handlebars vs ejs vs mustache vs pug vs squirrelly
Template Engines for Node.js
Search packages..
handlebarsejsmustachepugsquirrellySimilar Packages:
Template Engines for Node.js

Template engines are tools that allow developers to generate HTML dynamically by embedding JavaScript logic within templates. They facilitate the separation of concerns by allowing developers to create views that are decoupled from the business logic. This enhances maintainability and scalability of web applications. Each template engine has its own syntax, features, and design philosophies, catering to different needs and preferences in web development.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
handlebars23,827,98818,4962.78 MB1112 years agoMIT
ejs21,801,5408,045143 kB1162 years agoApache-2.0
mustache8,374,00316,693-1155 years agoMIT
pug1,868,608-59.7 kB-a year agoMIT
squirrelly31,891668419 kB25a year agoMIT
Feature Comparison: handlebars vs ejs vs mustache vs pug vs squirrelly

Syntax and Readability

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars employs a more structured syntax with curly braces for expressions, which enhances readability while still allowing for complex logic through helpers. This makes it suitable for larger projects.

  • ejs:

    EJS uses plain HTML with embedded JavaScript, making it very readable and familiar for those who are used to working with HTML. This simplicity allows for quick adoption and ease of use.

  • mustache:

    Mustache's logic-less approach leads to very clean and readable templates, as it avoids embedding JavaScript logic directly in the templates, making it easy to understand at a glance.

  • pug:

    Pug's indentation-based syntax reduces boilerplate code, allowing developers to write less while maintaining clarity. Its unique syntax may require some adjustment but can lead to cleaner templates.

  • squirrelly:

    Squirrelly offers a flexible syntax that allows for both traditional HTML and custom tags, making it versatile. Its readability is enhanced by its ability to define reusable components.

Performance

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars is optimized for performance with precompiled templates, which can significantly speed up rendering times, especially in larger applications where templates are reused frequently.

  • ejs:

    EJS is lightweight and performs well for small to medium-sized applications. However, for very large applications, its performance may degrade due to the need to recompile templates frequently.

  • mustache:

    Mustache is designed to be fast and efficient, with minimal overhead. Its simplicity contributes to quick rendering times, making it suitable for performance-sensitive applications.

  • pug:

    Pug is known for its speed due to its precompiled templates and efficient rendering engine. It can handle complex templates without significant performance hits, making it a good choice for larger projects.

  • squirrelly:

    Squirrelly is designed for high performance, with features that allow for fast rendering and minimal overhead. It is particularly effective for applications that require quick template processing.

Extensibility

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars excels in extensibility with its helper functions and partials, allowing developers to create reusable components and logic, making it very adaptable to various project needs.

  • ejs:

    EJS can be extended with custom functions, but it does not have a built-in system for helpers or partials, which may limit its extensibility compared to other engines.

  • mustache:

    Mustache is intentionally minimalistic and does not support extensibility through custom helpers, which can be a limitation for complex applications that require additional functionality.

  • pug:

    Pug supports mixins and includes, allowing developers to create reusable components and extend functionality easily, making it highly adaptable for complex projects.

  • squirrelly:

    Squirrelly provides a robust system for custom tags and helpers, allowing developers to extend its functionality significantly, making it suitable for complex applications.

Learning Curve

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars has a moderate learning curve due to its additional features like helpers and partials, but it is still accessible for developers with basic templating experience.

  • ejs:

    EJS has a gentle learning curve, especially for those familiar with HTML and JavaScript. Its straightforward syntax makes it easy to pick up and start using quickly.

  • mustache:

    Mustache's logic-less philosophy makes it easy to learn, but its limitations in functionality may require developers to adapt their approach to templating.

  • pug:

    Pug has a steeper learning curve due to its unique syntax and indentation-based structure. However, once mastered, it can greatly enhance productivity and code clarity.

  • squirrelly:

    Squirrelly is relatively easy to learn, especially for those familiar with JavaScript. Its flexibility and support for custom tags may require some initial investment in learning.

Community and Ecosystem

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars also enjoys a robust community, with many resources, plugins, and extensions available, making it a popular choice for larger applications.

  • ejs:

    EJS has a strong community and is widely used in the Node.js ecosystem, ensuring good support and a wealth of resources for developers.

  • mustache:

    Mustache has a smaller community compared to others, but its simplicity and cross-language support make it a reliable choice for various projects.

  • pug:

    Pug has a vibrant community and is well-supported with numerous plugins and resources, making it a popular choice among developers who favor its syntax.

  • squirrelly:

    Squirrelly is newer but is gaining traction due to its performance and flexibility. Its community is growing, and it offers good documentation and support.

How to Choose: handlebars vs ejs vs mustache vs pug vs squirrelly
  • handlebars:

    Opt for Handlebars if you need a more powerful templating solution with features like helpers and partials. It promotes a clear separation of logic from presentation, making it suitable for larger applications where maintainability is crucial.

