State Management and Reactive Programming Libraries Comparison
rxjs vs redux vs mobx vs effector
1 Year
rxjsreduxmobxeffectorSimilar Packages:
What's State Management and Reactive Programming Libraries?

State management and reactive programming libraries are essential tools in modern web development, enabling developers to manage application state and handle asynchronous data streams effectively. These libraries provide various paradigms for managing state, ensuring predictable state transitions, and facilitating communication between different parts of an application. By leveraging these libraries, developers can create more maintainable, scalable, and responsive applications that enhance user experiences and streamline development processes.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
rxjs45,396,87630,8474.5 MB2712 years agoApache-2.0
redux10,472,96960,952290 kB39a year agoMIT
mobx1,665,95627,6104.33 MB642 months agoMIT
effector45,3524,6201.42 MB1552 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: rxjs vs redux vs mobx vs effector

State Management Paradigm

  • rxjs:

    RxJS is centered around the concept of observables, which represent data streams. It allows for complex asynchronous operations to be handled in a declarative manner, making it easier to compose and manage multiple streams of data.

  • redux:

    Redux follows a predictable state container model based on a unidirectional data flow. State is stored in a single immutable object, and changes are made through pure functions called reducers, ensuring that state transitions are predictable and traceable.

  • mobx:

    MobX employs an observable-based approach, where state is automatically tracked and updated. This allows for a more natural and less verbose way to manage state, as components automatically react to changes in observable data.

  • effector:

    Effector uses a reactive programming model that allows for fine-grained state updates. It focuses on events and stores, enabling developers to create a clear and efficient state management flow without unnecessary reactivity overhead.

Learning Curve

  • rxjs:

    RxJS can be challenging to learn due to its extensive set of operators and the reactive programming paradigm. Developers need to familiarize themselves with concepts like observables, subjects, and operators to effectively utilize RxJS.

  • redux:

    Redux has a steeper learning curve due to its strict architecture and the need to understand concepts like actions, reducers, and middleware. However, once mastered, it provides a powerful and predictable way to manage application state.

  • mobx:

    MobX is relatively easy to learn, especially for developers who are accustomed to object-oriented programming. Its use of decorators and observables can be quickly grasped, making it accessible for rapid development.

  • effector:

    Effector has a moderate learning curve, especially for those familiar with reactive programming concepts. Its API is designed to be intuitive, but understanding the underlying principles of reactivity may take some time for newcomers.

Performance

  • rxjs:

    RxJS is highly performant for handling asynchronous data streams, but care must be taken to avoid memory leaks and excessive subscriptions. Proper management of subscriptions and using operators efficiently can enhance performance.

  • redux:

    Redux can suffer from performance issues if not implemented correctly, particularly with large state trees and frequent updates. However, using techniques like memoization and selective rendering can help mitigate these issues and improve performance.

  • mobx:

    MobX optimizes performance through its fine-grained reactivity, where only components that depend on changed observables are re-rendered. This can lead to significant performance improvements in applications with complex state dependencies.

  • effector:

    Effector is designed for high performance, minimizing unnecessary re-renders by allowing developers to specify exactly which parts of the state should trigger updates. This leads to efficient rendering and optimal application performance.

Extensibility and Middleware

  • rxjs:

    RxJS is inherently extensible, allowing developers to create custom operators and combine multiple streams of data. Its compositional nature makes it easy to build complex data flows and integrate with other libraries.

  • redux:

    Redux is known for its extensibility, particularly through middleware like Redux Thunk and Redux Saga, which allow for handling asynchronous actions and side effects. This makes Redux a robust choice for complex applications requiring extensive state management capabilities.

  • mobx:

    MobX is extensible through its decorators and can be integrated with other libraries and frameworks easily. However, it does not have a built-in middleware system like Redux, which may require additional setup for complex side effects.

  • effector:

    Effector is highly extensible, allowing developers to create custom events and stores easily. It also supports middleware-like functionality through its event system, enabling the implementation of side effects and additional logic seamlessly.

Community and Ecosystem

  • rxjs:

    RxJS has a strong community and is widely used in Angular applications. Its ecosystem includes numerous libraries and tools that leverage its capabilities, providing developers with ample resources and support.

