Which is Better JavaScript Utility Libraries?
lodash vs immutable vs underscore vs ramda
1 Year
lodashimmutableunderscoreramdaSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Utility Libraries?

JavaScript utility libraries provide developers with a set of functions and tools that simplify common programming tasks, enhance code readability, and improve efficiency. These libraries often focus on data manipulation, functional programming, and performance optimization, allowing developers to write cleaner and more maintainable code. Each library has its unique features and design philosophies, catering to different development needs and preferences.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
lodash50,706,25559,714-1084 years agoMIT
immutable18,270,93932,936682 kB1263 months agoMIT
underscore12,131,05927,319906 kB512 months agoMIT
ramda11,328,20323,7881.18 MB1464 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: lodash vs immutable vs underscore vs ramda

Immutability

  • lodash: Lodash does not enforce immutability but provides methods that can be used in an immutable style. It allows for mutable operations, which can be beneficial in scenarios where performance is prioritized over strict immutability.
  • immutable: Immutable.js provides persistent data structures that ensure data cannot be changed once created, promoting safer and more predictable code. This immutability helps prevent bugs related to unintended data mutations, especially in complex applications.
  • underscore: Underscore does not inherently support immutability, offering mutable operations that can lead to unintended side effects. It is more focused on providing utility functions rather than enforcing immutability.
  • ramda: Ramda is built around the concept of immutability and provides functions that do not mutate the original data structures. It encourages a functional programming approach, making it easier to reason about data transformations without side effects.

Functional Programming Support

  • lodash: Lodash provides some functional programming utilities but is not strictly a functional programming library. It includes functions for chaining and composing, making it easier to work with data in a functional style.
  • immutable: Immutable.js is not primarily a functional programming library, but its immutability aligns well with functional programming principles, allowing for safer function compositions and transformations.
  • underscore: Underscore includes some functional programming features but is less comprehensive than Ramda. It provides basic support for functional programming concepts but does not emphasize them as heavily.
  • ramda: Ramda is designed specifically for functional programming, offering a rich set of functions that support currying, composition, and point-free style. It encourages a functional approach to programming, making it ideal for developers who prioritize these paradigms.

Performance

  • lodash: Lodash is highly optimized for performance, with many functions designed to be faster than native JavaScript methods. It provides a variety of performance-focused utilities that can help improve the efficiency of data manipulation tasks.
  • immutable: Immutable.js is optimized for performance with its structural sharing technique, which allows for efficient updates without copying entire data structures. This can lead to significant performance improvements in applications that frequently update state.
  • underscore: Underscore is generally performant for basic utility functions but may not be as optimized as Lodash for more complex operations. It provides essential functions without the extensive performance enhancements found in Lodash.
  • ramda: Ramda's focus on immutability and functional programming can introduce some performance overhead compared to mutable libraries. However, its design encourages efficient data transformations when used correctly.

Modularity

  • lodash: Lodash is modular, allowing developers to import only the functions they need, which can reduce bundle size and improve performance. This modularity makes it a flexible choice for various projects.
  • immutable: Immutable.js is a single library focused on providing immutable data structures, which makes it less modular compared to others. It is a complete solution for immutability but does not offer a wide range of utility functions.
  • underscore: Underscore is less modular than Lodash and Ramda, providing a comprehensive set of utility functions in a single package. While it covers many use cases, it does not offer the same level of modularity.
  • ramda: Ramda is also modular, encouraging developers to import only the specific functions they require. This modular approach aligns with its functional programming philosophy, allowing for cleaner and more maintainable code.

Learning Curve

  • lodash: Lodash is relatively easy to learn, especially for those familiar with JavaScript. Its functions are straightforward and can be quickly integrated into projects, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.
  • immutable: Immutable.js has a steeper learning curve due to its unique data structures and concepts of immutability. Developers may need to invest time in understanding how to effectively use these structures in their applications.
  • underscore: Underscore is easy to learn and provides a familiar set of utility functions for JavaScript developers. Its straightforward API makes it accessible for beginners.
  • ramda: Ramda's emphasis on functional programming may present a learning curve for developers not familiar with these concepts. However, once understood, it can lead to more expressive and maintainable code.
How to Choose: lodash vs immutable vs underscore vs ramda
  • lodash: Choose Lodash if you need a versatile utility library that provides a wide range of functions for manipulating arrays, objects, and strings. It is well-suited for general-purpose programming and offers a rich feature set with a focus on performance and modularity, allowing you to include only the functions you need.
  • immutable: Choose Immutable.js if your application requires a strong emphasis on immutability and you want to avoid unintended side effects from data mutations. It is particularly useful in applications where performance is critical, such as those using React, as it allows for efficient change detection and rendering.
  • underscore: Choose Underscore if you are looking for a lightweight utility library that provides essential functions for working with arrays, objects, and functions. It is a good choice for projects that require basic utility functions without the overhead of more extensive libraries, and it serves as a foundation for many other libraries.
  • ramda: Choose Ramda if you prefer a functional programming style and want to leverage currying and composition in your code. Ramda is designed for functional programming and emphasizes immutability and side-effect-free functions, making it ideal for projects that prioritize functional paradigms.
README for lodash

lodash v4.17.21

The Lodash library exported as Node.js modules.

Installation

Using npm:

$ npm i -g npm
$ npm i --save lodash

In Node.js:

// Load the full build.
var _ = require('lodash');
// Load the core build.
var _ = require('lodash/core');
// Load the FP build for immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods.
var fp = require('lodash/fp');

// Load method categories.
var array = require('lodash/array');
var object = require('lodash/fp/object');

// Cherry-pick methods for smaller browserify/rollup/webpack bundles.
var at = require('lodash/at');
var curryN = require('lodash/fp/curryN');

See the package source for more details.

Note:
Install n_ for Lodash use in the Node.js < 6 REPL.

Support

Tested in Chrome 74-75, Firefox 66-67, IE 11, Edge 18, Safari 11-12, & Node.js 8-12.
Automated browser & CI test runs are available.