and faceting. It supports complex queries and allows for customization of ranking and relevance, ensuring users find what they need quickly.

  • flexsearch:

    FlexSearch provides basic search features, including fuzzy search and ranking. It is designed for simplicity and speed, making it suitable for applications that do not require extensive search capabilities.

  • elasticsearch:

    Elasticsearch offers a rich set of search features, including full-text search, filtering, aggregations, and complex query capabilities. It is highly customizable, allowing for tailored search experiences based on application needs.

  • typesense:

    Typesense offers features like typo tolerance, faceting, and real-time indexing. It focuses on providing relevant search results quickly, making it ideal for modern web applications.

How to Choose: lunr vs algoliasearch vs flexsearch vs elasticsearch vs typesense
  • lunr:

    Consider Lunr if you need a simple, client-side search library that is easy to integrate and use. It is well-suited for static sites or applications with smaller datasets where you want to provide quick search capabilities without relying on external services or complex setups.

  • algoliasearch:

    Choose Algolia if you need a hosted search solution that offers fast, reliable, and scalable search capabilities with minimal setup. It is ideal for applications that require instant search results and a rich user experience, particularly for e-commerce sites and content-heavy applications.

  • flexsearch:

    Select FlexSearch if you are looking for a lightweight, client-side search library that provides fast search capabilities without the need for a server. It is perfect for small to medium-sized applications where you want to implement search functionality directly in the browser, with minimal overhead.

  • elasticsearch:

    Opt for Elasticsearch if you need a powerful, open-source search engine that can handle large volumes of data and complex queries. It is suitable for applications that require advanced search features, such as full-text search, real-time indexing, and analytics capabilities, making it a great choice for big data applications and log analysis.

  • typesense:

    Choose Typesense if you want an open-source, easy-to-use search engine that provides fast and relevant search results with a focus on developer experience. It is designed for applications that require instant search capabilities and offers features like typo tolerance and faceting, making it suitable for modern web applications.

README for lunr

Lunr.js

Join the chat at https://gitter.im/olivernn/lunr.js

Build Status

A bit like Solr, but much smaller and not as bright.

Example

A very simple search index can be created using the following:

var idx = lunr(function () {
  this.field('title')
  this.field('body')

  this.add({
    "title": "Twelfth-Night",
    "body": "If music be the food of love, play on: Give me excess of it…",
    "author": "William Shakespeare",
    "id": "1"
  })
})

Then searching is as simple as:

idx.search("love")

This returns a list of matching documents with a score of how closely they match the search query as well as any associated metadata about the match:

[
  {
    "ref": "1",
    "score": 0.3535533905932737,
    "matchData": {
      "metadata": {
        "love": {
          "body": {}
        }
      }
    }
  }
]

API documentation is available, as well as a full working example.

Description

Lunr.js is a small, full-text search library for use in the browser. It indexes JSON documents and provides a simple search interface for retrieving documents that best match text queries.

Why

For web applications with all their data already sitting in the client, it makes sense to be able to search that data on the client too. It saves adding extra, compacted services on the server. A local search index will be quicker, there is no network overhead, and will remain available and usable even without a network connection.

Installation

Simply include the lunr.js source file in the page that you want to use it. Lunr.js is supported in all modern browsers.

Alternatively an npm package is also available npm install lunr.

Browsers that do not support ES5 will require a JavaScript shim for Lunr to work. You can either use Augment.js, ES5-Shim or any library that patches old browsers to provide an ES5 compatible JavaScript environment.

Features

  • Full text search support for 14 languages
  • Boost terms at query time or boost entire documents at index time
  • Scope searches to specific fields
  • Fuzzy term matching with wildcards or edit distance

Contributing

See the CONTRIBUTING.md file.