chai vs jest vs mocha vs jasmine
JavaScript Testing Frameworks
Search packages..
chaijestmochajasmineSimilar Packages:
JavaScript Testing Frameworks

JavaScript testing frameworks are essential tools that help developers ensure their code behaves as expected. They provide a structured way to write and execute tests, making it easier to identify bugs and maintain code quality. Each framework has its unique features and strengths, catering to different testing needs and preferences. Choosing the right one can significantly impact the efficiency of the testing process and the overall development workflow.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
chai42,620,3138,266147 kB912 months agoMIT
jest38,144,67245,2886.32 kB2374 months agoMIT
mocha12,116,51122,8712.31 MB2263 months agoMIT
jasmine1,319,76638075.4 kB023 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: chai vs jest vs mocha vs jasmine

Testing Style

  • chai:

    Chai offers a variety of assertion styles (should, expect, assert), allowing developers to choose the syntax that best fits their preferences. This flexibility enhances readability and expressiveness in tests.

  • jest:

    Jest embraces a modern testing approach with a focus on simplicity and speed. It uses a BDD-style syntax and integrates seamlessly with React, making it a popular choice for modern JavaScript applications.

  • mocha:

    Mocha provides a flexible testing style, allowing developers to write tests in a BDD or TDD (test-driven development) style. This flexibility makes it suitable for various testing scenarios.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine follows a behavior-driven development (BDD) style, encouraging developers to write tests that describe the behavior of the code. Its syntax is clean and easy to understand, promoting clear test cases.

Built-in Features

  • chai:

    Chai is primarily an assertion library and does not include a test runner or mocking capabilities. It is designed to be used alongside other testing frameworks like Mocha or Jasmine.

  • jest:

    Jest includes a test runner, assertion library, and mocking capabilities out of the box. Its integrated features streamline the testing process, reducing the need for configuration and setup.

  • mocha:

    Mocha is a flexible testing framework that does not include built-in assertions or mocking. Instead, it allows developers to choose their preferred assertion library (like Chai) and mocking tools, providing greater customization.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine comes with a built-in test runner, assertions, and spies, making it a complete testing solution without requiring additional libraries. This all-in-one approach simplifies the testing setup.

Performance

  • chai:

    Chai's performance is generally good, but since it is an assertion library, its speed largely depends on the testing framework it is used with. It is not designed to handle test execution, which may affect overall performance when combined with slower test runners.

  • jest:

    Jest is known for its fast performance, especially with its parallel test execution and intelligent test running features. It can run only the tests related to changed files, significantly speeding up the testing process.

  • mocha:

    Mocha's performance can vary based on the chosen assertion library and the complexity of the tests. While it is generally fast, it may require additional configuration to optimize performance for larger test suites.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine is optimized for performance and runs tests quickly. Its built-in test runner efficiently executes test cases, making it suitable for large test suites.

Community and Ecosystem

  • chai:

    Chai has a strong community and is widely used in conjunction with Mocha and other testing frameworks, making it a popular choice for assertion needs in JavaScript testing.

  • jest:

    Jest has rapidly gained popularity, especially in the React ecosystem. Its strong community support and extensive documentation make it easy to adopt and integrate into projects.

  • mocha:

    Mocha has a long-standing presence in the JavaScript testing community, with a robust ecosystem of plugins and integrations. Its flexibility allows it to be adapted to various testing needs.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine has a dedicated community and is often used in Angular applications. Its popularity ensures a wealth of resources, plugins, and support available for developers.

Learning Curve

  • chai:

    Chai is relatively easy to learn, especially for those familiar with JavaScript. Its assertion styles are intuitive, making it straightforward to write tests once the developer understands the testing framework it is paired with.

  • jest:

    Jest is designed to be easy to use, with a focus on simplicity and minimal configuration. Its comprehensive documentation and built-in features help new users get started quickly.

  • mocha:

    Mocha's learning curve can vary depending on the chosen assertion library and mocking tools. While the framework itself is straightforward, integrating it with other libraries may require additional learning.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine has a gentle learning curve, particularly for those familiar with BDD concepts. Its clear syntax and built-in features make it accessible for beginners.

How to Choose: chai vs jest vs mocha vs jasmine
  • chai:

    Choose Chai if you need a flexible assertion library that can be used with various testing frameworks. It allows for expressive and readable tests, making it easy to understand the intent behind each assertion.

  • jest:

    Choose Jest if you want a powerful testing framework that includes a test runner, assertion library, and mocking capabilities out of the box. It is particularly well-suited for React applications and offers features like snapshot testing and parallel test execution.

  • mocha:

    Choose Mocha if you need a highly customizable testing framework that allows you to choose your assertion library and mocking tools. It is versatile and works well for both unit and integration testing.

