native-base and react-native-paper are both popular component libraries for React Native that provide pre-built UI elements to speed up development. native-base offers a utility-first styling approach similar to Tailwind CSS, allowing deep customization without leaving your JSX. react-native-paper implements Google's Material Design specification, providing a consistent look and feel across iOS and Android with a strong focus on accessibility and standard interaction patterns.
Both native-base and react-native-paper solve the same core problem — providing ready-to-use UI components for React Native — but they take very different approaches to styling, theming, and design philosophy. Let's compare how they handle real-world development tasks.
native-base uses a utility-first prop system.
// native-base: Utility props
import { Button } from 'native-base';
<Button
color="blue.500"
size="lg"
borderRadius="md"
>
Submit
</Button>
react-native-paper relies on a global theme object.
// react-native-paper: Theme provider
import { Button, Provider as PaperProvider } from 'react-native-paper';
const theme = {
colors: { primary: '#0000ff' }
};
<PaperProvider theme={theme}>
<Button mode="contained">Submit</Button>
</PaperProvider>
native-base lets you override styles per instance easily.
// native-base: Inline override
<Button
bg="red.500"
_text={{ color: "white" }}
px={10}
>
Delete
</Button>
react-native-paper encourages using predefined modes.
// react-native-paper: Mode selection
<Button
mode="outlined"
textColor="red"
style={{ paddingVertical: 10 }}
>
Delete
</Button>
native-base has built-in color aliases for dark mode.
blue.500 which adapt automatically.NativeBaseProvider.// native-base: Dark mode aliases
import { NativeBaseProvider, Box } from 'native-base';
<Box bg="blue.500" />
// Automatically adjusts if dark mode is active
react-native-paper uses a theme switch.
// react-native-paper: Theme switch
const darkTheme = {
dark: true,
colors: { primary: '#ffffff' }
};
<PaperProvider theme={darkTheme}>
{/* App content */}
</PaperProvider>
native-base provides accessible components but relies on developer input.
// native-base: Manual accessibility
<Button
accessibilityLabel="Submit form"
color="blue.500"
>
Submit
</Button>
react-native-paper bakes accessibility into the design system.
// react-native-paper: Built-in accessibility
<Button
mode="contained"
accessibilityLabel="Submit form"
>
Submit
</Button>
While the differences are clear, both libraries also share many core ideas and tools. Here are key overlaps:
// Example: Shared TypeScript usage
interface Props {
label: string;
}
const MyButton = ({ label }: Props) => {
return <Button>{label}</Button>;
};
// Both libraries handle platform differences internally
// No need for Platform.OS checks for basic components
// NativeBase: extendTheme
// Paper: createTheme
// Both wrap the app to apply styles globally
// Example: Community integrations
// Both work with React Navigation, Formik, and Redux
| Feature | Shared by NativeBase and Paper |
|---|---|
| Core Tech | ⚛️ React Native, TypeScript |
| Rendering | 📱 iOS & Android native components |
| Theming | 🎨 Global providers & customization |
| Developer Tools | 🛠️ CLI, Documentation, Examples |
| Ecosystem | ✅ Works with standard RN libraries |
| Feature | native-base | react-native-paper |
|---|---|---|
| Styling | 🎨 Utility props (Tailwind-like) | 🧩 Theme object (Material Design) |
| Customization | 🔧 High flexibility per component | 📏 Opinionated, consistent |
| Design System | 🎨 Custom/Brand-focused | 📘 Google Material Design |
| Maintenance | ⚠️ Shifted focus to Gluestack | ✅ Actively maintained by Callstack |
| Setup | 🚀 Quick for custom designs | 🚀 Quick for standard apps |
native-base is like a custom tailoring kit 🧵—great for teams that want to build a unique brand identity with flexible styling tools. Ideal for consumer apps where design differentiation matters.
react-native-paper is like a prefabricated building kit 🏢—perfect for teams who want stability, accessibility, and a proven design system without extra effort. Shines in enterprise dashboards and internal tools.
Final Thought: Despite their differences, both libraries aim to make React Native development faster and more consistent. Choose based on your design requirements and long-term maintenance strategy.
Choose react-native-paper if you want a stable, opinionated library that follows Material Design guidelines out of the box. It is suitable for teams that prioritize consistency, accessibility, and faster setup without spending time on custom theme configuration. This is often the safer choice for enterprise apps requiring long-term support.
Choose native-base if you need full control over the visual design and prefer a utility-based styling system within your components. It is ideal for brands that require a unique identity distinct from standard Material or iOS designs. However, be aware that the team has shifted focus toward Gluestack for future iterations, so evaluate long-term maintenance needs.
React Native Paper is the cross-platform UI kit library containing a collection of customizable and production-ready components, which by default are following and respecting the Google’s Material Design guidelines.
Refer to the getting started guide for instructions.
Check the components and their usage in our documentation.
🧑💻 Run the example app with Expo to see it in action. The source code for the examples are under the /example folder.
📲 You can also try out components in our demo apps available in the both stores Android and iOS.
Read the contribution guidelines before contributing.
Use official component kits provided by Material Design.
react-native-paper is an open source project and will always remain free to use. If you think it's cool, please star it 🌟. Callstack is a group of React and React Native geeks, contact us at hello@callstack.com if you need any help with these or just want to say hi!
Like the project? ⚛️ Join the team who does amazing stuff for clients and drives React Native Open Source! 🔥
Thanks goes to these wonderful people (emoji key):
This project follows the all-contributors specification. Contributions of any kind welcome!