  • ejs:

    Choose EJS if you prefer a straightforward syntax that closely resembles HTML. It is easy to learn and integrates seamlessly with Express.js, making it ideal for simple projects or those who want to quickly render dynamic content without much overhead.

  • mustache:

    Select Mustache if you want a logic-less templating language that emphasizes simplicity and readability. It is ideal for projects that require minimal logic in templates and can be used across various programming languages, promoting consistency.

  • pug:

    Choose Pug if you prefer a concise and clean syntax that reduces the amount of code you write. It allows for easy nesting and is particularly useful for developers who favor a more expressive way of writing HTML, making it great for complex layouts.

  • squirrelly:

    Go with Squirrelly if you need a fast and flexible templating engine that supports both server-side and client-side rendering. Its unique features like custom tags and a focus on performance make it suitable for applications where speed is a priority.

Similar Npm Packages to handlebars

handlebars is a popular templating engine for JavaScript that allows developers to create dynamic HTML content by combining templates with data. It provides a simple syntax for defining templates and supports features like helpers, partials, and block expressions, making it a powerful tool for rendering HTML on the server or client side. While Handlebars is widely used, there are several alternatives that also offer templating capabilities. Here are a few notable ones:

  • ejs (Embedded JavaScript) is a simple templating engine that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. EJS allows you to embed JavaScript logic directly within your templates, making it easy to create dynamic content. Its syntax is straightforward and familiar to those who are comfortable with JavaScript, making it a popular choice for developers looking for a lightweight solution for server-side rendering in Node.js applications.

  • mustache is a logic-less templating engine that emphasizes simplicity and readability. It uses a minimal syntax, where templates are defined with placeholders that are replaced with actual data. Mustache is designed to be language-agnostic, meaning it can be used in various programming environments, not just JavaScript. Its lack of logic in templates encourages a clean separation between logic and presentation, making it a good choice for projects that prioritize maintainability.

  • pug (formerly known as Jade) is a high-performance templating engine that uses a unique indentation-based syntax to create HTML. Pug allows for cleaner and more concise templates by eliminating the need for closing tags and reducing boilerplate code. It supports features like mixins, inheritance, and conditionals, making it suitable for complex applications. Pug is particularly favored in projects where readability and maintainability of templates are crucial.

To see how Handlebars compares with EJS, Mustache, and Pug, check out the comparison: Comparing ejs vs handlebars vs mustache vs pug.

Similar Npm Packages to ejs

ejs (Embedded JavaScript) is a templating engine for Node.js that allows developers to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It provides a simple syntax for embedding JavaScript code within HTML, making it easy to create dynamic web pages. EJS is known for its speed and simplicity, making it a popular choice for rendering views in web applications. However, there are several alternatives to EJS that offer different features and capabilities. Here are a few notable ones:

  • handlebars is a powerful templating engine that extends the capabilities of Mustache templates. It provides a more expressive syntax and allows for the creation of reusable templates with helper functions. Handlebars is particularly useful for projects that require more complex templating logic, as it supports features like conditionals, loops, and custom helpers. If you need a templating engine that balances simplicity with powerful features, Handlebars is a great option.

  • nunjucks is a full-featured templating engine inspired by Jinja2 (a popular templating engine for Python). It offers a rich set of features, including template inheritance, asynchronous control, and powerful filters. Nunjucks is well-suited for applications that require advanced templating capabilities and is particularly useful for projects that need to render templates on both the server and client sides. If you are looking for a versatile templating engine that can handle complex scenarios, Nunjucks is worth considering.

  • pug (formerly known as Jade) is a high-performance templating engine that uses a unique indentation-based syntax, which eliminates the need for closing tags in HTML. Pug allows for cleaner and more concise templates, making it easier to read and maintain. It also supports features like mixins and template inheritance. If you prefer a more minimalistic syntax and want to reduce the amount of boilerplate code in your templates, Pug is an excellent choice.

For a detailed comparison of these templating engines, check out the link: Comparing ejs vs handlebars vs nunjucks vs pug.

Similar Npm Packages to mustache

mustache is a logic-less templating engine that enables developers to create dynamic HTML content by embedding variables and expressions within templates. It is designed to be simple and easy to use, making it a popular choice for rendering templates in both client-side and server-side applications. Mustache's syntax is straightforward, allowing for quick integration into various projects without the need for complex logic within the templates.

While Mustache is a solid choice for templating, there are several alternatives in the JavaScript ecosystem that offer different features and capabilities. Here are a few notable alternatives:

  • ejs (Embedded JavaScript) is a templating engine that allows you to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. EJS provides more flexibility than Mustache by allowing you to include JavaScript logic directly within your templates. This makes it suitable for projects where you need to perform more complex operations or manipulate data before rendering it in the view. EJS is widely used in server-side applications, especially with Node.js and Express.

