string-similarity vs natural vs similarity vs jaro-winkler
String Similarity Measurement Libraries Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
string-similaritynaturalsimilarityjaro-winklerSimilar Packages:
What's String Similarity Measurement Libraries?

String similarity measurement libraries are essential tools in web development for comparing and evaluating the likeness between strings. They are particularly useful in applications such as search engines, data deduplication, and natural language processing, where understanding the relationship between different strings can enhance user experience and data accuracy. These libraries implement various algorithms to compute similarity scores, helping developers choose the most appropriate method based on their specific use cases and performance requirements.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
string-similarity1,617,7132,527-234 years agoISC
natural180,53810,76813.8 MB829 months agoMIT
similarity111,48777-05 years agoISC
jaro-winkler57,12884-09 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: string-similarity vs natural vs similarity vs jaro-winkler

Algorithm Type

  • string-similarity:

    String-Similarity primarily implements the Levenshtein distance algorithm, which calculates the minimum number of single-character edits required to change one string into another, making it straightforward for basic comparisons.

  • natural:

    Natural provides multiple algorithms including Jaro-Winkler, Levenshtein, and cosine similarity, allowing for a versatile approach to string comparison and enabling developers to choose the most suitable algorithm for their needs.

  • similarity:

    Similarity focuses on various algorithms like Jaro-Winkler and Levenshtein, offering flexibility in string comparison methods while maintaining a simple API for ease of use.

  • jaro-winkler:

    Jaro-Winkler uses a variant of the Jaro distance metric, which is particularly effective for short strings and accounts for transpositions and common prefixes, making it ideal for comparing names and similar strings.

Performance

  • string-similarity:

    String-Similarity is optimized for speed, particularly for short strings, making it an excellent choice for applications that require rapid string matching.

  • natural:

    Natural's performance varies depending on the algorithm used; while some algorithms are efficient, others may be slower due to their complexity, making it essential to choose the right algorithm based on the dataset size and application requirements.

  • similarity:

    Similarity is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for applications where performance is critical and where quick comparisons are necessary.

  • jaro-winkler:

    Jaro-Winkler is optimized for performance with short strings, providing quick comparisons, which is beneficial in applications requiring real-time processing of user input or large datasets.

Ease of Use

  • string-similarity:

    String-Similarity is designed for simplicity, providing a minimalistic API that allows developers to quickly implement string similarity checks with minimal effort.

  • natural:

    Natural, while comprehensive, may have a steeper learning curve due to its wide range of features and algorithms, which might require more time to understand and utilize effectively.

  • similarity:

    Similarity offers a simple and intuitive API, making it easy for developers to get started with string comparisons without needing extensive documentation or prior knowledge.

  • jaro-winkler:

    Jaro-Winkler has a straightforward API that allows developers to easily implement string comparisons without extensive setup, making it user-friendly for quick integration.

Use Cases

  • string-similarity:

    String-Similarity is best used in applications that require quick and efficient string matching, such as autocomplete features, search suggestions, and simple data validation.

  • natural:

    Natural is ideal for more complex natural language processing tasks, including text classification, sentiment analysis, and any application requiring advanced string manipulation and comparison features.

  • similarity:

    Similarity is suitable for general-purpose string comparison tasks, such as search functionality, data cleaning, and deduplication processes, where a lightweight solution is needed.

  • jaro-winkler:

    Jaro-Winkler is particularly useful for applications involving name matching, duplicate detection, and any scenario where typographical errors are common, such as user input validation.

Community and Maintenance

  • string-similarity:

    String-Similarity is lightweight and maintained effectively, but it may not have a large community, which could limit the availability of extensive documentation or user support.

  • natural:

    Natural has an active community and is regularly updated, providing a wealth of resources and support for developers, making it a reliable choice for ongoing projects.

  • similarity:

    Similarity is maintained with periodic updates, though it may have a smaller community compared to more comprehensive libraries, which could affect the availability of support and resources.

  • jaro-winkler:

    Jaro-Winkler is well-maintained with a stable release cycle, and its focused functionality ensures it remains relevant for specific use cases, although it may not have as large a community as others.

How to Choose: string-similarity vs natural vs similarity vs jaro-winkler
  • string-similarity:

    Use String-Similarity if you need a simple and efficient library specifically designed for calculating similarity ratios based on the Levenshtein distance, making it ideal for applications that require quick and easy string matching.

  • natural:

    Select Natural if you require a comprehensive natural language processing toolkit that includes various string comparison algorithms, stemming, tokenization, and classification features, making it suitable for more complex text analysis tasks.

  • similarity:

    Opt for Similarity if you want a straightforward and lightweight library focused on calculating similarity scores between strings using various algorithms, providing a balance between simplicity and functionality for basic string comparison needs.

  • jaro-winkler:

    Choose Jaro-Winkler if you need a fast and effective way to compare short strings, especially names or titles, as it is optimized for detecting typographical errors and is particularly useful in applications like record linkage.

