css-select vs jquery vs cheerio-select vs dom7 vs sizzle
Web DOM Manipulation Libraries Comparison
1 Year
css-selectjquerycheerio-selectdom7sizzleSimilar Packages:
What's Web DOM Manipulation Libraries?

These libraries provide various functionalities for selecting and manipulating DOM elements in web development. They allow developers to traverse, filter, and manipulate the HTML structure of web pages, making it easier to implement dynamic behaviors and interactions. Each library has its own strengths, use cases, and design philosophies, catering to different needs in web development.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
css-select35,573,564561224 kB8-BSD-2-Clause
jquery13,194,40359,4221.25 MB902 years agoMIT
cheerio-select7,441,1302162.6 kB5-BSD-2-Clause
dom7740,808163292 kB282 years agoMIT
sizzle19,3776,295133 kB112 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: css-select vs jquery vs cheerio-select vs dom7 vs sizzle

Selector Syntax

  • css-select:

    Css-select provides a pure CSS selector syntax, enabling developers to use familiar CSS rules for selecting elements. It supports a comprehensive set of CSS selectors, making it versatile for querying both HTML and XML documents.

  • jquery:

    jQuery offers a rich selector syntax that allows for complex queries using CSS selectors. It is well-documented and widely adopted, making it easy to find resources and examples for various use cases.

  • cheerio-select:

    Cheerio-select uses a jQuery-like syntax for selecting elements, making it intuitive for developers familiar with jQuery. It supports a wide range of selectors, including IDs, classes, attributes, and pseudo-selectors, allowing for complex queries.

  • dom7:

    Dom7 adopts a jQuery-like syntax but is streamlined for modern JavaScript. It supports common selectors and methods, focusing on simplicity and performance, particularly for mobile applications.

  • sizzle:

    Sizzle provides a powerful selector engine that supports a wide range of CSS selectors, including advanced selectors like nth-child and attribute selectors. It is designed for performance and can be used independently or as part of jQuery.

Performance

  • css-select:

    Css-select is designed to be fast and efficient, providing quick selection capabilities for both small and large documents. Its performance is generally good, especially when used in Node.js environments.

  • jquery:

    jQuery is robust but can be heavier than other libraries, especially for simple tasks. However, it provides extensive optimizations and caching mechanisms that can improve performance in larger applications.

  • cheerio-select:

    Cheerio-select is optimized for server-side performance, allowing for fast parsing and manipulation of HTML without the overhead of a browser environment. It is lightweight and efficient for web scraping tasks.

  • dom7:

    Dom7 is optimized for mobile performance, providing a lightweight alternative to jQuery. It minimizes overhead and focuses on essential features, making it suitable for mobile applications where performance is critical.

  • sizzle:

    Sizzle is highly optimized for performance and is capable of handling complex selector queries efficiently. It is designed to work seamlessly with jQuery, enhancing its selector capabilities without sacrificing speed.

Browser Compatibility

  • css-select:

    Css-select is compatible with various environments, including browsers and Node.js. It does not rely on browser-specific features, making it versatile for different use cases.

  • jquery:

    jQuery is known for its extensive cross-browser compatibility, supporting a wide range of browsers, including older versions. It abstracts away many browser inconsistencies, making it a reliable choice for diverse environments.

  • cheerio-select:

    Cheerio-select is designed for server-side use and does not depend on browser compatibility. It is ideal for environments where a DOM is not present, such as Node.js applications.

  • dom7:

    Dom7 is built with modern browsers in mind and is optimized for mobile devices. It may not support older browsers as comprehensively as jQuery, but it focuses on modern web standards.

  • sizzle:

    Sizzle is designed to work well across different browsers and is integrated into jQuery to ensure compatibility. It handles various browser quirks and provides a consistent selection experience.

Use Cases

  • css-select:

    Css-select is ideal for projects that require a lightweight selector engine for parsing HTML or XML documents. It is useful in both server-side and client-side applications where CSS selectors are needed.

