electron-builder vs pkg vs electron-packager
Node.js Packaging Tools Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
electron-builderpkgelectron-packagerSimilar Packages:
What's Node.js Packaging Tools?

Node.js Packaging Tools are utilities that help developers package their Node.js applications into executable files or distributable formats. These tools streamline the process of creating standalone applications, making it easier to distribute software without requiring users to install Node.js or manage dependencies separately. They often provide features like code bundling, asset optimization, and cross-platform support, ensuring that the final package runs seamlessly on different operating systems. Examples include electron-builder for Electron apps, electron-packager for creating platform-specific builds, and pkg for packaging Node.js projects into single executable files.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
electron-builder385,04513,80276 kB3693 months agoMIT
pkg178,21524,338227 kB02 years agoMIT
electron-packager120,354195145 kB47a year agoBSD-2-Clause
Feature Comparison: electron-builder vs pkg vs electron-packager

Packaging Type

  • electron-builder:

    electron-builder creates installers and packages for Electron applications, supporting multiple formats like .exe, .dmg, .deb, and more. It allows for complex packaging scenarios, including auto-updating and code signing.

  • pkg:

    pkg packages Node.js applications into a single executable file, bundling the Node.js runtime and all dependencies. This eliminates the need for a separate Node.js installation on the target machine.

  • electron-packager:

    electron-packager produces platform-specific packages for Electron apps, generating .app, .exe, and other formats. It focuses on creating ready-to-distribute applications without additional features like installers or auto-updates.

Cross-Platform Support

  • electron-builder:

    electron-builder offers robust cross-platform support, allowing developers to build applications for Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single codebase. It handles platform-specific nuances automatically, making it easier to create multi-platform installers.

  • pkg:

    pkg provides cross-platform packaging for Node.js applications, creating executables for Windows, macOS, and Linux. However, it requires separate builds for each platform, and the packaging process must be run on the target OS or a compatible environment.

  • electron-packager:

    electron-packager also supports cross-platform packaging, but it requires the build process to be run on each target platform to generate platform-specific binaries. This means you need access to Windows, macOS, and Linux environments for complete cross-platform support.

Auto-Update Support

  • electron-builder:

    electron-builder includes built-in support for auto-updates, allowing applications to automatically download and install updates. This feature requires minimal configuration and is integrated into the packaging process.

  • pkg:

    pkg does not support auto-updating, as it focuses on creating standalone executables. Any update mechanism would need to be implemented separately within the application.

  • electron-packager:

    electron-packager does not provide auto-update functionality out of the box. Developers need to implement their own update mechanism or use third-party libraries to handle updates after packaging the application.

Code Signing

  • electron-builder:

    electron-builder supports code signing for macOS and Windows applications, enhancing security and trustworthiness. It provides configuration options for signing during the build process, making it easier to comply with platform requirements.

  • pkg:

    pkg does not include code signing features. Developers need to sign the executable files manually using platform-specific tools after the packaging process is complete.

  • electron-packager:

    electron-packager allows for code signing, but it requires manual setup and configuration. It does not provide built-in support, so developers must handle signing separately after packaging the application.

Ease of Use: Code Examples

  • electron-builder:

    electron-builder is relatively easy to use, especially for projects that require advanced features like auto-updates and code signing. Its documentation is comprehensive, and it integrates well with existing Electron projects.

    Example configuration in package.json:

    {
  "name": "my-electron-app",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "main": "main.js",
  "build": {
    "appId": "com.example.myapp",
    "mac": {
      "category": "public.app-category.utilities"
    },
    "win": {
      "target": "nsis"
    },
    "linux": {
      "target": "AppImage"
    }
  }
}

    Build command:

    electron-builder
  • pkg:

    pkg is easy to use for packaging Node.js applications, especially for CLI tools. It requires minimal setup and can be integrated into build scripts.

    Example usage:

    pkg index.js --out myapp
  • electron-packager:

    electron-packager is straightforward and easy to use, making it a good choice for simple packaging tasks. Its API is simple, and it requires minimal configuration to get started.