Similar Npm Packages to string-similarity

string-similarity is a JavaScript library designed to compare strings and determine their similarity. It provides a simple API to calculate similarity scores between two strings, which can be useful in various applications such as search engines, recommendation systems, and data deduplication. The library uses algorithms like the Levenshtein distance to compute how closely two strings match, making it a handy tool for developers looking to enhance text processing capabilities in their applications.

While string-similarity is a powerful tool, there are several alternatives in the JavaScript ecosystem that offer similar functionalities. Here are a few noteworthy alternatives:

  • fuzzyset is a library that provides fuzzy string matching capabilities. It allows you to create a set of strings and then query that set for similar strings based on a defined similarity threshold. This is particularly useful for applications that require searching through large datasets for approximate matches. Fuzzyset is designed to handle cases where exact matches are not necessary, making it ideal for applications like search and autocomplete features.

  • natural is a general natural language processing (NLP) library for JavaScript. It includes a variety of tools for text processing, including string similarity functions. Natural provides a broader set of features beyond just string comparison, such as tokenization, stemming, and classification. If your project requires more comprehensive NLP capabilities alongside string similarity, natural can be a great choice.

  • similarity is another library focused on calculating the similarity between strings. It offers a straightforward API for comparing strings and provides various algorithms to choose from. Similarity is lightweight and easy to use, making it suitable for projects that need a simple solution for string comparison without the overhead of additional features.

To explore how string-similarity compares with fuzzyset, natural, and similarity, check out the comparison: Comparing fuzzyset vs natural vs similarity vs string-similarity.

Similar Npm Packages to natural

natural is a general natural language processing (NLP) library for Node.js. It provides a suite of tools for various NLP tasks, including tokenization, stemming, classification, phonetics, and more. With its easy-to-use API, developers can integrate natural language processing capabilities into their applications without needing extensive knowledge of the underlying algorithms. Natural is particularly useful for projects that require text analysis, language understanding, or any form of linguistic processing.

While natural offers a robust set of features, there are other libraries that also provide NLP functionalities. Here are a few alternatives:

  • compromise is a lightweight NLP library that focuses on providing a simple and intuitive API for processing and understanding natural language. It excels in tasks such as part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, and text manipulation. Compromise is particularly well-suited for applications that require quick and efficient text processing without the overhead of more complex NLP libraries. Its flexible and modular design allows developers to easily extend its capabilities to fit their specific needs.
  • retext is a powerful text processing library that focuses on natural language processing and analysis. It is built on a plugin architecture, allowing developers to create custom plugins for specific tasks, such as linting, transforming, or analyzing text. Retext is ideal for projects that require a more modular approach to text processing, as it enables developers to compose various plugins to achieve complex NLP tasks. If your application needs to perform extensive text analysis or transformation, retext provides a flexible and extensible framework.

To see how natural compares with compromise and retext, check out the comparison: Comparing compromise vs natural vs retext.

Similar Npm Packages to similarity

similarity is an npm package designed for calculating the similarity between two strings. It provides a straightforward API that allows developers to easily determine how closely related two strings are, which can be useful in various applications such as search algorithms, data deduplication, and natural language processing. The library typically uses algorithms like the Levenshtein distance or cosine similarity to compute the similarity score, making it a handy tool for developers looking to implement string comparison features in their projects.

One notable alternative to similarity is string-similarity. This package also focuses on calculating the similarity between strings, providing a simple and efficient way to compare them. string-similarity offers a variety of methods to compute similarity scores, including the Jaro-Winkler distance and other algorithms, making it versatile for different use cases. It is particularly useful for applications that require fuzzy matching, such as autocomplete suggestions, spell checking, or any scenario where you want to find closely matching strings.

To see how similarity compares with string-similarity, check out the comparison: Comparing similarity vs string-similarity.

Similar Npm Packages to jaro-winkler

jaro-winkler is a string comparison algorithm that measures the similarity between two strings. It is particularly effective for comparing short strings and is often used in applications such as record linkage and deduplication. The Jaro-Winkler distance algorithm accounts for typographical errors and gives more weight to matches at the beginning of the strings, making it a popular choice for applications that require fuzzy string matching. While jaro-winkler is a robust solution for string similarity, there are several alternatives available in the npm ecosystem. Here are a few noteworthy options:

  • natural is a general natural language processing (NLP) library for JavaScript. It provides various tools for text processing, including string similarity measures, tokenization, stemming, and classification. The natural library includes several algorithms for string comparison, making it a versatile choice for applications that require more than just string similarity. If you need comprehensive NLP capabilities alongside string matching, natural is an excellent option.
  • similarity is a lightweight library focused specifically on measuring the similarity between strings. It uses a simple algorithm to calculate the similarity score based on the length of the longest common substring. This library is easy to use and can be a good choice for applications that require a straightforward approach to string comparison without the overhead of more complex algorithms. If you want a minimalistic solution for string similarity, similarity is worth considering.
  • string-similarity is another library dedicated to string comparison. It provides a simple API to calculate similarity scores between two strings using various algorithms, including Jaro-Winkler. This library is particularly useful for applications that need to determine how closely two strings match, making it a great alternative to jaro-winkler. If you are looking for a straightforward way to compare strings with a focus on similarity scoring, string-similarity is a solid choice.