  • jquery:

    jQuery is a go-to choice for traditional web applications that require extensive DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX support. It is widely used in legacy projects and applications that need a comprehensive solution.

  • cheerio-select:

    Cheerio-select is best suited for server-side applications, web scraping, and scenarios where DOM manipulation is needed without a browser. It excels in parsing and manipulating HTML documents in Node.js.

  • dom7:

    Dom7 is perfect for mobile web applications and frameworks that require a lightweight DOM manipulation library. It is especially useful in scenarios where performance on mobile devices is a priority.

  • sizzle:

    Sizzle is best used as a selector engine within other libraries or frameworks that require advanced selection capabilities. It is particularly useful for projects that need to optimize their selector performance.

Learning Curve

  • css-select:

    Css-select is easy to learn for developers familiar with CSS, as it uses standard CSS selector syntax. Its simplicity makes it accessible for quick integration into projects.

  • jquery:

    jQuery has a well-established learning curve, with extensive documentation and resources available. While it may take some time to master its full capabilities, many developers find it easy to get started with basic tasks.

  • cheerio-select:

    Cheerio-select has a gentle learning curve for developers familiar with jQuery, as it mimics its syntax and functionality. It is straightforward to pick up for those who have experience with DOM manipulation.

  • dom7:

    Dom7 has a relatively low learning curve, especially for those familiar with jQuery. Its API is designed to be intuitive and easy to use, making it suitable for developers of all skill levels.

  • sizzle:

    Sizzle may require some familiarity with advanced CSS selectors to fully leverage its capabilities. However, once understood, it provides powerful selection options that can enhance development efficiency.

How to Choose: css-select vs jquery vs cheerio-select vs dom7 vs sizzle
  • css-select:

    Opt for css-select if you require a pure CSS selector engine that can be used in various environments, including Node.js and browsers. It is particularly useful for projects that need to parse and query HTML or XML documents using CSS selectors without additional dependencies.

  • jquery:

    Choose jQuery if you need a comprehensive and widely-used library that simplifies HTML document traversal, event handling, and AJAX interactions. It is ideal for projects that require extensive cross-browser compatibility and a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions.

  • cheerio-select:

    Choose cheerio-select if you need a lightweight solution for server-side DOM manipulation, especially when working with HTML parsing in Node.js. It is ideal for web scraping and manipulating HTML documents in a jQuery-like syntax without a browser environment.

  • dom7:

    Select dom7 if you are looking for a minimalistic and modern alternative to jQuery that is optimized for mobile devices. It provides a simple API for DOM manipulation and event handling, making it suitable for lightweight applications and frameworks like Framework7.

  • sizzle:

    Use sizzle if you need a powerful and flexible selector engine that can be integrated into other libraries or frameworks. It is particularly useful for projects that require advanced selector capabilities and performance optimizations, as it is designed to work seamlessly with jQuery.

README for css-select

css-select NPM version Build Status Downloads Coverage

A CSS selector compiler and engine

What?

As a compiler, css-select turns CSS selectors into functions that tests if elements match them.

As an engine, css-select looks through a DOM tree, searching for elements. Elements are tested "from the top", similar to how browsers execute CSS selectors.

In its default configuration, css-select queries the DOM structure of the domhandler module (also known as htmlparser2 DOM). To query alternative DOM structures, see Options below.

Features:

  • 🔬 Full implementation of CSS3 selectors, as well as most CSS4 selectors
  • 🧪 Partial implementation of jQuery/Sizzle extensions (see cheerio-select for the remaining selectors)
  • 🧑‍🔬 High test coverage, including the full test suites from Sizzle, Qwery and NWMatcher and .
  • 🥼 Reliably great performance

Why?

Most CSS engines written in JavaScript execute selectors left-to-right. That means thet execute every component of the selector in order, from left to right. As an example: For the selector a b, these engines will first query for a elements, then search these for b elements. (That's the approach of eg. Sizzle, Qwery and NWMatcher.)