    Example usage:

    electron-packager . MyApp --platform=win32 --arch=x64
How to Choose: electron-builder vs pkg vs electron-packager
  • electron-builder:

    Choose electron-builder if you need a comprehensive solution for packaging Electron applications with built-in support for auto-updates, code signing, and cross-platform builds. It is ideal for developers who want a feature-rich tool that handles everything from simple to complex packaging tasks.

  • pkg:

    Opt for pkg if you want to package Node.js applications into standalone executables that run without requiring a Node.js installation. It is perfect for server-side applications or CLI tools where you want to eliminate dependency management for end users.

  • electron-packager:

    Select electron-packager if you require a lightweight and straightforward tool for creating platform-specific builds of Electron applications. It is best suited for projects where simplicity and ease of use are prioritized, and advanced features like auto-updates are not necessary.

Similar Npm Packages to electron-builder

electron-builder is a powerful and easy-to-use packaging and build tool for Electron applications. It simplifies the process of creating distributable packages for various platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. With features like auto-update support, code signing, and a wide range of configuration options, electron-builder is a popular choice among developers looking to streamline their Electron app deployment process.

While electron-builder is a robust solution, there are alternatives available that cater to different needs:

  • electron-packager is another widely used tool for packaging Electron applications. It focuses on simplicity and flexibility, allowing developers to create platform-specific builds with minimal configuration. Unlike electron-builder, which provides a more comprehensive set of features, electron-packager is lightweight and straightforward, making it a good choice for developers who prefer a more hands-on approach to packaging their applications.
  • pkg is a tool that allows developers to package Node.js projects into executable binaries. While it is not specifically designed for Electron applications, it can be used to create standalone executables for Node.js scripts. If your project is primarily a Node.js application and you want to distribute it as a single executable file, pkg is a suitable option. However, for full-fledged Electron applications that require a graphical user interface, electron-builder or electron-packager would be more appropriate.

To see how electron-builder compares with electron-packager and pkg, check out the comparison: Comparing electron-builder vs electron-packager vs pkg.

Similar Npm Packages to pkg

pkg is a popular npm package that allows developers to package Node.js projects into executable binaries. This means that you can take your Node.js application and compile it into a single executable file that can run on various platforms without requiring the end user to have Node.js installed. This is particularly useful for distributing command-line tools or applications that need to be easily deployed across different environments. The simplicity and convenience of pkg make it a go-to choice for developers looking to streamline the deployment process of their Node.js applications.

However, there are several alternatives in the ecosystem that also provide bundling and packaging capabilities. Here are a few notable ones:

  • browserify is a tool that allows developers to use Node.js-style require() calls in the browser. It takes your JavaScript files and bundles them into a single file that can be included in a web page. While browserify is primarily focused on browser environments, it is a solid choice for projects that need to leverage Node.js modules in client-side applications.

  • esbuild is an extremely fast JavaScript bundler and minifier. It is designed for speed and efficiency, making it one of the fastest tools available for building modern web applications. esbuild supports both CommonJS and ES modules, and its performance makes it an excellent choice for large projects that require quick build times.

  • rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript that is particularly well-suited for libraries and applications that need to be optimized for performance. It focuses on creating smaller bundles by using tree-shaking to eliminate unused code. If you are developing a library or want to ensure that your application has a minimal footprint, rollup is a great option.

  • webpack is one of the most widely used module bundlers in the JavaScript ecosystem. It provides a comprehensive solution for bundling JavaScript applications, along with support for various asset types such as CSS, images, and more. Webpack's extensive plugin system and configuration options make it highly customizable, making it suitable for both small and large-scale applications.

To see how pkg compares with browserify, esbuild, rollup, and webpack, check out the comparison: Comparing browserify vs esbuild vs pkg vs rollup vs webpack.

Product Hunt - Vote for us 🧡JSON to TypeScriptJavaScript CopilotChatTerms & Privacy