  • redux:

    Redux boasts a large and active community, with a wealth of resources, middleware, and tools available. Its popularity has led to extensive documentation and numerous tutorials, making it easier for developers to find support and best practices.

  • mobx:

    MobX has a supportive community and a decent ecosystem, with various libraries and tools available for integration. Its simplicity and ease of use have contributed to its popularity among developers.

  • effector:

    Effector has a growing community and ecosystem, but it is smaller compared to Redux and MobX. It offers good documentation and resources, but developers may find fewer third-party libraries and integrations available.

How to Choose: rxjs vs redux vs mobx vs effector
  • rxjs:

    Choose RxJS if your application heavily relies on asynchronous data streams and event handling. RxJS is perfect for scenarios where you need to manage multiple streams of data, providing powerful operators for composing asynchronous and event-based programs.

  • redux:

    Opt for Redux if you need a predictable state container with a strict unidirectional data flow. Redux is well-suited for large applications where you want to maintain a clear structure, especially when working with complex state interactions and middleware for side effects.

  • mobx:

    Select MobX if you prefer a more intuitive and less boilerplate-heavy approach to state management. MobX is ideal for applications where you want to leverage observable state and automatic dependency tracking, making it great for projects that require reactive programming without much overhead.

  • effector:

    Choose Effector if you need a highly efficient state management solution that emphasizes performance and simplicity. It is particularly suitable for applications with complex state logic and requires fine-grained control over state updates without unnecessary re-renders.

README for rxjs

RxJS Logo RxJS: Reactive Extensions For JavaScript

CI npm version Join the chat at https://gitter.im/Reactive-Extensions/RxJS

The Roadmap from RxJS 7 to 8

Curious what's next for RxJS? Follow along with Issue 6367.

RxJS 7

FOR 6.X PLEASE GO TO THE 6.x BRANCH

Reactive Extensions Library for JavaScript. This is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS and is the latest production-ready version of RxJS. This rewrite is meant to have better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

Apache 2.0 License

Versions In This Repository

  • master - This is all of the current work, which is against v7 of RxJS right now
  • 6.x - This is the branch for version 6.X

Most PRs should be made to master.

Important

By contributing or commenting on issues in this repository, whether you've read them or not, you're agreeing to the Contributor Code of Conduct. Much like traffic laws, ignorance doesn't grant you immunity.

Installation and Usage

ES6 via npm

npm install rxjs

It's recommended to pull in the Observable creation methods you need directly from 'rxjs' as shown below with range. If you're using RxJS version 7.2 or above, you can pull in any operator you need from the same spot, 'rxjs'.

import { range, filter, map } from 'rxjs';

range(1, 200)
  .pipe(
    filter(x => x % 2 === 1),
    map(x => x + x)
  )
  .subscribe(x => console.log(x));

If you're using RxJS version below 7.2, you can pull in any operator you need from one spot, under 'rxjs/operators'.

import { range } from 'rxjs';
import { filter, map } from 'rxjs/operators';

range(1, 200)
  .pipe(
    filter(x => x % 2 === 1),
    map(x => x + x)
  )
  .subscribe(x => console.log(x));

CDN

For CDN, you can use unpkg:

https://unpkg.com/rxjs@^7/dist/bundles/rxjs.umd.min.js

The global namespace for rxjs is rxjs:

const { range } = rxjs;
const { filter, map } = rxjs.operators;

range(1, 200)
  .pipe(
    filter(x => x % 2 === 1),
    map(x => x + x)
  )
  .subscribe(x => console.log(x));

Goals

  • Smaller overall bundles sizes
  • Provide better performance than preceding versions of RxJS
  • To model/follow the Observable Spec Proposal to the observable
  • Provide more modular file structure in a variety of formats
  • Provide more debuggable call stacks than preceding versions of RxJS

Building/Testing

  • npm run compile build everything
  • npm test run tests
  • npm run dtslint run dtslint tests

Adding documentation

We appreciate all contributions to the documentation of any type. All of the information needed to get the docs app up and running locally as well as how to contribute can be found in the documentation directory.