  • jasmine:

    Choose Jasmine if you prefer a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework that comes with built-in assertions and spies. It is a standalone framework that does not require a DOM and is great for testing JavaScript code in isolation.

Similar Npm Packages to chai

chai is an assertion library for Node.js and browsers that is often used in conjunction with testing frameworks like Mocha and Jest. It provides a variety of assertion styles, including BDD (Behavior Driven Development) and TDD (Test Driven Development), allowing developers to write tests in a way that is both expressive and readable. Chai’s flexibility and rich feature set make it a popular choice for testing JavaScript applications.

While Chai is a powerful assertion library, there are several alternatives available in the JavaScript testing ecosystem. Here are a few notable options:

  • jasmine is a behavior-driven development framework for testing JavaScript code. It provides a clean syntax for writing tests and includes built-in assertions, making it a self-contained solution for testing. Jasmine is particularly known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a great choice for developers who want to get started with testing quickly without needing to set up additional libraries.

  • jest is a comprehensive testing framework developed by Facebook, designed primarily for testing React applications but suitable for any JavaScript project. Jest includes a powerful assertion library, built-in mocking capabilities, and a test runner, making it an all-in-one solution for testing. Its zero-config setup and extensive features, such as snapshot testing and code coverage, make Jest a popular choice among developers looking for a robust testing solution.

  • mocha is a flexible and feature-rich JavaScript test framework that runs on Node.js and in the browser. It allows developers to use any assertion library, including Chai, making it highly customizable. Mocha supports asynchronous testing and provides a variety of reporting options, making it suitable for both small and large projects. If you prefer a modular approach to testing and want the freedom to choose your assertion library, Mocha is an excellent option.

To explore how Chai compares with Jasmine, Jest, and Mocha, check out the comparison: Comparing chai vs jasmine vs jest vs mocha.

Similar Npm Packages to jest

jest is a popular JavaScript testing framework developed by Facebook. It is designed to work seamlessly with React applications, but it can also be used for testing any JavaScript code. Jest provides a rich set of features, including zero-config setup, snapshot testing, mocking capabilities, and a powerful assertion library. Its focus on simplicity and ease of use makes it a preferred choice for many developers looking to implement unit and integration tests in their applications.

While Jest is a robust testing solution, there are several alternatives available in the JavaScript ecosystem. Here are a few noteworthy options:

  • ava is a test runner that is known for its minimalistic approach and support for asynchronous testing. It runs tests concurrently, which can lead to faster execution times, especially in larger test suites. Ava's syntax is straightforward, making it easy to write and maintain tests. If you prefer a simple and fast testing framework that supports modern JavaScript features, Ava is a great choice.

  • jasmine is one of the oldest testing frameworks in the JavaScript ecosystem. It provides a behavior-driven development (BDD) style of testing, allowing developers to write tests in a clear and descriptive manner. Jasmine comes with built-in assertions and spies, making it suitable for unit testing. If you are looking for a well-established framework with a rich set of features and a focus on BDD, Jasmine is worth considering.

  • mocha is a flexible testing framework that allows developers to choose their assertion libraries and mocking tools. It supports both BDD and TDD (test-driven development) styles and can be easily integrated with other libraries like Chai for assertions and Sinon for mocking. Mocha's flexibility makes it a popular choice for developers who want to customize their testing setup according to their needs.

To explore how Jest compares with Ava, Jasmine, and Mocha, check out the comparison: Comparing ava vs jasmine vs jest vs mocha.

Similar Npm Packages to mocha

mocha is a popular JavaScript test framework that runs on Node.js and in the browser, making it an excellent choice for testing both server-side and client-side applications. It provides a flexible and feature-rich environment for writing and running tests, supporting various assertion libraries and allowing developers to choose their preferred testing style. With its simple syntax and powerful features, Mocha is widely used in the JavaScript community for unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing.

While Mocha is a robust testing solution, there are several alternatives that developers can consider:

  • ava is a test runner designed for simplicity and speed. It runs tests concurrently, which can significantly reduce the time it takes to execute a test suite. AVA's minimalistic syntax and built-in support for async functions make it a great choice for modern JavaScript applications. If you are looking for a fast and straightforward testing framework that emphasizes simplicity and performance, AVA is worth considering.

  • jasmine is another well-known testing framework that provides a behavior-driven development (BDD) style of testing. It comes with a rich set of features, including spies, mocks, and assertions, making it suitable for various testing scenarios. Jasmine is often used for testing Angular applications, but it can be employed in any JavaScript project. If you prefer a BDD approach and need a comprehensive testing framework with built-in assertions, Jasmine is a solid option.

  • jest is a widely-used testing framework developed by Facebook. It is particularly popular for testing React applications but can be used with any JavaScript project. Jest comes with a powerful set of features, including snapshot testing, mocking, and code coverage analysis, all out of the box. Its user-friendly configuration and extensive documentation make it an excellent choice for developers looking for a complete testing solution. If you want a feature-rich testing framework that integrates seamlessly with modern JavaScript libraries, Jest is an excellent choice.