  • handlebars is an extension of Mustache that adds more powerful features, including helpers and the ability to create reusable templates. Handlebars allows for more complex logic and functionality while still maintaining a logic-less philosophy. It is particularly useful for applications that require more advanced templating capabilities, such as partials and custom helpers, making it a popular choice for larger projects.

  • pug (formerly known as Jade) is a high-performance templating engine that uses an indentation-based syntax to create HTML. Pug allows for cleaner and more concise templates compared to traditional HTML, and it supports features like mixins and inheritance. If you prefer a more expressive syntax and are looking for a templating engine that can help reduce the amount of boilerplate code, Pug is an excellent option.

To see how Mustache compares with EJS, Handlebars, and Pug, check out the comparison: Comparing ejs vs handlebars vs mustache vs pug.

Similar Npm Packages to pug

pug is a high-performance template engine for Node.js that allows developers to write HTML in a more concise and readable way. Originally known as Jade, pug uses a clean syntax that eliminates the need for closing tags and allows for easy nesting of elements. This makes it a popular choice for developers looking to create dynamic web pages with minimal boilerplate code. While pug is a powerful templating engine, there are several alternatives available that cater to different needs and preferences. Here are a few notable alternatives:

  • ejs (Embedded JavaScript) is a simple templating engine that allows you to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. EJS provides a straightforward syntax that is easy to learn, making it a great choice for developers who prefer a more traditional approach to templating. It supports features like partials and includes, allowing for code reuse and modularity. If you are looking for a templating engine that integrates seamlessly with JavaScript and offers flexibility, EJS is a solid option.

  • handlebars is a popular templating engine that extends the capabilities of Mustache templates. Handlebars allows for more complex logic and provides features such as helpers, partials, and custom functions. It emphasizes separation of logic and presentation, making it easier to maintain and scale applications. If you need a templating engine that supports advanced features while keeping your templates clean and readable, Handlebars is an excellent choice.

  • nunjucks is a powerful templating engine created by Mozilla that is inspired by Jinja2. It offers a rich feature set, including template inheritance, asynchronous rendering, and custom filters. Nunjucks is particularly well-suited for applications that require a high degree of flexibility and control over the rendering process. If you're building complex applications that need a robust templating solution, Nunjucks is worth considering.

To see how pug compares with ejs, handlebars, and nunjucks, check out the comparison: Comparing ejs vs handlebars vs nunjucks vs pug.

Similar Npm Packages to squirrelly

squirrelly is a fast and lightweight templating engine for JavaScript applications. It is designed to provide a simple syntax for creating dynamic HTML content, making it easy to render templates with data. Squirrelly is particularly known for its speed and flexibility, allowing developers to create highly efficient templates for both server-side and client-side rendering. While Squirrelly is a great choice for templating, there are several alternatives in the JavaScript ecosystem that also provide templating solutions. Here are a few notable ones:

  • ejs (Embedded JavaScript) is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. EJS allows you to include JavaScript logic directly within your templates, making it a popular choice for server-side rendering in Node.js applications. Its straightforward syntax and ability to include partials make it a versatile option for developers looking for a minimalistic templating solution.

  • handlebars is a powerful templating engine that builds on the Mustache template language. Handlebars provides a more expressive syntax and additional features such as helpers and partials, making it suitable for more complex templating needs. It is widely used in both client-side and server-side applications and is known for its logic-less templates, which promote cleaner and more maintainable code.

  • mustache is a logic-less templating language that emphasizes simplicity and readability. It allows developers to create templates without embedding complex logic, making it easy to separate presentation from application logic. Mustache can be used in various programming languages and is particularly useful for projects that prioritize clean and maintainable code.

  • pug (formerly known as Jade) is a high-performance templating engine that uses a unique indentation-based syntax. Pug allows developers to write concise and readable templates, reducing the amount of boilerplate code required. It is particularly popular in Node.js applications and supports features like mixins and inheritance, making it a powerful choice for building dynamic web pages.

To see how Squirrelly compares with EJS, Handlebars, Mustache, and Pug, check out the comparison: Comparing ejs vs handlebars vs mustache vs pug vs squirrelly.

README for handlebars

CI Build Status jsDelivr Hits npm downloads npm version Bundle size Install size

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Checkout the official Handlebars docs site at https://handlebarsjs.com/ and the live demo at http://tryhandlebarsjs.com/.

Installing

See our installation documentation.

Usage

In general, the syntax of Handlebars.js templates is a superset of Mustache templates. For basic syntax, check out the Mustache manpage.

