ngx-bootstrap vs ngx-popperjs
Angular Positioning Libraries for Floating UI Elements
ngx-bootstrapngx-popperjsSimilar Packages:
Angular Positioning Libraries for Floating UI Elements

ngx-bootstrap and ngx-popperjs are Angular-focused npm packages that address UI positioning needs, but with fundamentally different scopes. ngx-bootstrap is a complete implementation of Bootstrap components (like tooltips, dropdowns, and modals) for Angular, bundling its own positioning logic internally. In contrast, ngx-popperjs is a lightweight, dedicated Angular wrapper around the Popper.js v2 positioning engine, offering no UI components but exposing full control over floating element placement relative to reference elements.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
ngx-bootstrap05,5355.27 MB6115 months agoMIT
ngx-popperjs067253 kB0a year agoMIT

ngx-bootstrap vs ngx-popperjs: Angular Integration for UI Components and Positioning

When building Angular applications that require dropdowns, tooltips, modals, or other interactive UI elements, you often need robust positioning logic. Two packages in the Angular ecosystem address this need differently: ngx-bootstrap offers a full suite of Bootstrap-based components with built-in popper functionality, while ngx-popperjs provides a lightweight wrapper specifically for integrating Popper.js (the modern positioning engine). Let’s compare how they approach real-world development challenges.

🧩 Scope and Purpose: Full Component Library vs Targeted Utility

ngx-bootstrap is a comprehensive Angular implementation of Bootstrap 3 and 4 components — including dropdowns, tooltips, popovers, modals, datepickers, and more. It bundles its own positioning logic (historically based on Tether, later migrated to Popper.js) directly into each component.

// ngx-bootstrap: Using Tooltip directive
import { TooltipModule } from 'ngx-bootstrap/tooltip';

@Component({
  template: `<button tooltip="Hello world!">Hover me</button>`
})
export class MyComponent {}

ngx-popperjs is a minimal Angular wrapper around Popper.js v2, focused solely on providing reactive, declarative bindings for positioning floating elements (like tooltips or menus) relative to reference elements. It does not include any UI components — just the positioning engine.

// ngx-popperjs: Using Popper directive
import { PopperDirective } from 'ngx-popperjs';

@Component({
  template: `
    <button #trigger>Trigger</button>
    <div popper [popperTarget]="trigger" placement="top">
      I'm positioned!
    </div>
  `
})
export class MyComponent {}

⚙️ Underlying Positioning Engine: Integrated vs External

ngx-bootstrap historically used its own positioning logic but has since adopted Popper.js internally for components like tooltips and dropdowns. However, this integration is opaque — developers don’t directly interact with Popper.js APIs; configuration is limited to what the component exposes.

// ngx-bootstrap: Limited Popper options via component inputs
@Component({
  template: `<span tooltip="Info" [tooltipPlacement]="'right'">?</span>`
})
export class MyComponent {}
// Advanced Popper modifiers or strategies aren't directly configurable

ngx-popperjs exposes the full Popper.js v2 API through Angular directives. You can pass any Popper configuration object, including custom modifiers, strategy (fixed vs absolute), and event listeners.

// ngx-popperjs: Full Popper.js control
@Component({
  template: `
    <button #ref>Reference</button>
    <div 
      popper 
      [popperTarget]="ref"
      [popperOptions]="{ placement: 'top', strategy: 'fixed', modifiers: [...] }">
      Content
    </div>
  `
})
export class MyComponent {}

📦 Bundle Impact and Dependencies

ngx-bootstrap pulls in the entire component library even if you only use one feature (unless you carefully import individual modules). Its internal use of Popper.js means you get a version bundled within the package, which may not be upgradable independently.

ngx-popperjs has zero UI dependencies — it only requires @popperjs/core as a peer dependency. This gives you direct control over the Popper.js version and avoids shipping unused component code.

🔧 Customization and Extensibility

If you’re using standard Bootstrap-styled components and don’t need deep control over positioning behavior, ngx-bootstrap lets you ship features quickly with minimal setup.

But if you’re building a design system with custom-styled tooltips, context menus, or floating panels — or need to handle edge cases like scrollable containers, viewport boundaries, or dynamic content sizing — ngx-popperjs gives you the low-level hooks necessary to fine-tune behavior.

// ngx-popperjs: React to Popper updates
@Component({
  template: `
    <div popper [popperTarget]="btn" (popperOnUpdate)="onPositionUpdate($event)">
      ...
    </div>
  `
})
export class MyComponent {
  onPositionUpdate(data: Instance) {
    // Access Popper's state, coordinates, etc.
  }
}

In contrast, ngx-bootstrap components typically don’t expose these lifecycle events or internal state.

🔄 Maintenance and Version Alignment

As of current documentation:

  • ngx-bootstrap actively maintains its library and supports Angular through recent versions. It includes Popper.js internally but doesn’t guarantee alignment with the latest Popper features.
  • ngx-popperjs explicitly depends on @popperjs/core v2+, allowing you to upgrade Popper independently and take advantage of its active development (e.g., improved virtual scrolling support, better mobile handling).

🛠️ Real-World Decision Guide

Use ngx-bootstrap when:

  • You’re already using Bootstrap for styling.
  • You need a quick, opinionated solution for common components (tooltips, modals, datepickers).
  • You don’t require fine-grained control over positioning logic.
  • Your team prefers “batteries-included” libraries over composing primitives.

Use ngx-popperjs when:

  • You’re building custom UI components that need reliable, modern positioning.
  • You want direct access to Popper.js’s full API (modifiers, strategies, update events).
  • You’re avoiding Bootstrap’s CSS or using a different design system.
  • You need to minimize bundle size by excluding unused component code.

📌 Summary Table

Aspectngx-bootstrapngx-popperjs
Primary RoleFull UI component libraryPopper.js Angular binding
Includes UI?✅ Yes (Bootstrap-based)❌ No
Popper.js Access❌ Internal, limited config✅ Full API exposure
Bundle SizeLarger (entire component set)Minimal (only positioning logic)
CustomizationLimited to component inputsFull control via Popper options
Best ForRapid Bootstrap-based appsCustom floating UI in any design system

💡 Final Thought

Think of ngx-bootstrap as a complete toolkit — great if you want ready-made widgets that “just work” with Bootstrap. Think of ngx-popperjs as a precision instrument — ideal when you’re crafting bespoke UI interactions and need pixel-perfect control over where things appear on screen. Choose based on whether you’re adopting a full component system or assembling your own.

How to Choose: ngx-bootstrap vs ngx-popperjs
  • ngx-bootstrap:

    Choose ngx-bootstrap if you're building an Angular application that uses Bootstrap for styling and you need a quick, integrated solution for common interactive components like tooltips, dropdowns, modals, or datepickers. It’s ideal when you prioritize rapid development with pre-built widgets and don’t require deep customization of positioning behavior.

  • ngx-popperjs:

    Choose ngx-popperjs if you’re creating custom-designed floating UI elements (such as tooltips, context menus, or popovers) and need full access to Popper.js’s modern positioning capabilities. It’s best suited for projects that avoid Bootstrap’s CSS, demand fine-grained control over placement logic, or aim to minimize bundle size by excluding unused component code.