To explore how Mocha compares with AVA, Jasmine, and Jest, check out the following link: Comparing ava vs jasmine vs jest vs mocha.

Similar Npm Packages to jasmine

jasmine is a popular behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework for JavaScript. It provides a clean syntax for writing tests and includes features such as spies, mocks, and assertions, making it easier for developers to create and maintain test cases. While Jasmine is widely used, there are several alternatives in the JavaScript testing ecosystem that offer different features and capabilities. Here are a few notable alternatives:

  • jest is a comprehensive testing framework developed by Facebook that is widely adopted in the React community. It comes with a built-in test runner, assertion library, and mocking capabilities, making it an all-in-one solution for testing JavaScript applications. Jest is particularly known for its ease of use, snapshot testing, and parallel test execution, which can significantly speed up the testing process. If you are looking for a powerful and feature-rich testing framework, Jest is an excellent choice.
  • mocha is a flexible and extensible JavaScript testing framework that allows developers to choose their assertion libraries and mocking tools. It supports both BDD and TDD styles of testing and is known for its simplicity and versatility. Mocha can be easily integrated with various assertion libraries like Chai and Sinon, providing a customizable testing environment. If you prefer a more modular approach to testing, Mocha is a great option.
  • qunit is a powerful and easy-to-use JavaScript testing framework that focuses on simplicity and performance. It is particularly well-suited for testing jQuery applications but can be used for any JavaScript code. QUnit provides a straightforward API for writing tests and includes features such as asynchronous testing and detailed reporting. If you are looking for a lightweight testing framework with a focus on simplicity, QUnit is worth considering.

To explore how Jasmine compares with Jest, Mocha, and QUnit, check out the comparison: Comparing jasmine vs jest vs mocha vs qunit.

README for chai

ChaiJS
chai

Chai is a BDD / TDD assertion library for node and the browser that can be delightfully paired with any javascript testing framework.

downloads:? node:?
Join the Slack chat Join the Gitter chat OpenCollective Backers

For more information or to download plugins, view the documentation.

What is Chai?

Chai is an assertion library, similar to Node's built-in assert. It makes testing much easier by giving you lots of assertions you can run against your code.

Installation

Node.js

chai is available on npm. To install it, type:

$ npm install --save-dev chai

Browsers

You can also use it within the browser; install via npm and use the index.js file found within the download. For example:

<script src="./node_modules/chai/index.js" type="module"></script>

Usage

Import the library in your code, and then pick one of the styles you'd like to use - either assert, expect or should:

import { assert } from 'chai';  // Using Assert style
import { expect } from 'chai';  // Using Expect style
import { should } from 'chai';  // Using Should style

Register the chai testing style globally

import 'chai/register-assert';  // Using Assert style
import 'chai/register-expect';  // Using Expect style
import 'chai/register-should';  // Using Should style

Import assertion styles as local variables

import { assert } from 'chai';  // Using Assert style
import { expect } from 'chai';  // Using Expect style
import { should } from 'chai';  // Using Should style
should();  // Modifies `Object.prototype`

import { expect, use } from 'chai';  // Creates local variables `expect` and `use`; useful for plugin use

Usage with Mocha

mocha spec.js --require chai/register-assert.js  # Using Assert style
mocha spec.js --require chai/register-expect.js  # Using Expect style
mocha spec.js --require chai/register-should.js  # Using Should style

Read more about these styles in our docs.

Plugins

Chai offers a robust Plugin architecture for extending Chai's assertions and interfaces.

  • Need a plugin? View the official plugin list.
  • Want to build a plugin? Read the plugin api documentation.
  • Have a plugin and want it listed? Simply add the following keywords to your package.json:
    • chai-plugin
    • browser if your plugin works in the browser as well as Node.js
    • browser-only if your plugin does not work with Node.js

Related Projects

Contributing

Thank you very much for considering to contribute!

Please make sure you follow our Code Of Conduct and we also strongly recommend reading our Contributing Guide.

Here are a few issues other contributors frequently ran into when opening pull requests:

  • Please do not commit changes to the chai.js build. We do it once per release.
  • Before pushing your commits, please make sure you rebase them.

Contributors

Please see the full Contributors Graph for our list of contributors.

Core Contributors

Feel free to reach out to any of the core contributors with your questions or concerns. We will do our best to respond in a timely manner.

Keith Cirkel James Garbutt Kristján Oddsson

Core Contributor Alumni

This project would not be what it is without the contributions from our prior core contributors, for whom we are forever grateful:

Jake Luer Veselin Todorov Lucas Fernandes da Costa Grant Snodgrass

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc, the official website for the npm registry. Note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. Please share your feedback via our GitHub repository. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.