Once you have a template, use the Handlebars.compile method to compile the template into a function. The generated function takes a context argument, which will be used to render the template.

var source = "<p>Hello, my name is {{name}}. I am from {{hometown}}. I have " +
             "{{kids.length}} kids:</p>" +
             "<ul>{{#kids}}<li>{{name}} is {{age}}</li>{{/kids}}</ul>";
var template = Handlebars.compile(source);

var data = { "name": "Alan", "hometown": "Somewhere, TX",
             "kids": [{"name": "Jimmy", "age": "12"}, {"name": "Sally", "age": "4"}]};
var result = template(data);

// Would render:
// <p>Hello, my name is Alan. I am from Somewhere, TX. I have 2 kids:</p>
// <ul>
//   <li>Jimmy is 12</li>
//   <li>Sally is 4</li>
// </ul>

Full documentation and more examples are at handlebarsjs.com.

Precompiling Templates

Handlebars allows templates to be precompiled and included as javascript code rather than the handlebars template allowing for faster startup time. Full details are located here.

Differences Between Handlebars.js and Mustache

Handlebars.js adds a couple of additional features to make writing templates easier and also changes a tiny detail of how partials work.

Block expressions have the same syntax as mustache sections but should not be confused with one another. Sections are akin to an implicit each or with statement depending on the input data and helpers are explicit pieces of code that are free to implement whatever behavior they like. The mustache spec defines the exact behavior of sections. In the case of name conflicts, helpers are given priority.

Compatibility

There are a few Mustache behaviors that Handlebars does not implement.

  • Handlebars deviates from Mustache slightly in that it does not perform recursive lookup by default. The compile time compat flag must be set to enable this functionality. Users should note that there is a performance cost for enabling this flag. The exact cost varies by template, but it's recommended that performance sensitive operations should avoid this mode and instead opt for explicit path references.
  • The optional Mustache-style lambdas are not supported. Instead Handlebars provides its own lambda resolution that follows the behaviors of helpers.
  • Alternative delimiters are not supported.

Supported Environments

Handlebars has been designed to work in any ECMAScript 3 environment. This includes

  • Node.js
  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari 5+
  • Opera 11+
  • IE 6+

Older versions and other runtimes are likely to work but have not been formally tested. The compiler requires JSON.stringify to be implemented natively or via a polyfill. If using the precompiler this is not necessary.

Performance

In a rough performance test, precompiled Handlebars.js templates (in the original version of Handlebars.js) rendered in about half the time of Mustache templates. It would be a shame if it were any other way, since they were precompiled, but the difference in architecture does have some big performance advantages. Justin Marney, a.k.a. gotascii, confirmed that with an independent test. The rewritten Handlebars (current version) is faster than the old version, with many performance tests being 5 to 7 times faster than the Mustache equivalent.

Upgrading

See release-notes.md for upgrade notes.

Known Issues

See FAQ.md for known issues and common pitfalls.

Handlebars in the Wild

  • Assemble, by @jonschlinkert and @doowb, is a static site generator that uses Handlebars.js as its template engine.
  • Cory, by @leo, is another tiny static site generator
  • CoSchedule An editorial calendar for WordPress that uses Handlebars.js
  • dashbars A modern helper library for Handlebars.js.
  • Ember.js makes Handlebars.js the primary way to structure your views, also with automatic data binding support.
  • Ghost Just a blogging platform.
  • handlebars_assets: A Rails Asset Pipeline gem from Les Hill (@leshill).
  • handlebars-helpers is an extensive library with 100+ handlebars helpers.
  • handlebars-layouts is a set of helpers which implement extendible and embeddable layout blocks as seen in other popular templating languages.
  • hbs: An Express.js view engine adapter for Handlebars.js, from Don Park.
  • koa-hbs: koa generator based renderer for Handlebars.js.
  • jblotus created http://tryhandlebarsjs.com for anyone who would like to try out Handlebars.js in their browser.
  • jQuery plugin: allows you to use Handlebars.js with jQuery.
  • Lumbar provides easy module-based template management for handlebars projects.
  • Marionette.Handlebars adds support for Handlebars and Mustache templates to Marionette.
  • sammy.js by Aaron Quint, a.k.a. quirkey, supports Handlebars.js as one of its template plugins.
  • SproutCore uses Handlebars.js as its main templating engine, extending it with automatic data binding support.
  • YUI implements a port of handlebars
  • Swag by @elving is a growing collection of helpers for handlebars.js. Give your handlebars.js templates some swag son!
  • DOMBars is a DOM-based templating engine built on the Handlebars parser and runtime DEPRECATED
  • promised-handlebars is a wrapper for Handlebars that allows helpers to return Promises.
  • just-handlebars-helpers A fully tested lightweight package with common Handlebars helpers.

External Resources

Have a project using Handlebars? Send us a pull request!

License

Handlebars.js is released under the MIT license.

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc, the official website for the npm registry. Note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. Please share your feedback via our GitHub repository. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.