To explore how jaro-winkler compares with natural, similarity, and string-similarity, check out the comparison: Comparing jaro-winkler vs natural vs similarity vs string-similarity.

README for string-similarity

string-similarity

Finds degree of similarity between two strings, based on Dice's Coefficient, which is mostly better than Levenshtein distance.

Table of Contents

Usage

For Node.js

Install using:

npm install string-similarity --save

In your code:

var stringSimilarity = require("string-similarity");

var similarity = stringSimilarity.compareTwoStrings("healed", "sealed");

var matches = stringSimilarity.findBestMatch("healed", [
  "edward",
  "sealed",
  "theatre",
]);

For browser apps

Include <script src="//unpkg.com/string-similarity/umd/string-similarity.min.js"></script> to get the latest version.

Or <script src="//unpkg.com/string-similarity@4.0.1/umd/string-similarity.min.js"></script> to get a specific version (4.0.1) in this case.

This exposes a global variable called stringSimilarity which you can start using.

<script>
  stringSimilarity.compareTwoStrings('what!', 'who?');
</script>

(The package is exposed as UMD, so you can consume it as such)

API

The package contains two methods:

compareTwoStrings(string1, string2)

Returns a fraction between 0 and 1, which indicates the degree of similarity between the two strings. 0 indicates completely different strings, 1 indicates identical strings. The comparison is case-sensitive.

Arguments
  1. string1 (string): The first string
  2. string2 (string): The second string

Order does not make a difference.

Returns

(number): A fraction from 0 to 1, both inclusive. Higher number indicates more similarity.

Examples
stringSimilarity.compareTwoStrings("healed", "sealed");
// → 0.8

stringSimilarity.compareTwoStrings(
  "Olive-green table for sale, in extremely good condition.",
  "For sale: table in very good  condition, olive green in colour."
);
// → 0.6060606060606061

stringSimilarity.compareTwoStrings(
  "Olive-green table for sale, in extremely good condition.",
  "For sale: green Subaru Impreza, 210,000 miles"
);
// → 0.2558139534883721

stringSimilarity.compareTwoStrings(
  "Olive-green table for sale, in extremely good condition.",
  "Wanted: mountain bike with at least 21 gears."
);
// → 0.1411764705882353

findBestMatch(mainString, targetStrings)

Compares mainString against each string in targetStrings.

Arguments
  1. mainString (string): The string to match each target string against.
  2. targetStrings (Array): Each string in this array will be matched against the main string.
Returns

(Object): An object with a ratings property, which gives a similarity rating for each target string, a bestMatch property, which specifies which target string was most similar to the main string, and a bestMatchIndex property, which specifies the index of the bestMatch in the targetStrings array.

Examples
stringSimilarity.findBestMatch('Olive-green table for sale, in extremely good condition.', [
  'For sale: green Subaru Impreza, 210,000 miles',
  'For sale: table in very good condition, olive green in colour.',
  'Wanted: mountain bike with at least 21 gears.'
]);
// →
{ ratings:
   [ { target: 'For sale: green Subaru Impreza, 210,000 miles',
       rating: 0.2558139534883721 },
     { target: 'For sale: table in very good condition, olive green in colour.',
       rating: 0.6060606060606061 },
     { target: 'Wanted: mountain bike with at least 21 gears.',
       rating: 0.1411764705882353 } ],
  bestMatch:
   { target: 'For sale: table in very good condition, olive green in colour.',
     rating: 0.6060606060606061 },
  bestMatchIndex: 1
}

Release Notes

2.0.0

  • Removed production dependencies
  • Updated to ES6 (this breaks backward-compatibility for pre-ES6 apps)

3.0.0

  • Performance improvement for compareTwoStrings(..): now O(n) instead of O(n^2)
  • The algorithm has been tweaked slightly to disregard spaces and word boundaries. This will change the rating values slightly but not enough to make a significant difference
  • Adding a bestMatchIndex to the results for findBestMatch(..) to point to the best match in the supplied targetStrings array

3.0.1

  • Refactoring: removed unused functions; used substring instead of substr
  • Updated dependencies

4.0.1

  • Distributing as an UMD build to be used in browsers.

4.0.2

  • Update dependencies to latest versions.

4.0.3

  • Make compatible with IE and ES5. Also, update deps. (see PR56)

4.0.4

  • Simplify some conditional statements. Also, update deps. (see PR50)

Build status Known Vulnerabilities

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc or npmjs.com, the official website for the npm registry. Please note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.