While this works, it has some downsides: Children of as will be checked multiple times; first, to check if they are also as, then, for every superior a once, if they are bs. Using Big O notation, that would be O(n^(k+1)), where k is the number of descendant selectors (that's the space in the example above).

The far more efficient approach is to first look for b elements, then check if they have superior a elements: Using big O notation again, that would be O(n). That's called right-to-left execution.

And that's what css-select does – and why it's quite performant.

How does it work?

By building a stack of functions.

Wait, what?

Okay, so let's suppose we want to compile the selector a b, for right-to-left execution. We start by parsing the selector. This turns the selector into an array of the building blocks. That's what the css-what module is for, if you want to have a look.

Anyway, after parsing, we end up with an array like this one:

[
    { type: "tag", name: "a" },
    { type: "descendant" },
    { type: "tag", name: "b" },
];

(Actually, this array is wrapped in another array, but that's another story, involving commas in selectors.)

Now that we know the meaning of every part of the selector, we can compile it. That is where things become interesting.

The basic idea is to turn every part of the selector into a function, which takes an element as its only argument. The function checks whether a passed element matches its part of the selector: If it does, the element is passed to the next function representing the next part of the selector. That function does the same. If an element is accepted by all parts of the selector, it matches the selector and double rainbow ALL THE WAY.

As said before, we want to do right-to-left execution with all the big O improvements. That means elements are passed from the rightmost part of the selector (b in our example) to the leftmost (~~which would be c~~ of course a).

For traversals, such as the descendant operating the space between a and b, we walk up the DOM tree, starting from the element passed as argument.

//TODO: More in-depth description. Implementation details. Build a spaceship.

API

const CSSselect = require("css-select");

Note: css-select throws errors when invalid selectors are passed to it. This is done to aid with writing css selectors, but can be unexpected when processing arbitrary strings.

CSSselect.selectAll(query, elems, options)

Queries elems, returns an array containing all matches.

  • query can be either a CSS selector or a function.
  • elems can be either an array of elements, or a single element. If it is an element, its children will be queried.
  • options is described below.

Aliases: default export, CSSselect.iterate(query, elems).

CSSselect.compile(query, options)

Compiles the query, returns a function.

CSSselect.is(elem, query, options)

Tests whether or not an element is matched by query. query can be either a CSS selector or a function.

CSSselect.selectOne(query, elems, options)

Arguments are the same as for CSSselect.selectAll(query, elems). Only returns the first match, or null if there was no match.

Options

All options are optional.

  • xmlMode: When enabled, tag names will be case-sensitive. Default: false.
  • rootFunc: The last function in the stack, will be called with the last element that's looked at.
  • adapter: The adapter to use when interacting with the backing DOM structure. By default it uses the domutils module.
  • context: The context of the current query. Used to limit the scope of searches. Can be matched directly using the :scope pseudo-class.
  • relativeSelector: By default, selectors are relative to the context, which means that no parent elements of the context will be matched. (Eg. a b c with context b will never give any results.) If relativeSelector is set to false, selectors won't be absolutized and selectors can test for parent elements outside of the context.
  • cacheResults: Allow css-select to cache results for some selectors, sometimes greatly improving querying performance. Disable this if your document can change in between queries with the same compiled selector. Default: true.
  • pseudos: A map of pseudo-class names to functions or strings.

Custom Adapters

A custom adapter must match the interface described here.

You may want to have a look at domutils to see the default implementation, or at css-select-browser-adapter for an implementation backed by the DOM.

Supported selectors

As defined by CSS 4 and / or jQuery.


License: BSD-2-Clause

Security contact information

To report a security vulnerability, please use the Tidelift security contact. Tidelift will coordinate the fix and disclosure.

css-select for enterprise

Available as part of the Tidelift Subscription

The maintainers of css-select and thousands of other packages are working with Tidelift to deliver commercial support and maintenance for the open source dependencies you use to build your applications. Save time, reduce risk, and improve code health, while paying the maintainers of the exact dependencies you use. Learn more.